Jump to content

Outline of science

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following outline is provided as a topical overview of science:

Science is a systematic discipline that builds and organises knowledge in the form of testable hypotheses and predictions about the universe. Modern science is typically divided into two – or three – major branches: the natural sciences, which study the physical world, and the social sciences, which study individuals and societies. While referred to as the formal sciences, the study of logic, mathematics, and theoretical computer science are typically regarded as separate because they rely on deductive reasoning instead of the scientific method as their main methodology. Meanwhile, applied sciences are disciplines that use scientific knowledge for practical purposes, such as engineering and medicine.

Study and experimentation

[edit]

Experimentation is the use of controlled conditions to test an idea. A single independent variable is altered while all other conditions are kept the same to test the alteration's effect on a dependent variable.[1]

Scientific knowledge

[edit]
  • Anomalies are abnormal or deviating phenomena that are inconsistent with previous data or cannot be precisely classified or explained.[17]
  • Classification is the use of categories to organize and describe individual subjects. This can be done descriptively to explain existing differences or prescriptively to create groups in a way that is useful.[18]
  • Consilience is the process in which distinct findings can produce novel conclusions when considered together.[19]
  • Data are sets of facts or information.[20]
  • Deductive reasoning is reasoning conducted purely through logic.[21]
  • Discoveries are the finding or explanation of new information.[22]
  • Inductive reasoning is the use of varied observations to make an inference.[4]
  • Explanation is the understanding of why a phenomenon occurs.[23]
  • Hypotheses are proposals of scientific fact that have yet to be definitively verified.[24]
  • Objectivity is the answering of scientific questions impartially without affecting the results with biases.[2]
  • Reliability is the consistency in data as it is collected to demonstrate reproducibility.[26]
  • Scientific laws are descriptions of scientific fact that apply universally under all circumstances.[24]
  • Scientific theories are descriptions of scientific fact that are known to be true but cannot be proven to apply universally.[24]
  • Validity is the accurate correspondence and relevance of data to the real-world phenomena it is meant to measure.[27] Valid data is derived from objective observation or experimentation.[28]
  • Verisimilitude is the degree to which a claim approaches the truth. The verisimilitude between two false ideas can be compared to determine which is less flawed.[29]

Branches of science

[edit]

Science is divided into disciplines that explore different subject matter. Each discipline has its own considerations when being studied, and different methods are used between them. Scientists typically specialize in one discipline.[30] Interdisciplinary sciences pull from multiple fields of study.[31]

History

[edit]

Timeline

[edit]

Historical disciplines

[edit]
  • Alchemy is the historical study of what is now associated with chemistry.[59] It was accepted as a science until the end of the 17th century.[59][60]
  • Astrology is a method used in ancient and medieval times to study the social sciences through physical phenomena.[61]
  • Cosmogony is the study of Earth's origins through divine creation.[62]
  • Natural history is the historical name for study of subjects that are now associated with biology.[54]
  • Natural philosophy is the historical name for study of subjects that are now associated with physics and astronomy.[54]

Philosophy of science

[edit]

Philosophy of science encompasses the questions, assumptions, foundations, methods and implications of science.[citation needed]

  • Anti-realism is the opposition to scientific realism. Anti-realists believe that scientific theories cannot be objectively true or that they do not correlate to objectively real phenomena.[63]
  • Antiscience is a criticism and rejection of modern science and the scientific community.[64]
  • Denialism is the rejection of scientific facts that conflict with one's previous beliefs.[65]
  • Empiricism is the belief that truth is obtained from sense experience.[66] Empiricists believe that science is a systematic and detailed application of common everyday thought and inquiry.[67]
  • Evidentialism is the belief that a claim should only be accepted if there is evidence supporting it.[72]
  • Fallibilism is the belief that no claim can ever be known with absolute certainty. The term was defined by Charles Sanders Peirce.[73]
  • Holism is the belief that individual scientific claims cannot be understood without also considering related claims, as it is only a network of claims that allows scientific prediction.[74] This argument, the Duhem–Quine thesis, was developed by Willard Van Orman Quine as a response to logical positivism by adapting the philosophy of Pierre Duhem.[75]
  • Instrumentalism is the belief that science should be used as a guide predict phenomena without presenting it as a means of finding truth.[76]
  • Normal science is a system defined by Thomas Kuhn which described science in a given field as beginning with a paradigm shift that emerges from a new theory.[77]
  • Pragmatism is the belief that claims should be accepted based on value rather than evidence.[72]
  • Realism is the belief that true scientific theories can describe existing phenomena instead of merely hypothetical phenomena.[78][79]
  • Reductionism is the understanding of phenomena through fundamental causes and explanations.[80]
  • Relativism is the belief that knowledge cannot be understood objectively, but in relation to other forms of knowledge.[81]
  • Reliabilism is the belief that a fact is considered knowledge when it is derived from reliable methods.[29]
  • Science studies is the blending of perspectives and theories on scientific study to create a holistic understanding of science.[36]
  • Scientism is the belief that science should go beyond mere explanation and become the guiding force in society.[82][83]
  • Skepticism is the belief that unproven or widely-accepted beliefs should be questioned.[84]

Scientific community

[edit]

The scientific community encompasses scientists, their interactions, and their influences on one another.[85]

Science in society

[edit]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Browne, Porter & Bynum 1981, p. 136.
  2. ^ a b Godfrey-Smith 2003, p. 6.
  3. ^ Daintith & Martin 2010, p. 287.
  4. ^ a b c Erickson 2005, p. 56.
  5. ^ Bird 2005, p. 291.
  6. ^ Godfrey-Smith 2003, p. 58.
  7. ^ Morris 1992, pp. 989, 2026.
  8. ^ Erickson 2005, p. 29.
  9. ^ Morris 1992, p. 1335.
  10. ^ Gilbert 2001, p. 127.
  11. ^ Morris 1992, p. 1496.
  12. ^ Armstrong & Green 2022, pp. 19–20.
  13. ^ Armstrong & Green 2022, p. 34.
  14. ^ Armstrong & Green 2022, p. 35.
  15. ^ Bird 2005, p. 61.
  16. ^ Godfrey-Smith 2003, pp. 6–7.
  17. ^ Morris 1992, p. 121.
  18. ^ Browne, Porter & Bynum 1981, pp. 68–69.
  19. ^ Browne, Porter & Bynum 1981, p. 75.
  20. ^ Morris 1992, p. 586.
  21. ^ Agassi 1981, p. 313.
  22. ^ Webster 1991, pp. 23–24.
  23. ^ Bird 2005, pp. 61–62.
  24. ^ a b c Daintith & Martin 2010, p. 466.
  25. ^ Armstrong & Green 2022, p. 47.
  26. ^ Armstrong & Green 2022, p. 16.
  27. ^ Armstrong & Green 2022, p. 15.
  28. ^ Armstrong & Green 2022, p. 118.
  29. ^ a b Bird 2005, p. 293.
  30. ^ Heilbron 2003, p. 213.
  31. ^ Heilbron 2003, p. 214.
  32. ^ Morris 1992, p. 140.
  33. ^ Collocott 1971, p. 409.
  34. ^ Browne, Porter & Bynum 1981, p. 257.
  35. ^ Collocott 1971, p. 1164.
  36. ^ a b Godfrey-Smith 2003, p. 144.
  37. ^ Browne, Porter & Bynum 1981, p. 19.
  38. ^ Browne, Porter & Bynum 1981, p. 346.
  39. ^ Browne, Porter & Bynum 1981, p. 389.
  40. ^ Hagstrom 1965, p. 4.
  41. ^ Morris 1992, p. 1266.
  42. ^ Browne, Porter & Bynum 1981, p. 249.
  43. ^ Browne, Porter & Bynum 1981, p. 400.
  44. ^ Morris 1992, p. 1444.
  45. ^ Browne, Porter & Bynum 1981, p. 31.
  46. ^ Browne, Porter & Bynum 1981, p. 43.
  47. ^ Browne, Porter & Bynum 1981, p. 64.
  48. ^ Browne, Porter & Bynum 1981, p. 326.
  49. ^ Godfrey-Smith 2003, p. 14.
  50. ^ Godfrey-Smith 2003, pp. 4, 13–14.
  51. ^ a b Godfrey-Smith 2003, p. 16.
  52. ^ Godfrey-Smith 2003, p. 17.
  53. ^ Browne, Porter & Bynum 1981, p. 80.
  54. ^ a b c Godfrey-Smith 2003, p. 4.
  55. ^ Bird 2005, p. 273.
  56. ^ Erickson 2005, p. 153.
  57. ^ Godfrey-Smith 2003, p. 37.
  58. ^ Godfrey-Smith 2003, p. 2.
  59. ^ a b Godfrey-Smith 2003, p. 226.
  60. ^ Heilbron 2003, p. 20.
  61. ^ Browne, Porter & Bynum 1981, p. 30.
  62. ^ Browne, Porter & Bynum 1981, p. 84.
  63. ^ Bird 2005, pp. 124–125.
  64. ^ a b Wilkins 2013, p. 402.
  65. ^ Prothero 2013, pp. 343–344.
  66. ^ Browne, Porter & Bynum 1981, p. 121.
  67. ^ Godfrey-Smith 2003, pp. 8–9.
  68. ^ Bird 2005, p. 125.
  69. ^ Godfrey-Smith 2003, p. 22.
  70. ^ Godfrey-Smith 2003, p. 30.
  71. ^ Godfrey-Smith 2003, p. 27.
  72. ^ a b Shackel 2013, p. 421.
  73. ^ Godfrey-Smith 2003, p. 59.
  74. ^ Godfrey-Smith 2003, p. 31.
  75. ^ Godfrey-Smith 2003, p. 32.
  76. ^ Godfrey-Smith 2003, p. 15.
  77. ^ Godfrey-Smith 2003, pp. 79–80.
  78. ^ Bird 2005, p. 124.
  79. ^ Godfrey-Smith 2003, pp. 173–174.
  80. ^ Erickson 2005, p. 155.
  81. ^ Erickson 2005, p. 64.
  82. ^ Nickles 2013, p. 103.
  83. ^ Browne, Porter & Bynum 1981, p. 381.
  84. ^ Armstrong & Green 2022, p. 95.
  85. ^ Hagstrom 1965, p. 1.
  86. ^ Morris 1992, p. 502.
  87. ^ Browne, Porter & Bynum 1981, p. 94.
  88. ^ Godfrey-Smith 2003, pp. 2–3.
  89. ^ Armstrong & Green 2022, p. 74.
  90. ^ Nickles 2013, p. 102.
  91. ^ Armstrong & Green 2022, p. 20.
  92. ^ a b Erickson 2005, p. 73.
  93. ^ Erickson 2005, p. 44.
  94. ^ Armstrong & Green 2022, pp. 83–84.
  95. ^ Hagstrom 1965, p. 275.
  96. ^ Agassi 1981, p. 123.
  97. ^ Armstrong & Green 2022, pp. 40–41.
  98. ^ Armstrong & Green 2022, pp. 41–42.
  99. ^ a b Armstrong & Green 2022, p. 41.
  100. ^ Armstrong & Green 2022, pp. 121–122.
  101. ^ Armstrong & Green 2022, p. 149.
  102. ^ Armstrong & Green 2022, p. 6.
  103. ^ Armstrong & Green 2022, p. 128.
  104. ^ Hagstrom 1965, pp. 14–15, 70.
  105. ^ a b Erickson 2005, p. 32.
  106. ^ Morris 1992, p. 1926.
  107. ^ Godfrey-Smith 2003, pp. 122–124.
  108. ^ Godfrey-Smith 2003, p. 137.
  109. ^ Webster 1991, p. 60.
  110. ^ Webster 1991, pp. 2, 41.
  111. ^ Webster 1991, pp. 129–130.
  112. ^ Webster 1991, p. 30.
  113. ^ Erickson 2005, p. 147.
  114. ^ Erickson 2005, p. 150.
  115. ^ Erickson 2005, pp. 168–174.
  116. ^ Spinks 2001, pp. 151–152.
  117. ^ Webster 1991, pp. 34–37.
  118. ^ Aikenhead 2001, p. 31.

References

[edit]
[edit]
  • Media related to Science at Wikimedia Commons
  • Quotations related to Science at Wikiquote
  • Works related to Science at Wikisource