Participatory rural appraisal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
PRA ranking exercise being carried out by members of a Farmer Field School in Bangladesh, 2004

Participatory rural appraisal (PRA) is an approach used by non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and other agencies involved in international development. The approach aims to incorporate the knowledge and opinions of rural people in the planning and management of development projects and programmes.

Origins[edit]

The philosophical roots of participatory rural appraisal techniques can be traced to the activist adult education methods of Paulo Freire and the study clubs of the Antigonish Movement.[citation needed] In this view, an actively involved and empowered local population is essential to successful rural community development. Robert Chambers, a key exponent of PRA, argues that the approach owes much to "the Freirian theme, that poor and exploited people can and should be enabled to analyze their own reality."[1]

By the early 1980s, there was growing dissatisfaction among development experts with both the reductionism of formal surveys, and the biases of typical field visits. In 1983, Robert Chambers, a Fellow at the Institute of Development Studies (UK), used the term Rapid Rural Appraisal to describe techniques that could bring about a 'reversal of learning'.[2] Two years later, the first international conference to share experiences relating to RRA was held in Thailand.[3] This was followed by a rapid acceptance of usage of methods that involved rural people in examining their own problems, setting their own goals, and monitoring their own achievements. By the mid 1990s, the term RRA had been replaced by a number of other terms including 'participatory rural appraisal' (PRA) and 'participatory learning and action' (PLA).[4]

Robert Chambers acknowledged that the significant breakthroughs and innovations that informed the methodology came from community development practitioners in Africa, India and elsewhere. Chambers helped PRA gain acceptance among practitioners.[5] Chambers explained the function of participatory research in PRA as follows:

The central thrusts of the [new] paradigm … are decentralization and empowerment. Decentralization means that resources and discretion are devolved, turning back the inward and upward flows of resources and people. Empowerment means that people, especially poorer people, are enabled to take more control over their lives, and secure a better livelihood with ownership and control of productive assets as one key element. Decentralization and empowerment enable local people to exploit the diverse complexities of their own conditions, and to adapt to rapid change.[6]

Overview of techniques[edit]

Over the years numerous techniques and tools have been described in a variety of books and newsletters, or taught at training courses around the world.

The basic techniques used are:

To ensure that people are not excluded from participation, these techniques avoid writing wherever possible, relying instead on the tools of oral communication and visual communication such as pictures, symbols, physical objects and group memory. Efforts are made in many projects, however, to build a bridge to formal literacy; for example by teaching people how to sign their names or recognize their signatures. Often developing communities are reluctant to permit invasive audio-visual recording.[citation needed]

Developmental changes in PRA[edit]

Since the early 21st century, some practitioners have replaced PRA with the standardized model of community-based participatory research (CBPR).[citation needed] Social survey techniques have also changed during this period, including greater use of information technology such as fuzzy cognitive maps, e-participation, social network analysis, topic models, interactive multimedia, and geographic information systems (GIS).[citation needed]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Robert Chambers. Whose Reality Counts? Putting the First Last Intermediate Technology Publications, London, 1997, p. 106.
  2. ^ Rural Development: Putting the Last First, Robert Chambers, 1983, Longmans
  3. ^ Proceedings of the 1985 International Conference on Rapid Rural Appraisal, Khon Kaen University (Eds.), 1987, Rural Systems Research Project and Farming Systems Research Project, KKU, Thailand
  4. ^ Search results for 'participatory rural appraisal' and 'participatory learning and action' on Google Ngram Viewer
  5. ^ "Handing over the Stick: The Global Spread of Participatory Approaches to Development", Kamal Singh in Edwards and Gaventa (eds) (2001), Global Citizen Action, pp 163-175. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers
  6. ^ Challenging the Professions: Frontiers for Rural Development, Robert Chambers, 1993, ITDG London