Not safe for work
||This article possibly contains original research. (June 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
Not suitable/safe for work or NSFW is an Internet slang or shorthand tag used in e-mail, videos, and on interactive discussion areas (such as Internet forums, blogs, or community websites) to mark URLs or hyperlinks which contain nudity, intense sexuality, profanity, violence/gore or other disturbing content, which the viewer may not wish to be seen accessing in a public or formal setting such as in a workplace or school.
Determining a site to be NSFW is invariably subjective, and poses challenges for academics who study sexuality. The difficulty in identifying such content objectively has led to the creation of online tools to help individuals to identify NSFW content:
NSFW has particular relevance for individuals making personal use of the Internet at workplaces or schools which have policies prohibiting (even inadvertent) access to sexually provocative content.
On November 28, 2007, Fark.com founder Drew Curtis filed an application to trademark the phrase, but the application was abandoned. Conversely, the term Safe For Work, sometimes abbreviated to SFW, is used to label material that may have a questionable title or include subjects that could be NSFW, but are not.
Not safe for life
||This section may document a neologism or protologism in such a manner as to promote it. (March 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
In an allusion to the established use of the term on the Internet, Not safe for life (NSFL) generally refers to content that might not be in the interest of a person to view no matter the location and potential coviewers for being horrifying, disgusting, offensive or even mentally disturbing to the viewer themselves. Typically it refers to depictions of real graphic violence ("gore"). Many content-aggregator sites such as Reddit, video-platforms such as LiveLeak and imageboards such as 4chan have their own subsites which are dedicated to or allow such content – often with the requirement that such material be marked as such which is often done via a NSFL tag.
- Attwood, Feona; I. Q. Hunter (October 2009). "Not suitable for work? Teaching and researching the sexually explicit". Sexualities. 12 (5): 547–557. doi:10.1177/1363460709340366.
- Wortham, Jenna (December 10, 2007). "Fark 'NSFW' Trademark Bid All in Good Snark?". Wired.com. Archived from the original on 2009-11-11. Retrieved April 14, 2012.
- Notice of Abandonment, US serial number 77338491. USPTO, May 29, 2009.
- Minsky, Amy (16 October 2014). "Luka Magnotta’s gore video: Why is the court seeing it?". Retrieved 28 March 2015.