Pacific Scandal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The Pacific Scandal was a political scandal in Canada involving bribes being accepted by 150 members of the Conservative government in the attempts of private interests to influence the bidding for a national rail contract.[1] As part of British Columbia's 1871 agreement to join the Canadian Confederation, the government had agreed to build a transcontinental railway linking the Pacific Province to the eastern provinces.[2]

The scandal led to the resignation of Canada's first Prime Minister, John A. Macdonald, and a transfer of power from his Conservative government to a Liberal government led by Alexander Mackenzie.[3] One of the new government's first measures was to introduce secret ballots in an effort to improve the integrity of future elections. After the scandal broke, the railway plan collapsed and the proposed line was not built. An entirely different operation later built the Canadian Pacific Railway to the Pacific.


For a young and loosely defined nation, the building of a national railway was an active attempt at state-making,[4][page needed] as well as an aggressive capitalist venture. Canada, a nascent country with a population of 3.5 million in 1871, lacked the means to exercise meaningful de facto control within the de jure political boundaries of the recently acquired Rupert's Land; building a transcontinental railway was national policy of high order to change this situation.[5] Moreover, after the American Civil War the American frontier rapidly expanded west with land-hungry settlers, exacerbating talk of annexation. Indeed, sentiments of Manifest Destiny were abuzz in this time: in 1867, year of Confederation, U.S. Secretary of State W. H. Seward surmised that the whole North American continent "shall be, sooner or later, within the magic circle of the American Union".[6] Therefore, preventing American investment into the project was considered as being in Canada's national interest. Thus the federal government favoured an "all Canadian route" through the rugged Canadian Shield of northern Ontario, refusing to consider a less costly route passing south through Wisconsin and Minnesota.

However, a route across the Canadian Shield was highly unpopular with potential investors, not only in the United States but also in Canada and especially Great Britain, the only other viable source of financing. For would-be investors, the objections were not primarily based on politics or nationalism but economics. At the time, national governments lacked the finances needed to undertake such large projects. For the First Transcontinental Railroad, the United States government had made extensive grants of public land to the railway's builders, inducing private financiers to fund the railway on the understanding that they would acquire rich farmland along the route, which could then be sold for a large profit. However, the eastern terminus of the proposed Canadian Pacific route, unlike that of the First Transcontinental, was not in rich Nebraskan farmland, but deep within the Canadian Shield. Copying the American financing model whilst insisting on an all-Canadian route would require the railway's backers to build hundreds of miles of track across rugged shield terrain (with little economic value) at considerable expense before they could expect to access lucrative farmland in Manitoba and the newly created Northwest Territories, which at that time included Alberta and Saskatchewan. Many financiers, who had expected to make a relatively quick profit, were not willing to make this sort of long-term commitment.

Nevertheless, the Montreal capitalist Hugh Allan, with his syndicate Canada Pacific Railway Company, sought the potentially lucrative charter for the project. The problem lay in that Allan and Macdonald highly, and secretly, were in cahoots with American financiers such as George W. McMullen and Jay Cooke, men who were deeply interested in the rival American undertaking, the Northern Pacific Railroad.[5]


Political cartoon by John Wilson Bengough satirizing Prime Minister John A. Macdonald for the Pacific Scandal

Two groups competed for the contract to build the railway, Hugh Allan's Canada Pacific Railway Company and David Lewis Macpherson's Inter-Oceanic Railway Company. On April 2, 1873, Lucius Seth Huntington, a Liberal Member of Parliament, created an uproar in the House of Commons. He announced he had uncovered evidence that Allan and his associates had been granted the Canadian Pacific Railway contract in return for political donations of $360,000.[citation needed]

In 1873, it became known that Allan had contributed a large sum of money to the Conservative government's re-election campaign of 1872; some sources quote a sum over $360,000. Allan had promised to keep American capital out of the railway deal, but had lied to Macdonald over this vital point, and Macdonald later discovered the lie.[7][page needed] The Liberal party, at this time the opposition party in Parliament, accused the Conservatives of having made a tacit agreement to give the contract to Hugh Allan in exchange for money.[8]

In making such allegations, the Liberals and their allies in the press (in particular, George Brown's newspaper The Globe) presumed that most of the money had been used to bribe voters in the 1872 election. The secret ballot, then considered a novelty, had not yet been introduced in Canada. Although it was illegal to offer, solicit or accept bribes in exchange for votes, effective enforcement of this prohibition proved impossible.

Despite Macdonald's claims that he was innocent, evidence came to light showing receipts of money from Allan to Macdonald and some of his political colleagues. Perhaps even more damaging to Macdonald was when the Liberals discovered a telegram, through a former employee of Allan, which was thought to have been stolen from the safe of Allan's lawyer, John Abbott.[7][page needed]

The scandal proved fatal to Macdonald's government. Macdonald's control of Parliament was already tenuous following the 1872 election. In a time when party discipline was not as strong as it is today, once Macdonald's culpability in the scandal became known he could no longer expect to retain the confidence of the House of Commons.

Macdonald resigned as prime minister on 5 November 1873. He also offered his resignation as the head of the Conservative party, but it was not accepted and he was convinced to stay. Perhaps as a direct result of this scandal, the Conservative party fell in the eyes of the public and was relegated to being the Official Opposition in the federal election of 1874. This election, in which secret ballots were used for the first time, gave Alexander Mackenzie a firm mandate to succeed Macdonald as the new prime minister of Canada.[citation needed]

Despite the short-term defeat, the scandal was not a mortal wound to Macdonald, the Conservative Party, or the Canadian Pacific Railway. An economic depression gripped Canada shortly after Macdonald left office, and although the causes of the depression were largely external to Canada many Canadians nevertheless blamed Mackenzie for the ensuing hard times. Macdonald would return as prime minister in the 1878 election thanks to his National Policy. He would hold the office of prime minister to his death in 1891, and the Canadian Pacific would be completed by 1885[9] with Macdonald still in office.


  1. ^ "Pacific Scandal". The Canadian Encyclopedia. Archived from the original on October 17, 2012. Retrieved 23 September 2012.
  2. ^ "Building the National Railways (1851 - 1885)". Canada in the Making. Archived from the original on 11 May 2012. Retrieved 23 September 2012.
  3. ^ "Canadian Pacific Scandal". Quebec History. Claude Bélanger, Marianopolis College. Retrieved 23 September 2012.
  4. ^ Berton 1970.
  5. ^ a b Creighton 1965, p. 120.
  6. ^ Berton 1970, p. 10.
  7. ^ a b Hutchison 1964.
  8. ^ "Pacific Scandal". Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. Retrieved 23 September 2012.
  9. ^ "Completing the Design, Railroad to the Pacific". Countries Quest. Retrieved 23 September 2012.
  • Berton, Pierre (1970). The National Dream: The Great Railway, 1871-1881. Anchor Canada.
  • Creighton, Donald (1965). John A. Macdonald: The Old Chieftain. Toronto: The Macmillan Company of Canada Ltd.
  • Hutchison, Bruce (1964). Mr. Prime Minister 1867-1964. Toronto: Longmans Canada.

Further reading[edit]

  • Creighton, Donald (1955). John A. Macdonald: The Old Chieftain, Vol 2: 1867–1891.
  • Den Otter, A.A. (1988). "Nationalism and the Pacific Scandal". Canadian Historical Review. 69 (3): 315–339. downplays role of Americans
  • Irwin, Leonard Bertram (1939). Pacific Railways and Nationalism in the Canadian-American Northwest, 1845–1873.
  • Morton, W.L. (1964). The Critical Years: The Union of British North America, 1857–1873. pp. 245–277.
  • Swainson, Donald (1971). John A. Macdonald: The Man and the Politician. Oxford UP.

External links[edit]