Open quantum system

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In physics, an open quantum system is a quantum-mechanical system which interacts with an external quantum system, the environment. In reality, no quantum system is completely isolated from its surroundings, thus every quantum system is open to some extent, which leads to dissipation. Techniques developed in the context of open quantum systems have proven powerful in fields such as quantum optics, quantum measurement theory, quantum statistical mechanics, quantum information science, quantum thermodynamics, quantum cosmology and semi-classical approximations.

Quantum system and environment[edit]

No quantum system can be completely isolated from its environment. As a direct result a quantum system can never be in a pure state. A pure state is unitary equivalent to a zero temperature ground state forbidden by the third law of thermodynamics. A complete description of a quantum system requires to include the environment. The outcome of this process of embedding is that ultimately we end with the state of whole universe described by a wavefunction .

System bath partition

Even if the combined system is pure state and can be described by a wavefunction , a subsystem in general cannot be described by a wavefunction. This observation motivated the formalism of density matrices or density operators introduced by John von Neumann[1] in 1927 and independently, but less systematically by Lev Landau in 1927 and Felix Bloch in 1946. In general, the state of a subsystem is described by the density operator and an observable by the scalar product . There is no way to know if the combined system is pure from the knowledge of the observables of the subsystem. In particular if the combined system has quantum entanglement, the system state is not a pure state.

Open quantum system dynamics[edit]

The theory of open quantum systems seeks an economical treatment of the dynamics of observables that can be associated with the system. Typical observables are energy and quantum coherence. Loss of energy to the environment is termed quantum dissipation. Loss of coherence is termed quantum decoherence. The environment we wish to model as part of our open quantum system is typically very large, making exact solutions impossible to calculate. The reduction problem is difficult therefore a diversity of approaches have been pursued. A common objective is to derive a reduced description where the system's dynamics is considered explicitly and the bath is described implicitly.

The main assumption is that the entire world is a large closed system, and therefore, time evolution is governed by a unitary transformation generated by a global Hamiltonian. For the combined system bath scenario the global Hamiltonian can be decomposed into:

where is the system's Hamiltonian, is the bath Hamiltonian and is the system-bath interaction. The state of the system is obtained from a partial trace over the combined system and bath: .[2]

When the interaction between the system and the environment is weak a time dependent perturbation theory seems appropriate. The typical assumption is that the system and bath are initially uncorrelated . The idea has been originated by Felix Bloch and followed by Redfield known as the Redfield equation. Redfield equation is a Markovian master equation that describes the time evolution of the density matrix . The drawback of the Redfield equation is that it does not conserve the positivity of the density operator.

An alternative derivation employing projection operator techniques is known as the Nakajima–Zwanzig equation. The derivation highlight the problem that the reduced dynamics is non-local in time:

The effect of the bath is hidden in the memory kernel . Additional assumptions of a fast bath are required to lead to a time local equation: .

Another approach emerges as an analogue of classical dissipation theory developed by Ryogo Kubo and Y. Tanimura. This approach is connected to Hierarchical equations of motion which embed the density operator in a larger space of auxiliary operators such that a time local equation is obtained for the whole set and their memory is contained in the auxiliary operators.

A formal construction of a local equation of motion with a Markovian property is an alternative to a reduced derivation. The theory is based on an axiomatic approach. The basic starting point is a completely positive map. The assumption is that the initial system-environment state is uncorrelated and the combined dynamics is generated by a unitary operator. Such a map falls under the category of Kraus operator. The most general type of and time-homogeneous master equation with Markovian property describing non-unitary evolution of the density matrix ρ that is trace-preserving and completely positive for any initial condition is the Gorini–Kossakowski–Sudarshan–Lindblad equation or GKSL equation:

is a (Hermitian) Hamiltonian part and :

is the dissipative part describing implicitly through system operators the influence of the bath on the system. The Markov property imposes that the system and bath are uncorrelated at all times . The GKSL equation is unidirectional and leads any initial state to a steady state solution which is an invariant of the equation of motion . The family of maps generated by the GKSL equation forms a Quantum dynamical semigroup. In some fields such as quantum optics the term Lindblad superoperator is often used to express the quantum master equation for a dissipative system. E.B. Davis, derived the GKSL with Markovian property master equations using perturbation theory and additional approximations such as the rotating wave or secular thus fixing the flaws of the Redfield equation. Davis construction is consistent with the Kubo-Martin-Schwinger stability criterion for thermal equilibrium i.e. the KMS state[3] . An alternative approach to fix the Redfield has been proposed by J. Thingna, J.-S. Wang, and P. Hänggi[4] that allows for system-bath interaction to play a role in equilibrium differing from the KMS state.

In 1981, Amir Caldeira and Anthony J. Leggett proposed a simplifying assumption in which the bath is decomposed to normal modes represented as harmonic oscillators linearly coupled to the system.[5] As a result, the influence of the bath can be summarized by the bath spectral function. This method is known as the Caldeira–Leggett or harmonic bath model. To proceed and obtain explicit solutions, typically the path integral formulation description of quantum mechanics is employed.

The harmonic normal-mode bath leads to a physically consistent picture of quantum dissipation. Nevertheless, its ergodic properties are too weak. The dynamics does not generate wide scale quantum entanglement between the bath modes.

An alternative bath model is a spin bath. At low temperature and weak system-bath coupling these two bath models are equivalent. But for higher excitation the spin bath has strong ergodic properties. Once the system is coupled significant entanglement is generated between all modes. A spin bath can simulate a harmonic bath but the opposite is not true.

A natural system coupled to a spin bath is an N-V center in diamond. The color center is the system and the bath consists of 13C impurities which interact with the system via magnetic dipole-dipole interaction.

See also[edit]


  1. ^ von Neumann, John (1927), "Wahrscheinlichkeitstheoretischer Aufbau der Quantenmechanik", Göttinger Nachrichten, 1: 245–272
  2. ^ Kosloff, Ronnie (2013). "Quantum Thermodynamics: A Dynamical Viewpoint". Entropy. 15 (6): 2100–2128. arXiv:1305.2268. Bibcode:2013Entrp..15.2100K. doi:10.3390/e15062100. ISSN 1099-4300. CC-BY icon.svg This article contains quotations from this source, which is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.
  3. ^ Breuer, Heinz-Peter; F. Petruccione (2007). The Theory of Open Quantum Systems. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-921390-9.
  4. ^ Thingna, Juzar; Wang, Jian-Sheng; Hänggi, Peter (2012-05-21). "Generalized Gibbs state with modified Redfield solution: Exact agreement up to second order". The Journal of Chemical Physics. 136 (19): 194110. arXiv:1203.6207. Bibcode:2012JChPh.136s4110T. doi:10.1063/1.4718706. ISSN 0021-9606.
  5. ^ A. Caldeira and A. J. Leggett, Influence of dissipation on quantum tunneling in macroscopic systems, Physical Review Letters, vol. 46, p. 211, 1981.