Jump to content

Notharctus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notharctus
Temporal range: Early-Mid Eocene (Wasatchian-Uintan)
~50.3–40.4 Ma
Notharctus tenebrosus
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Primates
Suborder: Strepsirrhini
Family: Notharctidae
Subfamily: Notharctinae
Genus: Notharctus
Leidy, 1870
Species
  • N. pugnax Granger and Gregory 1917
  • N. robustiorLeidy 1872
  • N. tenebrosusLeidy 1870
  • N. venticolus
Osborn 1902
Synonyms
  • Hipposyus Leidy 1872
  • Limnotherium Marsh 1871
  • Telmalestes Marsh 1872
  • Thinolestes Marsh 1872
  • Tomitherium Cope 1872
Synonyms of N. tenebrosus
  • Limnotherium tyrannus
    Marsh, 1871
  • Hipposyus formosus
    Leidy, 1872
  • Tomitherium rostratum
    Cope, 1872
  • Thinolestes anceps
    Marsh, 1872
  • Limnotherium affine
    Marsh, 1872
  • Notharctus osborni
    Granger and Gregory, 1917
Synonyms of N. robustior
  • Telmatolestes crassus
    Marsh, 1872

Notharctus is a genus of adapiform primate that lived in North America and Europe during the early to middle Eocene.[1] The fingers of the genus were elongated for clamping onto branches, including the development of a thumb. Its spine is flexible and the animal was about 40 centimetres (16 in) in length, excluding the long tail.[2] The genus contains at least 4 species.[1] Notharctus belonged to an extinct primate group known as Adapiformes and fossils have been found in North America. Adapiform primates were among the first primates to exhibit a set of adaptations for life in the trees, such as grasping hands, binocular vision, and flexible backs. In addition to this, small orbits in the genera indicate that they were diurnal.

Taxonomy

[edit]

Notharctus is currently grouped within the Notharctidae, though it has been historically considered an adapid.[3] Within the Notharctidae, Notharctus is considered within the subfamily Notharctinae.[4]

History of research

[edit]
Notharctus tenebrosus from William K. Gregory's 1920 publication on the anatomy of the genus

Notharctus was one of the first discovered fossil primates from North America. The type species, Notharctus tenebrosus, was discovered by Joseph Leidy, who had difficulties assigning it to any specific group of mammals, noting similarities in its jaw anatomy to carnivorans and to "pachyderms".[5] Leidy opted to refer Notharctus to the pachyderms, but remarked in his description of the genus that the jawbone was incredibly anatomically similar to modern platyrrhine monkeys.[6] This similarity was also noted by Othniel Charles Marsh, who compared the jaw to Hyopsodus. Marsh assigned these remains to the genus Limnotherium, then later he found more remains which he described as Thinolestes.[6] Marsh later found limb bones, which shared similarities with lemurs, causing him to assign the genus to the Quadrumana (an obsolete classification including all non-human primates). Edward Drinker Cope proposed Notharctus and Pelycodus belonged to a new order, the Mesodonta, due to the fact that Pelycodus had been associated historically with creodont claws. Henry Fairfield Osborn supported this classification originally, but then later acknowledge Notharctus was a primate. Notharctus was then later grouped within Adapis by Jacob Wortman and Schlosser, who presumed the mesodonts were a polyphyletic assemblage. Wortman referred this group to the Neopithecini, a group also including simians but not lemurs. The family Notharctus was assigned to was given 2 names, with Marsh proposing Limnotheridae while Osborn proposed Notharctidae. With Walter W. Granger's discovery of a nearly complete skeleton, also in Wyoming, it was firmly established as a primate. William K Gregory considered Notharctus a lemuriform, rather than an adapiform (a grouping which did not exist at the time).[5] Cope later considered Notharctus a lemuroid.[7]

Description

[edit]

Notharctus is one of the best represented adapiform primates, with the postcranial and cranial morphology being well known. Notharctus is distinguished from other fossil primates by its stout jaws, typically fused mandible, and quadrate molars with a pronounced hypocone and mesostyle.[8] The different species of Notharctus have been estimated at different sizes, with N. robustior estimated to weigh 6.9 kg (15 lb) while N. tenebrosus has been estimated to weigh 4.2 kg (9.3 lb).[9]

Crania

[edit]
Skull of N. tenebrosus

Skull

[edit]

Notharctus has a small braincase compared to Lepilemur, which is considered the most basal living lemur. The snout is moderately long, with a long premaxillary bone, which is contrasted by a shortened jaw.[8][9] Notharctus had a lacrimal bone that was positioned at the end of the orbit but not anterior to it.[9] The sagittal and nuchal crests of the genus are large, similar to other adapids (though not as large as those in Adapis).[10] Behind the orbits there is a notable constriction, which suggests a smaller brain size than the related Smilodectes.[3] Despite this, Notharctus had both a larger and narrower skull. The occipital bone is narrow and pointed. On the petromastoid there is a prominent tuberosity. In Notharctus, much like other adapids, the external pterygoid is joined with the bulla. The postglenoid foramen is prominent, another trait shared by other adapids.[3] The skull of N. robustior is larger than that of N. tenebrosus, and the sagittal and nuchal crests are larger as well.[10] The mandibular symphysis of Notharctus is typically fused, though in some specimens they are not entirely coossified.[8]

Dentition

[edit]
The teeth of N. rubustior

The adult dental formula of Notharctus is 2.1.4.32.1.4.3 × 2 = 40.[6] The molar teeth of Notharctus have well-developed shearing crests, while the incisors are peg-like in form. Notharctus had canine teeth that are sexually dimorphic, and the canines were enlarged compared to other adapids.[7][9] The upper molars of this species have a pseudohypocone. The hypocones of the teeth are strong and cuspate, with strong cingulae surrounding the teeth[3]. Specifics of the teeth have been used historically to differentiate species of Notharctus, as the dentition of primates is distinctive.[8][11]

Appendicular skeleton

[edit]
Comparison of the feet of other primates with Notharctus (bottom)

The vertebral formula of Notharctus tenebrosus is 7 cervicals, 12 thoracics, 8 lumbars, 3 sacrals, and 19+ caudals. The thorax is long and deep. [12] In life, Notharctus was likely pronograde in posture, similar to modern lemurs.[12] The same can be said for the general postcranial anatomy, which has been compared to Propithecus and Lemur.[9][3] The hind limbs Notharctus are long, as is the tail. The ilium is sickle shaped and the ischium is elongate.[9]

On the hands and feet, the pollex and hallux are large and opposable, and the fingers and toes are long and possess nails,[9] while on the foot the calcaneus is relatively short. As in other adapiformes and lemuriformes, the shape of the posterior trochlear shelf alongside the presence of a projection on the talus allows for a more flexible positioning and support during leaping. The posterior trochlear shelf is larger than in modern lemuriformes.[3] In general, the anatomy of the tarsus is less rigid than in modern day lemurs. There is evidence that the genus had a type of grooming claw, thought to be an intermediate between a grooming claw and a nail.[13]

Paleoecology

[edit]
Illustration of Notharctus (top left) with other contemporaneous Eocene fauna. Taxa are: A: Notharctus B:Orohippus C: Hyrachyus D: Tillotherium E: Synoplotherium F: Palaeosyops G: Metacheiromys H: Patriofelis

Paleobiology

[edit]

Based on dental morphology, Notharctus most likely had a folivorous diet. This is contradicted by other aspects of the dental anatomy, which suggest the genus may have been frugivorous.[9][3]

Based upon limb bone morphology Notharctus most likely was an arboreal quadruped. The robust limbs of Notharctus suggest it moved by leaping and may have been capable of vertical grasp clinging, similar to modern day sportive lemurs and indri.[3][12][8]

Paleoenvironment

[edit]

Notharctus is known from many middle Eocene North American and European localities. The paleoenvironment of the Bridger and Uinta formations, which the environments Notharctus inhabited may not have differed much from, was subtropical, with varying rainfall levels depending on the season. The winters were likely cool and moist, with the mean annual temperature being 65 °F (18 °C).[10] Palms have been found in the Green River formation, which was likely comparable to the typical North American Eocene paleoenvironment.[10]

Notharctus was contemporary with an array of other fauna, including oxyaenids, omomyid primates, hyaenodonts, mesonychids and rhinocerotoids.[14]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Gebo 2002, p. 25.
  2. ^ Palmer, D., ed. (1999). The Marshall Illustrated Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs and Prehistoric Animals. London: Marshall Editions. p. 287. ISBN 1-84028-152-9.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h Szalay, Frederick S.; Delson, Eric (1979). Evolutionary history of the primates. Internet Archive. New York: New York Academic Press. pp. 110–115. ISBN 978-0-12-680150-7.
  4. ^ Covert, Herbert H. (1990-03-17). "Phylogenetic relationships among the Notharctinae of North America". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 81 (3): 381–397. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330810308. ISSN 0002-9483.
  5. ^ a b GREGORY, WILLIAM K. (1915-11-24). "I. ON THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE EOCENE LEMUR NOTHARCTUS TO THE ADAPIDAE AND TO OTHER PRIMATES" (PDF). BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA.
  6. ^ a b c Gregory, William King (1920). On the Structure and Relations of Notharctus, an American Eocene Primate. American Museum of Natural History.
  7. ^ a b Cope, Edward Drinker (1885-05-01). "THE LEMUROIDEA AND THE INSECTIVORA OF THE EOCENE PERIOD OF NORTH AMERICA". The American Naturalist.
  8. ^ a b c d e "A revision of the Eocene primates of the genus Notharctus. Bulletin of the AMNH ; v. 37, article 34". digitallibrary.amnh.org. Retrieved 2026-05-11.
  9. ^ a b c d e f g h Fleagle, J.G. (1999). Primate Adaptation and Evolution. San Diego: Academic Press.
  10. ^ a b c d Gazin. A review of the Middle and Upper Eocene primates of North America.
  11. ^ "Notharctine primates (Adapiformes) from the early to middle Eocene (Wasatchian–Bridgerian) of Wyoming: transitional species and the origins of Notharctus and Smilodectes". Journal of Human Evolution. 43 (3): 353–380. 2002-09-01. doi:10.1006/jhev.2002.0582. ISSN 0047-2484.
  12. ^ a b c Hartwig, Walter Carl (2002-04-11). The Primate Fossil Record. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-66315-1.
  13. ^ Maiolino, S.; Boyer, D. M.; Bloch, J. I.; Gilbert, C. C.; Groenke, J. (2012). "Evidence for a grooming claw in a North American adapiform primate: Implications for anthropoid origins". PLOS ONE. 7 (1) e29135. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...729135M. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029135. PMC 3254620. PMID 22253707.
  14. ^ Osborn, Henry Fairfield (1910). The age of mammals in Europe, Asia and North America. Smithsonian Libraries. New York, The Macmillan Company.

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]