# Papal conclave, 1513

Papal conclave
March 1513
Coat of arms during the vacancy of the Holy See
Dates and location
4-11 March 1513
Chapel of S. Nicolas, Vatican Apostolic Palace,
Rome
Key officials
Dean Raffaele Riario
Camerlengo Raffaele Riario
Protopriest Tamás Bakócz
Protodeacon Giovanni di Lorenzo de' Medici
Election
Ballots 2
Elected Pope
Giovanni di Lorenzo de' Medici
(Name taken: Leo X)

The papal conclave of 1513, occasioned by the death of Pope Julius II on 21 February 1513, opened on 4 March with twenty-five cardinals in attendance, out of a total number of thirty-one. The Conclave was presided over by Cardinal Raffaele Sansoni Riario, who was both Dean of the College of Cardinals and Cardinal Chamberlain of the Holy Roman Church (Camerlengo). Voting began on 10 March, and there were only two Scrutinies. Negotiations after the first balloting led to the election of Giovanni de'Medici, the son of Lorenzo the Magnificent and the de facto ruler of Florence, as Pope Leo X on the morning of 11 March.

## Death of Julius II

Most of the cardinals were already in Rome at the time of the death of Pope Julius II, on 21 February 1513.[1] They had been participating in the Fifth Lateran Council, which had been summoned by the Pope to deal with the most pressing problems facing the Church. Julius II was so ill that he was not able to attend the Fifth Session on 16 February,[2] but nineteen cardinals were present. Cardinal Riario presided in the Pope's absence.[3] It was at that Session that Julius had solemnly republished his famous Bull, Cum tam divino, forbidding the buying and selling of sacred things (simony), and most especially the papal office. The Bull was approved by the Council, which was then recessed until April 11.[4] At the Conclave, therefore, the continuation of the Council was a major concern, and was written into the Electoral Capitulations. At his last audience for the Cardinals, on 19 February, Pope Julius advised the Cardinals not to allow the schismatic cardinals from the 'Council of Pisa'[5] to take part in the Conclave, nor to allow the Ecumenical Council any part in the proceedings.

In fact, the death of the Pope had been expected for some weeks. It had been reported generally (the Venetians knew it on 10 February) that the Pope was suffering from a double tertian fever (malaria), and that his doctors held little hope for his recovery. King Louis XII of France had been kept informed of the situation, and it was reported in Florence on 14 February that he had ordered the French cardinals to hasten their journey to Rome. He also wrote to the College of Cardinals, advising them not to rush into voting for a new pope, but to await the arrival of the French cardinals.[6]

The Imperial Ambassador, Alberto Pio de Carpi, wrote to Maximilian I that the papabili were Riario, Fieschi and Luigi d'Aragona. The Cardinal prior Cardinalium presbyterorum, Tamás Bakócz, also had ambitions.[7]

Cardinal Giovanni de' Medici, who had not been attending the Council, was ill in Florence with an anal fistula. He was ruling Florence on behalf of his family. Nonetheless he set out on his painful journey to Rome on 22 February in great haste; he was certainly in Rome on February 28.[6] He employed the next few days in Rome in profitable conversations. He met, for example, with Cardinal Francesco Soderini, whose family had helped drive the Medici out of Florence in 1494, with the support of Louis XII, and who had been driven out of Florence in their turn by the resurgent Medici in 1512. It was agreed that the Soderini would be repatriated to Florence and that the feud would end. Soderini became a strong supporter of Medici in the Conclave, and Medici voted for Soderini on the first Scrutiny.[8]

## Sealed in the Conclave

Rafaele Riario was a leading candidate in the Conclave. Riario, a former member of the Pazzi conspiracy against the Medici, would later be caught plotting against Leo X and be forced to surrender the Palazzo della Cancelleria to avoid execution.

Pope Julius II had created twenty-seven cardinals during his reign of more than nine years. Twelve of these had died, leaving fifteen cardinals, who were referred to as the 'Younger Cardinals'. They formed a faction, under the leadership of the della Rovere cardinals. The 'Elder Cardinals', named by earlier popes, numbered sixteen, and were led by Raffaele Sansoni Riario, the Cardinal of S. Giorgio, a nephew of Pope Sixtus IV.

Twenty-five of the living thirty-one cardinals entered the conclave on Friday 4 March.[9] Cardinal Sisto Gara della Rovere, one of Pope Julius' nephews, was so ill that he had to be carried into the Conclave, and he was given special accommodations.[10] Cardinal Soderini and Cardinal de'Medici were also ill.[11] Medici had been in Rome since the 28th of February, but he was suffering from a fistula, and needed to be operated on.[12] He did not enter the Conclave until 6 March, and had to be carried into the Conclave area in a sedan chair.[13] The Cardinal Camerlengo, Raffaele Riario, accompanied by Cardinal d' Aragona and Cardinal Farnese, made the traditional examination of the entire area of the Conclave, and then supervised the sealing of the doors.[14]

The first several days were spent in the regular daily Congregations on the drafting of Electoral Capitulations and regulating the procedures of the Conclave. The Conclavists, too, were drawing up a list of demands, which included the disposal of the property of whichever Cardinal happened to be elected pope. The successful candidate's Conclavists were entitled to their employer's property as 'spoils', but the other conclavists wanted their share.[15]

It had been the custom for hundreds of years for each cardinal, at the time of the second Obeisance to the new Pope, to present him with a small memorandum (libellus), in which was listed the names of the Cardinal's most favored followers with specific requests for benefices for them. These requests were usually granted, usually on the spot. Each cardinal had to draw up his list.

A copy of the Capitulations was seen by the Florentine diarist, Luca Landucci.[16] He reported that there were thirty clauses. One provided that the Pope could not create more than two cardinals from members of his own family, when the number of Cardinals was below 24, and with the agreement of two-thirds of the cardinals. Another required that there be a General Council of Christians to reform the Church, and to prepare a crusade against the Infidel. Another required that the text of the Capitulations be read out twice a year in Congregation. Another stated that the Roman Curia could not be transferred elsewhere in Italy without the consent of half of the cardinals; and that it could not be transferred outside of Italy without the consent of two-thirds. Ludwig Pastor,[17] the historian of the Papacy, quotes those and others: that any cardinal who did not already possess an income of 6000 ducats would be given a subsidy of 200 ducats per month; that no cardinal would be appointed a Legate against his will; that all benefices connected with the Lateran Basilica and the Vatican Basilica would be conferred on Romans only. The list went on. No pope ever felt obliged to carry out all or any of these Capitulations.

Among the conclavists was Giacomo di Brescia, the private physician required by Cardinal Medici; Giacomo, despite his plea, was not permitted to leave early once his services were no longer required.[18][19]

### Reconsideration of Positions

Riario's position, without a single vote in his favor, must have caused him to reconsider his position. He was not papabile. He therefore had to make some sort of accommodation with his enemy Medici. That night, in the main hall of the Conclave (the Sala Ducale?), the Cardinals and Conclavists observed Cardinal Medici and Cardinal Raffaele Riario in close conversation for more than an hour, although no other observer was able to make out the subject.[27] Between then and the time for the vote next morning, a rumor spread among the cardinals as to the outcome of the conversation, and every other cardinal flocked to Medici's cell to congratulate him. Trollope claims that every cardinal did such because "it is ill voting against a man to-day who is to be the despotic master of your fate and fortunes on the morrow".[28] Actually, the success of Medici was due to the unity of the 'Younger Cardinals' behind their chosen candidate, as much as to Medici's mildness and generosity toward friend and enemy, as Pio de Carpi explained to the Emperor Maximilian.[29]

## Election

Medici was elected unanimously in the Scrutiny on the morning of 11 March. The statement of unanimity is not surprising; every conclave strives to end unanimiter et concorditer, leaving no grounds for a schism. A window which had been boarded closed for the Conclave was opened, and Cardinal Alessandro Farnese (future Pope Paul III), who was now senior Cardinal Deacon in place of Medici, announced the election of Medici by his chosen papal name, Leo X.[23] Since Medici had only been ordained a deacon, it was necessary for him to be ordained a priest and consecrated a bishop immediately. He was ordained a priest on 15 March, and consecrated on 17 March 1513 by Cardinal Raffaele Sansoni Riario.[30]

Florentine banker Filippo Strozzi the Younger accompanied Medici to Rome for the conclave; Strozzi's brother (a disciple of Savonarola) claimed that: "inasmuch as the latter aspired not without good reason to the Papacy, it was likely enough that he might have to vail himself of Filippo's credit".[31] In the event, Julius II's bull against simony had all the participants on alert, and there is no hint of simony at the Conclave of 1513.[32]

## Pirie's account

According to Valerie Pirie's The Triple Crown (1936):

Twenty-five cardinals entered the conclave. The absence of the French element[33] left practically only two contending parties—the young and the old. The former had secretly settled on Giovanni de' Medici; the second openly supported S. Giorgio, England's candidate.[34] The Sacred College had been assembled almost a week before the first serious scrutiny took place. Many of the cardinals, wishing to temporise and conceal their real intentions, had voted for the man they considered least likely to have any supporters. As luck would have it, thirteen prelates had selected the same outsider, with the result that they all but elected Arborense, the most worthless nonentity present. This narrow shave gave the Sacred College such a shock that its members determined to come to some agreement which would put matters on a more satisfactory basis for both parties.[35]

### Mathematical evaluation

Anthony Lo Bello of Allegheny College tested the ex ante probability of Pirie's account, assuming that the cardinals assumed that all but a handful of the assembled twenty-five cardinals were not among the papabili, and thus were not perceived as being able to receive the requisite seventeen votes, and that only a smaller number of these, m, had absolutely no supporters.[36] Lo Bello further assumes that r cardinals participated in the strategy that Pirie outlines and calculates the probabilities for 17 ≤ r ≤ 25, using factorials.[36] The probability of Pirie's account occurring in terms of r and m was:[36]

${\displaystyle {\frac {m(m+r-14)!r!}{(r-13)!(m+r-1)!}}}$

and the probability of a candidate receiving seventeen votes was

${\displaystyle {\frac {m(m+r-18)!r!}{(r-17)!(m+r-1)!}}.}$

Lo Bello concludes that the probability of Pirie's account is < 1% for reasonable values of r and m, and that, were Pirie's account to be correct, the "shock" of the cardinals was misjudged because the probability of actually electing a pope with this method was far less, < 0.1%.[37] This mathematical proof demolishes Pirie's notions.

It must be observed that Lo Bello has made several assumptions for the sake of input numbers, without authority or proof.

## Notes

1. ^ Pastor, Volume VI, pp. 433-436.
2. ^ J. P. Adams, Cardinals at the V Lateran Council. Retrieved: 2016-04-11.
3. ^ Mansi, pp. 762-763.
4. ^ Mansi, pp. 768-773.
5. ^ Bernardino López de Carvajal, Guillaume Briçonnet, Francesco Borgia, Federico Sanseverino, and René de Prie were deprived of their functions and declared schismatics on 11 October 1511: Guilelmus van Gulik & Conradus Eubel Hierarchia catholica medii et recentioris aevi III, edition altera (Monasterii 1923), p. 4, column 2, note 1.
6. ^ a b Petruccelli, p. 486.
7. ^ Petruccelli, p. 487.
8. ^ Paolo Giovio, "Life of Leo X", p. 154.
9. ^ Creighton IV, p. 178. Gregorovius, p. 175. Cf. Roscoe, 1888, p. 295. Roscoe is incorrect, both as to the number of living cardinals (He thought that there were 32) and as to the date (He wrote March 3). Paris de Grassis, the papal Master of Ceremonies noted in his Diary that the Conclave was enclosed on 4 March at 22:00 hours, Rome time: Joannes Baptista Gattico (1753). Acta selecta caeremonialia sanctae Romanae Ecclesiae, ex variis mss. codicibus et diariis saeculi XV.XVI.XVII. aucta et illustrata pluribus aliis monumentis nondum editis collectore P.D. Joanne Baptista Gattico. Tomus I. Rome: Joannes Laurentius Barberini. pp. 310–318, at p. 314.
10. ^ He died on 8 March, in the Conclave, and therefore did not take part in any balloting. Guilelmus van Gulik & Conradus Eubel Hierarchia catholica medii et recentioris aevi III, edition altera (Monasterii 1923), p. 11.
11. ^ Pastor VII, p. 18.
12. ^ Gaetano Marini, Degli archiatri pontificij Volume primo (Roma: Pagliarini 1784), pp. 318-319. Gregorovius, p. 175.
13. ^ Petruccelli, p. 486 and 488.
14. ^ Papebroch, p. 149.
15. ^ Papebroch, p. 150.
16. ^ Luca Landucci (1883). Del Badia. Jodoco, ed. Diario fiorentino dal 1450 al 1516 (in Italian). Firenze: G. C. Sansoni. p. 338.
17. ^ Pastor VII, p. 20.
18. ^ Papebroch, p. 150. Gaetano Marini, Degli archiatri pontificij Volume primo (Roma: Pagliarini 1784), pp. 318-319.
19. ^ a b Trollope, 1876, p. 181.
20. ^ Gattico, p. 315.
21. ^ Setton, 1984, p. 143.
22. ^ The Master of Ceremonies, Paris de Grassis, still uses the traditional terminology for the senior members of each order: prior Episcoporum, prior Cardinalium, prior Diaconum. He also speaks of the Decanus Collegii: Gattico, p. 315.
23. ^ a b c Roscoe, 1888, p. 297.
24. ^ Pastor VII, p. 21. A complete list of all the votes in the first Scrutiny is given by Paris de Grassis, quoted in: Jean Godefroy, ed. (1712). Lettres du roi Louis XII et du cardinal Georges d'Amboise: depuis 1504 à 1514 (in French and Latin). Volume IV. Brusselles: Foppens. pp. 68–70. A chart of the distribution of the votes was prepared by J. P. Adams, The First Scrutiny (March 10, 1513). Retrieved: 2016-04-11.
25. ^ Papebroch, p. 150.
26. ^ Pastor VII, p. 22. The votes for Serra came from: Achille de Grassis, Carlo de Caretto, Pietro Accolti, Francesco Soderini, Antonio del Monte, Adriano del Castello de Corneto, Francesco Remolino, Marco Vigerio, Raffaele Riario, Domenico Grimani, Tamas Bakosz, Alessandro Farnese, and Alfonso Petrucci: Godefroy, p. 68 (from Paris de Grassis). Six of these were cardinals appointed by Julius II: Salvador Miranda, Consistories of the XVI Century, retrieved: 2016-04-11.
27. ^ The meeting was at dinner, according to Trollope, 1876, pp. 181–182. But Papebroch's source (p. 150 § 9) makes it clear that it was after dinner in the middle of the Sala Majore.
28. ^ Trollope, 1876, p. 183.
29. ^ Petruccelli, pp. 493-494.
30. ^ Gulik & Eubel, p. 13, n. 2. GCatholic, Pope Leo X. Retrieved: 2016-04-11.
31. ^ Trollope, 1876, pp. 183–184.
32. ^ Pastor VII, p. 25.
33. ^ This is not quite true. Cardinal Robert Guibé (Chailland) was present, and so was Cardinal Domenico del Carretto, who was a French agent. Gulik & Eubel, p. 13 n. 2.
34. ^ Pirie seems to be wrong. S. Giorgio received no votes at all. The alternative is that a dozen cardinals were lying.
35. ^ Pirie, 1936, p. 49.
36. ^ a b c Lo Bello, 1982, p. 231.
37. ^ Lo Belo, 1982, p. 233.