Oldham by-election, 1899
The Oldham by-election of 1899 occurred in the summer of that year, and involved a by-election to fill both seats in the two-member Oldham Parliamentary borough. The block voting method allowed each elector to vote for two candidates. The election resulted in the Liberal Party winning both seats from the Conservatives who had previously held them; however the election is principally notable for being the first to be fought by future Prime Minister Winston Churchill.
At the beginning of 1899, the two members of parliament for Oldham were Robert Ascroft and James Oswald. However, Oswald had been chronically ill for many months and had been absent from his Parliamentary duties and his constituency; he had indicated that he would not seek re-election and left a resignation note with the Conservative Party and instructed them to use it if they thought it expedient. Ascroft was an active Parliamentarian, but was struck down with pneumonia at his home in Croydon on Monday 12 June, becoming partially unconscious. Over the next few days his condition did not improve, and by Sunday 18 June there was said to be "very little hope". He died on the afternoon of 19 June.
Ascroft's sudden death created an opportunity for the Conservative Party to use Oswald's resignation note and hold a double by-election, but the party delayed the decision until Ascroft's funeral on Friday 23 June. It was later observed that Ascroft was very popular in the town but had not maintained a group of election campaign workers, presumably hoping that his personal support would be enough. The forcing of a by-election therefore caught Oldham Conservatives unawares. Nevertheless, on Monday 26 June Oswald's resignation note was sent in, and in consequence he was appointed Steward of the Manor of Northstead as a way of resigning his seat.
Before his illness, Ascroft had already met with Winston Churchill at the House of Commons to ask him to replace Oswald and run as the second candidate at the next election. The date of a joint follow up meeting in Oldham had been fixed for some time when Churchill noticed in the newspapers that Ascroft had died. The Conservative Party officers met in Oldham on the evening of 23 June as arranged to hear from Churchill, and unanimously adopted him as the party's candidate for the single by-election to replace Ascroft. The meeting then decided to leave the question of a second candidate to another meeting on the following night. Churchill was principally known as the son of Lord Randolph Churchill, a senior Conservative politician who had died four years earlier; although only 24, he had begun a journalistic career as a war correspondent with the Morning Post. According to one observer, society then knew Churchill as "a brilliant and irrepressible talker".
The second Conservative candidate turned out to be James Mawdsley, who was secretary of the Amalgamated Association of Operative Cotton Spinners, an unusual case of a Conservative who was an active trade unionist. The choice of Mawdsley as Conservative candidate had been kept secret and surprised several Conservatives who were not in the very small meeting at which the candidates were adopted. There was some discussion of which of the two very different Conservative candidates, the aristocrat or the labour representative, would be more popular in Oldham.
Only one name was initially put forward for the Liberal Party selection, that of Alfred Emmott; however by the time the selection meeting took place on the evening of Monday 26 June it was clear that there would be a double vacancy and Emmott was adopted together with Walter Runciman. Emmott had been a member of Oldham corporation for nearly twenty years and was the town's Mayor in 1891–92; he had been invited, but had declined, the offer of the Liberal candidacy in 1886. Runciman was the 28-year-old son of a shipping magnate, with whom he shared a name.
As the previous election had been close, the by-election campaign was an intense one in which the candidates addressed meetings "at breakfast time, during the dinner hour, and in the evening". One of the main campaign issues was the Clerical Tithes Bill, which the Conservative-dominated government was promoting; the Bill gave additional help to Church of England clergy and to Church schools. Oldham included many non-conformists who were opposed to the Bill. When the issue of the Bill was raised, the Liberal candidates opposed it, arguing that Parliament was not the place to discuss matters of faith; Churchill initially supported it on the basis that legislation was needed to maintain law and order. A Protestant delegation representing several organisations was pleased with the pledge to support the Bill and strongly endorsed Churchill and Mawdsley. However, when Churchill (who later admitted that he knew nothing of the issue) found out how unpopular the Bill was, he declared in a speech three days before polling day that he would have voted against it in accordance with the wishes of his constituents.
Churchill made a campaigning visit to Hollinwood, then known as a strongly anti-Conservative area, as his father had done in previous elections; his appearance prompted a heckler to declare "Eh, lad, thou art a chip of t'owd block". On 3 July the two Conservative candidates received a delegation on Women's suffrage, to which Churchill declared himself opposed, saying that it would lessen the respect for women "which all men very rightly have". Mawdsley, however, declared his support.
The presence of trade unionist James Mawdsley as a Conservative candidate caused some degree of protest. The Royton branch of his union passed (by 107 to 54 votes) a motion protesting at his candidature, and Mawdsley was asked why he had not come forward as a Labour candidate when invited to in 1895. Mawdsley replied that there had been a decision to run two candidates: one being Liberal-Labour and the other (himself) a Conservative-Labour candidate. He further said that he would support a Liberal-Labour candidate. The Independent Labour Party, despite not standing a candidate, held a meeting calling on working men to free themselves from both established parties. It was reported that the Conservatives accepted Mawdsley as a candidate on the assumption that if elected, he would be allowed to express his own views on trade union issues.
On polling day, the Conservatives were said to have been outnumbered by Liberals in the number of carriages conveying voters to the polls by 130 to 90. Lady Randolph Churchill turned up in a striking blue dress and sunshade. Churchill himself tried to obtain a motor car from Coventry to bring voters to the polls, but it broke down at Stafford and never arrived. Polling closed at 8 pm.
Shortly after 11 pm the result was announced from the town hall.
|Liberal gain from Conservative||Swing|
The loss of both seats caused some recriminations in Conservative circles. Henry Howorth, in a letter to The Times, took it as an object lesson that "playing at pitch and toss" with Conservative principles would not lead to a victory and that it was better that the party went into opposition than "surrender to every Socialistic demand".
Winston Churchill had impressed as an election candidate, being described as "working like a Trojan". However The Times correspondent felt that his speeches concentrated more on good phrases than on good arguments and that his popularity was superficial.
- Randolph Churchill, "Winston S. Churchill 1874–1965", Vol. I, Heinemann, London 1966, pp. 443–449.
- "Election Intelligence", The Times, 21 June 1899, p. 12.
- "Court Circular", The Times, 15 June 1899, p. 9.
- "Court Circular", The Times, 16 June 1899, p. 10.
- "Court Circular", The Times, 19 June 1899, p. 8.
- "Obituary", The Times, 20 June 1899, p. 10.
- "Election Intelligence", The Times, 5 July 1899, p. 12.
- "Appointments to the Chiltern Hundreds and Manor of Northstead Stewardships since 1850" (PDF). House of Commons Library. Retrieved 19 August 2008.
- "Political Notes", The Times, 27 June 1899, p. 9.
- Winston Churchill, "My Early Life", Thornton Butterworth Ltd, 1930, pp. 233–234.
- "Election Intelligence", The Times, 24 June 1899, p. 12.
- "The Popular Guide to the New House of Commons", Pall Mall Gazette Extra No. 75, 1 November 1900, p. 106.
- Henry Pelling, "Social Geography of British Elections 1885–1910", Macmillan, 1967, p. 253.
- Manchester Evening News, 26 June 1899, quoted in Randolph Churchill, "Winston S. Churchill", Vol. I Companion Part 2, Heinemann, London, 1967, p. 1029.
- "Election Intelligence", The Times, 27 June 1899, p. 8.
- Hansard, 4th series, vol. 73, col. 782.
- "Election Intelligence", The Times 1 July 1899, p. 12.
- Randolph Churchill, "Winston S. Churchill 1874–1965", Vol. I, Heinemann, London 1966, p. 445.
- "Election Intelligence", The Times, 3 July 1899, p. 12. The organisations in the delegation were the Laymen's League (Liverpool), the Church Association (London), the Oldham Protestant Committee, the Oldham Protestant Hundred, the Northern Protestant Electoral Council, and the National Protestant League.
- Randolph Churchill, "Winston S. Churchill 1874–1965", Vol. I, Heinemann, London 1966, pp. 445–446.
- "Election Intelligence", The Times, 4 July 1899, p. 9.
- "Election Intelligence", The Times, 6 July 1899, p. 11.
- "Election Intelligence", The Times, 7 July 1899, p. 10.
- The Constitutional Year Book, 1904, published by Conservative Central Office, page 172 (196 in web page)
- Winston Churchill, "My Early Life", Thornton Butterworth Ltd, London 1930, pp. 239–240.
- "The Oldham Election" (letter), The Times, 11 July 1899, p. 11.