Martin P6M SeaMaster
|A P6M-2 SeaMaster on the water at speed.|
|Role||Patrol flying boat|
|Manufacturer||Glenn L. Martin Company|
|First flight||14 July 1955|
|Primary user||United States Navy|
The Martin P6M SeaMaster, built by the Glenn L. Martin Company, was a 1950s strategic bomber flying boat for the United States Navy that almost entered service; production aircraft were built and Navy crews were undergoing operational conversion, with a service entry about six months off, when the program was cancelled on 21 August 1959. Envisioned as a way to give the Navy a strategic nuclear force, the SeaMaster was eclipsed by the Polaris submarine-launched ballistic missile. Due to the political situation at the Pentagon, the Navy promoted the P6M primarily as a high speed minelayer.
Design and development
In the immediate postwar defense climate, the United States Air Force's Strategic Air Command was the linchpin of the United States' security as the sole means of delivery of the nation's nuclear arsenal. The Navy saw its strategic role being eclipsed by the Air Force and knew both its prestige and budgets were at stake. Its first attempt, the United States (a large "super carrier" to launch Navy strategic bombers from) having been a victim of budget cuts, the Navy chose instead to create a "Seaplane Striking Force" useful for both nuclear and conventional warfare, including reconnaissance and minelaying. Groups of these planes, supported by seaplane tenders or even special submarines, could be located closer to the enemy, and as mobile targets would be harder to neutralize.
The requirement, issued in April 1951, was for a seaplane able to carry 30,000 lb (14,000 kg) of "warload" with a range of 1,500 mi (1,300 nmi; 2,400 km) from its aquatic base. The aircraft had to be capable of a low altitude dash at Mach 0.9 (1,100 km/h), which required an extremely capable aircraft. Both Convair and Martin submitted proposals, and the Martin one was chosen as more promising. An order for two prototypes was issued, which was projected to lead to six pre-production aircraft and a projected twenty-four production planes.
Originally the plane was to have a Curtiss-Wright turbo-ramjet engine, but this ran into problems and a more conventional Allison J71-A-4 turbojet was employed, fitted in pairs in overwing pods to keep the spray out of the intakes. Wings swept at 40° were used; they displayed a notable anhedral and were designed with tip tanks that doubled as floats on the water. Many features of Martin's XB-51 bomber prototype were used, including an all-flying "T" tail and a rotating bomb bay—pneumatically sealed against seawater in the P6M.
The first flight of the XP6M-1 came on 14 July 1955, but early tests showed that the engines were mounted too close to the fuselage and scorched it when afterburners were used, leading to pointing the engines slightly outward in subsequent aircraft. Flight testing was initially successful, but, on 7 December 1955, a control system fault destroyed the first prototype with the loss of all aboard. The first prototype, BuNo 138821, c/n XP-1, disintegrated in flight at 5,000 feet (1,500 m) due to the horizontal tail going to full up in control malfunction, subjecting the airframe to 9 g stress as it began an outside loop, crashing into the Potomac River near the junction of St. Mary's River, killing four crew members: Navy pilot Lieutenant Commander Utgoff, and Martin employees, Morris Bernhard, assistant pilot, Herbert Scudder, flight engineer, and H.B. Coulon, flight test engineer.
Eleven months later, on 9 November 1956, the second prototype, BuNo 138822, c/n XP-2, first flown on 18 May 1956, was also destroyed, due to a change made in the horizontal stabilizer control system without adequate evaluation before test flying the design. The crash occurred at 15:36 near Odessa, Delaware due to a faulty elevator jack. As the seaplane nosed up at ~21,000 feet (6,400 m) and failed to respond to control inputs, the crew of four ejected, pilot Robert S. Turner, co-pilot William Cunningham, and two crew all parachuting to safety. The airframe broke up after falling to 6,000 feet (1,800 m) before impact.
The first pre-production YP6M-1 was completed about a year later, with testing resuming in January 1958.
Five more were built in 1958 when the Navy announced that Harvey Point Defense Testing Facility in Hertford, North Carolina, would serve as the testing grounds for the fleet of Martin P6M SeaMasters. These aircraft were fitted with test versions of the full combat equipment suite and were used for bombing, mine laying and reconnaissance evaluations. The P6M-1 test program was mostly successful; however, the J71 engines proved far less reliable than required. The P6M-1 had spray ingestion problems at high gross weight, which precluded takeoffs except under ideal conditions. The P6M-1 also had a serious control deficiency due to porpoising under some trim settings. These deficiencies resulted in the P6M-1 program being cut, as it was no longer considered possible for it to be a successful asset.
The Navy and Martin felt that a new version, the P6M-2 would provide a useful aircraft. The first was rolled out in early 1959. Changes included new, more powerful Pratt & Whitney J75 engines, an aerial refueling probe, improved avionics, and a canopy with better visibility. A buddy refueling drogue kit had also been developed to fit in the bomb bay. Three had been built by summer 1959 and Navy crews were moving them through operational conversion when the program was abruptly canceled in August of that year.
The P6M-2 was an impressive aircraft; its Mach 0.9 (1,100 km/h) performance "on the deck" could be equaled by few aircraft of the time, and few today. The planes were built incredibly tough, with the aircraft skin at the wing roots over 1 in (25 mm) thick. The men managing the test program were shocked when the docile and pleasant handling characteristics of the P6M-1 were replaced by some severe compressibility effects above Mach 0.8. These included rapid changes in directional trim, severe buffeting, and wing drop requiring high control inputs to counter. Until those problems were fixed, the P6M-2 could not be considered for use by the Fleet. The problems were caused by the larger engine nacelles required for the J75s. There were also problems on the water, including a tendency for the tip floats to dig in under certain situations, and engine surges. These problems were eventually solved, but time had run out for the SeaMaster just as the first crews were training for its operational debut. The major defense budget cuts of the Eisenhower administration were forcing the Navy to make choices. In August 1959 Martin was told to halt operations; the program was going to be canceled. Seaplanes were a small community in Naval Aviation, and the P6M, significantly over budget and behind schedule, was competing with aircraft carriers for funding. The Navy had an impending superior system for the nuclear strike role, the Fleet Ballistic Missile Submarine.
Although the technology of the P6M was phenomenal, in the age of the ICBM and SLBM, the manned bomber was considered an expensive, unreliable way to deliver nuclear weapons. The P6M program had already cost $400 million (about $2.5 billion in 2004 dollars[update]) and could not be justified without the strategic mission.
All of the aircraft were scrapped. Some tail sections were retained for testing, and one of these is now in the Glenn L. Martin Maryland Aviation Museum.
Martin tried unsuccessfully to market the technology in the civilian market, with a SeaMaster version called the SeaMistress but there were no takers, and the company soon abandoned the aircraft business entirely to focus on missiles and electronics. The P6M was the final aircraft constructed by the Glenn L. Martin Company.
- prototypes, two built (BuNos 138821, 138822). Both crashed.
- pre-production model, six built (BuNos 143822-143827). All six examples were scrapped when the program was cancelled.
- production model, eight built (BuNos 145876-145899). 145877-145879 were completed and flown, 145876 and 145880-145883 were completed but not flown. The contracts for 145884-145899 were cancelled.
- Crew: 4
- Length: 134 ft 4 in (40.94 m)
- Wingspan: 102 ft 7 in (31.26 m)
- Height: 33 ft 10 in (10.31 m)
- Wing area: 1,900 ft² (176.52 m²)
- Empty weight: 97,439 lb (44,198 kg)
- Loaded weight: 162,932 lb Combat / 184,280 lb T.O. (73,905 kg Combat / 83,588 kg T.O.)
- Useful load: 86,841 lb (39,390 kg)
- Max. takeoff weight: 190,000 lb Calm water / 160,000 lb Rough water (86,183 kg Calm water / 72,575 kg Rough water) **Allowable 6 ft to 9 ft (1.8 m to 2.7 m) swells**
- Powerplant: 4 × Pratt & Whitney J75-P-2 turbojets, 17,500 lbf (77.8 kN) each
- Maximum speed: (Sea Level) 596 kt (686 mph, 1,104 km/h) - (20,000 ft) 564 kt, (35,000 ft) 520 kt
- Cruise speed: 465 kts (535 mph, 861 km/h)
- Stall speed: 132.2 kt (Power off, flaps down, T.O. wt) (152 mph, 245 km/h)
- Range: 1,810 nm (Combat) (2,083 mi, 3,200 km)
- Combat radius: 750 nm (863 mi, 1389 km) (Carrying 30,000 lb / 13,608 kg payload)
- Service ceiling: 50,000 ft (15,240 m)
- Rate of climb: 7,380 ft/min (37.5 m/s) - Sea Level, T.O. wt, Military Power
- Wing loading: 100 lb/ft² (310 kg/m²)
- Thrust/weight: 0.368
- Mines: 28 x MK36 Mod 1 (1,001 lb/ea, 454 kg/ea) - 28,028 lb/Tot (12,713 kg)
- Mines: 15 x MK25 Mod 2 (2,030 lb/ea, 921 kg/ea) - 30,450 lb/Tot (13,812 kg)
- Mines: 36 x MK50 Mod 0 (504 lb/ea, 228 kg/ea) - 18,144 lb/Tot (8,230 kg)
- Mines: 15 x MK52 Mod 0,1,2,3,4,5,6 (1,348 lb/ea, 611 kg/ea) - 20,220 lb/Tot (9,172 kg)
- Mines: 8 x MK39 Mod 0 (2,025 lb/ea, 919 kg/ea) - 16,200 lb/Tot (7,348 kg)
- Mines: 15 x MK19 Mod 2 (540 lb/ea, 245 kg/ea) - 8,100 lb/Tot (3,674 kg)
- Mines: 5 x MK10 Mod 9 (1,960 lb/ea, 889 kg/ea) - 9,800 lb/Tot (4,445 kg)
- Reconnaissance: High Altitude Reconnaissance Camera 4,050 lb/Tot (1,837 kg)
- Reconnaissance: 27 x M120(T9E8) Photoflash (154 lb/ea, 70 kg/ea) 4,158 lb (1,886 kg)
- Bomb: 2 x MK91 (3,500 lb/ea, 1,588 kg/ea) - 7,000 lb/Tot (3,175 kg)
- Bomb: 1 x MK28 (1,800 lb/ea, 817 kg/ea) - 1,800 lb/Tot (817 kg)
- Aircraft of comparable role, configuration and era
- Related lists
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Martin P6M SeaMaster.|
- Piet & Raithel 2001, p. 148
- Greg Goebel. "The Martin SeaMaster & Convair Sea Dart".
- American Aviation 12 Sept 1955 p12: "Navy is planning to use more powerful engines than the four Allison J71s plus afterburners to make the production model of the Martin Seamaster supersonic. XP6M-1 with the J71s will attain Mach .95."
- Nicolaou 1986, pp. 25–26
- Nicolaou 1986, pp. 26–27
- Piet & Raithel 2001, p. 98
- Piet & Raithel 2001, p. 107
- Piet & Raithel 2001, p. 117
- "SeaMonsters of the Navy, by Mark Wolverton, Air & Space, Feb/Mar 2012, pp. 62-63