Diagram of human cell nucleus. Nuclear pore labeled at bottom left
Nuclear pore. Side view. 1. Nuclear envelope. 2. Outer ring. 3. Spokes. 4. Basket. 5. Filaments. (Drawing is based on electron microscopy images)
Nuclear pores are large protein complexes that cross the nuclear envelope, which is the double membrane surrounding the eukaryotic cell nucleus. There are about an average of 2000 nuclear pore complexes (NPCs), in the nuclear envelope of a vertebrate cell, but it varies depending on cell type and the stage in the life cycle. The proteins that make up the nuclear pore complex are known as nucleoporins. About half of the nucleoporins typically contain solenoid protein domains—either an alpha solenoid or a beta-propeller fold, or in some cases both as separate structural domains. Each NPC contains at least 456 individual protein molecules and is composed of 30 distinct proteins (nucleoporins). The other half show structural characteristics typical of "natively unfolded" or intrinsically disordered proteins, i.e. they are highly flexible proteins that lack ordered tertiary structure. These disordered proteins are the FG nucleoporins, so called because their amino-acid sequence contains many phenylalanine—glycine repeats.
Nuclear pore complexes allow the transport of molecules across the nuclear envelope. This transport includes RNA and ribosomal proteins moving from nucleus to the cytoplasm and proteins (such as DNA polymerase and lamins), carbohydrates, signaling molecules and lipids moving into the nucleus. It is notable that the nuclear pore complex (NPC) can actively conduct 1000 translocations per complex per second. Although smaller molecules simply diffuse through the pores, larger molecules may be recognized by specific signal sequences and then be diffused with the help of nucleoporins into or out of the nucleus. It has been recently shown that these nucleoporins have specific evolutionary conserved features encoded in their sequences that provide insight into how they regulate the transport of molecules through the nuclear pore. Nucleoporin-mediated transport is not directly energy requiring, but depends on concentrations gradients associated with the RAN cycle. Each of the eight protein subunits surrounding the actual pore (the outer ring) projects a spoke-shaped protein over the pore channel. The center of the pore often appears to contain a plug-like structure. It is yet unknown whether this corresponds to an actual plug or is merely cargo caught in transit.
Size and complexity
The entire nuclear pore complex has a diameter of about 120 nanometers in vertebrates. The diameter of the channel ranges from 5.2 nanometers in humans to 10.7 nm in the frog Xenopus laevis, with a depth of roughly 45 nm. mRNA, which is single-stranded, has a thickness of about 0.5 to 1 nm. The molecular mass of the mammalian NPC is about 124 megadaltons (MDa) and it contains approximately 30 different protein components, each in multiple copies. In contrast, the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is smaller, weighing only 66 MDa.
Transport through the nuclear pore complex
Small particles (< ~30-60 kDa) are able to pass through the nuclear pore complex by passive diffusion. Larger particles are also able to diffuse passively through the large diameter of the pore, at rates that decrease gradually with molecular weight. Efficient passage through the complex requires several protein factors, and in particular, nuclear transport receptors that bind to cargo molecules and mediate their translocation across the NPC, either into the nucleus (importins) or out of it (exportins). The largest family of nuclear transport receptors are karyopherins, which includes dozens of both importins and exportins; this family is further subdivided to the karyopherin-α and the karyopherin-β subfamilies. Other nuclar transport receptors include NTF2 and some NTF2-like proteins.
Three models have been suggested to explain the translocation mechanism:
- Affinity gradients along the central plug
- Brownian affinity gating
- Selective phase
Import of proteins
Any cargo with a nuclear localization signal (NLS) exposed will be destined for quick and efficient transport through the pore. Several NLS sequences are known, generally containing a conserved sequence with basic residues such as PKKKRKV. Any material with an NLS will be taken up by importins to the nucleus.
The classical scheme of NLS-protein importation begins with Importin-α first binding to the NLS sequence, which then acts as a bridge for Importin-β to attach. The importinβ—importinα—cargo complex is then directed towards the nuclear pore and diffuses through it. Once the complex is in the nucleus, RanGTP binds to Importin-β and displaces it from the complex. Then the cellular apoptosis susceptibility protein (CAS), an exportin which in the nucleus is bound to RanGTP, displaces Importin-α from the cargo. The NLS-protein is thus free in the nucleoplasm. The Importinβ-RanGTP and Importinα-CAS-RanGTP complex diffuses back to the cytoplasm where GTPs are hydrolyzed to GDP leading to the release of Importinβ and Importinα which become available for a new NLS-protein import round.
Although cargo passes through the pore with the assistance of chaperone proteins, the translocation through the pore itself is not energy-dependent. However, the whole import cycle needs the hydrolysis of 2 GTPs and is thus energy-dependent and has to be considered as active transport. The import cycle is powered by the nucleo-cytoplasmic RanGTP gradient. This gradient arises from the exclusive nuclear localization of RanGEFs, proteins that exchange GDP to GTP on Ran molecules. Thus there is an elevated RanGTP concentration in the nucleus compared to the cytoplasm.
Export of proteins
Some molecules or macromolecular complexes need to be exported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, as do ribosome subunits and messenger RNAs. Thus there is an export mechanism similar to the import mechanism.
In the classical export scheme, proteins with a nuclear export sequence (NES) can bind in the nucleus to form a heterotrimeric complex with an exportin and RanGTP (for example the exportin CRM1). The complex can then diffuse to the cytoplasm where GTP is hydrolysed and the NES-protein is released. CRM1-RanGDP diffuses back to the nucleus where GDP is exchanged to GTP by RanGEFs. This process is also energy dependent as it consumes one GTP. Export with the exportin CRM1 can be inhibited by Leptomycin B.
Export of RNA
There are different export pathways through the NPC for each RNA class that exists. RNA export is also signal mediated (NES); the NES is in RNA-binding proteins (except for tRNA which has no adapter). It is notable that all viral RNAs and cellular RNAs (tRNA, rRNA, U snRNA, microRNA) except mRNA are dependent on RanGTP. Conserved mRNA export factors are necessary for mRNA nuclear export. Export factors are Mex67/Tap (large subunit) and Mtr2/p15 (small subunit). In higher eukaryotes, mRNA export is thought to be dependent on splicing which in turn recruits a protein complex, TREX, to spliced messages. TREX functions as an adapter for TAP, which is a very poor RNA binding protein. However, there are alternative mRNA export pathways that do not rely on splicing for specialized messages such as histones. Recent work also suggest an interplay between splicing-dependent export and one of these alternative mRNA export pathways for secretory and mitochondrial transcripts.
Assembly of the NPC
As the NPC controls access to the genome, it is essential that it exists in large amounts in stages of the cell cycle where plenty of transcription is necessary. For example, cycling mammalian and yeast cells double the amount of NPC in the nucleus between the G1 and G2 phase of the cell cycle, and oocytes accumulate large numbers of NPCs to prepare for the rapid mitosis that exists in the early stages of development. Interphase cells must also keep up a level of NPC generation to keep the levels of NPC in the cell constant as some may get damaged. Some cells can even increase the NPC numbers due to increased transcriptional demand.
Theories of assembly
There are several theories as to how NPCs are assembled. As the immunodepletion of certain protein complexes, such as the Nup 107–160 complex, leads to the formation of poreless nuclei, it seems likely that the Nup complexes are involved in fusing the outer membrane of the nuclear envelope with the inner and not that the fusing of the membrane begins the formation of the pore. There are several ways that this could lead to the formation of the full NPC.
- One possibility is that as a protein complex it binds to the chromatin. It is then inserted into the double membrane close to the chromatin. This, in turn, leads to the fusing of that membrane. Around this protein complex others eventually bind forming the NPC. This method is possible during every phases of mitosis as the double membrane is present around the chromatin before the membrane fusion proteins complex can insert. Post mitotic cells could form a membrane first with pores being inserted into after formation.
- Another model for the formation of the NPC is the production of a prepore as a start as opposed to a single protein complex. This prepore would form when several Nup complexes come together and bind to the chromatin. This would have the double membrane form around it in during mitotic reassembly. Possible prepore structures have been observed on chromatin before nuclear envelope (NE) formation using electron microscopy. During the interphase of the cell cycle the formation of the prepore would happen within the nucleus, each component being transported in through existing NPCs. These Nups would bind to an importin, once formed, preventing the assembly of a prepore in the cytoplasm. Once transported into the nucleus Ran GTP would bind to the importin and cause it to release the cargo. This Nup would be free to form a prepore. The binding of importins has at least been shown to bring Nup 107 and the Nup 153 nucleoporins into the nucleus. NPC assembly is a very rapid process yet defined intermediate states occur which leads to the idea that this assembly occurs in a stepwise fashion.
During mitosis the NPC appears to disassemble in stages. Peripheral nucleoporins such as the Nup 153 Nup 98 and Nup 214 disassociate from the NPC. The rest, which can be considered a scaffold proteins remain stable, as cylindrical ring complexes within the nuclear envelope. This disassembly of the NPC peripheral groups is largely thought to be phosphate driven, as several of these nucleoporins are phosphorylated during the stages of mitosis. However, the enzyme involved in the phosphorlyation is unknown in vivo. In metazoans (which undergo open mitosis) the NE degrades quickly after the loss of the peripheral Nups. The reason for this may be due to the change in the NPC’s architecture. This change may make the NPC more permeable to enzymes involved in the degradation of the NE such as cytoplasmic tubulin, as well as allowing the entry of key mitotic regulator proteins. In organisms that undergo a semi-open mitosis such as the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans, 14 out of the 30 nucleoporins disassemble from the core scaffold structure, driven by the activation of the NIMA and Cdk1 kinases that phosphorylate nucleoporins and open nuclear pores thereby widening the nuclear pore and allowing the entry of mitotic regulators.
Preservation of integrity
It was shown, in fungi that undergo closed mitosis (where the nucleus does not disassemble), that the change of the permeability barrier of the NE was due to changes within the NPC and is what allows the entry of mitotic regulators. In Aspergillus nidulans NPC composition appears to be effected by the mitotic kinase NIMA, possibly by phosphorylating the nucleoporins Nup98 and Gle2/Rae1. This remodelling seems to allow the protein complex cdc2/cyclinB to enter the nucleus as well as many other proteins, such as soluble tubulin. The NPC scaffold remains intact throughout the whole closed mitosis. This seems to preserve the integrity of the NE.
- Maul, Gerd G; Deaven, Larry (1977). "Quantitative Determination of Nuclear Pore Complexes in Cycling Cells with Differing DNA Content". Journal of Cell Biology. 73: 748–760. PMC . PMID 406262. doi:10.1083/jcb.73.3.748. Retrieved 12 December 2014.
- Rout, M. P.; et al. (2000). "The yeast nuclear pore complex: composition, architecture, and transport mechanism". J. Cell Biol. 148 (4): 635–652. PMC . PMID 10684247. doi:10.1083/jcb.148.4.635.
- Denning D, Patel S, Uversky V, Fink A, Rexach M (2003). "Disorder in the nuclear pore complex: The FG repeat regions of nucleoporins are natively unfolded". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100 (5): 2450–5. PMC . PMID 12604785. doi:10.1073/pnas.0437902100.
- Peters R (2006). "Introduction to nucleocytoplasmic transport: molecules and mechanisms". Methods Mol Biol. Methods in Molecular Biology™. 322: 235–58. ISBN 978-1-58829-362-6. PMID 16739728. doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-000-3_17.
- Peyro, M.; Soheilypour, M.; Lee, B.L.; Mofrad, M.R.K. (2015-11-06). "Evolutionarily Conserved Sequence Features Regulate the Formation of the FG Network at the Center of the Nuclear Pore Complex". Scientific Reports. 5: 15795. doi:10.1038/srep15795.
- Ando, David; Colvin, Michael; Rexach, Michael; Gopinathan, Ajay (2013-09-16). "Physical Motif Clustering within Intrinsically Disordered Nucleoporin Sequences Reveals Universal Functional Features". PLoS ONE. 8 (9): e73831. PMC . PMID 24066078. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073831.
- Winey, Mark; Yarar, Defne; Giddings, Jr., Thomas H; Mastronarde, David N (1 November 1997). "Nuclear Pore Complex Number and Distribution throughout the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cell Cycle by Three-Dimensional Reconstruction from Electron Micrographs of Nuclear Envelopes". Molecular Biology of the Cell. 8 (11): 2119–2132. doi:10.1091/mbc.8.11.2119. Retrieved 12 December 2014.
- Mohr, Dagmar; Frey, Steffen; Fischer, Torsten; Güttler, Thomas; Görlich, Dirk (13 August 2009). "Characterisation of the passive permeability barrier of nuclear pore complexes". The EMBO Journal. 28 (17): 2541–2553. PMC . PMID 19680228. doi:10.1038/emboj.2009.200. Retrieved 12 December 2014.
- Keminer, Oliver; Peters, Reiner (July 1999). "Permeability of Single Nuclear Pores". Biophysical Journal. 77 (1): 217–228. PMC . PMID 10388751. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(99)76883-9.
- Kuznetsov, Yurii G.; Daijogo, Sarah; Zhou, Jiashu; Semler, Bert L.; McPherson, A. (March 2005). "Atomic Force Microscopy Analysis of Icosahedral Virus RNA". Journal of Molecular Biology. 347 (1): 41–52. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2005.01.006. Retrieved 12 December 2014.
- Reichelt, R; Holzenburg, A; Buhle, Jr., E L; Jarnik, M; Engel, A; Aebi, U (1 April 1990). "Correlation between Structure and Mass Distribution of the Nuclear Pore Complex and of Distinct Pore Complex Components". Journal of Cell Biology. 110: 883–894. doi:10.1083/jcb.110.4.883. Retrieved 12 December 2014.
- Alber, Frank; Dokudovskaya, Svetlana; Veenhoff, Liesbeth M.; Zhang, Wenzhu; Kipper, Julia; Devos, Damien; Suprapto, Adisetyantari; Karni-Schmidt, Orit; Williams, Rosemary; Chait, Brian T.; Rout, Michael P.; Sali, Andrej (29 November 2007). "Determining the architectures of macromolecular assemblies". Nature. 450 (7170): 683–694. PMID 18046405. doi:10.1038/nature06404. Retrieved 12 December 2014.
- Rout MP, Blobel G (November 1993). "Isolation of the yeast nuclear pore complex". J. Cell Biol. 123 (4): 771–83. PMC . PMID 8227139. doi:10.1083/jcb.123.4.771.
- Rodriguez M, Dargemont C, Stutz F (3 August 2004). "Nuclear export of RNA". Biology of the Cell. 96 (8): 639–55. PMID 15519698. doi:10.1016/j.biolcel.2004.04.014.
- Marfori M, Mynott A, Ellis JJ, et al. (October 2010). "Molecular basis for specificity of nuclear import and prediction of nuclear localization". Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 1813 (9): 1562–77. PMID 20977914. doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2010.10.013.
- Reed R, Hurt E (February 2002). "A conserved mRNA export machinery coupled to pre-mRNA splicing". Cell. 108 (4): 523–31. PMID 11909523. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00627-X.
- Cenik, C; et al. (2011). "Genome analysis reveals interplay between 5' UTR introns and nuclear mRNA export for secretory and mitochondrial genes.". PLoS Genetics. 7 (4): e1001366. PMC . PMID 21533221. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001366.
- Sheehan MA, Mills AD, Sleeman AM, Laskey RA, Blow JJ (January 1988). "Steps in the assembly of replication-competent nuclei in a cell-free system from Xenopus eggs". The Journal of Cell Biology. 106 (1): 1–12. PMC . PMID 3339085. doi:10.1083/jcb.106.1.1.
- Kiseleva E, Rutherford S, Cotter LM, Allen TD, Goldberg MW (October 2001). "Steps of nuclear pore complex disassembly and reassembly during mitosis in early Drosophila embryos". Journal of Cell Science. 114 (Pt 20): 3607–18. PMID 11707513.
- Markossian, Sarine; Suresh, Subbulakshmi; Osmani, Aysha H.; Osmani, Stephen A. (2015-02-15). "Nup2 requires a highly divergent partner, NupA, to fulfill functions at nuclear pore complexes and the mitotic chromatin region". Molecular Biology of the Cell. 26 (4): 605–621. ISSN 1059-1524. PMC . PMID 25540430. doi:10.1091/mbc.E14-09-1359.
- De Souza, Colin P. C.; Osmani, Aysha H.; Hashmi, Shahr B.; Osmani, Stephen A. (2004). "Partial Nuclear Pore Complex Disassembly during Closed Mitosis in Aspergillus nidulans". Current Biology. 14 (22): 1973–1984. ISSN 0960-9822. PMID 15556859. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.10.050.
- Souza, Colin P. C. De; Osmani, Stephen A. (2007-09-01). "Mitosis, Not Just Open or Closed". Eukaryotic Cell. 6 (9): 1521–1527. ISSN 1535-9778. PMC . PMID 17660363. doi:10.1128/EC.00178-07.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Nuclear pore.|
- Histology image: 20104loa – Histology Learning System at Boston University
- Nuclear pore at the US National Library of Medicine Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
- Nuclear Pore Complex animations
- Nuclear Pore Complex illustrations
- 3D electron microscopy structures of the NPC and constituent proteins from the EM Data Bank(EMDB)
- NCDIR - National Center for the Dynamic Interactome