From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Temporal range: Chengjiang–Burgess Shale
Orthrozanclus elongata reconstruction.jpg
Reconstruction of O. elongata by Zhao et al. (2017)[1]
Orthrozanclus elongata fossil.png
Specimen of O. elongata, from Zhao et al. (2017)[2]
Scientific classification e
Kingdom: Animalia
Superphylum: Lophotrochozoa
Phylum: incertae sedis
Family: Halkieriidae
Genus: Orthrozanclus
Conway Morris & Caron, 2007
  • O. reburrus Conway Morris & Caron, 2007
  • O. elongata Zhao & Smith, 2017[1]

Orthrozanclus reburrus ("Dawn scythe with bristling hair") is a sea creature known from the Middle Cambrian (~505 million years ago) Burgess shale, about one centimeter long, with long spikes protruding from its armored body

The describers of this fossil animal, Simon Conway Morris and Jean-Bernard Caron, say Orthrozanclus may have formed a link between the halkieriid and the wiwaxiid families,[3] uniting them tentatively in a group called "Halwaxiida", characterized by a similar type of body armor; these organisms might have been stem group molluscs, or fall as a stem group to the larger lophotrochozoan clade (containing molluscs, annelids and brachiopods). However, the status of the Halwaxiid grouping is not universally accepted.[4]

History of discovery[edit]

J.B. Caron and D.A. Jackson found a specimen in the Burgess Shale and in 2006 referred to it as "scleritomorph C" without a detailed description.[5] In 2007 Caron and Simon Conway Morris published a description and named the fossil Orthrozanclus reburrus, which means "Dawn scythe with bristling hair".[3]

The two known specimens of O. elongata were discovered in 2015 and 2016 and formally described the following year.[1]


Orthrozanclus reburrus was 6–10.3 millimetres (0.24–0.41 in) long including its long spines, and had a fairly slim, roughly oval body that tapered towards the rear, was distinctly convex on top but was surrounded by a flatter rim. The underside was soft and unarmored, but the upward-facing surfaces were armored by: a small shell, near the front end; three zones of armor plates called "sclerites", which fitted close to the body and one of which ran all the way round the animal; 16 to 20 long, upwards-curving spines on each side of the body. The sclerites and spines were unmineralized, and had internal cavities that appear to have been circular in cross-section. The shell was convex and shaped like a triangle with rounded corners. It had a bulge at the front, a raised rear edge and a ridge along the middle that flared out towards the rear. It also had finely spaced rings that indicate growth by addition of material round the edges, and coarser ridges which may indicate that the animal was metameric, in other words built out of repeated "modules". The function of the shell at the front is unknown.[3]

The animal clearly lived on the sea-floor, and is thought to have had a muscular foot rather like that of a snail.[3]


A reconstruction of Wiwaxia

Orthrozanclus′ sclerites are very similar to those of its Burgess Shale contemporary Wiwaxia. Its shell is very similar to: one of the two Burgess Shale shell types labelled Oikozetetes; the forward shell of Halkieriids, most of which are dated to the Early Cambrian; and those of other Early Cambrian fossils such as Ocruranus and Eohalobia. These similarities suggest that Orthrozanclus was an intermediate form between Wiwaxia and the Halkieriids and that all three of these taxa formed a monophyletic clade, in other words a group that consists of a common ancestor and all of its descendants. However this draws Orthrozanclus into a complex debate that has gone on since 1990 about whether Wiwaxia is more closely related to molluscs or to polychaete worms, and therefore about the entire "family tree" of the Lophotrochozoa, a "super-phylum" that is thought to contain modern molluscs, annelids and brachiopods as well as some extinct groups.[3] The main opponent of this view, Nicholas Butterfield, proposes that Wiwaxia is more closely related to annelids while Halkieriids are very close to molluscs.[4][6][7]

Cladograms: Conway Morris and Caron (2007) — Hypothesis 1 (left) and 2 (right).
The authors regard Hypothesis 1 as better supported by the evidence, but not robust.[3]
Butterfield's alternative.[4]

Zhao et al. (2017) propose an alternative - that halkieriids (including orthrozanclus and halkieria) are unrelated to Wiwaxia, but are instead related to the camenellan tommotiids and thus belong in the brachiopod stem lineage.[1]


  1. ^ a b c d Zhao, Fangchen; Smith, Martin R; Yin, Zongjun; Zeng, Han; Li, Guoxiang; Zhu, Maoyan (2017). "Orthrozanclus elongata n. sp. And the significance of sclerite-covered taxa for early trochozoan evolution". Scientific Reports. 7. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-16304-6. 
  2. ^ Fangchen, Zhao; Smith, Martin; Zongjun, Yin; Han, Zang; Maoyan, Zhu (2017), "High resolution images of Orthrozanclus elongata", figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3841387.v1 
  3. ^ a b c d e f Conway Morris, S. & Caron, J-B. (2 March 2007). "Halwaxiids and the Early Evolution of the Lophotrochozoans". Science. 315 (5816): 1255–1258. Bibcode:2007Sci...315.1255M. doi:10.1126/science.1137187. PMID 17332408. Retrieved 2008-08-04. 
  4. ^ a b c N.J., Butterfield (2007-12-18). "Lophotrochozoan roots and stems". In Budd, G.E.; Streng, M.; Daley, A.C.; Willman, S. Programme with Abstracts. Palaeontological Association Annual Meeting. Uppsala, Sweden. pp. 26–7. 
  5. ^ Caron, J.-B. & Jackson, D.A. (2006). "Taphonomy of the Greater Phyllopod Bed Community, Burgess Shale". Palaios. 21 (5): 451–465. Bibcode:2006Palai..21..451C. doi:10.2110/palo.2003.P05-070R. Retrieved 2008-08-04. 
  6. ^ Butterfield, N.J. (2006). "Hooking some stem-group worms: fossil lophotrochozoans in the Burgess Shale". BioEssays. 28 (12): 1161–6. doi:10.1002/bies.20507. PMID 17120226. Retrieved 2008-08-06. 
  7. ^ Butterfield, N.J. (May 2008). "An Early Cambrian Radula". Journal of Paleontology. 82 (3): 543–554. doi:10.1666/07-066.1. Retrieved 2008-08-20. 

External links[edit]

See also[edit]