Inflammatory demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Oligoclonal negative MS)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Inflammatory demyelinating diseases (IDDs), sometimes called Idiopathic (IIDDs) because the unknown etiology of some of them, and sometimes known as borderline forms of multiple sclerosis,[1] is a collection of multiple sclerosis variants, sometimes considered different diseases,[2][3] but considered by others to form a spectrum differing only in terms of chronicity, severity, and clinical course.[4][5]

Multiple Sclerosis for some people is a syndrome more than a single disease.[6] As of 2019 three auto-antibodies have been found in atypical MS giving birth to separate diseases: Anti-AQP4, Anti-MOG and Anti-NF spectrums. The subject is under intense research and the list of MS autoantibodies is expected to grow in the near future[7][8]

Diseases included in this category[edit]

Apart of the standard multiple sclerosis, defined by the dissemination in time and space of demyelinating lesions, with different clinical presentations (Relapsing-Onset or Progressive-Onset)[9] including a special genetic variant named rapidly progressive multiple sclerosis.[10] there are a long list of similar diseases. It depends of the author, but usually are included:

  • Neuromyelitis optica (NMO), and its associated "spectrum of disorders" (NMOSD), currently considered a common syndrome for at least three separated diseases:,[11] mainly produced by AQP4 autoimmune channelopathy, though other variants exists, some with anti-MOG and some others idiopathic. Some researchers think that there could exist an overlapping between Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis cases and neuromyelitis optica or acute disseminated encephalomyelitis.[12]
  • Opticospinal MS or Optic-spinal MS (OSMS): Old OSMS cases are now considered inside the NMO spectrum, but this does not apply to anti-AQP4 negative cases.[13] After the discovery of anti-AQP4 autoantibodies it was found that some cases of OSMS were AQP4-negative, and therefore, they are considered real MS cases. OSMS has its own specific immunological biomarkers[14] The whole picture is under construction and several reports exists about overlapping conditions:
    • Myelocortical multiple sclerosis (MCMS), proposed variant with demyelination of spinal cord and cerebral cortex but not of cerebral white matter [15] Several atypical cases could belong here. See the early reports of MCMS[16][17][18]
    • Pure spinal multiple sclerosis: Patients with clinical and paraclinical features suggestive of cord involvement of multiple sclerosis (MS)-type albeit not rigidly fulfilling the McDonald criteria[19] Some inflammatory conditions are associated with the presence of scleroses in the CNS.[20] Optic neuritis (monophasic and recurrent) and Transverse myelitis (monophasic and recurrent)
  • Anti-MOG associated spectrum, often clinically presented as an anti-MOG autoimmune encephalomyelitis,[21][22] but can also appear as negative NMO or atypical multiple sclerosis.[23]
  • Pseudotumefactive and tumefactive multiple sclerosis: lesions whose size is more than 2 cm, with mass effect, oedema and/or ring enhancement[28][29]
    • Balo concentric sclerosis, an unusual presentation of plaques forming concentrenic circles, which can sometimes get better spontaneously.
    • Schilder disease or diffuse myelinoclastic sclerosis: is a rare disease that presents clinically as a pseudotumoural demyelinating lesion; and is more common in children.[30][31]
    • Solitary sclerosis: This variant has been recently proposed (2012) by Mayo Clinic researchers.[32] though it was also reported by other groups more or less at the same time.[33][34] It is defined as isolated demyelinating lesions which produce a progressive myelopathy similar to primary progressive MS, and is currently considered a synonym for tumefactive multiple sclerosis.[35]

As MS is an active field for research, the list is not closed or definitive. For example, some diseases like Autoimmune GFAP Astrocytopathy or variants of CIDP that affects the CNS (CIDP is the chronic counterpart of Guillain–Barré syndrome) could be included. Autoimmune variants peripheral neuropathies or progressive inflammatory neuropathy could be in the list assuming the autoimmune model for MS, together with a rare demyelinating lesional variant of trigeminal neuralgia[36] and some NMDAR Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis[27]

Venous induced demyelination has also been proposed as a hypothetical MS variant produced by CCSVI, Susac's syndrome (MS has an important vascular component[37]), myalgic encephalomyelitis (aka chronic fatigue syndrome).[38] Also leukoaraiosis can produce lesions disseminated in time and space. Maybe two sub-conditions of Leukodystrophy: Adrenoleukodystrophy and Adrenomyeloneuropathy could be in the list.

Identified causes[edit]

Though for the most of the cases these diseases are still idiopathic, recent research has found the causes for some of them, making them not idiopathic anymore. There are currently tree identified auto-antibodies and a genetic variant. The autoantibodies are anti-AQP4, anti-MOG and some anti-Neurofascins.[39] The genetic variant is a mutation in the gene NR1H3.

The pathogenic mechanism is usually not related to the clinical course. Therefore, one given pathogenic underlying condition can yield several clinical diseases, and one disease can be produced by several pathogenic conditions.

anti-AQP4 spectrum[edit]

Originally found in neuromyelitis optica, this autoantibody has been associated with other conditions. Its current spectrum is as following:

Anti-MOG spectrum[edit]

See Anti-MOG associated encephalomyelitis

The presence of anti-MOG autoantibodies has been associated with the following conditions[43]

  • Some cases of aquaporin-4-seronegative neuromyelitis optica: NMO derived from an antiMOG associated encephalomyelitis,[44]
  • Some cases of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, specially the recurrent ones (MDEM)[45]
  • Some cases of McDonalds-positive multiple sclerosis[43][46][23][47]
  • isolated optic neuritis or transverse myelitis[43]
  • Recurrent optic neuritis. The repetition of an idiopatic optic neuritis is considered a distinct clinical condition, and it has been found to be associated with anti-MOG autoantibodies[48]

The anti-mog spectrum in children is equally variated: Out of a sample of 41 children with MOG-antibodies 29 had clinical NMOSD (17 relapsing), 8 had ADEM (4 relapsing with ADEM-ON), 3 had a single clinical event CIS, and 1 had a relapsing tumefactive disorder. Longitudinal myelitis was evident on MRI in 76[percent]. It has also been noted that percentage of children with anti-mog antibodies respect a demyelinating sample is higher than for adults[49]

Double positive NMO[edit]

Some NMO patients present double positive for autoantibodies to AQP4 and MOG. These patients have MS-like brain lesions, multifocal spine lesions and retinal and optic nerves atrophy.[50]

Anti-Neurofascin spectrum[edit]

See Anti-neurofascin demyelinating diseases

Some anti-neurofascin demyelinating diseases were previously considered a subtype of Multiple Sclerosis but now they are considered a separate entity, as it happened before to anti-MOG and anti-AQP4 cases. Around 10% of MS cases are now thought to be anti-Neurofascin disease in reality.[51]

Anti-neurofascin autoantibodies have been reported in atypical cases of MS and CIDP, and a whole spectrum of Anti-neurofascin demyelinating diseases has been proposed.[52]

Some cases of CIDP are reported to be produced by auto-antibodies against several neurofascin proteins. These proteins are present in the neurons and four of them have been reported to produce disease: NF186, NF180, NF166 and NF155.[52]

Antibodies against Neurofascins NF-155 can also appear in MS[53] and NF-186 could be involved in subtypes of MS[54] yielding an intersection between both conditions.

Summarising, autoantibodies against several neurofascins can produce MS: neurofascin186 (NF186), neurofascin155 (NF155), contactin 1 (CNTN1), contactin associated protein 1 (CASPR1) and gliomedin. All of them nodal and paranodal proteins.[55]

Other auto-antibodies under study[edit]

Some auto-antibodies have been found consistently across different MS cases:


A KIR4.1 multiple sclerosis variant was reported in 2012[56] and later reported again,[57] which could be considered a different disease (as Devic's disease did before), and can represent up to a 47% of the MS cases

Anoctamin 2[edit]

Auto-antibodies against anoctamin-2 (ANO-2), one of the ion-channel proteins, have been reported consistently since 2013[58]

This finding is not universal. Most of the MS patients do not show auto-antibodies against ANO-2. Therefore, this points toward an ANO2 autoimmune sub-phenotype in MS. [59]

Later reports point towards a mimicry between ANO-2 and EBV-EBNA-1 protein[60]

Other auto-antibodies[edit]

  • Anti-Flotilin spectrum: The proteins Flotillin 1 and flotillin 2 have been recently identified as target antigens in some patients with multiple sclerosis. First 14 cases were reported together in the first report, and 3 new cases were reported later inside a cohort of 43 patients.[61]
  • Mutations in GJB1 coding for connexin 32, a gap junction protein expressed in Schwann cells and oligodendrocytes, that usually produce Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. In some cases also MS (as defined by McDonalds criteria) can appear in these patients.[62]

Also an OPA1 variant [63]. Finally, there exist some reports by Drs. Aristo Vojdani, Partha Sarathi Mukherjee, Joshua Berookhim, and Datis Kharrazian of an aquaporine-related multiple sclerosis, related to vegetal aquaporine proteins.[64]

Other auto-antibodies can be used to stablish a differential diagnosis from very different diseases like Sjögren syndrome which can be separated by Anti–Calponin-3 autoantibodies[65]

The correlation between this genetic mutation and MS was challenged but in 2018 has been replicated by an independent team.[66] Notice that this results do not refer to general MS.

Genetic types[edit]

Different behaviour has been reported according to the presence of different HLA genes.

HLA DRB3*02:02 patients[edit]

In HLA DRB3 cases, autoimmune reactions against the enzyme GDP-L-fucose synthase has been reported[67][68] The same report points that the autoimmune problem could derive from the gut microbiota.

HLA-DRB1*15:01 has the strongest association with MS[69].

HLA-DRB1*04:05, HLA-B*39:01, and HLA-B*15:01 are associated with independent MS susceptibility and HLA-DQβ1 position 9 with phenylalanine had the strongest effect on MS susceptibility.[69]

Another possible type is one with auto-antibodies against GDP-L-fucose synthase. In HLA-DRB3*02:02 patients, autoimmune reactions against the enzyme GDP-L-fucose synthase has been reported[67][68] The same report points that the autoimmune problem could derive from the gut microbiota.

Rapidly progressive multiple sclerosis[edit]

This is a specially aggressive clinical course of progressive MS[10] that has been found to be caused by a special genetic variant. It is due to a mutation inside the gene NR1H3, an arginine to glutamine mutation in the position p.Arg415Gln, in an area that codifies the protein LXRA.[70]

It is important to notice that this kind of MS was previously reported to behave different that the standard progressive course,[71] being linked to Connexin 43 autoantibodies with pattern III lesions (distal oligodendrogliopathy)[72] and being responsive to plasma exchange[73]

In very rapidly progressive multiple sclerosis the use of immunosuppressive therapy (mitoxantrone/cyclophosphamide), rituximab, autologous haematopoietic stem cell therapy or combination therapy should be considered carefully.[74]

Radiologically atypical MS[edit]

Inside well defined MS (Lesions disseminated in time and space with no other explanation) there are atypical cases based in radiological or metabolic criteria. A four-groups classification has been proposed:[75]

Primary progressive variants[edit]

Some researchers propose to separate primary progressive MS from other clinical courses. PPMS, after recent findings seem to point that it is pathologically a very different disease.[78][79]

Some authors think since long ago that primary progressive MS should be considered a disease different from standard MS,[80][81] and it was also proposed that PPMS could be heterogeneous[82]

Clinical variants have been described. For example, Late Onset MS.[83] Since 2016, a special clinical variant of "rapidly progressive" MS has been found to be different from RRMS and other kinds of PPMS.[10] It is due to a mutation inside the gene NR1H3, an arginine to glutamine mutation in the position p.Arg415Gln, in an area that codifies the protein LXRA.

For the rest of the progressive cases, it has been found that the lesions are diffuse instead of the normal focal ones,[84] and are different under MR spectroscopy.[85][86] RRMS and PPMS patients also show differences on the retinal layers yields examined under OCT.[87]

Some authors have proposed a dual classification of PPMS, according to the shape of edges of the scars, in MS-like and ADEM-like[88] Proteomic analysis have shown that two proteins, Secretogranin II and Protein 7B2, in CSF can be used to separate RRMS from PPMS[89]

Recently, the hypothesis of PPMS being apart from RRMS/SPMS is taken further credibility due that it was shown that CSF from PPMS patients can carry the disease to other animals, producing neurodegeneration in mice[78] and that Normal Appearing White Matter (NAWM) structure is also different[90]

The predominant lesions in PPMS are slowly expanding lesions with T cells, microglial, and macrophage-associated demyelination in close similar to pattern I demyelination[91]

As of 2019 it has been found that the profile of T-cells is different in PPMS and SPMS[92]

Clinical situations inside standard MS[edit]

MS can be considered among the acquired demyelinating syndromes with a multiphasic instead of monophasic behaviour.[93] Multiple sclerosis has a prodromal stage in which an unknown underlying condition, able to damage the brain, is present, but no lesion has still developed.

MS is usually classified in clinical types, though they are unrelated to the underlying pathology. Some critical reports say that the current "types" were artificially made up, just to treat RRMS as a separate disease. In this way the number of patients was low enough to enter the orphan drugs act, and get the interferon approved by the FDA under this schema.[94] Recent reviews state that all types are a mixture of inflammation and neurodegeneration, and that all types should be considered the same disease.[95]

Apart from the "clinical types", several classifications can be made currently closer to the underlying pathology, like Oligoclonal negative MS, around 5% of the cases[96] which is suspected to be immunogenetically different.[97] Their evolution is better than standard MS patients,[98] or Oligoclonal IgM positive MS, with immunoglobulin M Bands (IgM-Bands), which accounts for a 30-40% of the MS population and has been identified as a predictor of MS severity.[99] It has been reported to have a poor response to interferon-beta but a better response to glatimer acetate instead[100]

Other possible clinical courses are:

Preclinical MS: CIS and CDMS[edit]

The first manifestation of MS is the so-called Clinically isolated syndrome, or CIS, which is the first isolated attack. The current diagnosis criteria for MS do not allow doctors to give an MS diagnosis until a second attack takes place. Therefore, the concept of "clinical MS", for an MS that can be diagnosed, has been developed. Until MS diagnosis has been established, nobody can tell whether the disease one is dealing with is MS.

Cases of MS before the CIS are sometimes found during other neurological inspections and are referred to as subclinical MS.[101] Preclinical MS refers to cases after the CIS but before the confirming second attack.[102] After the second confirming attack the situation is referred to as CDMS (clinically defined multiple sclerosis).[103]

CIS itself is sometimes considered itself as a disease entity, different from MS. Even if they share the same underlying condition CIS is not MS given that it lacks the presence of lesions.[104] Approximately 84% of the subjects with CIS experience a second clinical demyelinating event and are diagnosed with clinically definite MS (CDMS) within 20 years.

RIS, subclinical and silent MS[edit]

See also Radiologically isolated syndrome

Silent MS has been found in autopsies before the existence of MRI[105] showing that the so-called "clinical definitions" cannot be applied to around 25% of the MS cases.[106] Currently a distinction is made between "silent" and subclinical.

In absence of attacks, sometimes a radiological finding suggestive of demyelination (T2 hyperintensities[107]) can be used to establish a pre-diagnosis of MS. This is often named "Radiologically Isolated Syndrome" (RIS). Cases before the first attack or CIS are subclinical in the sense that they do not produce clinical situations.

If a second radiological event appears without clinical consequences, the clinical situation is named "Silent MS" (Okuda criteria).[108] Anyway, it is reported that all MS cases have an active subclinical phase before the CIS[109]

It has been noted that some aspects of the MS underlying condition are present in otherwise healthy MS patients' relatives,[110] suggesting a wider scope for the "silent MS" term.

In these cases Interleukin-8 is a risk for clinical conversion.[111] It has also been proposed that always exists a subclinical phase in the beginning of every MS case, during which the permeability of the BBB can be used for diagnosis[112]

It is also under investigation whether MS has a prodrome, i.e., a preliminary stage in which the disease exists with non-specific symptoms. Some reports point to a prodrome of several years for RRMS and decades for PPMS.[113]

Aggressive multiple sclerosis[edit]

Relapsing-Remitting MS is considered aggressive when the frequency of exacerbations is not less than 3 during 2 years. Special treatment is often considered for this subtype.[114] According to these definition aggressive MS would be a subtype of RRMS. Other authors disagree and define aggressive MS by the accumulation of disability, considering it as a rapidly disabling disease course[115]

The aggressive course is associated to grey matter damage and meningeal inflammation, and presents a special intrathecal (meninges and CSF) inflammatory profile.[116]

After the 2016 revision of the MS phenotypes, it is called Highly active multiple sclerosis[117]

Pediatric and pubertal MS[edit]

MS cases are rare before puberty, but they can happen. Whether they constitute a separate disease is still an open subject. Anyway, even this pubertal MS could be more than one disease, because early-onset and late-onset have different demyelination patterns[118]

Pediatric MS patients tend to have active inflammatory disease course with a tendency to have brainstem / cerebellar presentations at onset. Due to efficient repair mechanisms at early life, pediatric MS patients tend to have longer time to reach EDSS 6 but reach it at earlier age.[119]

An iron-responsive variant of MS has been reported in children.[120]

Controversy for the definition[edit]

Given that the etiology of MS is unknown, the current definitions of MS are all based on its appearance. The most commonly used definition, the McDonald criteria, requires just the presence of demyelinating lesions separated in space and time, together with the exclusion of every known demyelinating condition.

This unspecific definition has been critizised. For some people this has turned MS into an heterogeneous condition with several underlying problems.[121] Besides, the complementary problem also exists. Given that McDonalds-MS is based just in the distribution of the lesions, even twins with the same underlying condition can be classified different[122]

Finally, the "exclusion of every other known disease" condition also creates problems. Rightfully classified MS patients can be rightfully classified out of the spectrum when their particular underlying problem is discovered. For example, neuromyelitis optica was previously considered MS and currently is not, even if it appears that the MS definition has not changed.

Currently there is no single diagnosis test for MS that is 100% sensitive and specific.[123][124]

Pathological and clinical definitions[edit]

McDonald criteria propose a clinical diagnosis based on a pathological definition, saying that the focus for diagnosis "remains on the objective demonstration of dissemination of lesions in both time and space" (DIT and DIS). But given that other diseases produce similar lesions, it is also required that those lesions cannot be explained by any other known disease.

This open definition present problems.[125] For example, before the discovery of anti-AQP4 in 2006, most optic-spinal MS patients were classified rightfully as MS. Currently they are classified as NMO. Both diagnosis are correct even though the definition has not (apparently) changed.

According to some pathologists, a pathological definition is required because clinical definitions have problems with differential diagnosis[126] and they always use a pathological definition on articles about post-mortem retrospective diagnosis, but for practitioners that need a diagnosis as soon as possible MS is often regarded as a pure clinical entity, defined simply by a positive result in the standard clinical case definition being then named "clinically definite MS" (CDMS, Poser) or simply "MS" (McDonald).[127]

Both definitions lead to different results. For example, confluent subpial cortical lesions are the most specific finding for MS, being exclusively present in MS patients.[128] but can only be detected post-mortem by an autopsy[129] Therefore, any other diagnosis method will have false positives.

Other meanings of MS[edit]

There is no known etiology for MS and therefore no etiology-based definition is possible. Comparison to a post-mortem retrospective diagnosis is possible, but useless to practitioners and short-term researchers, and it is not usually done. Therefore, all meanings for the words "Multiple Sclerosis" are somehow diffuse.

The pathological definition based on proven dissemination in time and space has problems. For example, it leaves situations like RIS (radiologically isolated syndrome) outside the MS spectrum because the lack of proof, even in the case that this condition later could shown the same pathogenic conditions than MS cases.[130]

Besides, usually the term "multiple sclerosis" is used to refer to the presence of the unknown underlying condition that produces the MS lesions instead to the mere presence of the lesions. The term MS is also used to refers to the process of developing the lesions.[131]

Some authors instead speak about the biological disease vs. its clinical presentation.[132]

Anyway, the precise meaning in each case can be normally deduced from the context.

Handling several clinical definitions[edit]

Given that several definitions of MS coexist, some authors are referring to them using whether CDMS for Poser positives, or McDonalds-MS with a prefix for McDonalds positives, including the release year in the prefix.[133]

CIS and conversion to MS[edit]

The 2010 revision of the McDonald criteria[134] allows the diagnosis of MS with only one proved lesion (CIS). Consistently, the later revision for the MS phenotypes in 2013 was forced to consider CIS as one of the MS phenotypes.[135]

Therefore, the former concept of "Conversion from CIS to MS", that was declared when a patient had a second MS attack, does not apply anymore. More accurate is now to speak about conversions from the CIS phenotype to other MS phenotype.[136]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Fontaine B (2001). "[Borderline forms of multiple sclerosis]". Rev. Neurol. (Paris) (in French). 157 (8–9 Pt 2): 929–34. PMID 11787357.
  2. ^ Wingerchuk DM, Lucchinetti CF (2007). "Comparative immunopathogenesis of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, neuromyelitis optica, and multiple sclerosis". Curr. Opin. Neurol. 20 (3): 343–50. doi:10.1097/WCO.0b013e3280be58d8. PMID 17495631.
  3. ^ Poser CM, Brinar VV (October 2007). "Disseminated encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis: two different diseases - a critical review". Acta Neurol. Scand. 116 (4): 201–6. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.2007.00902.x. PMID 17824894.
  4. ^ Weinshenker B, Miller D (1998). "Multiple sclerosis: one disease or many?". In Thompson AB, Siva A, Kesselring J (eds.). Frontiers in Multiple Sclerosis (2nd ed.). London: Taylor & Francis Group. pp. 37–46. ISBN 978-1-85317-506-0.
  5. ^ Hartung HP, Grossman RI (May 2001). "ADEM: distinct disease or part of the MS spectrum?". Neurology. 56 (10): 1257–60. doi:10.1212/WNL.56.10.1257. PMID 11376169.
  6. ^ Zabad RK, Stewart R, Healey KM (October 2017). "Pattern Recognition of the Multiple Sclerosis Syndrome". Brain Sciences. 7 (10): 138. doi:10.3390/brainsci7100138. PMC 5664065. PMID 29064441.
  7. ^ Katharina Lang, Harald Prüss, Frequencies of neuronal autoantibodies in healthy controls. Estimation of disease specificity, Neuroimmunology and neuroinflammation, July 18, 2017, DOI:
  8. ^ Susumu Kusunoki, Autoantibodies in neuroimmunological diseases; relevance of fine specificity, Experimental Neurology, Volume 250, December 2013, Pages 219-220, doi:
  9. ^ Bruno Brochet, Neuropsychiatric Symptoms of Inflammatory Demyelinating Diseases, Springer international, Switzerland 2015, ISBN 3319184644, 9783319184647
  10. ^ a b c Wang Z, et al. (2016). "Nuclear Receptor NR1H3 in Familial Multiple Sclerosis". Neuron. 90 (5): 948–954. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.04.039. PMC 5092154. PMID 27253448.
  11. ^ Weinshenker Brian G (2014). "The two faces of neuromyelitis optica". Neurology. 82 (6): 466–467. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000000114. PMID 24415570.
  12. ^ a b Gahr M, Lauda F, Wigand ME, Connemann BJ, Rosenbohm A, Tumani H, Reindl M, Uzelac Z, Lewerenz J (2015). "Periventricular white matter lesion and incomplete MRZ reaction in a male patient with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis presenting with dysphoric mania". BMJ Case Rep. 2015: bcr2014209075. doi:10.1136/bcr-2014-209075. PMC 4422915. PMID 25917068.
  13. ^ Matsushita T, Isobe N, Matsuoka T, Shi N, Kawano Y, Wu XM, Yoshiura T, Nakao Y, Ishizu T, Kira JI (2009). "Aquaporin-4 autoimmune syndrome and anti-aquaporin-4 antibody-negative opticospinal multiple sclerosis in Japanese". Mult. Scler. 15 (7): 834–47. doi:10.1177/1352458509104595. PMID 19465451.
  14. ^ Özlem Mercan, Zekiye Ülger, Cemile Handan Mısırlı, Recai Türkoğlu, Opticospinal Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Course and Immunological Parameters, Experimed, 2018, Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 47 - 51, DOI: 10.26650/experimed.2018.18002
  15. ^ Bruce D Trapp, Megan Vignos, Jessica Dudman, Ansi Chang, Jacqueline Chen, Kunio Nakamura, Richard A Rudick, Cortical neuronal densities and cerebral white matter demyelination in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective study, The Lancet, August 21, 2018DOI:
  16. ^ Hendrickson M. Myelocortical multiple sclerosis: a subgroup of multiple sclerosis patients with spinal cord and cortical demyelination, Oct 4, 2013; 34294, ECTRIMS Online Library
  17. ^ Vignos, Megan C., A histopathological and magnetic resonance imaging assessment of myelocortical MS: A new pathological variant,
  18. ^ Hendrickson, M., Chang, A., Fisher, E., Staugaitis, S., Fox, R., Mork, S., & Trapp, B. (2013, October). Myelocortical multiple sclerosis: a subgroup of multiple sclerosis patients with spinal cord and cortical demyelination. M.S.Journal, Vol. 19, No. 11, pp. 366-366
  19. ^ Jie Ping Schee, Shanthi Viswanathan, Pure spinal multiple sclerosis: A possible novel entity within the multiple sclerosis disease spectrum, MS Journal, May 17, 2018
  20. ^ O'Connor P, Marriott J (2010). "Differential Diagnosis and Diagnostic Criteria for Multiple Sclerosis: Application and Pitfalls" (PDF). In Hohlfeld R, Lucchinetti CF (eds.). Multiple sclerosis 3 (1st ed.). Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier. ISBN 978-1-4160-6068-0.
  21. ^ Pröbstel AK et al. Anti-MOG antibodies are present in a subgroup of patients with a neuromyelitis optica phenotype. J Neuroinflammation. 2015 Mar 8;12(1):46.
  22. ^ Spadaro Melania; et al. (2015). "Histopathology and clinical course of MOG-antibody-associated encephalomyelitis". Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology. 2 (3): 295–301. doi:10.1002/acn3.164. PMC 4369279. PMID 25815356.
  23. ^ a b Spadaro M, et al. (2016). "Autoantibodies to MOG in a distinct subgroup of adult multiple sclerosis". Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 3 (5): e257. doi:10.1212/NXI.0000000000000257. PMC 4949775. PMID 27458601.
  24. ^ Rossman I (2015). "An 8 Year Old Girl with Chronic Inflammatory Optic Neuritis (CRION): the Youngest Reported Case to Date". Neurology. 84 (14): Supplement P7.015.
  25. ^ Konstantina Chalmoukou el al. Anti-MOG antibodies are frequently associated with steroid-sensitive recurrent optic neuritis, Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2015 Aug; 2(4): e131. 2015 Jul 2. doi:10.1212/NXI.0000000000000131, PMC 4496630
  26. ^ Reindl M, Di Pauli F, Rostásy K, Berger T (Aug 2013). "The spectrum of MOG autoantibody-associated demyelinating diseases". Nat Rev Neurol. 9 (8): 455–61. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2013.118.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  27. ^ a b Todd A Hardy, Reddel, Barnett, Palace, Lucchinetti, Weinshenker, Atypical CNS inflammatory demyelinating disease, The lancet neurology, August, 2016, DOI:, Manuscript Number: THELANCETNEUROLOGY-D-16-00113R1 availale at [1]
  28. ^ Lucchinetti CF, Gavrilova RH, Metz I, Parisi JE, Scheithauer BW, Weigand S, Thomsen K, Mandrekar J, Altintas A, Erickson BJ, König F, Giannini C, Lassmann H, Linbo L, Pittock SJ, Brück W (July 2008). "Clinical and radiographic spectrum of pathologically confirmed tumefactive multiple sclerosis". Brain. 131 (Pt 7): 1759–75. doi:10.1093/brain/awn098. PMC 2442427. PMID 18535080.
  29. ^ Given CA, Stevens BS, Lee C (1 January 2004). "The MRI appearance of tumefactive demyelinating lesions". AJR Am J Roentgenol. 182 (1): 195–9. doi:10.2214/ajr.182.1.1820195. PMID 14684539.
  30. ^ Garrido C, Levy-Gomes A, Teixeira J, Temudo T (2004). "[Schilder's disease: two new cases and a review of the literature]". Rev Neurol (in Spanish). 39 (8): 734–8. PMID 15514902.
  31. ^ Afifi AK, Bell WE, Menezes AH, Moore SA (1994). "Myelinoclastic diffuse sclerosis (Schilder's disease): report of a case and review of the literature". J. Child Neurol. 9 (4): 398–403. CiteSeerX doi:10.1177/088307389400900412. PMID 7822732.
  32. ^ Schmalstieg WF, Keegan BM, Weinshenker BG (Feb 2012). "Solitary sclerosis: progressive myelopathy from solitary demyelinating lesion". Neurology. 78 (8): 540–4. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e318247cc8c. PMID 22323754.
  33. ^ Lattanzi S (2012). "Solitary sclerosis: Progressive myelopathy from solitary demyelinating lesion". Neurology. 79 (4): 393, author reply 393. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000418061.10382.f7. PMID 22826546.
  34. ^ Ayrignac X, Carra-Dalliere C, Homeyer P, Labauge P (2013). "Solitary sclerosis: progressive myelopathy from solitary demyelinating lesion. A new entity?". Acta Neurol Belg. 113 (4): 533–4. doi:10.1007/s13760-013-0182-x. PMID 23358965.
  35. ^ Jiménez Arango JA, Uribe Uribe CS, Toro González G (2013). "Lesser-known myelin-related disorders: Focal tumour-like demyelinating lesions". Neurologia. 30 (2): 97–105. doi:10.1016/j.nrl.2013.06.004. PMID 24094691.
  36. ^ Tohyama, Sarasa and Hung, Peter S.P. and Cheng, Joshua C. and Zhang, Jia Y. and Hodaie, Mojgan, Lesional Trigeminal Neuralgia - Clinical and Neuroimaging Definition of a New Syndrome (March 2, 2019). The Lancet preprints, available at SSRN: [2]
  37. ^ Minagar A, Jy W, Jimenez JJ, Alexander JS (2006). "Multiple sclerosis as a vascular disease". Neurol. Res. 28 (3): 230–5. doi:10.1179/016164106X98080. PMID 16687046.
  38. ^ "Chronic Fatigue Syndrome - Symptoms, Diagnosis, Treatment of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome". Health Information. New York Times. The following test results... are seen consistently...: Brain MRI showing swelling in the brain or destruction of part of the nerve cells (demyelination)
  39. ^ Kazutoshi Sato Douglas; et al. (Feb 2014). "Distinction between MOG antibody-positive and AQP4 antibody-positive NMO spectrum disorders". Neurology. 82 (6): 474–481. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000000101. PMC 3937859. PMID 24415568.
  40. ^ Li Y, Xie P, Lv F, et al. (2008). "Brain magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities in neuromyelitis optica". Acta Neurol. Scand. 118 (4): 218–25. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.2008.01012.x. PMID 18384459.
  41. ^ Wingerchuk, Dean (2006). "Neuromyelitis Optica (Devic's Syndrome)" (PDF). 2006 Rare Neuroimmunologic Disorders Symposium. Retrieved 2007-01-05.
  42. ^ Ken Ikeda et al. Repeated Non-enhancing Tumefactive Lesions in a Patient with a Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder. Internal Medicine Vol. 50 (2011) No. 9 P 1061-1064, 2011/05/01,
  43. ^ a b c Reindl M, Di Pauli F, Rostásy K, Berger T (Aug 2013). "The spectrum of MOG autoantibody-associated demyelinating diseases". Nat Rev Neurol. 9 (8): 455–61. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2013.118. PMID 23797245.
  44. ^ Spadaro Melania; et al. (2015). "Histopathology and clinical course of MOG-antibody-associated encephalomyelitis". Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology. 2 (3): 295–301. doi:10.1002/acn3.164. PMC 4369279. PMID 25815356.
  45. ^ M. Baumann, E.M. Hennes, K. Schanda, M. Karenfort, B. Bajer-Kornek, K. Diepold, B. Fiedler, I. Marquardt, J. Strautmanis, S. Vieker, M. Reindl, K. Rostásy. Clinical characteristics and neuroradiological findings in children with multiphasic demyelinating encephalomyelitis and MOG antibodies. European Journal of Paediatric Neurology, Volume 19, Supplement 1, May 2015, Pages S21, Abstracts of the 11th EPNS Congress. 22 May 2015. doi:10.1016/S1090-3798(15)30066-0
  46. ^ Jarius S, Metz I, König FB, Ruprecht K, Reindl M, Paul F, Brück W, Wildemann B (Feb 2016). "Screening for MOG-IgG and 27 other anti-glial and anti-neuronal autoantibodies in 'pattern II multiple sclerosis' and brain biopsy findings in a MOG-IgG-positive case". Mult Scler. 22 (12): 1541–1549. doi:10.1177/1352458515622986. PMID 26869529.
  47. ^ Kitagawa S, Osada T, Kaneko K, Takahashi T, Suzuki N, Nakahara J (Nov 2018). "Clinical analysis of opticospinal multiple sclerosis (OSMS) presentation detecting anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody". Clin. Neurol. 58 (12): 737–744. doi:10.5692/ PMID 30487359.
  48. ^ Chalmoukou K; et al. (2015). "Recurrent Optic Neuritis (rON) is characterised by Anti-MOG Antibodies: A follow-up study". Neurology. 84 (14 Suppl P5): 274.
  49. ^ Silvia Tenembaum et al. Spectrum of MOG Autoantibody-Associated Inflammatory Diseases in Pediatric Patients, Neurology 2015; vol. 84 no. 14 Supplement I4-3A
  50. ^ Yaping Ya et al. Autoantibody to MOG suggests two distinct clinical subtypes of NMOSD, Science China Life Sciences, 26 November 2015, doi:10.1007/s11427-015-4997-y
  51. ^ Marcus Vinicius, Magno Goncalves, Yara Dadalti Fragoso, The involvement of anti-neurofascin 155 antibodies in central and peripheral demyelinating diseases, Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation, 8 Apr 2019;6:6.10.20517/2347-8659.2019.08
  52. ^ a b Jun-ichi Kira, Ryo Yamasaki, Hidenori Ogata, Anti-neurofascin autoantibody and demyelination, Neurochemistry international, Dec. 2018, doi:
  53. ^ Stich O, Perera S, Berger B, Jarius S, Wildemann B, Baumgartner A, Rauer S (March 2016). "Prevalence of neurofascin-155 antibodies in patients with multiple sclerosis". Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 364: 29–32. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2016.03.004. PMID 27084211.
  54. ^ Early research into a treatment for progressive MS
  55. ^ Jun ichi Kira et al, Anti-neurofascin autoantibody and demyelination, Neurochemistry International, 22 December 2018,
  56. ^ Srivastava R, Aslam M, Kalluri SR, Schirmer L, Buck D, Tackenberg B, Rothhammer V, Chan A, Gold R, Berthele A, Bennett JL, Korn T, Hemmer B (2012). "Potassium channel KIR4.1 as an immune target in multiple sclerosis". N. Engl. J. Med. 367 (2): 115–23. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1110740. PMC 5131800. PMID 22784115.
  57. ^ Schneider R (2013). "Autoantibodies to Potassium Channel KIR4.1 in Multiple Sclerosis". Front Neurol. 4: 125. doi:10.3389/fneur.2013.00125. PMC 3759297. PMID 24032025.
  58. ^ Burcu Ayoglu et al., Autoantibody Profiling in Multiple Sclerosis Using Arrays of Human Protein Fragments, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, September 1, 2013, First published on June 3, 2013, 12 (9) 2657-2672;
  59. ^ Burcu Ayoglu et al., Anoctamin 2 identified as an autoimmune target in multiple sclerosis, PNAS February 23, 2016 113 (8) 2188-2193; February 9, 2016,
  60. ^ Katarina Tengvall et al., Molecular mimicry between Anoctamin 2 and Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 1 associates with multiple sclerosis risk, PNAS, August 2, 2019
  61. ^ Flotillin-1/2 autoantibodies in patients with inflammatory disorders of the CNS, Sara Mariotto, Alberto Gajofatto, Daniela Alberti, Sabine Lederer, Salvatore Monaco, Sergio Ferrari, Romana Hoeftberger, Neurology, April 09, 2019; vol. 92 no. 15 Supplement P2.2-072, Print ISSN 0028-3878, Online ISSN 1526-632X, [3]
  62. ^ Georgios Koutsis et al. X linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and multiple sclerosis: emerging evidence for an association, Neurogenetics,
  63. ^ Yu-Wai-Man P, Spyropoulos A, Duncan HJ, Guadagno JV, Chinnery PF (September 2016). "A multiple sclerosis-like disorder in patients with OPA1 mutations". Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology. 3 (9): 723–9. doi:10.1002/acn3.323. PMC 5018584. PMID 27656661.
  64. ^ Vojdani A, Mukherjee PS, Berookhim J, Kharrazian D (2015). "Detection of antibodies against human and plant aquaporins in patients with multiple sclerosis". Research Abs. 2: 1378. doi:10.13070/ev.en.2.1378. PMC 4529886. PMID 26290755.
  65. ^ Julius Birnbaum, Ahmet Hoke, Aliya Lalji, Peter Calabresi, Pavan Bhargava, and Livia Casciola-Rosen, Anti–Calponin 3 Autoantibodies: A Newly Identified Specificity in Patients With Sjögren’s Syndrome, ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, Vol. 70, No. 10, October 2018, pp 1610–1616, DOI 10.1002/art.40550
  66. ^ Yan Zhang et al., Genetic variants regulate NR1H3 expression and contribute to multiple sclerosis risk, Journal of the Neurological Sciences Volume 390, 15 July 2018, Pages 162-165,
  67. ^ a b University of Zurich(2018, October 11). Link Between Gut Flora and Multiple Sclerosis Discovered. NeuroscienceNews. Retrieved October 11, 2018 from
  68. ^ a b Planas R, Santos R, Tomas-Ojer P, Cruciani C, Lutterotti A, Faigle W, Schaeren-Wiemers N, Espejo C, Eixarch H, Pinilla C, Martin R, Sospedra M (2018). "GDP-l-fucose synthase is a CD4+ T cell–specific autoantigen in DRB3*02:02 patients with multiple sclerosis" (PDF). Science Translational Medicine. 10 (462): eaat4301. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aat4301.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  69. ^ a b Kotaro Ogawa et al., Next-generation sequencing identifies contribution of both class I and II HLA genes on susceptibility of multiple sclerosis in Japanese, Journal of Neuroinflammation, volume 16, Article number: 162 (2019)
  70. ^ Hain HS, Hakonarson H (Jun 2016). "The Added Value of Family Material in the Discovery of Multiple Sclerosis Genes". Neuron. 90 (5): 905–6. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.05.027. PMID 27253441.
  71. ^ Yvette Morcos et al. A role for hypertrophic astrocytes and astrocyte precursors in a case of rapidly progressive multiple sclerosis, Mult Scler August 2003 vol. 9 no. 4 332-341, doi:10.1191/1352458503ms931oa
  72. ^ Masaki K, Suzuki SO, Matsushita T, Matsuoka T, Imamura S, Yamasaki R, et al. (2013). "Connexin 43 Astrocytopathy Linked to Rapidly Progressive Multiple Sclerosis and Neuromyelitis Optica". PLoS ONE. 8 (8): e72919. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...872919M. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0072919. PMC 3749992. PMID 23991165.
  73. ^ Seidi, Osheik, The Role of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Clinical Neurology, university of Khartoum,
  74. ^ Broadley SA, et al. (2015). "A new era in the treatment of multiple sclerosis". Med J Aust. 203 (3): 139–141. doi:10.5694/mja14.01218. PMID 26224184.
  75. ^ Codjia et al. Multiple sclerosis with atypical MRI presentation: Results of a nationwide multicenter study in 57 consecutive cases, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, Volume 28, February 2019, Pages 109-116, doi:
  76. ^ Ayrignac et al. Brain magnetic resonance imaging helps to differentiate atypical multiple sclerosis with cavitary lesions and vanishing white matter disease, European Journal of Neurology Volume 23, Issue 6, 04 January 2016, doi=
  77. ^ X. Ayrignac et al, Brain magnetic resonance imaging helps to differentiate atypical multiple sclerosis with cavitary lesions and vanishing white matter disease, January 2016,
  78. ^ a b Cristofanilli M, Rosenthal H, Cymring B, Gratch D, Pagano B, Xie B, Sadiq SA (2014). "Progressive multiple sclerosis cerebrospinal fluid induces inflammatory demyelination, axonal loss, and astrogliosis in mice". Exp. Neurol. 261: 620–32. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.07.020. PMID 25111532.
  79. ^ Ulloa Bianca; Alahiri Marwan; Liu Ying; Sadiq Saud (2015). "Cerebrospinal Fluid Haptoglobin (Hp) Levels are elevated in MS patients with progressive disease". Neurology. 84 (14): 213.
  80. ^ Vukusic S, Confavreux C (2003). "Primary and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis". J. Neurol. Sci. 206 (2): 153–5. doi:10.1016/S0022-510X(02)00427-6. PMID 12559503.
  81. ^ Dressel A, Kolb AK, Elitok E, Bitsch A, Bogumil T, Kitze B, Tumani H, Weber F (2006). "Interferon-beta1b treatment modulates cytokines in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis". Acta Neurol. Scand. 114 (6): 368–73. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.2006.00700.x. PMID 17083335.
  82. ^ Villar LM; et al. (Aug 2014). "Immunoglobulin M oligoclonal bands: biomarker of targetable inflammation in primary progressive multiple sclerosis". Ann Neurol. 76 (2): 231–40. doi:10.1002/ana.24190. PMID 24909126.
  83. ^ María Curbelo, Alejandra Martinez, Judith Steinberg and Adriana Carra, LOMS vs. Other Diseases: The Consequence of "To Be or Not To Be" (P3.081), Neurology April 5, 2016 vol. 86 no. 16 Supplement P3.081
  84. ^ Zwemmer JN, Bot JC, Jelles B, Barkhof F, Polman CH (April 2008). "At the heart of primary progressive multiple sclerosis: three cases with diffuse MRI abnormalities only". Mult. Scler. 14 (3): 428–30. doi:10.1177/1352458507084591. PMID 18208890.
  85. ^ Rahimian N, Saligheh Rad H, Firouznia K, Ebrahimzadeh SA, Meysamie A, Vafaiean H, Harirchian MH (September 2013). "Magnetic resonance spectroscopic findings of chronic lesions in two subtypes of multiple sclerosis: primary progressive versus relapsing remitting". Iran J Radiol. 10 (3): 128–32. doi:10.5812/iranjradiol.11336. PMC 3857974. PMID 24348597.
  86. ^ Reinke SN, Broadhurst DL, Sykes BD, Baker GB, Catz I, Warren KG, Power C (2014). "Metabolomic profiling in multiple sclerosis: insights into biomarkers and pathogenesis". Mult. Scler. 20 (10): 1396–400. doi:10.1177/1352458513516528. PMID 24468817.
  87. ^ Balk L, Tewarie P, Killestein J, Polman C, Uitdehaag B, Petzold A (2014). "Disease course heterogeneity and OCT in multiple sclerosis". Mult. Scler. 20 (9): 1198–1206. doi:10.1177/1352458513518626. PMID 24402036.
  88. ^ Poser CM, Brinar VV (2004). "The nature of multiple sclerosis". Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 106 (3): 159–71. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2004.02.005. PMID 15177764.
  89. ^ Liguori M, Qualtieri A, Tortorella C, Direnzo V, Bagalà A, et al. (2014). "Proteomic Profiling in Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Courses Reveals Potential Biomarkers of Neurodegeneration". PLoS ONE. 9 (8): e103984. Bibcode:2014PLoSO...9j3984L. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103984. PMC 4123901. PMID 25098164.
  90. ^ Ramos I. et al. Revealing underlying differences of NAWM from primary and secondary progressive MS (P4.404), Neurology April 18, 2017 vol. 88 no. 16 Supplement P4.404
  91. ^ Abdelhak A, Weber MS, Tumani H (2017). "Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: Putting Together the Puzzle". Front. Neurol. 8: 8–234. doi:10.3389/fneur.2017.00234. PMC 5449443. PMID 28620346.
  92. ^ Cinthia Farina1 et al., Loss of circulating CD8+ CD161high T cells in primary progressive multiple sclerosis, Front. Immunol. | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01922
  93. ^ Quintana FJ, Patel B, Yeste A, Nyirenda M, Kenison J, Rahbari R, Fetco D, Hussain M, O'Mahony J, Magalhaes S, McGowan M, Johnson T, Rajasekharan S, Narayanan S, Arnold DL, Weiner HL, Banwell B, Bar-Or A (2014). "Epitope spreading as an early pathogenic event in pediatric multiple sclerosis". Neurology. 83 (24): 2219–26. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001066. PMC 4277672. PMID 25381299.
  94. ^ R. Dobson G. Giovannoni, Multiple sclerosis – a review, 09 October 2018,
  95. ^ Hans Lassmann, Pathogenic Mechanisms Associated With Different Clinical Courses of Multiple Sclerosis, Front Immunol. 2018; 9: 3116. Jan 10 2019. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.03116, PMCID: PMC6335289, PMID 30687321
  96. ^ Link H, Huang YM (2006). "Oligoclonal bands in multiple sclerosis cerebrospinal fluid: An update on methodology and clinical usefulness". Neuroimmunology. 180 (1–2): 17–28. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroim.2006.07.006. PMID 16945427.
  97. ^ Imrell K, Landtblom AM, Hillert J, Masterman T (2006). "Multiple sclerosis with and without CSF bands: Clinically indistinguishable but immunogenetically distinct". Neurology. 67 (6): 1062–1064. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000237343.93389.35. PMID 17000979.
  98. ^ Zeman AZ, Kidd D, McLean BN, Kelly MA, Francis DA, Miller DH, Kendall BE, Rudge P, Thompson EJ, McDonald WI (1996). "A study of oligoclonal band negative multiple sclerosis". J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 60 (1): 27–30. doi:10.1136/jnnp.60.1.27. PMC 486185. PMID 8558146.
  99. ^ Rui Li, Kristina R. Patterson, Amit Bar-Or, Reassessing B cell contributions in multiple sclerosis, Nature Immunology, volume 19, pages 696–707, June 2018, [4]
  100. ^ Casanova, B., Lacruz, L., Villar, M.L. et al., Different clinical response to interferon beta and glatiramer acetate related to the presence of oligoclonal IgM bands in CSF in multiple sclerosis patients, Neurological Sciences, August 2018, Volume 39, Issue 8, pp 1423–1430, Neurol Sci (2018) 39: 1423.
  101. ^ Hakiki B, Goretti B, Portaccio E, Zipoli V, Amato MP (2008). "'Subclinical MS': follow-up of four cases". Eur. J. Neurol. 15 (8): 858–61. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02155.x. PMID 18507677.
  102. ^ Lebrun C, Bensa C, Debouverie M, De Seze J, Wiertlievski S, Brochet B, Clavelou P, Brassat D, Labauge P, Roullet E (2008). "Unexpected multiple sclerosis: follow-up of 30 patients with magnetic resonance imaging and clinical conversion profile". J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 79 (2): 195–8. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2006.108274. PMID 18202208.
  103. ^ Frisullo G, Nociti V, Iorio R, Patanella AK, Marti A, Mirabella M, Tonali PA, Batocchi AP (December 2008). "The persistency of high levels of pSTAT3 expression in circulating CD4+ T cells from CIS patients favors the early conversion to clinically defined multiple sclerosis". J. Neuroimmunol. 205 (1–2): 126–34. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroim.2008.09.003. PMID 18926576.
  104. ^ Yuli Hou, Yujuan Jia, Jingtian Hou, Natural Course of Clinically Isolated Syndrome: A Longitudinal Analysis Using a Markov Model, 18 July 2018, Scientific Reports, volume 8, Article number: 10857 (2018)
  105. ^ Mackay Roland P.; Hirano Asao (1967). "Report of two clinically silent cases discovered at autopsy". Arch Neurol. 17 (6): 588–600. doi:10.1001/archneur.1967.00470300030007. PMID 6054893.
  106. ^ Engell T (May 1989). "A clinical patho-anatomical study of clinically silent multiple sclerosis". Acta Neurol Scand. 79 (5): 428–30. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.1989.tb03811.x. PMID 2741673.
  107. ^ Lebrun C, Kantarci OH, Siva A, Pelletier D, Okuda DT (2018). "Anomalies Characteristic of Central Nervous System Demyelination. Radiologically Isolated Syndrome". Neurologic Clinics. 36 (1): 59–68. doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2017.08.004. PMID 29157404.
  108. ^ Gabelic T, Ramasamy DP, Weinstock-Guttman B, Hagemeier J, Kennedy C, Melia R, Hojnacki D, Ramanathan M, Zivadinov R (2014). "Prevalence of radiologically isolated syndrome and white matter signal abnormalities in healthy relatives of patients with multiple sclerosis". AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 35 (1): 106–12. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3653. PMID 23886745. Lay
  109. ^ Banwell B (2019). "Are children with multiple sclerosis really "old" adults". Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 25 (7): 888–890. doi:10.1177/1352458519841505.
  110. ^ Gabelic T, Weinstock-Guttman B, Melia R, Lincoff N, Masud MW, Kennedy C, Brinar V, Ramasamy DP, Carl E, Bergsland N, Ramanathan M, Zivadinov R (2013). "Retinal nerve fiber thickness and MRI white matter abnormalities in healthy relatives of multiple sclerosis patients". Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 115 Suppl 1: S49–54. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.09.021. PMID 24321155.
  111. ^ Rossi S; et al. (2015). "Subclinical central inflammation is risk for RIS and CIS conversion to MS". Mult Scler. 21 (11): 1443–52. doi:10.1177/1352458514564482. PMID 25583841.
  112. ^ Cramer; et al. (2015). "Permeability of the blood-brain barrier predicts conversion from optic neuritis to multiple sclerosis". Brain. 138 (Pt 9): 2571–83. doi:10.1093/brain/awv203. PMC 4547053. PMID 26187333.
  113. ^ Cortese, Marianna, The timing of environmental risk factors and prodromal signs of multiple sclerosis, Doctoral thesis, 2017-12-18 [5]
  114. ^ Sazonov DV, Malkova NA, Bulatova EV, Riabukhina OV (2009). "[Combined therapy of aggressive remitted multiple sclerosis with mitoxantrone in combination with copaxone]". Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 109 (12): 76–9. PMID 20037526.
  115. ^ Rush, MacLean, Freedman. Aggressive multiple sclerosis: proposed definition and treatment algorithm. Nat Rev Neurol. 2015 Jun 2. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.85. PMID 26032396
  116. ^ Maggliozzi, et al. (2018). "Inflammatory intrathecal profiles and cortical damage in multiple sclerosis". Annals of Neurology. 83 (4): 739–755. doi:10.1002/ana.25197. PMID 29518260.
  117. ^ Cindy Díaz et al. Highly active multiple sclerosis: An update, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, Volume 30, May 2019, Pages 215-224,
  118. ^ Chabas D, Castillo-Trivino T, Mowry EM, Strober JB, Glenn OA, Waubant E (September 2008). "Vanishing MS T2-bright lesions before puberty: a distinct MRI phenotype?". Neurology. 71 (14): 1090–3. CiteSeerX doi:10.1212/ PMID 18824673.
  119. ^ Alroughani R, Boyko A (March 2018). "Pediatric multiple sclerosis: a review". BMC Neurology. 18 (1): 27. doi:10.1186/s12883-018-1026-3. PMC 5845207. PMID 29523094.
  120. ^ Rensburg SJ, Peeters AV, Toorn R, Schoeman J, Moremi KE, van Heerden CJ, Kotzee MJ (June 2019). "Identification of an iron-responsive subtype in two children diagnosed with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis using whole exome sequencing". Molecular Genetics and Metabolism Reports. 19: 100465. doi:10.1016/j.ymgmr.2019.100465. PMC 6434495.
  121. ^ Minagar, Alireza (2014). "Multiple Sclerosis: An Overview of Clinical Features, Pathophysiology, Neuroimaging, and Treatment Options". Colloquium Series on Integrated Systems Physiology: From Molecule to Function. 6 (4): 1–117. doi:10.4199/C00116ED1V01Y201408ISP055.
  122. ^ Susman, Ed, News from the ECTRIMS Congress: MS Discordant Twins Often Have Silent Lesions on Imaging, Neurology Today, 3 November 2016 - Volume 16 - Issue 21 - p 18–19, doi:10.1097/01.NT.0000508402.13786.97
  123. ^ Alex Rovira et al. Evidence-based guidelines: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines on the use of MRI in multiple sclerosis—clinical implementation in the diagnostic process, Nature Reviews Neurology 11, 471–482 (2015), 07 July 2015, doi:
  124. ^ Mistry N, Dixon J, Tallantyre E, Tench C, Abdel-Fahim R, Jaspan T, Morgan PS, Morris P, Evangelou N (May 2013). "Central veins in brain lesions visualized with high-field magnetic resonance imaging: a pathologically specific diagnostic biomarker for inflammatory demyelination in the brain". JAMA Neurology. 70 (5): 623–8. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.1405. PMID 23529352.
  125. ^ Sven Schippling, MRI for multiple sclerosis diagnosis and prognosis, Neurodegenerative Disease Management VOL. 7, NO. 6s | Supplement normal, 16 Nov 2017, doi=
  126. ^ Lassmann H (2010). "Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis". Brain. 133 (Pt 2): 317–9. doi:10.1093/brain/awp342. PMID 20129937.
  127. ^ McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, Goodkin D, Hartung HP, Lublin FD, McFarland HF, Paty DW, Polman CH, Reingold SC, Sandberg-Wollheim M, Sibley W, Thompson A, van den Noort S, Weinshenker BY, Wolinsky JS (2001). "Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis" (PDF). Ann. Neurol. 50 (1): 121–7. CiteSeerX doi:10.1002/ana.1032. PMID 11456302.
  128. ^ Lassmann Hans (2014). "Multiple sclerosis: Lessons from molecular neuropathology". Experimental Neurology. 262: 2–7. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2013.12.003. PMID 24342027.
  129. ^ Kutzelnigg Alexandra; et al. (2007). "Widespread Demyelination in the Cerebellar Cortex in Multiple Sclerosis". Brain Pathology. 17 (1): 38–44. doi:10.1111/j.1750-3639.2006.00041.x. PMID 17493036.
  130. ^ Christine Lebrun et al. Anomalies Characteristic of Central Nervous System Demyelination. Radiologically Isolated Syndrome. DOI:
  131. ^ Dutta R, Trapp BD (2006). "[Pathology and definition of multiple sclerosis]". Rev Prat (in French). 56 (12): 1293–8. PMID 16948216.
  132. ^ Quintana FJ et al. Epitope spreading as an early pathogenic event in pediatric multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2014 Dec 9;83(24):2219-26. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001066. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
  133. ^ Gloria Dalla Costa, Vittorio Martinelli, Francesca Sangalli, Lucia Moiola, Bruno Colombo, Marta Radaelli, Letizia Leocani, Roberto Furlan, Giancarlo Comi, Prognostic value of serum neurofilaments in patients with clinically isolated syndromes, January 11, 2019, DOI:
  134. ^ Polman, CH; Reingold, SC; Banwell, B; Clanet, M; Cohen, JA; Filippi, M; Fujihara, K; Havrdova, E; Hutchinson, M; Kappos, L; Lublin, FD; Montalban, X; O'Connor, P; Sandberg-Wollheim, M; Thompson, AJ; Waubant, E; Weinshenker, B; Wolinsky, JS (February 2011). "Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria". Annals of Neurology. 69 (2): 292–302. doi:10.1002/ana.22366. PMC 3084507. PMID 21387374.
  135. ^ Lublin et al. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis. The 2013 revisions. (international consensus). Neurology July 15, 2014 vol. 83 no. 3 278-286, doi:
  136. ^ Dalton CM, Brex PA, Miszkiel KA, Hickman SJ, MacManus DG, Plant GT, Thompson AJ, Miller DH (July 2002). "Application of the new McDonald criteria to patients with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis". Annals of Neurology. 52 (1): 47–53. doi:10.1002/ana.10240. PMID 12112046.