Paris Street; Rainy Day
| Paris Street; Rainy Day | |
|---|---|
| Rue de Paris, temps de pluie (French) | |
| Artist | Gustave Caillebotte |
| Year | 1877 |
| Medium | Oil on canvas |
| Dimensions | 212.2 cm × 276.2 cm (83.5 in × 108.7 in) |
| Location | Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago |
| Accession | 1964.336 |
Paris Street; Rainy Day (French: Rue de Paris, temps de pluie) is a large Impressionist oil painting completed by French artist Gustave Caillebotte in 1877. The work portrays a scene of pedestrians in rainy weather crossing a boulevard intersection in the present-day Place de Dublin, a square in the eighth arrondissement of Paris. It is the best known of Caillebotte's several cityscapes linked to Paris's reconstruction under Napoleon III and Georges-Eugène Haussmann in the mid-19th century. Paris Street; Rainy Day exemplifies the artist's views on modernity. Caillebotte made a number of preliminary sketches in graphite and oil.
The composition shows 24 mostly bourgeois pedestrians, dominated by the foreground couple with an umbrella staring outside of the viewer's field of vision. Unusually for an Impressionist painting, Paris Street; Rainy Day takes the form of a photorealistic cityscape, representative of a homogenized Paris. Caillebotte employs several visual techniques to create the illusion of three-dimensional space, mainly through linear two-point perspective, colour effects, and repoussoir.
Paris Street; Rainy Day debuted in April 1877 at the Third Impressionist Exhibition, where it was widely praised for its photorealism and precision. It was not displayed publicly again until a posthumous retrospective exhibition in 1894. Caillebotte bequeathed the work to his youngest brother Martial, and it remained in the family's possession before being sold to wealthy art collectors in the mid-20th century. The painting has been in the collection of the Art Institute of Chicago since 1964, when it was purchased during a reappraisal of Caillebotte's work.
Background
[edit]
Gustave Caillebotte first met with Impressionist artists presumably no later than the First Impressionist Exhibition in 1874.[1] He may have been courted for said occasion but declined because he had been committed to the Salon of 1875 for his submission Les raboteurs de parquet,[note 1] which was ultimately rejected.[3] In February 1876, Caillebotte received an invitation from Pierre-Auguste Renoir and Henri Rouart to participate in the Second Impressionist Exhibition that April; Les raboteurs de parquet and Young Man at His Window were some of the eight paintings the painter showcased at the event.[4] Over time, he used money from his inheritance to help fund the annual Impressionists shows as an organizer, starting with the Third Impressionist Exhibition in January 1877.[4]
Beginning in the 1850s, Napoleon III placed Georges-Eugène Haussmann, the prefect of the Seine department, in charge of overseeing the mass modernisation of Paris.[5] Commonly referred to by the neologism "Haussmannisation",[6] the project saw the construction of parks, squares, housing, kiosks, street beautification, about 137 km (85 mi) of boulevards, and thorough infrastructural improvements to sewage, water management, and public transportation.[7] A consequence was the displacement of thousands of mostly working class residents, including 75 percent of Île de la Cité, to slums in the outskirts of Paris.[8] Caillebotte and his family moved to a large, four-story mansion in Paris's eighth arrondissement amid the reconstruction, built on a parcel of land his father Martial purchased from the city on January 15, 1866.[9] Much of Caillebotte's oeuvre is linked to this period of upheaval, featuring depictions of Paris emblematic of his views of modernity.[10]
Description
[edit]Preparation
[edit]
There are 23 surviving studies in graphite and oil paint.[11] Caillebotte spent most of the sketches fleshing out the form of the pedestrians, varying their pose and form.[11] The most elaborate, Study for Paris Street; Rainy Day (1877), focuses on the architecture, is in graphite on laid paper, and features a freehand sketch of the area and geometric line work reinforcing the painting's motifs and perspective.[12][13] Background details are small and contrast with the drawing's broad field of vision, creating a wide angle effect, which implies the use of an optical device for assistance.[14] The prevailing theory proposes that Caillebotte traced his preparatory sketches from photos.[15] Most scholars agree that he deployed photography in some form to produce the works, though a 2015 investigative report from the Art Institute of Chicago contests the assertion and concluded that Caillebotte likely made use of a camera lucida.[15] The oldest pencil sketch, View from rue de Madrid toward rue de Lisbonne (1875), renders a different intersection in the city, though it is cited as a precursor to Paris Street; Rainy Day.[16]
The oil on canvas measures 54 by 65 cm (21 by 26 in) and is more in line with Caillebotte's Impressionist works.[17] It develops the colour palette while modifying the perspective scheme and arrangement of objects in the compositional space.[15] The dominant pigments are lead white, ochres and chrome yellows, umber, vermilion, cobalt blue and ultramarine, cobalt violet, and viridian.[17]
Composition
[edit]
Paris Street; Rainy Day is an oil painting on canvas measuring 212.2 by 276.2 cm (83.5 by 108.7 in) in the collection of the Art Institute of Chicago in Chicago, Illinois.[18] It is signed and dated in greyish-brown paint to the lower left: "G. Caillebotte. 1877".[18] The work was restored in 1964 and again after the 2012–2013 exhibition cycle, its condition confirmed via X-ray, infrared, microscopic, and ultraviolet imaging.[19][20] A technical examination of the piece found that Paris Street; Rainy Day had been preserved under a layer of varnish applied in the early 1900s that steadily deteriorated, indicated by fingerprints, the fading of colours, and dark spots on the painted surface.[19][20]
This painting depicts a scene of pedestrians traversing the intersection of the rue de Turin, rue de Moscou, rue Clapeyron, and the ru de Saint-Pétersbourg in the rain in present-day Place de Dublin, a square near the site of Caillebotte's apartment in the eighth arrondissement of Paris.[21] There are 24 individuals dispersed throughout in fashions suggestive of their bourgeois class and the winter.[22] Men are dressed in dark trousers and buttoned overcoats concealing a white linen shirt,[23] while women sport dark walking dresses with embellished drapery that they carry off the ground to avoid getting dirty.[24] Umbrellas are steel-framed and likely made of stretched waterproof silk.[25] The painting positions a minority of workers in the background: a maid, two cab drivers, and a house painter carrying a ladder.[26]
In the foreground are a bourgeois couple with an umbrella staring at something outside of the viewer's field of vision.[27] They are relaxed in posture; according to the art historian Mary Morton, the two exemplify Haussmannian Paris by exuding an "impassivity, sense of propriety, and entitlement."[28] The man is the archetypal flâneur, an idle stroller,[29] whose open coat contrasts with the painting's presentation of the other males.[30] Underneath he wears a white shirt, a black knotted cravat, a waistcoat and fitted grey trousers, his outfit completed with a top hat as an adornment.[30] His companion is dressed in a brown wool two-piece gown equipped with two rows of buttons, black velvet sleeves, and fur trim at the hips, collar and cuffs.[24] The woman's adornments include a fur toque, a veil and an earring on the left ear.[24] She and the man are caressed, the only subjects that are physically bound, though two men in the far left foreground and two women in the far distance share comparable proximity.[31] The art historian Michael Marinnan compares Paris Street; Rainy Day to Le Pont de l'Europe (1876) because of their portrayals of class relations and geographically adjacent settings.[32] The Art Institute of Chicago's scholarly catalogue of Caillebotte's work designates the pieces as "ambitious, accessible, and readily understandable representations of upper-middle-class residents in the new neighborhoods around the Gare Saint-Lazare."[33]
Style
[edit]
Caillebotte illustrates Paris Street; Rainy Day with a photorealistic cityscape, departing from conventional forms of Impressionist art.[34] The piece was created with brush strokes of up to 1.5 cm (0.59 in),[35] with substantial changes to the surface made by painting over or removing layers with a palette knife to start anew.[36] Its colour palette comprises lead and zinc white, cobalt, ultramarine and cerulean blue, emerald green, viridian, Naples and cadmium yellow, and several iron-based pigments.[37] Some have argued Paris Street; Rainy Day more so resembles academic art in scale, perspective, and composition.[38] The art historian Kirk Varnedoe considered that Caillebotte's stylistic choices foreshadowed the techniques of French Neo-Impressionist artists that emerged in the 1880s.[39]
Paris Street; Rainy Day reflects Caillebotte's preoccupation with life in post-Haussmannised Paris.[39] His representation of the city is austere, one that appears hostile to human interaction, evoking the scale and uniformity of space frequently cited in critiques of Haussmannisation.[40] The architectural backdrop is homogeneous and dominating, within a setting featuring no distinct topography.[41] Pedestrians seem disengaged with each other and their surroundings, their expression either covered or lacking intricate detail; this isolation finds further expression in the umbrellas and rain.[42] Visual cues, such as colour palette and the wet cobblestone pavement, evoke the weather rather than literal rainfall.[38] Weather effects may pose a deeper symbolic function; some scholars have proposed that these aspects convey the restoration of Paris for the bourgeoisie from insurrection.[43]
Paris Street; Rainy Day uses visual techniques which create the illusion of depth, notably through a linear two-point perspective, wherein the pictorial space converges at two vanishing points.[44] It is one of the few paintings that employs this device to convey three dimensional space.[45] Distance is accentuated by strokes of grey and blue hues on the limestone building facades and Caillebotte's use of repoussoir with the foreground couple.[46] The green lamppost underpins the arrangement by splitting the canvas into halves, setting up a hierarchy of space up to the horizon.[47] Given its compositional framework, historians have found similarities to Renaissance art, in particular Flagellation of Christ (1459–1460) by Italian painter and mathematician Piero della Francesca.[48]
Provenance
[edit]In the immediate aftermath of the death of his younger brother René in 1876, Caillebotte devised a will stipulating the disposition of paintings in his personal collection to the French state for display at the Musée du Luxembourg and then the Louvre.[4] State officials at first were reluctant to accept the bequest; the Luxembourg did not have enough exhibition space for the collection, and the state imposed a clause dictating no more than three or four works be shown at a time for each artist at the museum.[49] This initiated protracted negotiations between Caillebotte's youngest brother Martial and Renoir, the former as an heir, and the advisory committee of the Musées Nationaux after the artist's death in 1894.[50] The parties reached an agreement in January 1895, which conferred works not chosen by the state to the Caillebotte heirs.[51] The state finalised the bequest on February 26, 1896, transferring ownership of 38 of the 67 paintings originally offered.[52]
Paris Street; Rainy Day remained in the possession of the Caillebottes by way of Martial, laying in obscurity at a family residence.[51][53] The American art collector Walter P. Chrysler Jr. acquired the painting in 1954 and kept it until no later than 1964, after which it was sold to Daniel Wildenstein through the gallery Wildenstein & Company.[note 2] In 1964, the Art Institute of Chicago purchased Paris Street; Rainy Day from Wildenstein with funds allocated by its associate director John Maxon.[55] It was known under several different names before the Art Institute of Chicago renamed the piece permanently in 1991, based on the English translation of the French title advertised at the Third Impressionist Exhibition.[56]
Reception
[edit]
Caillebotte debuted Paris Street; Rainy Day alongside two other streetscape paintings—Le Pont de l'Europe and The House Painters—and two portraits in April 1877 at the Third Impressionist Exhibition.[57] Critics described the painting one the exhibition's definitive pieces, with one naming Paris Street; Rainy Day as "la masterpiece de l'exposition" (lit. 'the masterpiece of the exhibition').[58] It was widely praised for its photorealism, to the extent that Caillebotte was perceived as Impressionist merely in name.[59] The writer Paul Sébillot claimed in one of the exhibition's earliest reviews that Paris Street; Rainy Day provides "some areas of arresting reality", from an artist whose work offers a glimpse of what photography could look like as a fully realised medium.[60] Most critics noted the precise architectural details and the painting's presentation of a sterile urban space, though made no mention of pedestrian interactions.[61] Paris Street; Rainy Day was not without criticism; it drew disapproval for its lack of rain, muted tints, and Caillebotte's manipulation of perspective.[62]
Paris Street; Rainy Day was not displayed publicly again until a June 1894 posthumous retrospective organised by the art dealer Paul Durand-Ruel, which brought together 122 of his paintings.[63] By this time, Caillebotte had waned in estimation as an artist, and the highly publicised dispute about the execution of his bequest further obscured his reputation, let alone the show.[64]
Legacy
[edit]Caillebotte's reputation gradually diminished in the final twelve years of his life.[65] While Caillebotte was an established painter in his lifetime, his renown had been sustained from his initial success with Les raboteurs de parquet and then his role as a leader of the Impressionists.[64] From the early 1880s, the artist retreated from exhibitions to focus on hobbies in gardening, yachting, and stamp collecting, significantly reducing his output of artwork and critical attention thereof.[66] Caillebotte rarely loaned his art, did not sell to clients as he did not need to paint for a living to support himself, nor were there any reproductions in circulation.[67] Thanks to publicity from the bequest, his reputation as a collector of Impressionist paintings eclipsed his artistic contributions.[68] Early discourse about Impressionism thus tended to focus on Caillebotte as a patron and friend of more prolific artists if at all, with only scant coverage of his work.[69]
The Art Institute of Chicago's acquisition of Paris Street; Rainy Day was the most significant catalyst generating renewed interest in Caillebotte's art in the 20th century.[65] His revival slowly enhanced through international exhibitions starting in the 1950s that increased visibility of his paintings in the public, and he found favour with a new generation of historians and critics.[70] Caillebotte's fame reached its peak at the turn of the millennium, helped by the 1986 show The New Painting: Impressionism, 1874–1886 and the 1994–1996 retrospective Gustave Caillebotte: Urban Impressionist, both of which included Paris Street; Rainy Day among several recognisable and lesser known works.[71][72] Paris Street; Rainy Day remains one of the Art Institute of Chicago's most popular paintings and a key work in touring exhibitions ran by the museum in the 21st century, the most recent being the year-long retrospective Gustave Caillebotte: Painting Men from October 2024 to October 2025.[73][74]
Notes
[edit]- ^ This is speculated from letters of correspondence between Caillebotte and Italian artist Giuseppe De Nittis.[2]
- ^ The date of Wildenstein's acquisition of Paris Street; Rainy Day is contested. The exhibition catalogue Gustave Caillebotte: The Painter's Eye (2015) puts the year of purchase at 1960, while, according to the Art Institute of Chicago, the transaction took place in 1964.[53][54]
References
[edit]Citations
[edit]- ^ Berhaut 1994, p. 5.
- ^ Morton & Shackelford 2015, p. 27–28.
- ^ Marrinan 2016, p. 64.
- ^ a b c Distel 1995, p. 19–20.
- ^ Facos 2011, p. 307.
- ^ Pride 2016, p. 17.
- ^ Facos 2011, p. 307; Distel 1995, p. 88–89.
- ^ Facos 2011, p. 307–308.
- ^ Marrinan 2016, p. 20.
- ^ Distel 1995, p. 88.
- ^ a b Distel 1995, p. 119–139.
- ^ Marrinan 2016, p. 114.
- ^ Groom & Keegan 2015, § Cat 1. Study for Paris Street; Rainy Day, 1877, § Technical Report, § Technical Summary.
- ^ Groom & Keegan 2015, § Cat 1. Paris Street; Rainy Day, 1877, § Curatorial Entry, § The Drawing.
- ^ a b c Groom & Keegan 2015, § Cat 2. Paris Street; Rainy Day, 1877, § Curatorial Entry, § Creating Paris Street; Rainy Day: New Discoveries about Caillebotte's Process.
- ^ Groom & Keegan 2015, § Cat 1. Study for Paris Street; Rainy Day, 1877, § Curatorial Entry, § Lead.
- ^ a b Callen 2004, p. 92.
- ^ a b Groom & Keegan 2015, § Cat 2. Paris Street; Rainy Day, 1877, § Curatorial Entry, § Lead.
- ^ a b Groom & Keegan 2015, § About This Catalogue, § Introduction.
- ^ a b Mlinaric, Jessica (June 22, 2014). "Caillebotte Uncovered: Art Institute Restoration Reveals Hidden Details". Chicagoist. Archived from the original on June 26, 2014. Retrieved April 13, 2026.
- ^ Callen 2004, p. 92; Wilson-Bareau 1998, p. 88; Hagen & Hagen 2003, p. 403.
- ^ Allan, Groom & Perrin 2026, p. 68; Broude 2002, p. 19–20.
- ^ Ribeiro 2012, p. 189–190.
- ^ a b c Ribeiro 2012, p. 195.
- ^ Ribeiro 2012, p. 188–189.
- ^ Sharpe 2023, p. 109; Boime 2008, p. 765–766.
- ^ Fried 1999, p. 27; Morton 2021, p. 552.
- ^ Roslak 2007, p. 68; Morton 2021, p. 552.
- ^ Krämer 2021, p. 343.
- ^ a b Ribeiro 2012, p. 191.
- ^ Kessler 2006, p. 12; Fried 1999, p. 27.
- ^ Marrinan 2016, p. 111.
- ^ Groom & Keegan 2015, § Cat 2. Paris Street; Rainy Day, 1877, § Curatorial Entry, § Caillebotte and the Urban Space of the rue de Turin.
- ^ Howard 1997, p. 95.
- ^ Groom & Keegan 2015, § Cat 2. Paris Street; Rainy Day, 1877, § Technical Report, § Painted Layer, § Painting Tools.
- ^ Groom & Keegan 2015, § Cat 2. Paris Street; Rainy Day, 1877, § Technical Report, § Painted Layer, § Application/Techniques and Artist's Revision.
- ^ Groom & Keegan 2015, § Cat 2. Paris Street; Rainy Day, 1877, § Technical Report, § Painted Layer, § Palette.
- ^ a b Rondeau 2017, p. 80.
- ^ a b Varnedoe 1987, p. 90.
- ^ Distel 1995, p. 96; Varnedoe 1987, p. 90.
- ^ Distel 1995, p. 95; Allan, Groom & Perrin 2026, p. 68.
- ^ Distel 1995, p. 95; Forgione 2005, p. 675.
- ^ Distel 1995, p. 95; Boime 2008, p. 765–766.
- ^ Bantleon & Haselsteiner-Scharner 2009, p. 362; Bagai, Habib & Venkataraman 2024, p. 327.
- ^ Bagai, Habib & Venkataraman 2024, p. 327.
- ^ Bantleon & Haselsteiner-Scharner 2009, p. 360–361; Marrinan 2016, p. 122.
- ^ Distel 1995, p. 116; Rondeau 2017, p. 80.
- ^ Varnedoe 1987, p. 20, 24; Broude 2002, p. 19.
- ^ Varnedoe 1987, p. 198.
- ^ Distel 1995, p. 23.
- ^ a b Hulbert, Megan (August 7, 2025). "Lecture: Gustave Caillebotte—The Artist as Collector". Art Institute of Chicago. Archived from the original on May 5, 2026. Retrieved May 5, 2026.
- ^ Distel 1995, p. 24; Varnedoe 1987, p. 198.
- ^ a b Groom & Keegan 2015, § Cat 2. Paris Street; Rainy Day, 1877, § Provenance.
- ^ Morton & Shackelford 2015, p. 243–244.
- ^ Morton & Shackelford 2015, p. 243–244; Reck 1995, p. 157.
- ^ Groom & Keegan 2015, § Cat 2. Paris Street; Rainy Day, 1877, § Curatorial Entry, § Caillebotte and the Urban Space of the rue de Turin, § Footnote 12.
- ^ Wilson-Bareau 1998, p. 105; Distel 1995, p. 20; Herbert 1988, p. 20.
- ^ Wilson-Bareau 1998, p. 105.
- ^ Young 2015, p. 78.
- ^ Young 2015, p. 78; Varnedoe 1987, p. 187.
- ^ Morton 2021, p. 552; Boime 2008, p. 764.
- ^ Wilson-Bareau 1998, p. 105; Boime 2008, p. 764.
- ^ Patry 2021, p. 567; Berhaut 1994, p. 93, 288.
- ^ a b Allan, Groom & Perrin 2026, p. 64.
- ^ a b Distel 1995, p. 14.
- ^ Barber 1999, p. 137; Morton & Shackelford 2015, p. 16.
- ^ Hagen & Hagen 2003, p. 400.
- ^ Morton & Shackelford 2015, p. 17.
- ^ Varnedoe 1987, p. 10.
- ^ Varnedoe 1987, p. 11; Morton & Shackelford 2015, p. 19.
- ^ Morton & Shackelford 2015, p. 19–20.
- ^ Groom & Keegan 2015, § Cat 2. Paris Street; Rainy Day, 1877, § Exhibition History.
- ^ Edgar, Hannah (July 30, 2025). "Column: The Art Institute defends the title of 'Gustave Caillebotte: Painting His World.' A catalog contributor is skeptical". Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on July 30, 2025. Retrieved May 26, 2026.
- ^ "Caillebotte: Painting Men". Musée d'Orsay. Archived from the original on May 26, 2026. Retrieved May 26, 2026.
Bibliography
[edit]- Allan, Scott; Groom, Gloria; Perrin, Paul, eds. (2026). Gustave Caillebotte: Painting Men. J. Paul Getty Trust. ISBN 9798887120812.
- Bagai, Shobha; Habib, Amber; Venkataraman, Geetha (2024). Mathematics for Social Scientists: Learning Essential Foundational Skills. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 9781040086957.
- Berhaut, Marie (1994). Pietri, Sophie (ed.). Gustave Caillebotte. Catalogue Raisonné Des Peintures Et Pastels (in French). Wildenstein Institute. ISBN 9782850472497.
- Bernhart, Walter (2009). Wolf, Werner; Bantleon, Katharina; Thoss, Jeff (eds.). Metareference across Media: Theory and Case Studies. Vol. 4. Brill Publishers. ISBN 9789042026711.
- Bantleon, Katharina; Haselsteiner-Scharner, Jasmin. "Of Museums, Beholders, Artworks and Photography: Metareferential Elements in Thomas Struth’s Photographic Projects Museum Photographs and Making Time". In Bernhart (2009).
- Boime, Albert (2008). Art in an Age of Civil Struggle, 1848-1871. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 9780226063423.
- Broude, Norma (2002). Gustave Caillebotte and the Fashioning of Identity in Impressionist Paris. Rutgers University Press. ISBN 978-0-8135-3018-5.
- Callen, Anthea (2004). Techniques of the Impressionists. Greenwich Editions. ISBN 9780862887322.
- Distel, Anne (1995). Gustave Caillebotte: Urban Impressionist. Abbeville Press. ISBN 9780789200419.
- Dombrowski, André, ed. (2021). A Companion to Impressionism. Wiley Blackwell. ISBN 9781119373933.
- Krämer, Felix. "The Little Dwarf and the Giant Lady: At Home with Gustave Caillebotte". In Dombrowski (2021).
- Morton, Mary. "Against the Grain: Gustave Caillebotte and Paul Durand-Ruel's Impressionism". In Dombrowski (2021).
- Patry, Sylvie. "Are Museum Curators "Very Special Clients?": Impressionism, the Art Market, and Museums (Paul Durand-Ruel and the Musée du Luxembourg at the Turn of the Twentieth Century)". In Dombrowski (2021).
- Facos, Michelle (2011). An Introduction to Nineteenth-Century Art (PDF). Taylor & Francis. ISBN 9781136840708.
- Forgione, Nancy (December 2005). "Everyday Life in Motion: The Art of Walking in Late-Nineteenth-Century Paris". The Art Bulletin. 87 (4). College Art Association: 664–687. doi:10.1080/00043079.2005.10786265. JSTOR 25067208.
- Fried, Michael (1999). "Caillebotte's Impressionism". Representations (66). University of California Press: 1–51. doi:10.2307/2902878. JSTOR 2902878.
- Groom, Gloria, ed. (2012). Impressionism, Fashion, and Modernity. Yale University Press. ISBN 9780865592537.
- Ribeiro, Aileen. "Gustave Caillebotte: Paris Street; Rainy Day". In Groom (2012).
- Groom, Gloria; Keegan, Kelly (2015). "Caillebotte: Paintings and Drawings at the Art Institute of Chicago". Art Institute of Chicago. doi:10.53269/9780865592773. ISBN 978-0-86559-277-3.
- Hagen, Rose-Marie; Hagen, Rainer (2003). What Great Paintings Say: Volume 2. Taschen. ISBN 9783822813720.
- Herbert, Robert L. (1988). Impressionism: Art, Leisure, and Parisian Society. Yale University Press. ISBN 9780300050837.
- Howard, Michael (1997). Encyclopedia of Impressionism. Thunder Bay Press. ISBN 9781571450333.
- Isaacson, Joel (1980). The Crisis of Impressionism, 1878-1882. University of Michigan Museum of Art. ISBN 978-0912303215.
- Kessler, Marni Reva (2006). Sheer Presence: The Veil in Manet's Paris. University of Minnesota Press. ISBN 9781452909011.
- Marrinan, Michael (2016). Gustave Caillebotte: Painting the Paris of Naturalism, 1872-1887. Getty Research Institute. ISBN 9781606065075.
- Morton, Mary; Shackelford, George T.M. (2015). Gustave Caillebotte: The Painter's Eye. National Gallery of Art. ISBN 9780226263557.
- Pride, Jennifer S. (2016). "Looking through the Parisian Window: Caillebotte, Zola, and the Post-Haussmann Interior". Art Inquiries. 7 (1). SECAC: 17–29.
- Reck, Rima Drell (October 1995). "Review: [Untitled]". The French Review. 69 (1). American Association of Teachers of French: 157–164. JSTOR 397029.
- Rondeau, James (2017). Paintings at the Art Institute of Chicago: Highlights of the Collection. Art Institute of Chicago. ISBN 9780300225723.
- Roslak, Robyn (2007). Neo-Impressionism and Anarchism in Fin-de-Siècle France: Painting, Politics and Landscape. Routledge. ISBN 9781138248397.
- Sharpe, William (2023). The Art of Walking: A History in 100 Images. Yale University Press. ISBN 9780300266849.
- Varnedoe, Kirk (1987). Gustave Caillebotte. Yale University Press. ISBN 9780300082791.
- Wilson-Bareau, Juliet (1998). Manet, Monet, and the Gare Saint-Lazare. Yale University Press. ISBN 9780300075106.
- Wood, Paul, ed. (1999). The Challenge of the Avant-Garde. Yale University Press. ISBN 9780300077612.
- Barber, Fionna. "Caillebotte, masculinity, and the bourgeois gaze". In Wood (1999).
- Young, Marnin (2015). Realism in the Age of Impressionism: Painting and the Politics of Time. Yale University Press. ISBN 9780300208320.
External links
[edit]- Paris Street; Rainy Day, 1877, one of the Art Institute of Chicago's digital scholarly catalogues
- Caillebotte Paris Street; Rainy Day Returns, Art Institute of Chicago
- Gustave Caillebotte's Paris Street; Rainy Day, (4:44) Smarthistory
- Video Postcard: Paris Street; Rainy Day (1877), (1:47) Art Institute of Chicago