The Or Commission (Hebrew: ועדת אור; full name: ועדת החקירה הממלכתית לבירור ההתנגשויות בין כוחות הביטחון לבין אזרחים ישראלים באוקטובר 2000, lit. "Commission of Inquiry into the Clashes Between Security Forces and Israeli Citizens in October 2000", was a panel of inquiry appointed by the Israeli government to investigate the events of October 2000 at the beginning of the Second Intifada in which 12 Arab citizens of Israel and one Palestinian were killed by Israeli police amid several demonstrations. One Israeli Jew was killed by a stone dropped from a bridge onto her vehicle near one such demonstration; however, it is not clear that the incident was linked. The commission released its findings on "the clashes between security forces and Israeli civilians" on September 2, 2003. The chief investigator was Theodor Or, an Israeli Supreme Court Justice.
Main conclusions of the Or Commission
The governmental body of inquiry criticised the Israeli police for being unprepared for the riots and using excessive force to disperse the protesting and rioting citizens. Eight policemen were reprimanded by the commission, most of them after they had retired from the police force. Two police officers were released from the force due to the conclusions.
As the Commission's mandate was one of inquiry, no action was taken against most of those warned by it, but rather recommendations were made. Most Jewish politicians were determined to be largely not responsible, with the exception being the Internal Security Ministry, Prof. Shlomo Ben-Ami. The commission recommended that he be removed from his post, and he would later become foreign minister. Also, three Arab figures (two Arab members Knesset and the head of the northern branch of the Islamic movement in Israel) were found to be partially responsible by incitement that preceded the riots.
Background to the demonstrations
The Or Commission found that Arab citizens suffer discrimination in Israel and leveled criticism at the government for failing to give fair and equal attention to the needs of Arab citizens of Israel. The commission found that frustration with discrimination led to the outpourings of frustration in October 2000.
The commission's report was highly controversial on all sides, both gravely disappointing the families of the victims and angering those who blamed Arab citizens for the unrest of October 2000.
Arab advocacy organizations such as Adalah, the Arab Association for Human Rights, and Mossawa argued that the report exonerated Jewish Israeli political figures who played a central role in mishandling the crisis around October 2000, and gave slap-on-the-wrist treatment to those who fired the shots, while severely censuring Arab political figures for incendiary speech. Some commentators believed this amounted to virtual circumvention of due process for Arab citizens.
At the same time, the Or Commission's statements were perhaps the first public official acknowledgment of discrimination faced by the Arab citizenry of Israel; Adalah and Mossawa commended the Or Commission for this admission. One year after the release of the commission report, Theodore Or publicly attacked the government for failing to implement its recommendations.
Yet even acknowledging that Israeli democracy is flawed, its political system is still vastly superior to those of its adversaries. Israeli Arabs enjoy more political and civil liberties than citizens of just about any Arab country; and the only Arab lands that come anywhere close to being democracies are Lebanon, Iraq and the disputed Palestinian territories—the last two only because of American intervention. That the Israeli government criticizes its own treatment of Arabs is a testament to its democracy; can anyone imagine, say, the Saudi regime offering similar criticisms of its treatment of Shiites, non-Muslims or women? American democracy, too, is not without its flaws. During World War II, for instance, black Americans were still disfranchised, and innocent Japanese-Americans were rounded up and put in camps. It does not follow that America was no better than Nazi Germany.
- שער שלישי : אירועים מיוחדים - 1.10.00, 2.10.00 : פרק א' - פרדיס - 1.10.00 [Third Gate: Special Events: 1 October 2000 to 2 October 2000: Section A - Faradies 1 October 2000] (in Hebrew). State of Israel Judicial Authority.
- "Or Commission Timeline". Haaretz. 31 August 2003. Retrieved 10 January 2014.
- Or, Theodor on the website of the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law 
- "Official summary of the Or Commission report". Haaretz. Archived from the original on October 1, 2007. Retrieved 2007-10-05.
- Adalah reports on the Or Commission findings Archived May 16, 2008, at the Wayback Machine.
- Yoav Stern (13 October 2006). "Adalah: Police failed to seek indictments in Oct. 2000 riots". Haaretz. Retrieved 10 January 2014.
- Yair Ettinger (2 September 2004). "Or slams apathy over Arab riots report". Haaretz. Retrieved 12 January 2014.
- James Taranto (20 March 2006). "(unknown title)". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 10 January 2014.
- "In-depth: The Or Commission of Inquiry". Haaretz in-depth report. Aug 31, 2003.
- Official summary of the Or Commission report
- "The Official Summation of the Or Commission Report". jewishvirtuallibrary.org. haaretz.com. September 2, 2003. Retrieved 18 April 2015.
- Full Or Report (Hebrew)
- James Bennet (1 September 2003). "Police Used Excessive Force on Israeli Arabs, Panel Says". The New York Times.
- "'Orr Panel' Finds Decades Israeli Discrimination". scoop.co.nz. 2003-09-04. Retrieved 2011-04-29.