|This article needs additional citations for verification. (August 2014)|
Paranuclear capacity is the condition of a country possessing the technology to quickly build nuclear weapons, without having actually yet done so. Because such latent capability is not proscribed by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, this is sometimes called the "Japan Option" (as a work-around to the treaty), as Japan is a clear case of a country with complete technical prowess to develop a nuclear weapon quickly, or as it is sometimes called "being one screwdriver's turn" from the bomb, as Japan is considered to have the materials, expertise and technical capacity to make a nuclear bomb at will.
Though not absolutely necessary, having a complete nuclear fuel cycle is an important aspect of giving a state a paranuclear capability.
Technicalities of paranuclear capability
|This section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (August 2014)|
Countries considered paranuclear
Another reputable case for nuclear latency is South Korea. Although South Korea's capability for nuclear weapons has not been extensively analyzed, it is quite possible that South Korea could make nuclear weapons in times of danger from North Korea. South Korea has been shown to enrich uranium to a weapon grade level and at one point was very close to developing a nuclear weapon but did not due to pressure from the United States. Many South Koreans also support the obtainment of nuclear weapons to combat the threat of the North. South Korea also possess cruise missiles, which could serve as a delivery system up to 1500 km.
Sweden is considered to have a paranuclear capability. It had a nuclear weapons development program in the 1950s and 1960s.
Mexico is another country that has the resources to build nuclear weapons; however, after signing the nonproliferation treaty, it has since abandoned building nuclear weapons despite being able to.
- List of states with nuclear weapons
- Nuclear energy policy
- Nuclear energy policy by country
- Nuclear power by country
- Panofsky, Wolfgang K. H. (June 14, 2007). "Capability versus intent: The latent threat of nuclear proliferation". "Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists". Retrieved 2009-08-04.
- "Nuclear Weapons Program". Federation of American Scientists.
- Cole, Juan (2009-10-07). "Does Iran really want the bomb? Perhaps what Iran wants is the ability to produce a nuclear weapon fast, rather than have a standing arsenal". Salon.
- "Hypothesis: Iran Seeks the "Japan Option"". Slate. 2009-10-07.
- Demetriou, Danielle (20 April 2009). "Japan 'should develop nuclear weapons' to counter North Korea threat". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 29 June 2010.
- Sakamaki, Sachiko (28 May 2009). "North Korean Atomic Tests Lift Lid on Japan’s Nuclear ‘Taboo’". Bloomberg. Retrieved 29 June 2010.
- John H. Large (May 2, 2005). "THE ACTUAL AND POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY IN THE AREA OF NORTH EAST ASIA (KOREAN PENINSULAR AND JAPAN)" (PDF). R3126-A1. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-07-10.
- "Nuclear Scholars Initiative 2010: Recap of Seminar Four". CSIS. Retrieved 29 June 2010.
- Brumfiel, Geoff (November 2004). "Nuclear proliferation special: We have the technology". Nature. 432-437 432 (7016): 432–7. Bibcode:2004Natur.432..432B. doi:10.1038/432432a. PMID 15565123. Retrieved 29 June 2010.
- Chester Dawson (28 October 2011). "In Japan, Provocative Case for Staying Nuclear". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 13 November 2011.
- Mack, Andrew (1 July 1997). "Potential, not proliferation: Northeast Asia has several nuclear-capable countries, but only China has built weapons". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Retrieved 18 May 2015 – via HighBeam Research. (subscription required (. ))
- "Nuclear Weapons Archive, 7.5 nuclear capable states".
|This article related to nuclear weaponry is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|
|This article about nuclear power and nuclear reactors for power generation is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|