Otoacoustic emission

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

An otoacoustic emission (OAE) is a sound which is generated from within the inner ear. Having been predicted by Thomas Gold in 1948, its existence was first demonstrated experimentally by David Kemp in 1978[1] and otoacoustic emissions have since been shown to arise through a number of different cellular and mechanical causes within the inner ear.[2][3] Studies have shown that OAEs disappear after the inner ear has been damaged, so OAEs are often used in the laboratory and the clinic as a measure of inner ear health.

Broadly speaking, there are two types of otoacoustic emissions: spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs), which can occur without external stimulation, and evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAEs), which require an evoking stimulus.

Mechanism of occurrence[edit]

OAEs are considered to be related to the amplification function of the cochlea. In the absence of external stimulation, the activity of the cochlear amplifier increases, leading to the production of sound. Several lines of evidence suggest that, in mammals, outer hair cells are the elements that enhance cochlear sensitivity and frequency selectivity and hence act as the energy sources for amplification. One theory is that they act to increase the discriminability of signal variations in continuous noise by lowering the masking effect of its cochlear amplification.[4]

Types of OAEs[edit]

Spontaneous OAEs[edit]

Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE)s are sounds that are emitted from the ear without external stimulation and are measurable with sensitive microphones in the external ear canal. At least one SOAE can be detected in app. 35-50% of the population. The sounds are frequency-stable between 500 Hz and 4500 Hz to have unstable volumes between -30 dB SPL and +10 dB SPL. The majority of the people are unaware of their SOAEs; portions of 1-9% however perceive a SOAE as an annoying tinnitus.[5]

Evoked OAEs[edit]

Evoked otoacoustic emissions are currently evoked using three different methodologies. Stimulus Frequency OAEs (SFOAEs) are measured during the application of a pure-tone stimulus, and are detected by the vectorial difference between the stimulus waveform and the recorded waveform (which consists of the sum of the stimulus and the OAE). Transient-evoked OAEs (TEOAEs or TrOAEs) are evoked using a click (broad frequency range) or toneburst (brief duration pure tone) stimulus. The evoked response from a click covers the frequency range up to around 4 kHz, while a toneburst will elicit a response from the region that has the same frequency as the pure tone. Distortion product OAEs (DPOAEs) are evoked using a pair of primary tones f_1 and f_2 with particular intensity (usually either 65 - 55 dBSPL or 65 for both) and ratio (f_1\mbox{ }:\mbox{ }f_2). The evoked responses from these stimuli occur at frequencies (f_{dp}) mathematically related to the primary frequencies, with the two most prominent being f_{dp}=2f_1-f_2 (the "cubic" distortion tone, most commonly used for hearing screening) and f_{dp}=f_2-f_1 (the "quadratic" distortion tone, or simple difference tone).[6][7]

Clinical importance[edit]

Otoacoustic emissions are clinically important because they are the basis of a simple, non-invasive test for hearing defects in newborn babies and in children who are too young to cooperate in conventional hearing tests. Many western countries now have national programmes for the universal hearing screening of newborn babies. Periodic early childhood hearing screenings program are also utilizing OAE technology. One excellent example has been demonstrated by the Early Childhood Hearing Outreach initiative at the National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management (NCHAM), Utah State University which has helped hundreds of Early Head Start programs across the United States implement OAE screening and follow-up practices in those early childhood educational settings.[8][9][10] The primary screening tool is a test for the presence of a click-evoked OAE. Otoacoustic emissions also assist in differential diagnosis of cochlear and higher level hearing losses (e.g., auditory neuropathy).

Biometric importance[edit]

In 2009, Stephen Beeby of The University of Southampton led research into utilizing otoacoustic emissions for biometric identification. Devices equipped with a microphone could detect these subsonic emissions and potentially identify an individual, thereby providing access to the device, without the need of a traditional password.[11] It is speculated, however, that colds, medication, trimming one's ear hair, or recording and playing back a signal to the microphone could subvert the identification process.[12]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Kemp, D. T. (1 January 1978). "Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system". The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 64 (5): 1386. Bibcode:1978ASAJ...64.1386K. doi:10.1121/1.382104. 
  2. ^ Kujawa, SG; Fallon, M; Skellett, RA; Bobbin, RP (August 1996). "Time-varying alterations in the f2-f1 DPOAE response to continuous primary stimulation. II. Influence of local calcium-dependent mechanisms.". Hearing research 97 (1-2): 153–64. doi:10.1016/s0378-5955(96)80016-5. PMID 8844195. 
  3. ^ Chang, Kay W.; Norton, Susan (1 September 1997). "Efferently mediated changes in the quadratic distortion product (f2−f1)". The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102 (3): 1719. Bibcode:1997ASAJ..102.1719C. doi:10.1121/1.420082. 
  4. ^ Lilaonitkul, W; Guinan JJ, Jr (March 2009). "Reflex control of the human inner ear: a half-octave offset in medial efferent feedback that is consistent with an efferent role in the control of masking.". Journal of neurophysiology 101 (3): 1394–406. doi:10.1152/jn.90925.2008. PMC 2666406. PMID 19118109. 
  5. ^ M. J. Penner: An estimate of the prevalence of tinnitus caused by spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. In: Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Band 116, Nummer 4, April 1990, S. 418-423.
  6. ^ Kujawa, SG; Fallon, M; Bobbin, RP (May 1995). "Time-varying alterations in the f2-f1 DPOAE response to continuous primary stimulation. I: Response characterization and contribution of the olivocochlear efferents.". Hearing research 85 (1-2): 142–54. doi:10.1016/0378-5955(95)00041-2. PMID 7559170. 
  7. ^ Bian, L; Chen, S (December 2008). "Comparing the optimal signal conditions for recording cubic and quadratic distortion product otoacoustic emissions.". The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 124 (6): 3739–50. Bibcode:2008ASAJ..124.3739B. doi:10.1121/1.3001706. PMID 19206801. 
  8. ^ Eiserman, W., & Shisler, L. (2010). Identifying Hearing Loss in Young Children: Technology Replaces the Bell. Zero to Three Journal, 30, No.5, 24-28.
  9. ^ Eiserman, W., Hartel, D., Shisler, L., Buhrmann, J., White, K., & Foust, T. (2008). Using otoacoustic emissions to screen for hearing loss in early childhood care settings. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. , 72, pp 475-482.
  10. ^ Eiserman, W., Shisler, L., & Foust, T. (2008). Hearing screening in Early Childcare Settings. The ASHA Leader. November 4, 2008.
  11. ^ Telegraph.co.uk, April 25, 2009, "Ear noise can be used as identification"
  12. ^ IEEE Spectrum Online, April 29, 2009, "Your Ear Noise as Computer Password"

Further reading[edit]

  • M.S. Robinette and T.J. Glattke (eds., 2007). Otoacoustic Emissions: Clinical Applications, third edition (Thieme).
  • G.A. Manley, R.R. Fay, and A.N. Popper (eds., 2008). Active Processes and Otoacoustic Emissions (Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, vol. 30).
  • S. Dhar and J.W. Hall, III (2011). Otoacoustic Emissions: Principles, Procedures, and Protocols (Plural Publishing).