Palestine and the United Nations

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

State of Palestine[1]
Flag of the United Nations.svg Flag of Palestine.svg
United Nations membership
Represented by
Non-member Observer State
Since2012 (2012)
Permanent RepresentativeRiyad H. Mansour

Issues relating to the State of Palestine and aspects of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict occupy repeated annual debate times, resolutions and resources at the United Nations. Since its founding in 1948, the United Nations Security Council, as of January 2010, has adopted 79 resolutions directly related to the Arab–Israeli conflict.[2][needs update]

The adoption on November 29, 1947 by the United Nations General Assembly of a resolution recommending the adoption and implementation of a plan of partition of Palestine was one of the earliest acts of the United Nations. This followed the report of the United Nations Special Committee on Palestine.[3] Since then, it has maintained a central role in this region, especially by providing support for Palestinian refugees via the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) and by providing a platform for Palestinian political claims via the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People, the United Nations Division for Palestinian Rights, the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People, the United Nations Information System on the Question of Palestine (UNISPAL) and the International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People. The UN has sponsored several peace negotiations between the parties, the latest being the 2002 Road map for peace.



Map showing the 1947 UN partition plan for Palestine in UNGA Res. 181(II).

Following World War II and the establishment of the United Nations, the General Assembly resolved[4] that a Special Committee be created "to prepare for consideration at the next regular session of the Assembly a report on the question of Palestine." It would consist of the representatives of Australia, Canada, Czechoslovakia, Guatemala, India, Iran, Netherlands, Peru, Sweden, Uruguay and Yugoslavia. In the final report of September 3, 1947,[5] seven members of the Committee in Chapter VI "expressed themselves, by recorded vote, in favour of the Plan of Partition with Economic Union" (reproduced in the Report). The Plan proposed "an independent Arab State, an independent Jewish State, and the City of Jerusalem". On November 29, 1947, the General Assembly recommended the adoption and implementation of a Plan of Partition with Economic Union, General Assembly Resolution 181, a slightly modified version of that proposed by the majority in the Report of September 3, 1947, 33 votes in favor, 13 against, and 10 abstentions.[6] The vote itself, which required a two-third majority, was a dramatic affair. It led to celebrations in the streets of Jewish cities, but was rejected by the Arab Palestinians and the Arab League.

Within a few days, full scale Jewish–Arab fighting broke out in Palestine.[7] It also led to anti-Jewish violence in Arab countries,[8] and to a Jewish exodus from Arab and Muslim countries. "On May 14, 1948, on the day in which the British Mandate over Palestine expired, the Jewish People's Council gathered at the Tel Aviv Museum, and approved" a "proclamation" which declared "the establishment of a Jewish state in Eretz Israel, to be known as the State of Israel",[9] Resolution 181 also laid the foundation for the creation of an Arab state, but its neighbour states and the Arab League, which rejected all attempts at the creation of a Jewish state, rejected the plan. In the introduction to the cablegram[10] from the Secretary-General of the League of Arab States to the UN Secretary-General on 15 May 1948, the Arab League gave reasons for its "intervention": "On the occasion of the intervention of Arab States in Palestine to restore law and order and to prevent disturbances prevailing in Palestine from spreading into their territories and to check further bloodshed".

The same day, five Arab states invaded and rapidly occupied much of the Arab portion of the partition plan. This war changed the dynamic of the region, transforming a two-state plan into a war between Israel and the Arab world. During this war, resolution 194 reiterated the UN's claim on Jerusalem and resolved in paragraph 11 "that the refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbours should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date". This resolution, accepted immediately by Israel, is the major legal foundation of the Palestinian right of return claim, a major point in peace negotiations. Resolution 194 also called for the creation of the United Nations Conciliation Commission for Palestine. The Arab states initially opposed this resolution, but within a few months, began to change their position, and became the strongest advocates of its refugee and territorial provisions.[11]

In the aftermath of the 1948 war, and conditional on Israel's acceptance and implementation of resolutions 181 and 194, the UN General Assembly voted, with the May 11, 1949 Resolution 273 (III), to admit Israel to UN membership as a "peace-loving country". This resolution reiterated the demands for UN control over Jerusalem and for the return of Palestinian refugees. The vote for resolution 273 was held during the five-month-long Lausanne conference, organized by the UN to reconcile the parties. This conference was largely a failure but was noteworthy as the first proposal by Israel to establish the 1949 armistice line between the Israeli and Arab armies, the so-called green line, as the border of the Jewish state. This line has acquired an after-the-fact international sanction.[12][13][14]

Following the failure at Lausanne to settle the problem of the Arab refugees, UNRWA was created with the December 1949 resolution 302 (IV) to provide humanitarian aid to this group. The Conciliation Commission for Palestine published its report in October 1950.[15] It is noteworthy as the source of the official number of Palestinian Arab refugees (711,000). It again reiterated the demands for UN control over Jerusalem and for the return of Palestinian refugees.


After the failure of early attempts at resolution, and until 1967, discussion of Israel and Palestine was not as prominent at the UN. Exceptions included border incidents like the Qibya massacre, the passage of Security Council Resolution 95 supporting Israel's position over Egypt's on usage of the Suez Canal, and most prominently the 1956 Suez Crisis.


After months of debate in the Security Council and General Assembly before, during and after the 1967 Six-Day War,[16] United Nations Security Council Resolution 242 was adopted. It became a universally accepted basis for Arab-Israeli and later, Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations. In it, the Land for peace principle was spelled out. This resolution is one of the most discussed, both within and outside of the UN.[citation needed]

The Six-Day War generated a new wave of Palestinian refugees who could not be included in the original UNRWA definition. From 1991, the UN General Assembly has adopted an annual resolution allowing the 1967 refugees within the UNRWA mandate.

In 1968, the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People was created to investigate Jewish settlements on Palestinian territories. It generates yearly General Assembly resolutions and other documents.


The Israeli–Palestinian conflict gained prominence following the emergence of Palestinian armed groups, especially the Palestine Liberation Organization and the increased political strength of the Arab group as the main suppliers of petroleum to the Western world. At the UN, the Arab group also gained the support of the Eastern Bloc against Israel allied to the US.

In rapid succession, several events brought the Palestinian struggle to the forefront: the 1972 Olympic Munich massacre, the 1973 Yom Kippur War, the ensuing 1973 oil crisis and, in 1975, the beginning of the Lebanese Civil War.

The Geneva Conference of 1973 was an attempt to negotiate a solution to the Arab–Israeli conflict. No comprehensive agreement was reached, and attempts in later years to revive the Conference failed.

On November 13, 1974, Yasser Arafat became the first representative of an entity other than a member state to address the General Assembly. In 1975, the PLO was granted permanent observer status at the General Assembly.

Starting in 1974, Palestinian territories[vague] were named "Occupied Arab Territories" in UN documents. In 1982, the phrase "Occupied Palestinian Territories" became the usual name.[citation needed] This phrase was not used at the UN prior to 1967, when the same territories were under military occupation by Jordan and Egypt.[citation needed]

The Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People was created in 1975 and of the United Nations Division for Palestinian Rights in 1977. Also in 1977, the International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People was first celebrated on November 29 the anniversary of resolution 181.

The 1979 Egypt–Israel Peace Treaty[17] was a landmark event. Egyptian president Anwar Sadat is credited for initiating the process, following the failure of the UN-mediated peace negotiations, notably the Geneva Conference. The secret negotiations at Camp David in 1978 between Sadat, Menachem Begin and Jimmy Carter, and the treaty itself essentially bypassed UN-approved channels. The Camp David Accords (but not the Treaty itself) touch on the issue of Palestinian statehood. Egypt, Israel, and Jordan were to agree a way to establish elected self-governing authority in the West Bank and Gaza. Egypt and Israel were to find means to resolve the refugee problem.[18]

The General Assembly was critical of the accords. General Assembly Resolution 34/65 (1979) condemned "partial agreements and separate treaties". It said that the Camp David accords had "no validity insofar as they purport to determine the future of the Palestinian people and of the Palestinian territories occupied by Israel since 1967". In protest, the General Assembly did not renew the peace-keeping force in the Sinai peninsula, the UNEF II, despite requests by the US, Egypt and Israel, as stipulated in the treaty. To honor the treaty despite the UN's refusal, the Multinational Force and Observers was created, which has always operated independently of the UN. Egypt was expelled from the Arab League for a period of ten years.


Postage stamp of United Nations honoring the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People (1981).

The Palestinian National Council adopted in Algiers in 1988 the declaration of independence of the State of Palestine. The UN has not officially recognised this state but, by renaming the PLO observer as the Palestine observer,[19] can be seen as having done so unofficially. In July 1998, the General Assembly adopted resolution 52/250 conferring upon Palestine additional rights and privileges, including the right to participate in the general debate held at the start of each session of the General Assembly, the right of reply, the right to co-sponsor resolutions and the right to raise points of order on Palestinian and Middle East issues.



The year 2000 saw the failure of the Camp David peace negotiations and the beginning of the Second Intifada. In 2003, the Israeli West Bank barrier became another subject of criticism. It was declared illegal by both the General Assembly[20] and the International Court of Justice. The Court found that the portions of the wall beyond the Green Line and the associated regime that had been imposed on the Palestinian inhabitants is illegal. The Court cited illegal interference by the government of Israel with the Palestinian's national right to self-determination; and land confiscations, house demolitions, the creation of enclaves, and restrictions on movement and access to water, food, education, health care, work, and an adequate standard of living in violation of Israel's obligations under international law.[21] The UN Fact Finding Mission and several UN Rapporteurs subsequently noted that in the movement and access policy there has been a violation of the right not to be discriminated against on the basis of race or national origin.[22]

A series of terrorist attacks in March 2002 prompted Israel to conduct Operation Defensive Shield. The fiercest episode was the battle of Jenin in the UNRWA administered refugee camp of Jenin, where 75 died (23 IDF soldiers, 38 armed and 14 unarmed Palestinians) and 10% of the camp's buildings destroyed. The UN send a first visiting mission. A separate fact-finding mission was mandated by the Security Council but blocked by Israel, a move condemned in General Assembly resolution 10/10 (May 2002).[23] This mission was replaced by a report[24] which was widely commented in the media. Many observers noted that the UN dropped the accusations of massacre made by Palestinians during and soon after the battle, and reproduced in the annex 1 of the report.

The Road map for peace is, since 2002, the latest and current effort by the UN to negotiate peace in the region. This document[25] was initially proposed by US president George W. Bush and sponsored by a quartet of the USA, Russia, the European Union and the UN. The official text is in the form of a letter to the Security Council, not a General Assembly or Security Council resolution. It generated a series of changes: the sidelining of Yasser Arafat and the unilateral withdrawal of Jewish settlers and the Israeli forces from occupied territories, notably the Gaza strip. Progress is now stalled.

On December 11, 2007, the General Assembly adopted a resolution on agricultural technology for development[26] sponsored by Israel.[27] The Arab group proposed a series of amendments referring to the Palestinian occupied territories, but these amendments were rejected. The Tunisian representative said: "The Arab Group was convinced that Israel was neither interested in agriculture nor the peace process."[28] This group demanded a vote on the resolution, an unusual demand for this kind of country-neutral resolution. "The representative of the United States (...) expressed disappointment with the request for a recorded vote because that could send a signal that there was no consensus on the issues at stake, which was not the case. The United States was saddened by the inappropriate injection into the agenda item of irrelevant political considerations, characterized by inflammatory remarks that devalued the importance of the United Nations agenda".[29] The resolution was approved by a recorded vote of 118 in favour to none against, with 29 abstentions. The abstentions were mainly from the Arab Group, with the notable exception of Pakistan which voted in favour.[30]


In February 2011, the United States vetoed a draft resolution to condemn all Jewish settlements established in the occupied Palestinian territory since 1967 as illegal.[31] The resolution, which was supported by all other Security Council members and co-sponsored by over 120 nations,[32] would have demanded that "Israel, as the occupying power, immediately and completely ceases all settlement activities in the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem and that it fully respect its legal obligations in this regard."[33] The U.S. representative said that while it agreed that the settlements were illegal, the resolution would harm chances for negotiations.[33] Israel's deputy Foreign Minister, Daniel Ayalon, said that the "UN serves as a rubber stamp for the Arab countries and, as such, the General Assembly has an automatic majority," and that the vote "proved that the United States is the only country capable of advancing the peace process and the only righteous one speaking the truth: that direct talks between Israel and the Palestinians are required." [34] Palestinian negotiators, however, have refused to resume direct talks until Israel ceases all settlement activity.[33]

On January 31, 2012 the United Nations independent "International Fact-Finding Mission on Israeli Settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory" filed a report stating that Israeli settlements led to a multitude of violations of Palestinian human rights and that if Israel did not stop all settlement activity immediately and begin withdrawing all settlers from the West Bank, it potentially might face a case at the International Criminal Court. It said that Israel was in violation of article 49 of the fourth Geneva convention forbidding transferring civilians of the occupying nation into occupied territory. It held that the settlements are "leading to a creeping annexation that prevents the establishment of a contiguous and viable Palestinian state and undermines the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination." After Palestine's admission to the United Nations as a non-member state in September 2012, it potentially may have its complaint heard by the International Court. Israel refused to co-operate with UNHRC investigators and its foreign ministry replied to the report saying that "Counterproductive measures – such as the report before us – will only hamper efforts to find a sustainable solution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict. The human rights council has sadly distinguished itself by its systematically one-sided and biased approach towards Israel."[35][36][37]

By September 2012, with their application for full membership stalled due to the inability of Security Council members to 'make a unanimous recommendation', the Palestine Authority had decided to pursue an upgrade in status from "observer entity" to "non-member observer state". On November 27 it was announced that the appeal had been officially made, and would be put to a vote in the General Assembly on 29 November, where their status upgrade was expected to be supported by a majority of states. In addition to granting Palestine "non-member observer state status", the draft resolution "expresses the hope that the Security Council will consider favourably the application submitted on 23 September 2011 by the State of Palestine for admission to full membership in the United Nations, endorses the two state solution based on the pre-1967 borders, and stresses the need for an immediate resumption of negotiations between the two parties."

On Thursday, 29 November 2012, In a 138-9 vote (with 41 abstaining) General Assembly resolution 67/19 adopted, upgrading Palestine to "non-member observer state" status in the United Nations.[38][39] The new status equates Palestine's with that of the Holy See. The change in status was described by The Independent as "de facto recognition of the sovereign state of Palestine".[40]

The vote was an important move for the State of Palestine, whilst it was a diplomatic setback for Israel and the United States. Status as an observer state in the UN will allow the State of Palestine to join treaties and specialised UN agencies, such as the International Civil Aviation Organisation,[41] the Law of the Seas Treaty and the International Criminal Court. It shall permit Palestine to claim legal rights over its territorial waters and air space as a sovereign state recognised by the UN. It shall also provide Palestine with the right to sue for control of disputed territory in the International Court of Justice and bring war-crimes charges, mainly those relating to Israel's occupation of the State of Palestine, against Israel in the International Criminal Court.[42]

The UN has permitted Palestine to title its representative office to the UN as 'The Permanent Observer Mission of the State of Palestine to the United Nations',[43] and Palestine has started to re-title its name accordingly on postal stamps, official documents and passports,[39][44] whilst it has instructed its diplomats to officially represent 'The State of Palestine', as opposed to the 'Palestine National Authority'.[39] Additionally, on 17 December 2012, UN Chief of Protocol Yeocheol Yoon decided that "the designation of 'State of Palestine' shall be used by the Secretariat in all official United Nations documents",[1] thus recognising the PLO-proclaimed State of Palestine as being sovereign over the territories of Palestine and its citizens under international law.

As of 31 July 2019, 138 (71.5%) of the 193 member states of the United Nations, in addition to the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, have recognised the State of Palestine as sovereign over both West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Many of the countries that do not recognise the State of Palestine nevertheless recognise the PLO as the 'representative of the Palestinian people'


Emergency Special Sessions[edit]

Middle East issues were the subject of six of the General Assembly's ten 'emergency special sessions'. The tenth emergency special session has, so far, spanned nine years and has become another semi-permanent committee on the question of Palestine.

Regional Groups[edit]

The United Nations Regional Groups were created in 1961. From the onset, the majority of Arab countries within the Asia group blocked the entry of Israel in that group. Thus, for 39 years, Israel was one of the few countries without membership to a regional group and could not participate in most UN activities. On the other hand, Palestine was admitted as a full member of the Asia group on April 2, 1986.[note 1]


The difficulty within the UN to find a unanimous definition of the word terrorism stems in part from the inability to reach consensus over whether Palestinian political violence is a form of resistance or terrorism. The OIC countries argue that Palestinians are fighting foreign occupation.[49] From the UNODC web site,

The question of a definition of terrorism has haunted the debate among states for decades. (...) The UN Member States still have no agreed-upon definition. (...) The lack of agreement on a definition of terrorism has been a major obstacle to meaningful international countermeasures. Cynics have often commented that one state's "terrorist" is another state's "freedom fighter".

Acts of Palestinian political violence have been repeatedly condemned in press releases from the Secretary General (e.g.,[50][51]). The text of General Assembly resolutions does not distinguish terrorism from military operations. For example, in resolution 61/25 (2006) titled "Peaceful Settlement of the Question of Palestine",

condemning all acts of violence and terror against civilians on both sides, including the suicide bombings, the extrajudicial executions and the excessive use of force

Several resolutions recognize the right of Palestinians to fight the Israeli occupation "by all available means". For example, the 2002 UNCHR resolution E/CN.4/2002/L.16 states:

Recalling particularly General Assembly resolution 37/43 of 3 December 1982 reaffirming the legitimacy of the struggle of peoples against foreign occupation by all available means, including armed struggle, (...) 1. Affirms the legitimate right of the Palestinian people to resist the Israeli occupation by all available means in order to free its land and be able to exercise its right of self-determination and that, by so doing, the Palestinian people is fulfilling its mission, one of the goals and purposes of the United Nations;[52]

Western countries who voted against this 2002 resolution claimed its language condones Palestinian terrorism:

Ms. Gervais-Virdicaire (Canada)(...) 3. The failure of the draft resolution to condemn all acts of terrorism, particularly in the context of recent suicide bombings targeting civilians, was a serious oversight which rendered it fundamentally unacceptable; there could be no justification for terrorist acts. (...) Ms. Glover (United Kingdom) (...) 16. Although her delegation agreed with many of the concerns expressed in the draft resolution, the text contained language which might be interpreted as endorsing violence and condoning terrorism.[53]

Palestinian refugees[edit]

Refugees are aided by two agencies at the UN, the UNHCR and UNRWA. UNRWA assists Palestinian refugees exclusively. Refugees are defined differently by these two organisations, the main difference being the inclusion of descendants and the inclusion of the 50% of refugees within the Palestinian territories which, by UNHCR criteria, are internally displaced persons.

  • In 2006, the UNHCR assisted a total of 17.4 million "Persons of concern" around the world, including 350,000 Palestinians, with a budget of $1.45 billion or $83 per person. The UNHCR was staffed by 6,689.
  • In 2006, UNRWA assisted some 4.5 million Palestinian refugees with a regular budget of $639 million supplemented by $145 million for emergency programs, amounting to $174 per person. UNRWA was staffed by 28,000, most refugees themselves.

Andrew Whitley of UNRWA has called the hopes that Palestinian refugees might one day return to their homes "cruel illusions".[54]

United States policy at the UN[edit]

UN diplomats have indicated that the United States would veto any unilateral attempt to declare a Palestinian state at the Security Council.[55]

UN Human Rights Council[edit]

The Special Rapporteur on the question of Palestine to the previous UNCHR, the current UNHRC and the General Assembly was, between 2001 and 2008, John Dugard. The mandate of the Rapporteur is to investigate human rights violations by Israel only, not by Palestinians.[56] Dugard was replaced in 2008 with Richard Falk, who has compared Israel's treatment of Palestinians with the Nazis' treatment of Jews during the Holocaust.[57][58][59] Like his predecessor, Falk's mandate only covers Israel's human rights record.[60] Commenting on the end of Falk's mandate in May 2014, US delegate Samantha Power cited Falk's "relentless anti-Israeli bias" and "his noxious and outrageous perpetuation of 9/11 conspiracy theories."[61]

Miguel d'Escoto Brockmann, a former UNGA president, was elected to the UNHRC Advisory Committee in June 2010.[62]

In March 2012, UNHCR was criticised for facilitating an event featuring a Hamas politician. The Hamas parliamentarian had spoken at an NGO event in the UN Geneva building. Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu castigated the UNHRC's decision stating: "He represents an organization that indiscriminately targets children and grown-ups, and women and men. Innocents – is their special favorite target." Israel's ambassador to the UN, Ron Prosor, denounced the speech, stating that Hamas was an internationally recognized terrorist organization that targeted civilians. "Inviting a Hamas terrorist to lecture to the world about human rights is like asking Charles Manson to run the murder investigation unit at the NYPD", he said.[63]

Fact Finding mission on the 2008 Gaza War (Goldstone report)[edit]

Richard J. Goldstone, a South African, is a former Constitutional Court Judge and lawyer. He led UN Fact-Finding Mission on the 2008–09 Gaza War.

A fact finding mission on human rights violations during the 2008 Gaza War between Israel and Hamas administration in Gaza was called by January 12, 2009 UNHRC, which limited the investigation to "violations (...) by the occupying Power, Israel, against the Palestinian people throughout the Occupied Palestinian Territory, particularly in the occupied Gaza Strip"[64] but, before any investigation, it already "Strongly condemns the ongoing Israeli military operation carried out in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, particularly in the occupied Gaza Strip, which has resulted in massive violations of the human rights of the Palestinian people".

Former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and Ireland President Mary Robinson refused to head the mission because she "felt strongly that the Council's resolution was one-sided and did not permit a balanced approach to determining the situation on the ground."[65] On 3 April 2009, Richard Goldstone was named head of the mission. In a 16 July interview, he said "at first I was not prepared to accept the invitation to head the mission". "It was essential," he continued, to expand the mandate to include "the sustained rocket attack on civilians in southern Israel, as well as other facts." He set this expansion of the mandate as a condition for chairing the mission.[66] The next day, he wrote in the New York Times "I accepted because the mandate of the mission was to look at all parties: Israel; Hamas, which controls Gaza; and other armed Palestinian groups."[67] The UNHRC press release announcing his nomination documents the changed focus of the mission.[68] Writing in The Spectator, commentator Melanie Phillips said that the resolution that created the mandate allowed no such change and questioned the validity and political motivations of the new mandate.[69]

Israel thought that the change of the mandate did not have much practical effect.[70]

Israel refused to cooperate with the Goldstone Mission and denied its entry to Israel, while Hamas and Palestinian National Authority supported and assisted the Mission.[71][72]

In January, months before the mission, Professor Christine Chinkin, one of the four mission members, signed a letter to the London Sunday Times, asserting that Israel's actions "amount to aggression, not self-defense" and that "the manner and scale of its operations in Gaza amount to an act of aggression and is contrary to international law".[73] She authored the final report.

Israel concluded that "it seemed clear beyond any doubt that the initiative was motivated by a political agenda and not concern for human rights" and therefore refused to cooperate with it – in contrast to its policy to cooperate fully with most of the international inquiries into events in the Gaza Operation.[74]

The mission report was published on 15 September 2009.[75] As noted in the press release, the mission concluded "that serious violations of international human rights and humanitarian law were committed by Israel in the context of its military operations in Gaza from December 27, 2008 to January 18, 2009, and that Israel committed actions amounting to war crimes, and possibly crimes against humanity. The Mission also found that Palestinian armed groups had committed war crimes, as well as possibly crimes against humanity."[76]

Goldstone, however, explained that what he had headed was not an investigation, but a fact-finding mission. "If this was a court of law, there would have been nothing proven", Goldstone said, emphasizing that his conclusion that war crimes had been committed was always intended as conditional. Nevertheless, the report itself is replete with bold and declarative legal conclusions seemingly at odds with the cautious and conditional explanations of its author.[77]

Reactions to the report's findings were varied. The report was not immediately ratified by a UNHRC resolution. This step was postponed to March 2010.[78] This delay is attributed to diplomatic pressure from Western members of the Council, including the US which joined in April 2009 and, surprisingly, from the Palestinian Authority representative.[79][80][81] About the U.S. pressure, UNHRC representative Harold Hongju Koh described the U.S. participation to the Council as "an experiment" with the Goldstone report being the first test.[82]

The report was finally ratified by 14 October UNHRC resolution A/HRC/S-12/L.1.[83] Like the January 12 resolution but unlike the report, this ratification condemns Israel, not Hamas.[84] The "unbalanced focus" of the ratification was criticized by U.S. State Department spokesman Ian Kelly,[85] U.S. ambassador to the UNHRC Douglas Griffiths and Richard Goldstone himself.[86]

On 1 April 2011, Goldstone retracted his claim that it was Israeli government policy to deliberately target citizens, saying "If I had known then what I know now, the Goldstone Report would have been a different document".[87] On 14 April 2011 the three other co-authors of the United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict of 2008–2009, Hina Jilani, Christine Chinkin and Desmond Travers, released a joint statement criticizing Goldstone's recantation of this aspect of the report. They all agreed that the report was valid and that Israel and Hamas had failed to investigate alleged war crimes satisfactorily.[88][89]

Commission of inquiry on the 2014 Gaza conflict[edit]

On 23 July 2014, during the 2014 Israel–Gaza conflict, the UNHRC adopted resolution S-21 for a commission of inquiry to "investigate all violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, particularly in the occupied Gaza Strip, in the context of the military operations conducted since 13 June 2014".[90] The apparent anti-Israel bias in the mandate of the commission was denounced by Gregory J. Wallance in The Guardian[91] and by the US, Canadian and Australian delegates to the UNHRC during the debate of the resolution.[90]

Commission on the Status of Women[edit]

During its 51st session in 2007, the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women said that it

Reaffirms that the Israeli occupation remains a major obstacle for Palestinian women with regard to their advancement, self-reliance and integration in the development planning of their society[92]

A spokeswoman outlined Israel's position on the resolution:

As in previous years, this Commission has before it, once again, a resolution on the sole situation of Palestinian women. In monopolizing attention for Palestinian women and promoting uneven standards, the resolution turns a humanitarian issue into a political one. Hence, it damages the prospects for peace based on mutual respect and understanding.[93]

Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food[edit]

Jean Ziegler, the UN special rapporteur on the right to food, published in October 2003 a report[94] accusing Israel of starving Palestinian children. The Israeli ambassador to the UN demanded that the report be withdrawn and accused its author of abusing his office.[95]


UNESCO has adopted hundreds of decisions on the access of Palestinians to education. Palestine is the only territory with a yearly decision to this effect.[citation needed] UNESCO also adopts yearly resolutions for the preservation of the old Jerusalem, a UNESCO world heritage site included in the List of World Heritage in Danger.

In 2007, an emergency session of UNESCO was held to discuss Israeli archaeological excavations at the Mughrabi ascent in the Old City of Jerusalem. The session report said that the excavations were "a naked challenge by the Israeli occupation authorities" to the UN position on the status of Jerusalem.[96] Following a fact-finding mission, Israel was exonerated of blame by the executive board.[citation needed] UNESCO never criticized repeated episodes of mechanized excavations within the Temple Mount ground by the Muslim Waqf, and is financing a museum within the al-Aqsa Mosque compound on Temple Mount.[citation needed] The museum closed for non-Muslims in 2000 and this situation has not changed until the time of this note, June 2014.

Arab discrimination against Palestinians[edit]

Many Palestinian refugees are located in Jordan, Syria and Lebanon. In 2003 Amnesty International sent a memorandum to the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD), expressing concerns about discrimination against Palestinians. CERD responded in 2004, urging the Lebanese government to "take measures to ameliorate the situation of Palestinian refugees ... and at a minimum to remove all legislative provisions and change policies that have a discriminatory effect on the Palestinian population in comparison with other non-citizens."[97]

The violent takeover of Gaza by Hamas in 2007 has, so far, not been condemned at the UN.[citation needed] In November 2007, Ha'aretz reported that the Palestinian Authority observer at the UN, Riad Mansour, had sought to include a clause "expressing concern about the takeover by illegal militias of Palestinian Authority institutions in June 2007" and calling for the reversal of this situation. It reported diplomatic sources as saying that Mansour had been subjected to a barrage of insults, led by the representatives of Egypt, Syria and Libya. Delegates from some Arab countries had claimed that Mansour's initiative would be interpreted as an official UN condemnation of Hamas, and would gain Israel international legitimacy for cutting electricity and fuel supplies to Gaza. Mansour agreed to softer language expressing "concern about an illegal takeover."[98]

Between May and September 2007, the Nahr al-Bared Palestinian refugee camp in Lebanon became the center of fighting between the Lebanese Internal Security Force and Fatah al-Islam gunmen.[99] The Lebanese Army was supported in this action by Palestinian movements responsible for security in the camp.[100] Bombing by the Lebanese army left the camp in ruins and caused the mass displacement of 27,000 Palestinian refugees to other camps.[101] The UN Security Council issued two statements during the fighting, both condemning Fatah al-Islam and "fully support[ing] the efforts carried out by the Lebanese Government and army to ensure security and stability throughout Lebanon".[102][103][104][105] Khaled Abu Toameh[106] and Jonathan Kay[107] faulted the UN for not condemning the Lebanese Army, arguing that it had condemned Israeli Defense Forces in similar circumstances in the past, namely the Battle of Jenin.

UNRWA perpetuating Palestinian refugee status[edit]

Several observers accuse the UN of promoting this discrimination by creating a special status for Palestinian refugees. A report by the International Federation for Human Rights stated:

Because the UNRWA's position consists of the prospect of a conflict resolution leading to the creation of an independent Palestinian State and to the return of the refugees on that territory, as a definitive solution, it tends to justify the Lebanese policies granting the Palestinian refugees only a minimal legal status. In other words, the Palestinian refugees' rights are limited to the right of residence as a condition of the application of UNRWA's humanitarian assistance.[108]

A 2007 op-ed by Nicole Brackman and Asaf Rominowsky stated:

UNRWA serves as a crucial tool of legitimacy for the Palestinian refugee issue — as long as the office is active, how could anyone question the Palestinian refugee problem? Thus an oxymoronic situation: Despite the Israeli disengagement from Gaza in 2005 and the creation in 1993 of a Palestinian Authority with jurisdiction over the Palestinian refugee camps in Gaza/West Bank, UNRWA remains the key social, medical, educational and professional service provider for Palestinians living in "refugee" camps. This runs contrary to every principle of normal territorial integrity and autonomy.[109]

A similar argument was made by commentators in The Independent[110] and in a 2009 report from the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.[111]

Direct involvement of UN personnel in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict[edit]

There have been occasional reports of UN personnel becoming caught up in hostilities.

On November 22, 2002, during a gun battle between the IDF and Islamic Jihad militants, Iain Hook, UNRWA project manager of the Jenin camp rehabilitation project, was killed by Israeli gunfire.[112] A soldier had reportedly mistaken him for a militant and a cellphone in his hand for a gun or grenade.[113]

On May 11, 2004, Israel said that a UN ambulance had been used by Palestinian militants for their getaway following a military engagement in Southern Gaza,[114]

In 2004, Israel complained about comments made by Peter Hansen, head of UNRWA. Hansen had said that there were Hamas members on the UNRWA payroll, and that he did not see that as a crime, they were not necessarily militants, and had to follow UN rules on staying neutral.[115][116][117]

In January 2009 during the Gaza War, a number of people were killed by Israeli bombing outside a school run by the UNRWA; the number and identity of victims is disputed (see Al-Fakhura school incident for details.) Initially, the UN accused Israel of directly bombing the school. Maxwell Gaylord, the UN humanitarian co-ordinator for the Palestinian territories, described the incidents as tragic. Israel claims that a Hamas squad was firing mortar shells from the immediate vicinity of the school. Hamas denies this claim. In February 2009, Gaylord said that the UN "would like to clarify that the shelling and all of the fatalities took place outside and not inside the school".[118][119] The headquarters of the UNRWA in Gaza was also shelled on January 15. Tons of food and fuel were destroyed. Israel claims that militants ran for safety inside the UN compound after firing on Israeli forces from outside. UNRWA spokesman Chris Gunness dismissed the Israeli claims as "baseless".[120][121]

In March 2012, UN official Khulood Badawi, an Information and Media Coordinator for the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, tweeted a picture of a Palestinian child covered in blood captioned the picture with "Another child killed by #Israel... Another father carrying his child to a grave in #Gaza." It was later stated that the picture was published in 2006 and was of a Palestinian girl who had died in an accident unrelated to Israel.[122][123][124] Israel's Ambassador to the United Nations Ron Prosor called for her dismissal, stating that she was "directly engaged in spreading misinformation". He accused her conduct as deviating from "the organization's responsibility to remain impartial" and said that such actions "contribute to incitement, conflict and, ultimately, violence."[122][123] She later tweeted that she mistakenly had tweeted an old photo.[125] Ma'an News Agency reported a week later that the hospital medical report on the dead girl read that she died "due to falling from a high area during the Israeli strike on Gaza". There are differing accounts of how the Israeli air strike, reported to be as little as 100 meters away, may have caused the accident.[126]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ For the purposes of United Nations Regional Groups arrangement, the Palestine Liberation Organization participates in the Asia group since April 2, 1986.[45][46][47][48]


  1. ^ a b Gharib, Ali (December 20, 2012). "U.N. Adds New Name: "State of Palestine"". The Daily Beast. Retrieved January 10, 2013.
  2. ^ Hammond, Jeremy (January 27, 2010). "Rogue State: Israeli Violations of U.N. Security Council Resolutions". Foreign Policy Journal. Retrieved May 19, 2012.
  3. ^ P. J. I. M. de Waart, Dynamics of Self-determination in Palestine, Brill, 1994, p.121
  4. ^ A/RES/106 (S-1) Archived August 6, 2012, at the Wayback Machine of May 15, 1947 General Assembly Resolution 106 Constituting the UNSCOP
  5. ^ "United Nations: General Assembly: A/364: 3 September 1947: Official Records of the Second Session of the General Assembly: Supplement No. 11: Retrieved 4 May 2012". Archived from the original on June 3, 2012. Retrieved October 22, 2016.
  6. ^ "A/RES/181(II) of 29 November 1947". United Nations. 1947. Archived from the original on May 24, 2012. Retrieved January 11, 2012.
  7. ^ Benny Morris, The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem Revisited, p. 13
  8. ^ Tudor Parfitt, The Road to Redemption: the Jews of the Yemen, Brill, 1996, p.166
  9. ^ Declaration of Establishment of State of Israel: 14 May 1948: Retrieved 4 May 2012 Archived March 21, 2012, at the Wayback Machine
  10. ^ "Links to documents". Archived from the original on January 7, 2014. Retrieved October 22, 2016.
  11. ^ Khouri, Fred (1985). The Arab-Israeli Dilemma (3rd edition). Syracuse University Press. pp. 129–130. ISBN 0-8156-2340-2.
  12. ^ Twersky, David (July 14, 2006). "The Assault on Israel's 1967 Border". New York Sun. Retrieved July 8, 2008.
  13. ^ Newman, David (January 9, 2007). "A Green Line in the Sand". New York Times. Retrieved July 8, 2008.
  14. ^ anonymous (July 9, 2004). "Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory". International court of Justice. Archived from the original on April 1, 2008. Retrieved July 8, 2008.
  15. ^ General progress report and supplementary report of the United Nations Conciliation Commission for Palestine, Covering the period from December 11, 1949 to October 23, 1950, GA A/1367/Rev.1 23 October 1950
  16. ^ Lall, Arthur S. (1970). The UN and the Middle East Crisis, 1967. Columbia University Press. ISBN 0-231-08635-0.
  17. ^ Treaty of Peace between the Arab Republic of Egypt and the State of Israel, March 26, 1979,
  18. ^ The Camp David Accords, The Framework for Peace in the Middle East, September 17, 1978,
  19. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on June 22, 2011. Retrieved 2010-08-04.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  20. ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 11, 2009. Retrieved 2010-08-04.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  21. ^ International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion, "Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory", paragraphs 120–137 and 163 "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 6, 2010. Retrieved July 6, 2010.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  22. ^ See the report of The UN Fact Finding Mission on Gaza, A/HRC/12/48, 25 September 2009, paragraph 1548
  23. ^ ES-10/10. Illegal Israeli actions in Occupied East Jerusalem and the rest of the Occupied Palestinian Territory Archived January 3, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
  24. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on September 11, 2009. Retrieved 2009-09-03.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  25. ^ ODS Team. "Ods Home Page" (PDF). Retrieved October 22, 2016.
  26. ^ A/C.2/62/L.23/Rev.2
  27. ^ Patrick Worsnip, Israel gets rare UN approval for farm resolution, Reuters, Tue December 11, 2007, Archived February 15, 2008, at the Wayback Machine
  28. ^ Second Committee approves text calling on member states to step up promotion of agricultural technology for development, draft A/C.2/62/L.23/Rev.2,
  29. ^ idem
  30. ^ Record of vote,
  31. ^ Charbonneau, Louis; Dunham, Will (February 18, 2011). "U.S. vetoes U.N. draft condemning Israeli settlements". Thomson Reuters. Reuters. Retrieved February 20, 2011.
  32. ^ Haaretz Service (February 18, 2011). "Palestinian envoy: U.S. veto at UN 'encourages Israeli intransigence' on settlements". Haaretz Daily Newspaper Ltd. Retrieved February 20, 2011.
  33. ^ a b c Staff writers (February 18, 2011). "United States vetoes Security Council resolution on Israeli settlements". UN News Centre. United Nations. Retrieved February 20, 2011.
  34. ^ Haaretz Service (February 20, 2011). "Deputy FM: Anti-settlement vote proves UN is a 'rubber stamp' for Arab nations". Haaretz Daily Newspaper Ltd. Retrieved February 20, 2011.
  35. ^ Harriet Sherwood, Israel must withdraw all settlers or face ICC, says UN report, The Guardian, January 31, 2013.
  36. ^ Independent UN inquiry urges halt to Israeli settlements in occupied Palestinian territory, United Nations News Center, January 31, 2012.
  37. ^ Human Rights Council Twenty-second session, Agenda item 7, Human rights situation in Palestine and other occupied Arab territories, Report of the independent international fact-finding mission to investigate the implications of the Israeli settlements on the civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights of the Palestinian people throughout the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem(Advanced Unedited Version), accessed February 1, 2013.
  38. ^ "A/67/L.28 of 26 November 2012 and A/RES/67/19 of 29 November 2012". Archived from the original on December 10, 2012. Retrieved December 2, 2012.
  39. ^ a b c Inside Story (January 8, 2013). "Palestine: What is in a name (change)?". Al Jazeera English. Retrieved October 22, 2016.
  40. ^ "Israel defies UN after vote on Palestine with plans for 3,000 new homes in the West Bank". The Independent. December 1, 2012.
  41. ^ Abbas has not taken practical steps toward seeking membership for Palestine in UN agencies, something made possible by the November vote Archived October 11, 2014, at the Wayback Machine
  42. ^ "Palestinians' UN upgrade to nonmember observer state: Struggles ahead over possible powers". Fox News. November 30, 2012. Retrieved December 1, 2013.
  43. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on January 31, 2013. Retrieved 2015-01-12.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  44. ^ Lisyesterday, Jonathan (January 5, 2013). "Palestinian Authority officially changes name to 'State of Palestine'". Haaretz. Retrieved October 22, 2016.
  45. ^ Permanent Observer Mission of Palestine to the United Nations. "Status of Palestine at the United Nations". United Nations. Archived from the original on June 6, 2011. Retrieved December 9, 2010.: "On 2 April 1986, the Asian Group of the U.N. decided to accept the PLO as a full member."
  46. ^ United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2002). "Government structures". United Nations. Archived from the original on June 13, 2010. Retrieved December 5, 2010.: "At present, the PLO is a full member of the Asian Group of the United Nations".
  47. ^ United Nations General Assembly Resolution 52/250: Participation of Palestine in the work of the United Nations Archived May 22, 2011, at the Wayback Machine (1998): "Palestine enjoys full membership in the Group of Asian States".
  48. ^ Palestine/PLO (being a GA observer only) is not included in the list of "Members of the General Assembly, arranged in current regional groups" Archived 2011-06-06 at the Wayback Machine. Further, a recent document of UN-HABITAT, which classifies countries by explicit lists according to the "United Nations Regional Groups" (see: "UN-HABITAT's Global Report on Human Settlements" Archived 2011-05-15 at the Wayback Machine (2007), pp. 329–330), along with a more recent document of UN-AIDS – which classifies countries by explicit lists according to the "Regional Groups that are used by the UN General Assembly, ECOSOC, and its subsidiary bodies" (see: UNAIDS, The Governance Handbook Archived January 9, 2011, at the Wayback Machine (2010), pp. 28–29), do not include Palestine/PLO in any Regional Group, but instead write: "the General Assembly conferred upon Palestine, in its capacity as observer, additional rights and privileges of participation. These included the right to participation in the general debate of the General Assembly, but did not include the rights to vote or put forward candidates" (see: UN-HABITAT's Global Report on Human Settlements, p. 335, 2nd footnote; UNAIDS, The Governance Handbook, p. 29, 4th footnote).
  49. ^ Annex to Resolution No. 59/26-P, Convention of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference on combating international terrorism, from the Archived January 27, 2008, at the Wayback Machine, which states: "Article 2, a. Peoples' struggle including armed struggle against foreign occupation, aggression, colonialism, and hegemony, aimed at liberation and self-determination in accordance with the principles of international law shall not be considered a terrorist crime."
  50. ^ Secretary-General condemns "despicable" Hebron terrorist attack, Press Release SG/SM/8498, November 15, 2002
  51. ^ Secretary-General dismayed by Beit She'An attack, condemns such terrorist acts as extremely harmful to Palestinian cause, Press Release SG/SM/8533 PAL/1928, 29/11//2002
  52. ^ Question of the violation of human rights in the Occupied Arab Territories, including PalestineUNCHR, 58th session, E/CN.4/2002/L.16, 9 April 2002
  53. ^ Commission on Human Rights, Fifty-eighth session, Summary Record of the 39th meeting, Geneva, 15 April 2002,
  54. ^ Jordan slams UN official for urging Palestinian refugees to resettle in Arab states AP and Haaretz, October 28, 2010
  55. ^ Netanyahu: Direct talks are only path to true Mideast peace Haaretz, October 28, 2010
  56. ^ "C. Palestinian human rights violations. 6. The mandate of the Special Rapporteur is concerned with violations of human rights and international humanitarian law that are a consequence of military occupation. Although military occupation is tolerated by international law it is not approved and must be brought to a speedy end. The mandate of the Special Rapporteur therefore requires him to report on human rights violations committed by the occupying Power and not by the occupied people. For this reason this report, like previous reports, will not address the violation of the human rights of Israelis by Palestinians. Nor will it address the conflict between Fatah and Hamas, and the human rights violations that this conflict has engendered. Similarly it will not consider the human rights record of the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank or of Hamas in Gaza. The Special Rapporteur is aware of the ongoing violations of human rights committed by Palestinians upon Palestinians and by Palestinians upon Israelis. He is deeply concerned and condemns such violations. However, they find no place in this report because the mandate requires that the report be limited to the consequences of the military occupation of the OPT by Israel." From p. 6 of A/HRC/7/17: Human rights situation in Palestine and other occupied Arab territories. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, John Dugard, January 21, 2008. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 28, 2011. Retrieved 2011-03-03.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  57. ^ After describing the Nazi horrors, [Falk] asked: "Is it an irresponsible overstatement to associate the treatment of Palestinians with this criminalized Nazi record of collective atrocity? I think not. The recent developments in Gaza are especially disturbing because they express so vividly a deliberate intention on the part of Israel and its allies to subject an entire human community to life-endangering conditions of utmost cruelty." Quoted in U.N. Taps American Jewish Critic of Israel as Rights Expert, By Marc Perelman, Forward Magazine March 27, 2008, issue of April 4, 2008. [1]
  58. ^ Franks, Tim (April 8, 2008). "UN expert stands by Nazi comments". BBC.
  59. ^ Slouching toward a Palestinian Holocaust Archived February 19, 2008, at the Wayback Machine by Richard Falk
  60. ^ "He submits periodic reports to the UNHRC on the human rights situation in the West Bank and Gaza, but his mandate only covers Israel's human rights record." Richard Falk under attack from the Palestinian authority. By Omar Radwan, Middle East Monitor Wednesday, March 10, 2010. [2]
  61. ^ Samantha Power chides outgoing U.N. human rights envoy Richard Falk. Reuters, March 26, 2014 5:37am [3]
  62. ^ Bayefsky, Anne. "The UN's war on Israel continues – and the U.S. is silent". Special to, June 18, 2010.
  63. ^ "Netanyahu to UNHRC: You should ashamed". The Jerusalem Post. March 19, 2012. Archived from the original on March 20, 2012.
  64. ^ Resolution A/HRC/S-9/L.1
  65. ^ Accounting for Gaza Archived January 12, 2012, at the Wayback Machine by Mary Robinson, Daily Times, September 30, 2009.
  66. ^ Goldstone: Israel should cooperate Jerusalem Post, Jul 16, 2009.
  67. ^ Richard Goldstone, New York Times, Sep 17, 2009.
  68. ^ UNHRC press release April 3, 2009.
  69. ^ "It looks therefore as if he [Goldstone] and the UNHRC President unilaterally tore up both the Council's mandate and UN regulations". She said the mandate was changed in order to allow a negligible criticism of Hamas "to provide Goldstone with the fig-leaf to disguise the moral bankruptcy of the entire process". Phillips, Melanie. "The Moral Inversion of Richard Goldstone" Archived September 22, 2009, at the Wayback Machine The Spectator, September 16, 2009.
  70. ^ Wasn't the mandate of the Mission changed to be more balanced? Archived October 12, 2009, at the Wayback Machine Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Access date October 11, 2009.
  71. ^ Page 13 of the Human rights in Palestine and other occupied Arab territories. Report of the United Nations Fact-Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict
  72. ^ UNISPAL. Human Rights Council discussed report of fact-finding mission on the Gaza conflict. Retrieved 27 Oct.2009. Archived April 6, 2012, at the Wayback Machine
  73. ^ "Israel's bombardment of Gaza is not self-defence – it's a war crime", The Sunday Times, January 11, 2009.
  74. ^ Why hasn't Israel cooperated with international investigations into the Gaza Operation? Archived October 11, 2009, at the Wayback Machine Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Access date October 4, 2009.
  75. ^ Human rights in Palestine and other Occupied Arab Territories: Report of the United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict Archived October 7, 2009, at the Wayback Machine
  76. ^ Press release on presentation of report to the Human Rights Council – English Archived July 3, 2010, at the Wayback Machine September 29, 2009.
  77. ^ Gal Beckerman: Goldstone: "'If This Was a Court Of Law, There Would Have Been Nothing Proven.'" The Forward, October 16, 2009.
  78. ^ UN puts off action on Gaza report BBC News Friday, October 2, 2009.
  79. ^ Andrew Wander: Gaza report hobbled by diplomacy? Al Jazeera English, October 1, 2009.
  80. ^ Gaza report vote delay angers Hamas Al Jazeera English, October 3, 2009.
  81. ^ Ben Lynfield: Palestinian fury as Abbas stalls Israeli war crimes vote The Scotsman, October 5, 2009.
  82. ^ Jordans, Fank. "US officials: UN rights membership an 'experiment'" AP, September 29, 2009.
  83. ^ The human rights situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem Archived July 18, 2011, at the Wayback Machine Human Rights Council Twelfth special session October 15–16, 2009
  84. ^ MacInnis, Laura. "U.N. rights council criticizes Israel over Gaza". Reuters, October 16, 2009.
  85. ^ Edwards, Steven. "UN report accuses Israel of war crimes"[dead link]. National Post, October 17, 2009.
  86. ^ Hui Min Neo. "UN rights council endorses damning Gaza report". AFP. October 16, 2009.
  87. ^ Parker, Kathleen (April 1, 2011). "Reconsidering the Goldstone Report on Israel and war crimes". The Washington Post.
  88. ^ "Authors reject calls to retract Goldstone report on Gaza". AFP. April 14, 2011. Archived from the original on January 3, 2013. Retrieved April 17, 2011.
  89. ^ Hina Jilani; Christine Chinkin; Desmond Travers (April 14, 2011). "Goldstone report: Statement issued by members of UN mission on Gaza war". The Guardian. London. Retrieved April 17, 2011.
  90. ^ a b "Human Rights Council establishes Independent, International Commission of Inquiry for the Occupied Palestinian Territory". Retrieved October 22, 2016.
  91. ^ Gregory J. Wallance (August 3, 2014). "U.N. council's commission of omission". The Guardian. Retrieved August 3, 2014.
  92. ^ Commission on the Status of Women, Report on the fifty first session, E/2007/27, E/CN.6/2007/9, Archived July 18, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
  93. ^ Statement by Ms. Meirav Eilon-Shahar, Counsellor. Explanation of Position, Draft resolution: Situation of and assistance to Palestinian women, E/CN.6/2007/L.2 (51st Session of the Commission on the Status of Women, New York, 9 March 2007),
  94. ^ The right to food. Report by the Special Rapporteur, Jean Ziegler Addendum. Mission to the Occupied Palestinian Territories. UN Document E/CN.4/2004/10/Add.2, published October 31, 2003, available online at "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on September 24, 2012. Retrieved 2011-01-15.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  95. ^ Palestinian food report upsets Israel Al Jazeera (Reuters). October 10, 2003
  96. ^ Latest developments in the situation of the World Heritage Site of the Old City of Jerusalem, Special Plenary Meeting ( April 16 to 17, 2007),
  97. ^ Amnesty International, Exiled and suffering: Palestinian refugees in Lebanon, p.7, available online at "Archived copy". Retrieved 2011-02-13. accessed 13 February 2011
  98. ^ Shlomo Shamir, "Arabs foil PA condemnation of Hamas' takeover of Gaza at UN", Ha'aretz November 18, 2007,
  99. ^ "Lebanon army takes control of camp after battle", Reuters, [4] September 2, 2007
  100. ^ "Hariri: Lebanon fears worst", Independent Online [5] May 21, 2007
  101. ^ "The majority of the refugees fled the camp and adjacent areas with few or no belongings believing that they would be returning after a few days. Overnight they lost everything – their homes, personal and household belongings, commercial property and assets, and jobs." Emergency Appeal for Northern Lebanon Final report, April 30, 2009, UNRWA
  102. ^ SC/9024 Security Council press statement on Lebanon May 23, 2007
  103. ^ Reilly, William, "U.N. Council, officials plea for Lebanon", UPI (May 23, 2007)
  104. ^ S/PRST/2007/17 Statement by the President of the Security Council June 11, 2007
  105. ^ Leopold, Evelyn, "U.N. Council backs Beirut: Worried by arms traffic", Reuters (June 11, 2007)
  106. ^ Toameh, Khaled Abu, "Silence on Nahr al-Bared" Commentary (July 31, 2007)
  107. ^ Jenin comes to Lebanon. So where is the outcry? Archived December 9, 2014, at the Wayback Machine, by Jonathan Kay, National Post Tuesday, May 29, 2007
  108. ^ Lebanon Palestinian refugees: systematic discrimination and complete lack of interest on the part of the international community, n°356/2 March 2003 Archived February 16, 2008, at the Wayback Machine
  109. ^ Brackman, Nicole and Asaf Romirowsky. Dubious refugee relief. Is U.N. aiding or abetting Palestinians?. June 21, 2007. Archived April 24, 2008, at the Wayback Machine
  110. ^ Miller, Judith and David Samuels. "No way home: The tragedy of the Palestinian diaspora" The Independent. October 22, 2009.
  111. ^ Lindsay, James. "Fixing UNRWA" Retrieved November 20, 2010.
  112. ^ Jenin rebuilt Archived February 12, 2007, at the Wayback Machine Iain Hook shot and killed by an Israeli soldier November 22, 2002.
  113. ^ Fisher, Ian (November 27, 2002). "West Bank Explosion Kills 2 'Most Wanted'". New York Times. Retrieved June 29, 2012. The military has said it fired on Mr. Hook, mistakenly believing he had a gun or grenade in his hand.
  114. ^ Asman, David. "The Asman Observer, Second Front" Archived February 16, 2008, at the Wayback Machine. Fox News. June 14, 2004,
  115. ^ "Canada looking at UN agency over Palestinian connection", CBC News, October 4, 2004, CBC website
  116. ^ Matthew Levitt, Dennis Ross, Hamas: Politics, Charity, and Terrorism in the Service of Jihad, Yale University Press, 2007, ISBN 0-300-12258-6, ISBN 978-0-300-12258-9
  117. ^ Joshua Muravchik, The Future of the United Nations: Understanding the Past to Chart a Way Forward. AEI Press, 2005. ISBN 0-8447-7183-X, 9780844771830
  118. ^ "Strike at Gaza school 'kills 40'". BBC News. Retrieved October 22, 2016.
  119. ^ "Gaza school strike disputed". CNN. January 7, 2009.
  120. ^ "Israel Shells UN Headquarters In Gaza". Huffington Post. January 15, 2009.
  121. ^ Israel shells Gaza UN warehouse, hospital, media offices China Daily, 2009-01-16 Retrieved 2010-03-28
  122. ^ a b "Israel: Fire UN official over false Gaza photo". The Jerusalem Post. March 16, 2012.
  123. ^ a b "Fake photos of escalation posted on Twitter". The Jerusalem Post. March 14, 2012. Archived from the original on March 17, 2012.
  124. ^ Sheera Frenkel, Tweets of misleading photos feed Israeli-Palestinian feud, The McClatchy Company, March 14, 2012.
  125. ^ Herb Keinon, No sign UN will fire worker over incendiary tweet, Jerusalem Post, March 20, 2012.
  126. ^ Charlotte Alfred, Twitter flap obscures details of Gaza girl's death, Ma'an News Agency, 27/03/2012 (updated) 01/04/2012 09:31

Further reading[edit]

  • Khouri, Fred (1985). The Arab-Israeli Dilemma (3rd edition). Syracuse University Press. ISBN 0-8156-2340-2.
  • Lall, Arthur S. (1970). The UN and the Middle East Crisis, 1967. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 0-231-08635-0.
  • Alfred E. Kellermann (1998). Israel among the Nations. The Hague, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International. ISBN 90-411-1142-5.
  • Dore Gold (2004). Tower of Babble. New York: Three Rivers Press. ISBN 1-4000-5494-X.
  • Kim, Soo Yeon and Bruce Russett, "The New Politics of Voting Alignments in the United Nations General Assembly", International Organization Vol. 50, No. 4 (Autumn, 1996), pp. 629–652 [6]
  • Gerald Steinberg; Anne Herzberg (2011). The Goldstone Report 'Reconsidered': A Critical Analysis. ISBN 9659179308.

External links[edit]