A poster of Pather Panchali
|Directed by||Satyajit Ray|
|Screenplay by||Satyajit Ray|
|Based on||Pather Panchali
by Bibhutibhushan Bandyopadhyay
|Music by||Ravi Shankar|
|Edited by||Dulal Dutta|
|Distributed by||Aurora Film Corporation (1955)
Edward Harrison (1958)
Merchant Ivory Productions
Sony Pictures Classics (1995)[a]
Pather Panchali ([pɔt̪ʰer pãtʃali], English: Song of the Little Road) is a 1955 Bengali drama film directed by Satyajit Ray and produced by the Government of West Bengal, India. It is based on Bibhutibhushan Bandyopadhyay's 1929 Bengali novel of the same name and is Ray's directorial debut. It features Subir Banerjee, Kanu Banerjee, Karuna Banerjee, Uma Dasgupta and Chunibala Devi. The first film in the Apu trilogy, Pather Panchali depicts the childhood of the protagonist Apu (Subir Banerjee) and his elder sister Durga (Uma Dasgupta) and the harsh village life of their poor family.
Production was interrupted because of funding problems and it took nearly three years for the film to be completed. The film was shot mainly on location, had a limited budget,[c] featured mostly amateur actors, and was made by an inexperienced crew. The sitar player Ravi Shankar composed the film's soundtrack and score using classical Indian ragas. Subrata Mitra was in charge of the cinematography while editing was handled by Dulal Dutta. Following its premiere on 3 May 1955 during an exhibition at New York's Museum of Modern Art, Pather Panchali was released in Calcutta later the same year to an enthusiastic reception. A special screening was attended by the Chief Minister of West Bengal and the Prime Minister of India. Critics have praised its realism, humanity, and soul-stirring quality while others have called its slow pace a drawback, and some have condemned it for romanticising poverty. Scholars have commented on the film's lyrical quality and realism (influenced by Italian neorealism), its portrayal of the poverty and small delights of daily life, and the use of what the author Darius Cooper has termed the "epiphany of wonder", among other themes.
The tale of Apu's life is continued in the two subsequent installments of Ray's Apu trilogy: Aparajito (The Unvanquished, 1956) and Apur Sansar (The World of Apu, 1959). Pather Panchali is described as a turning point in Indian cinema, as it was among the films that pioneered the Parallel Cinema movement, which espoused authenticity and social realism. The first film from independent India to attract major international critical attention, it won India's National Film Award for Best Feature Film in 1955, the Best Human Document award at the 1956 Cannes Film Festival, and several other awards, establishing Ray as one of the country's most distinguished filmmakers. It is often featured in lists of the greatest films ever made.
Harihar Roy (Kanu Banerjee) earns a meagre living as a pujari (priest) in Nischindipur, rural Bengal, and dreams of a better career as a poet and playwright. His wife Sarbajaya (Karuna Banerjee) takes care of their children, Durga (Uma Dasgupta) and Apu (Subir Banerjee), and Harihar's elderly cousin, Indir Thakrun (Chunibala Devi). Because of their limited resources, Sarbajaya resents having to share her home with the old and helpless cripple Indir. At times, Sarbajaya's taunts become offensive, forcing Indir to take temporary refuge in the home of another relative. Durga is fond of Indir and often gives her fruit she has stolen from a wealthy neighbour's orchard. One day, the neighbour's wife accuses Durga of stealing a bead necklace (which Durga denies) and blames Sarbajaya for encouraging her tendency to steal.
As the elder sibling, Durga cares for Apu with motherly affection, but spares no opportunity to tease him. Together, they share the simple joys of life: sitting quietly under a tree, viewing pictures in a travelling vendor's bioscope, running after the candy man who passes through the village, and watching a jatra (folk theatre) performed by a troupe of actors. Every evening they are delighted by the sound of a distant train's whistle. One day, they run away from home to catch a glimpse of the train, only to discover Indir lying dead on their return.
Unable to earn a good living in the village, Harihar travels to the city to seek a better job. He promises Sarbajaya that he will return with money to repair their dilapidated house. During his absence, the family sinks deeper into poverty. Sarbajaya grows increasingly lonely and bitter. One day during the monsoon season, Durga plays in the downpour for too long, catches a cold and develops a high fever. Adequate medical care being unavailable, the fever becomes worse, and on a night of incessant rain and gusty winds, she dies. Harihar returns home and starts to show Sarbajaya the merchandise he has brought from the city. Sarbajaya, who remains silent, breaks down at the feet of her husband, and Harihar cries out in grief as he discovers that he has lost his daughter. The family decide to leave their ancestral home. As they start packing, Apu finds the necklace that Durga had earlier denied having stolen; he throws it into a pond. Apu and his parents leave the village on an ox-cart.
- Kanu Banerjee as Harihar Roy
- Karuna Banerjee as Sarbajaya Roy
- Subir Banerjee as Apurba Roy (Apu)
- Runki Banerjee as Durga Roy (child)
- Uma Dasgupta as Durga Roy (teenager)
- Chunibala Devi as Indir Thakrun, the old aunt
- Tulsi Chakraborty as Prasanna, school teacher
Novel and title
Bibhutibhushan Bandopadhyay's novel Pather Panchali is a classic bildungsroman (a type of coming-of-age story) in the canon of Bengali literature. It first appeared as a serial in a Calcutta periodical in 1928, and was published as a book the next year. The novel depicts a poor family's struggle to survive in their rural ancestral home and the growing up of Apu, the son of the family. The later part of the novel, where Apu and his parents leave their village and settle in Benaras, formed the basis of Aparajito (The Unvanquished, 1956), the second film of the Apu trilogy.
Satyajit Ray, working as a graphic designer for Signet Press, created the illustrations for a new abridged edition of the book in 1944. At that time, Ray read the unabridged novel; Signet's owner D. K. Gupta told Ray that the abridged version would make a great film. The idea appealed to Ray, and around 1946–47, when he considered making a film, he turned to Pather Panchali because of certain qualities that "made it a great book: its humanism, its lyricism, and its ring of truth". The author's widow permitted Ray to make a film based on the novel; the agreement was in principle only, and no financial arrangement was made.
The Bengali word path literally means path, and pather means "of the path". The word panchali refers to a type of narrative folk song that used to be performed in Bengal and was the forerunner of another type of folk performance, the jatra. English translations of the Bengali title include Song of the Little Road, The Lament of the Path, Song of the Road, and Song of the Open Road.
Pather Panchali did not have a script; it was made from Ray's drawings and notes. Ray completed the first draft of the notes during his sea voyage to and from London in 1950. Before principal photography began, he created a storyboard dealing with details and continuity. Years later, he donated those drawings and notes to Cinémathèque Française.
In Apur Panchali (the Bengali translation of My Years with Apu: A Memoir, 1994), Ray wrote that he had omitted many of the novel's characters and that he had rearranged some of its sequences to make the narrative better as cinema. Changes include Indir's death, which occurs early in the novel at a village shrine in the presence of adults, while in the film Apu and Durga find her corpse in the open. The scene of Apu and Durga running to catch a glimpse of the train is not in the novel, in which neither child sees the train, although they try. Durga's fatal fever is attributed to a monsoon downpour in the film, but is unexplained in the novel. The ending of the film—the family's departure from the village—is not the end of the novel.
Ray tried to extract a simple theme from the random sequences of significant and trivial episodes of the Pather Panchali novel, while preserving what W. Andrew Robinson describes as the "loitering impression" it creates. According to Ray, "the script had to retain some of the rambling quality of the novel because that in itself contained a clue to the feel of authenticity: life in a poor Bengali village does ramble." For Robinson, Ray's adaptation focuses mainly on Apu and his family, while Bandopadhyay's original featured greater detail about village life in general.
Kanu Banerjee (who plays Harihar) was an established Bengali film actor. Karuna Banerjee (Sarbajaya) was an amateur actress from the Indian People's Theatre Association, and the wife of Ray's friend. Uma Dasgupta, who successfully auditioned for the part of Durga, also had prior theatre experience. For the role of Apu, Ray advertised in newspapers for boys of ages five to seven. None of the candidates who auditioned fulfilled Ray's expectations, but his wife spotted a boy in their neighbourhood, and this boy, Subir Banerjee, was cast as Apu. (The surname of three of the main actors happened to be Banerjee, but they were not related to each other). The hardest role to fill was the wizened old Indir. Ray eventually found Chunibala Devi, a retired stage actress living in one of Calcutta's red-light districts, as the ideal candidate. Several minor roles were played by the villagers of Boral, where Pather Panchali was filmed.
Shooting started on 27 October 1952. Boral, a village near Calcutta, was selected in early 1953 as the main location for principal photography, and night scenes were shot in-studio. The technical team included several first-timers, including Ray himself and cinematographer Subrata Mitra, who had never operated a film camera. Art director Bansi Chandragupta had professional experience, having worked with Jean Renoir on The River. Both Mitra and Chandragupta went on to establish themselves as respected professionals.
Mitra had met Ray on the set of The River, where Mitra was allowed to observe the production, take photographs and make notes about lighting for personal reference. Having become friends, Mitra kept Ray informed about the production and showed his photographs. Ray was impressed enough by them to promise him an assistant's position on Pather Panchali, and when production neared, invited him to shoot the film. As the 21-year-old Mitra had no prior filmmaking experience, the choice was met with scepticism by those who knew of the production. Mitra himself later speculated that Ray was nervous about working with an established crew.
Funding was a problem from the outset. No producer was willing to finance the film, as it lacked stars, songs and action scenes. On learning of Ray's plan, one producer, Mr Bhattacharya of Kalpana Movies, contacted Bandopadhyay's widow to request the filming rights and get the film made by Debaki Bose, a well-established director. The widow declined as she had already permitted Ray to make the film. The estimated budget for the production was ₹70,000 (about US$14,613 in 1955).[d] One producer, Rana Dutta, gave money to continue shooting, but had to stop after some of his films flopped.
Ray thus had to borrow money to shoot enough footage to persuade prospective producers to finance the whole film. To raise funds, he continued to work as a graphic designer, pawned his life insurance policy and sold his collection of gramophone records. Production manager Anil Chowdhury convinced Ray's wife, Bijoya, to pawn her jewels. Ray still ran out of money partway through filming, which had to be suspended for nearly a year. Thereafter shooting was done only in intermittent bursts. Ray later admitted that the delays had made him tense and that three miracles saved the film: "One, Apu's voice did not break. Two, Durga did not grow up. Three, Indir Thakrun did not die."
Bidhan Chandra Roy, the Chief Minister of West Bengal, was requested by an influential friend of Ray's mother to help the production. The Chief Minister obliged, and government officials saw the footage. The Home Publicity Department of the West Bengal government assessed the cost of backing the film and sanctioned a loan, given in installments, allowing Ray to finish production.[e] The government misunderstood the nature of the film, believing it to be a documentary for rural uplift, and recorded the loan as being for "roads improvement", a reference to the film's title.
Monroe Wheeler, head of the department of exhibitions and publications at New York's Museum of Modern Art (MoMA), who was in Calcutta in 1954, heard about the project and met Ray. He considered the incomplete footage to be of very high quality and encouraged Ray to finish the film so that it could be shown at a MoMA exhibition the following year. Six months later, American director John Huston visited India for some early location scouting for The Man Who Would Be King (eventually made in 1975). Wheeler had asked Huston to check the progress of Ray's project. Huston saw excerpts of the unfinished film and recognised "the work of a great film-maker". Because of Huston's positive feedback, MoMA helped Ray with additional money.
Including the delays and hiatuses in production, it took three years to complete the shooting of Pather Panchali.
The realist narrative style of Pather Panchali was influenced by Italian neorealism and the works of French director Jean Renoir. In 1949 Renoir came to Calcutta to shoot his film The River (1951). Ray, a founding member of the Calcutta Film Society (established in 1947), helped him scout for locations in the countryside. When Ray told him about his longstanding wish to film Pather Panchali, Renoir encouraged him to proceed. In 1950 Ray was sent to London by his employer, the advertising agency D.J. Keymer, to work at their headquarters. During his six months in London, he watched about 100 films. Among these, Vittorio De Sica's neorealist film Bicycle Thieves (1948) had a profound impact on him. In a 1982 lecture, Ray said that he had come out of the theatre determined to become a filmmaker. The film made him believe that it was possible to make realistic cinema that was shot on location with an amateur cast.
The international success of Akira Kurosawa's Rashomon (1950) and Bimal Roy's 1953 film Do Bigha Zamin (which was shot partly on location and was about a peasant family) led Ray to believe that Pather Panchali would find an international audience. Ray also had more indigenous influences, such as Bengali literature and the native Indian theatrical tradition, particularly the rasa theory of classical Sanskrit drama. Darius Cooper describes the complicated doctrine of rasa as "center[ed] predominantly on feelings experienced not only by the characters but also conveyed in a certain artistic way to the spectator".
The soundtrack of the film was composed by the sitar player Ravi Shankar, who was at an early stage of his career, having debuted in 1939. The background scores feature pieces based on several ragas of Indian classical music, played mostly on the sitar. The soundtrack, described in a 1995 issue of The Village Voice as "at once plaintive and exhilarating", is featured in The Guardian's 2007 list of 50 greatest film soundtracks. It has also been cited as an influence on The Beatles, specifically George Harrison.
Shankar saw about half the film in a roughly edited version before composing the background score, but he was already familiar with the story. According to Robinson, when Ray met Shankar the latter hummed a tune that was folk-based but had "a certain sophistication". This tune, usually played on a bamboo flute, became the main theme for the film. The majority of the score was composed within the duration of a single night, in a session that lasted for about eleven hours. Shankar also composed two solo sitar pieces—one based on the raga Desh (traditionally associated with rain), and one sombre piece based on the raga Todi. He created a piece based on the raga Patdeep, played on the tar shehnai, to accompany the scene in which Harihar learns of Durga's death. The film's cinematographer, Subrata Mitra, performed on the sitar for parts of the soundtrack.
Release and reception
Ray and his crew worked long hours on post-production, managing to submit it just in time for Museum of Modern Art's Textiles and Ornamental Arts of India exhibition of May 1955. The film, billed as The Story of Apu and Durga, lacked subtitles. It was one of a series of six evening performances at MoMA, including the US debut of sarod player Ali Akbar Khan and the classical dancer Shanta Rao. Pather Panchali's MoMA opening on 3 May was well received. Subsequently, the film had its domestic premiere at the annual meeting of the Advertising Club of Calcutta; the response there was not positive, and Ray felt "extremely discouraged". Before its theatrical release in Calcutta, Ray designed large posters, including a neon sign showing Apu and Durga running, which was strategically placed in a busy location in the city. Pather Panchali was released in a Calcutta cinema on 26 August 1955 and received a poor initial response. But because of word of mouth, the screenings started filling up within a week or two. It opened again at another cinema, where it ran for seven weeks. A delay in subtitling led to the postponement of the UK release until December 1957. It went on to achieve great success in the US in 1958, running for eight months at the Fifth Avenue Playhouse in New York.
In India the film's reception was enthusiastic. The Times of India wrote, "It is absurd to compare it with any other Indian cinema ... Pather Panchali is pure cinema". Chief Minister Roy arranged a special screening in Calcutta for Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, who came out of the theatre impressed. Despite opposition from some within the governments of West Bengal and India because of its depiction of poverty, Pather Panchali was sent to the 1956 Cannes Film Festival with Nehru's personal approval. It was screened towards the end of the festival, coinciding with a party given by the Japanese delegation, and only a small number of critics attended. Although some were initially unenthusiastic at the prospect of yet another Indian melodrama, the film critic Arturo Lanocita found "the magic horse of poetry ... invading the screen". Pather Panchali was subsequently named Best Human Document at the festival.
Lindsay Anderson commented after the Cannes screening that Pather Panchali had "the quality of ultimate unforgettable experience". In subsequent years, critics have given positive reviews. A 1958 review in Time described Pather Panchali as "perhaps the finest piece of filmed folklore since Robert Flaherty's Nanook of the North". In her 1982 book 5001 Nights at the Movies, Pauline Kael wrote, "Beautiful, sometimes funny, and full of love, it brought a new vision of India to the screen". Basil Wright considered it "a new and incontrovertible work of art".[f] James Berardinelli wrote in 1996 that the film "touches the souls and minds of viewers, transcending cultural and linguistic barriers". In 2006 Philip French of The Observer called it "one of the greatest pictures ever made". Twenty years after the release of Pather Panchali, Akira Kurosawa summarised the effect of the film as overwhelming and lauded its ability "to stir up deep passions".
The reaction was not uniformly positive. On seeing the film, François Truffaut is reported to have said, "I don't want to see a movie of peasants eating with their hands." Bosley Crowther, the most influential critic of The New York Times, wrote in 1958, "Any picture as loose in structure or as listless in tempo as this one is would barely pass as a 'rough cut' with the editors in Hollywood", even though he praised its gradually emerging poignancy and poetic quality. The Harvard Crimson argued in 1959 that its fragmentary nature "contributes to the film's great weakness: its general diffuseness, its inability to command sustained attention. For Pather Panchali, remarkable as it may be, is something of a chore to sit through." Early in 1980s, Ray was criticised by Nargis Dutt, parliamentarian and former actress, for "exporting poverty". Darius Cooper writes that while many critics celebrated the Apu trilogy "as a eulogy of third-world culture, others criticized it for what they took to be its romanticization of such a culture".
In the 1990s, Merchant Ivory Productions, with assistance from the Academy Film Archive and Sony Pictures Classics, undertook a project to restore the prints. The restored prints, along with several other Ray films, were released in select US theatres. As of December 2013, the film has a 97% fresh rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on an aggregate of 34 reviews. Pather Panchali is available in DVD in Region 2 (DVD region code) PAL and Region 1 NTSC formats. Artificial Eye Entertainment is the distributor of Region 2 while Columbia Tri-Star is the distributor of Region 1 format.[a]
In 2013, the video distribution company The Criterion Collection, in collaboration with the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences’ Film Archive, began the restoration of the original negatives of the Apu trilogy, including Pather Panchali. These negatives had been severely damaged by a fire in London in 1993, and all film cans and fragments belonging to the Ray films were sent to the Motion Picture Academy for storage, where they lay unseen for two decades. It was discovered upon reexamination that, although many parts of the films were indeed destroyed by fire or the effects of age, other parts were salvageable. The materials were shipped to a restoration laboratory in Bologna, Italy: L’Immagine Ritrovata. Over a thousand hours of labor by hand were expended in restoring and scanning the negatives and, in the end, about 40 percent of the Pather Panchali negative was restored. (For those parts of the negative that were missing or unusable, duplicate negatives and fine-grain masters from various commercial or archival sources were used.) The Criterion Collection’s own lab then spent six months creating the digital version of all three films, at times choosing to preserve the distinctive look of the films even at the cost of retaining some imperfections.
On 4 May 2015, the restored Pather Panchali premiered at the Museum of Modern Art, a little more than 60 years to the day after the film’s world premiere at the same venue. Several days later, all three films opened at New York’s Film Forum, where they were originally scheduled to run for three weeks. Because of overwhelming public demand – with one writer commenting that "audiences can’t seem to get enough" – the films were held over at that theater until June 30. The trilogy was then sent to be exhibited in many other cities throughout the U.S. and Canada. The restoration work was widely acclaimed, with commentators calling the look of the restored films "gorgeous", "pristine" and “incredible”.
In his 1958 New York Times review, Crowther writes that Pather Panchali delicately illustrates how "poverty does not always nullify love" and how even very poor people can enjoy the little pleasures of their world. Marie Seton describes how the film intersperses the depiction of poverty and the delights and pleasures of youth. She represents the bond between Durga and Indir, and their fate, as signifying a philosophical core: that both the young and the old die. Seton writes of the film's "lyrical" qualities, noting especially the imagery immediately before the onset of monsoon. Robinson writes about a peculiar quality of "lyrical happiness" in the film, and states that Pather Panchali is "about unsophisticated people shot through with great sophistication, and without a trace of condescension or inflated sentiment".
Darius Cooper discusses the use of different rasa in the film, observing Apu's repeated "epiphany of wonder",[g] brought about not only by what the boy sees around him, but also when he uses his imagination to create another world. For Cooper, the immersive experience of the film corresponds to this epiphany of wonder. Stephen Teo uses the scene in which Apu and Durga discover railway tracks as an example of the gradual build-up of epiphany and the resulting immersive experience.
Sharmishtha Gooptu discusses the idea that the idyllic village life portrayed in Pather Panchali represents authentic Bengali village life, which disappeared during the upheavals of Partition in 1947. She suggests that the film seeks to connect an idealised, pre-partition past with the actual present of partitioned Bengal, and that it uses prototypes of rural Bengal to construct an image of the ideal village. In contrast to this idealism, Mitali Pati and Suranjan Ganguly point out how Ray used eye-level shots, natural lighting, long takes and other techniques to achieve realism. Mainak Biswas has written that Pather Panchali comes very close to the concept of Italian neorealism, as it has several passages with no dramatic development, even though the usual realities of life, such as the changing of seasons or the passing of a day, are concretely filmed.
Pather Panchali has won many national and international awards. At India's 3rd National Film Awards in 1955, it was named Best Feature Film and Best Bengali Feature Film. The next year, it competed for the Palme d'Or at Cannes, where it won Best Human Document and an OCIC Award – Special Mention. More awards from film festivals across the world followed: the Vatican Award (Rome), the Golden Carbao (Manila), and the Diploma of Merit (Edinburgh) in 1956; the Selznick Golden Laurel for Best Film (Berlin), the Golden Gate for Best Director and Best Picture (San Francisco) in 1957; Best Film (Vancouver), and the Critics' Award for Best Film (Stratford) in 1958. It also won several awards for best foreign-language film: at the National Board of Review Awards 1958; at the Afro Arts Theater, New York, 1959; the Kinema Jumpo Award in Japan, 1966; and the Bodil Award in Denmark, 1969. In 1958 it had been nominated for Best Film at the 11th British Academy Film Awards.
Sight & Sound, the British Film Institute's (BFI) magazine, has included Pather Panchali several times in its Critics' Polls of the greatest-ever films. In 1962, it ranked 11th; in 1992, 6th; and in 2002, 22nd. The magazine ranked the film 42nd in its 2012 list of "Top 50 Greatest Films of All Time". In 1998, in a similar critics' poll from Asian film magazine Cinemaya, Pather Panchali was ranked the second-greatest film of all time. The Village Voice ranked the film at number 12 (tied with The Godfather) in its Top 250 "Best Films of the Century" list in 1999, based on a poll of critics.
Pather Panchali was included in various other all-time lists, including Time Out's "Centenary Top One Hundred Films" in 1995, the San Francisco Chronicle "Hot 100 Films From the Past" in 1997, the Rolling Stone "100 Maverick Movies of the Last 100 Years" in 1999, "The New York Times Guide to the Best 1,000 Movies Ever Made" in 2002, the BFI Top Fifty "Must See" Children's Films in 2005, and BFI's "Top 10 Indian Films" of all time. It was included in NDTV's list of "India's 20 greatest films", and in 2013 in CNN-IBN's list of "100 greatest Indian films of all time". The Apu trilogy as a whole was included in film critic Roger Ebert's list of "100 Great Movies" in 2001 and in Time's All-Time 100 best movies list in 2005.
Pather Panchali was followed by two films that continued the tale of Apu's life—Aparajito (The Unvanquished) in 1956 and Apur Sansar (The World of Apu) in 1959. Together, the three films constitute the Apu trilogy. Aparajito portrays the adolescent Apu, his education in a rural school and a Calcutta college. Its central theme is the poignant relationship between a doting mother and her ambitious young son. Apur Sansar depicts Apu's adult life, his reaction to his wife's premature death, and his final bonding with his son whom he abandoned as an infant. The sequels also won many national and international awards. Ray did not initially plan to make a trilogy: he decided to make the third film only after being asked about the possibility of a trilogy at the 1957 Venice Film Festival, where Aparajito won the Golden Lion. Apur Panchali (2014) is a Bengali film directed by Kaushik Ganguly, which depicts the real-life story of Subir Bannerjee, the actor who portrayed Apu in Pather Panchali.
Pather Panchali was the first film made in independent India to receive major critical attention internationally, placing India on the world cinema map. It was one of the first examples of Parallel Cinema, a new tradition of Indian film-making in which authenticity and social realism were key themes, breaking the rule of the Indian film establishment. Although Pather Panchali was described as a turning point in Indian cinema, some commentators preferred the view that it refined a "realist textual principle" that was already there. In 1963 Time noted that thanks to Pather Panchali, Satyajit Ray was one of the "hardy little band of inspired pioneers" of a new cinematic movement that was enjoying a good number of imitators worldwide. The film has since been considered as a "global landmark" and "among the essential moviegoing experiences". On 2 May 2013, commemorating Ray's birthday, the Indian version of the search engine Google displayed a doodle featuring the train sequence.
After Pather Panchali, Ray went on to make 36 more films, including feature films, documentaries and shorts. He worked on scripting, casting, scoring, cinematography, art direction and editing, as well as designing his own credit titles and publicity material. He developed a distinctive style of film-making based, as was the case with Pather Panchali, on visual lyricism and strongly humanistic themes. Thus, Ray established himself as an internationally recognized auteur of cinema.
- Aurora Film Corporation was the distributor, according to credits shown in the film. MoMA and the distributor Edward Harrison were instrumental in the film's MoMA screening and later US release.(Bee, Hellczer & McFadden 2013, p. 204) A DVD review in dvdbeaver.com listed Artificial Eye Entertainment as the distributor of Region 2 and Columbia Tri-Star as the distributor of Region 1 format DVDs.
- Different sources identify different running times for the film. A Museum of Modern Art anthology states 112 minutes.(Bee, Hellczer & McFadden 2013, p. 204) An LA Weekly notice states 115 minutes. Stuart Jeffries of The Guardian states 125 minutes in a 2010 report. Rovi Hal Erickson of The New York Times states 126 minutes in a review summary in NYT Critics' Pick. In 2005 Doug Pratt states 125 minutes but mentions that most references list the running time at about 10 minutes less than that. (Pratt 2005, p. 908) The British Board of Film Classification lists separate running times for film (110 minutes 55 seconds) and video (119 minutes 31 seconds) versions.
- Satyajit Ray wrote in My Years with Apu: A Memoir (1994) that the budget was ₹70,000, (Ray 1996, p. 36) and the loan from the government of West Bengal was ₹70,000. (Ray 1996, p. 60) During an interview in 1970, in reply to the question "How much did the production of Pather Panchali cost in all, if you count in the value of the rupee today?", Ray said, "In those days it cost a little over ₹150,000, whereas an average film now costs twice that much." (Isaksson 2007, p. 40)
- The exchange rate in 1955 was ₹4.79 per 1 US dollar (US$). (Kalra 2012, p. 408)
- Ray writes that the amount of loan was Rs 70,000. (Ray 2005, p. 77)
- The comment by Basil Wright appears in James Chapman's 2003 book Cinemas of the World: Film and Society from 1895 to the Present. The year of the comment is not mentioned. (Chapman 2003, p. 323)
- Darius Cooper uses the term "epiphany of wonder" to denote the rasa of camatkara. He quotes Abhinavabharati by Abhinavagupta to explain the camatkara rasa: "... camatkara is an uninterrupted (acchina) state of immersion (avesha) in an enjoyment characterized by the presence of a sensation of inner fullness (trpti). It might be said indeed that camatkara is the action proper to a tasting (cam) or enjoying subject, i.e., to a person immersed in the inner movement (trpti) of a magical (adbhuta) enjoyment." (Cooper 2000, pp. 24–25) Cooper says that through Apu the "universe is revealed. To Apu is given the dominant quality of camatkara, and it is through this sense of wonder that Apu is made to discover and enjoy not only the world that constantly surrounds him but also that other world created by his pratibha or imagination." (Cooper 2000, p. 25)
- Sengoopta, Chandak (16 November 2009). "Apu-In-The-Word". Outlook. p. 2/5. Archived from the original on 24 April 2014. Retrieved 22 April 2014.
- "Pather Panchali". www.dvdbeaver.com. Archived from the original on 11 December 2013. Retrieved 12 October 2008.
- "Pather Panchali". LA Weekly. Archived from the original on 3 December 2013. Retrieved 2 December 2013.
- Jeffries, Stuart (19 October 2010). "Pather Panchali: No 12 best arthouse film of all time". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 17 October 2013. Retrieved 2 December 2013.
- Hal Erickson, Rovi. "Pather Panchali (1955)". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 8 December 2013. Retrieved 2 December 2013.
- "Pather Panchali (1957)". British Board of Film Classification. Archived from the original on 27 April 2014. Retrieved 21 April 2014.
- Gokulsing & Dissanayake 2013, p. 277.
- Gugelberger 1996, p. 173.
- Robinson 1989, p. 74.
- Sekhar, Saumitra (2012). "Pather Panchali". Banglapedia. Asiatic Society of Bangladesh. Archived from the original on 3 December 2013. Retrieved 6 September 2013.
- Robinson 1989, p. 75.
- Ray 2010, p. 22.
- Robinson 1989, p. 58.
- Ray 2010, pp. 22–23.
- Ray 2010, p. 23.
- Isaksson 2007, p. 39.
- Ray 2005, p. 33.
- Robinson 1989, p. 77.
- Mohanta, Sambaru Chandra. "Panchali". Banglapedia. The Asiatic Society of Bangladesh. Archived from the original on 24 May 2005. Retrieved 6 September 2013.
- Harrison, Edward (20 October 1958). "Cinema: New Picture". Time. Archived from the original on 7 December 2013. Retrieved 18 May 2008.(subscription required)
- Crowther, Bosley (23 September 1958). "Screen: Exotic Import; Pather Panchali' From India Opens Here". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 8 December 2013. Retrieved 18 May 2008.
- Herman, Jan; Thomas, Kevin (28 May 1998). "The Orange Screen; A Peek at the Best; Pather Panchali and October represent pinnacles of film achievement". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 8 December 2013. Retrieved 26 May 2008.
- Ray 2010, p. 44.
- Ray 2010, p. 42.
- Ray 2010, pp. 45–46.
- Robinson 1989, p. 76.
- Ray 2010, p. 45.
- Robinson 1989, pp. 75–76.
- Robinson 1989, pp. 78–80.
- Cousins 2004, pp. 237–238.
- Robinson 1989, p. 78.
- Ettedgui 1999, pp. 48–59.
- Gulzar, Nihalni & Chatterjee 2003, p. 539.
- Ettedgui 1999, p. 50.
- Ray 2010, p. 51.
- Ray 1996, pp. 33–34.
- Robinson 1989, p. 82.
- Robinson 1989, p. 83.
- Robinson 1989, p. 84.
- Ray 2010, p. 77.
- "Filmi Funda Pather Panchali (1955)". The Telegraph. 20 April 2005. Archived from the original on 3 December 2013. Retrieved 8 December 2013.
- McGill, Douglas c. (16 August 1988). "Monroe Wheeler, Board Member of Modern Museum, Is Dead at 89". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 8 December 2013. Retrieved 13 June 2008.
- Robinson 1989, p. 87.
- Robinson 1989, p. 86.
- Amitav Ghosh in his essay "Satyajit Ray" in Khair 2005, pp. 3–4
- Mehta 1998, p. 222.
- Ruberto & Wilson 2007, p. 16.
- Corrigan & White 2012, p. 252.
- Robinson 1989, p. 67.
- Ray 1996, p. 17.
- Robinson 1989, p. 71.
- Ray 1996, p. 25.
- Cooper 2000, pp. 1–4.
- Lavezzoli 2006, p. 53.
- Hoberman, J (11 April 1995). "The Hunger Artist". The Village Voice. p. 51. Archived from the original on 8 December 2013. Retrieved 7 December 2013.
- "The 50 greatest film soundtracks". The Observer. 18 March 2007. Archived from the original on 8 December 2013. Retrieved 12 May 2008.
- Leng 2006, pp. 48–9.
- Ray 2010, p. 92.
- Robinson 1989, pp. 87–88.
- Robinson 1989, p. 88.
- Ettedgui 1999, p. 49.
- Silver, Charles (13 November 2012). "Satyajit Ray's Pather Panchali". Inside Out. Museum of Modern Art. Archived from the original on 21 October 2013. Retrieved 4 December 2013.
- Robinson 1989, p. 89.
- Robinson 1989, p. 105.
- Seton 2003, p. 87.
- Basu, Dilip. "Films of Satyajit Ray: Getting Started". Satyajit Ray Film and Study Collection. University of California – Santa Cruz. Archived from the original on 3 December 2013. Retrieved 26 June 2008.
- Robinson 1989, p. 103.
- Seton 2003, p. 9.
- Seton 2003, p. 88.
- Kael 2011, p. 569.
- Chapman 2003, p. 323.
- Berardinelli, James (1996). "Review: Pather Panchali". ReelViews. Archived from the original on 13 December 2013. Retrieved 31 July 2008.
- French, Philip (5 May 2002). "Pather Panchali". The Observer. Archived from the original on 14 December 2013. Retrieved 27 July 2006.
- Robinson 1989, p. 91.
- McFadden, Robert D. (8 March 1981). "Bosley Crowther, 27 Years a Critic of Films for Times, is Dead at 75". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2 November 2013. Retrieved 11 June 2008.
- Quint, Peter E. (2 November 1959). "Pather Panchali". The Harvard Crimson. Archived from the original on 8 May 2005. Retrieved 25 May 2008.
- Robinson 1989, p. 327.
- Cooper 2000, p. 2.
- Pather Panchali at Rotten Tomatoes
- "The Restoration". Janus Films. Retrieved 1 August 2015.
- Hoffman, Jordan (5 May 2015). "Back on the little road: Satyajit Ray’s Pather Panchali returns in all its glory". The Guardian. Retrieved 1 August 2015.
- Hubert, Craig (22 June 2015). "5 Films to See This Week: "54", "The Apu Trilogy", and More". Louise Blouin Media. Retrieved 1 August 2015.
- "Play Dates". Janus Films. Retrieved 1 August 2015.
- Stevens, Dana (21 May 2015). "The Big River". Slate. Retrieved 1 August 2015.
- Boone, Steven; Tallerico, Brian (11 May 2015). "Cinematic Poetry: The Restoration of "The Apu Trilogy". RogerEbert.com. Retrieved 1 August 2015.
- Seton 2003, pp. 81–84.
- Robinson 1989, pp. 95–96.
- Cooper 2000, pp. 24–40.
- Cooper 2000, pp. 24–26.
- Cooper 2000, p. 25.
- Teo 2013, p. 49.
- Gooptu 2010, p. 148.
- Gooptu 2010, p. 149.
- Pati & Ganguly 1996, p. 417.
- Biswas 2007, pp. 87–88.
- "Awards for Satyajit Ray". Ray Film and Study Collection. University of California – Santa Cruz. Archived from the original on 17 October 2013. Retrieved 18 May 2008.
- "3rd National Film Awards" (PDF). Directorate of Film Festivals. p. 6. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 November 2013. Retrieved 5 December 2013.
- "Awards 1956 : All Awards". Festival de Cannes. Archived from the original on 12 December 2013. Retrieved 5 December 2013.
- Lyden 2009, pp. 61–62.
- Robinson 1989, p. 366.
- "Indian Film Honored; Pather Panchali Wins Prize at Stratford, Ont., Fete". The New York Times. 14 July 1958. p. 16. Archived from the original on 11 December 2013. Retrieved 24 May 2008.
- "1958 Award Winners". National Board of Review of Motion Pictures. Archived from the original on 2 December 2013. Retrieved 24 November 2013.
- "Awards 1969, Bodil Awards" (in Danish). Filmmedarbejderforeningen. Archived from the original on 30 October 2013. Retrieved 7 December 2013.
- "Film And British Film in 1958". British Academy of Film and Television Arts. Archived from the original on 9 December 2013. Retrieved 9 December 2013.
- Johnson, Eric. "Sight and Sound Poll 1962: Critics". Archived from the original on 22 February 2012. Retrieved 7 December 2013.
- "The Sight & Sound Top Ten Poll: 1992". Sight & Sound. British Film Institute. Archived from the original on 9 March 2012. Retrieved 20 May 2008.
- "Sight & Sound Top Ten Poll 2002: The rest of the critics' list". Sight & Sound. British Film Institute. Archived from the original on 15 May 2012. Retrieved 24 April 2009.
- Christie, Ian (1 August 2012). "The Top 50 Greatest Films of All Time". Sight & Sound. Archived from the original on 12 October 2013. Retrieved 8 December 2013.
- Totaro, Donato (31 January 2003). "The "Sight & Sound" of Canons". Offscreen Journal (Canada Council for the Arts). Archived from the original on 16 October 2013. Retrieved 19 April 2009.
- "Take One: The First Annual Village Voice Film Critics' Poll". The Village Voice. 1999. Archived from the original on 26 August 2007. Retrieved 27 July 2006.
- "Top 100 Films (Centenary) from Time Out Film Guide". Filmsite.org. Archived from the original on 21 October 2013. Retrieved 19 April 2009.
- "Hot 100 Films From the Past by San Francisco Chronicle Film Critics". Filmsite.org. Archived from the original on 21 October 2013. Retrieved 19 April 2009.
- "100 Maverick Movies of the Last 100 Years by Rolling Stone Magazine". Filmsite.org. Archived from the original on 21 October 2013. Retrieved 19 April 2009.
- "The Best 1,000 Movies Ever Made". The New York Times. 2002. Archived from the original on 11 December 2013. Retrieved 7 December 2013.
- "The Top Fifty "Must See" Children's Films by the British Film Institute (BFI)". Filmsite.org. Archived from the original on 21 October 2013. Retrieved 19 April 2009.
- "Top 10 Indian Films". British Film Institute. 2002. Archived from the original on 25 May 2012. Retrieved 15 March 2011.
- "India's 20 greatest films". NDTV. Archived from the original on 21 January 2014. Retrieved 3 January 2014.
- "100 Years of Indian Cinema: The 100 greatest Indian films of all time". CNN-IBN. 17 April 2013. Archived from the original on 4 January 2014. Retrieved 3 January 2014.
- Ebert, Roger (4 March 2001). "The Apu Trilogy (1959)". rogerebert.com. Archived from the original on 21 October 2013. Retrieved 19 April 2009.
- Schickel, Richard (30 January 2010). "All-time 100 Movies". Time. Archived from the original on 20 October 2013. Retrieved 14 December 2013.
- Wood 1972, p. 61.
- Bergan 2006, p. 497.
- Ganguly, Ruman (29 March 2013). "Parambrata starts shooting for Apur Panchali". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 13 December 2013. Retrieved 7 December 2013.
- Gulzar, Nihalni & Chatterjee 2003, p. 612.
- Likhi, Abhilaksh (15 August 1999). "Sense & Cinema". The Tribune. Archived from the original on 12 December 2013. Retrieved 18 May 2008.
- Das Gupta 1980, pp. 32–42.
- Bhaskaran, Gautaman (5 September 2004). "Ray's eternal song". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 28 July 2013. Retrieved 18 May 2008.
- "A Religion of Film". Time. 20 September 1963. Archived from the original on 14 December 2013. Retrieved 18 May 2008.(subscription required)
- Clark, Mike (30 October 2003). "New on DVD". USA Today. Archived from the original on 20 October 2012. Retrieved 18 May 2008.
- Saxena, Anupam (2 May 2013). "Google doodles Satyajit Ray's Pather Panchali on filmmaker's birth anniversary". NDTV. Archived from the original on 14 December 2013. Retrieved 14 December 2013.
- "Satyajit Ray's 92nd Birthday". Google. Archived from the original on 14 December 2013. Retrieved 14 December 2013.
- Santas 2002, p. 18.
- Gokulsing & Dissanayake 2004, p. 32.
- Goristas, Helen (May 2002). "Satyajit Ray". Senses of Cinema. Archived from the original on 11 May 2008. Retrieved 19 May 2008.
- Bee, Harriet Schoenhotz; Hellczer, Cassandra; McFadden, Sarah, eds. (2013). MoMA Highlights: 350 Works from The Museum of Modern Art, New York. The Museum of Modern Art. ISBN 978-0-87070-846-6.
- Bergan, Ronald (2006). Film. Dorking Kindersley. ISBN 978-1-4053-1280-6.
- Biswas, Moinak (2007). "In the mirror of an alternative globalism: the neorealist encounter in India". In Ruberto, Laura E.; Wilson, Kristi M. Italian Neorealism and Global Cinema. Wayne State University Press. ISBN 978-0-8143-3324-2.
- Chapman, James (2003). Cinemas of the World: Film and Society from 1895 to the Present. Reaktion Books. ISBN 1-86189-162-8.
- Cooper, Darius (2000). The Cinema of Satyajit Ray: Between Tradition and Modernity. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-62980-2.
- Corrigan, Timothy; White, Patricia (2012). The Film Experience: An Introduction. Bedford/St. Martin's. ISBN 978-0-312-68170-8.
- Cousins, Mark (2004). The Story of Film: A Worldwide History of Film from the Host of the BBC's Scene by Scene. Thunder's Mouth Press. ISBN 1-56025-612-5.
- Das Gupta, Chidananda (Autumn 1980). "New Directions in Indian Cinema". Film Quarterly (University of California Press) 34 (1): 32. doi:10.1525/fq.1980.34.1.04a00070. ISSN 0015-1386. OCLC 1569205.
- Ettedgui, Peter (1999). Cinematography: Screencraft. Focal Press. ISBN 0-240-80382-5.
- Gokulsing, K. Moti; Dissanayake, Wimal (2004). Indian Popular Cinema: A Narrative of Cultural Change. Trentham Books. ISBN 1-85856-329-1.
- Gokulsing, K. Moti; Dissanayake, Wimal (2013). Routledge Handbook of Indian Cinemas. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-136-77284-9.
- Gooptu, Sharmistha (2010). Bengali Cinema: 'An Other Nation'. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-203-84334-5.
- Gugelberger, Georg M. (1996). The Real Thing: Testimonial Discourse and Latin America. Duke University Press. ISBN 978-0-8223-1844-6.
- Gulzar; Nihalni, Govind; Chatterjee, Saibal (2003). "Biographies". Encyclopaedia of Hindi Cinema. Popular Prakashan. ISBN 81-7991-066-0.
- Isaksson, Folke (2007). "Conversation with Satyajit Ray". In Cardullo, Bert. Satyajit Ray: Interviews. University Press of Mississippi. ISBN 978-1-57806-937-8.
- Kael, Pauline (2011). 5001 Nights at the Movies. Henry Holt and Company. ISBN 978-1-250-03357-4.
- Kalra, Bhawna (February 2012). "Devaluation of Indian Rupee against US $: A Historical Perspective" (PDF). International Journal of Research in Economics & Social Sciences (Euro Asia Research and Development Association) 2 (2). ISSN 2249-7382. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 October 2013. Retrieved 8 December 2013.
- Khair, Tabish (2005). Amitav Ghosh : A Critical Companion. Orient Longman. ISBN 81-7824-113-7.
- Lavezzoli, Peter (2006). The Dawn of Indian Music in the West. Continuum International Publishing Group. ISBN 0-8264-1815-5.
- Leng, Simon (2006). While My Guitar Gently Weeps: The Music of George Harrison. Hal Leonard Corporation. ISBN 1-4234-0609-5.
- Lyden, John (2009). The Routledge Companion to Religion and Film. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-415-44853-6.
- Mehta, Ved (1998). "City of Dreadful Night". A Ved Mehta Reader: The Craft of the Essay. Yale University Press. ISBN 0-300-07561-8.
- Pati, Mitali; Ganguly, Suranjan (1996). "Perspectives on Bengali film and literature". In Natarajan, Nalini; Nelson, Emmanuel Sampath. Handbook of Twentieth-century Literatures of India. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-313-28778-7.
- Pratt, Douglas (2005). Doug Pratt's DVD: Movies, Television, Music, Art, Adult, and More!. UNET 2 Corporation. ISBN 978-1-932916-01-0.
- Ray, Satyajit (2010). Apur Panchali (in Bengali). Ananda Publishers. ISBN 81-7215-367-8.
- Ray, Satyajit (1996). My Years with Apu. Penguin Books India. ISBN 978-0-14-024780-0.
- Ray, Satyajit (2005). Our Films, Their Films. Orient Longman. ISBN 81-250-1565-5.
- Robinson, Andrew (1989). Satyajit Ray: The Inner Eye. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-06946-6.
- Ruberto, Laura E.; Wilson, Kristi M. (2007). Italian Neorealism and Global Cinema. Wayne State University Press. ISBN 0-8143-3324-9.
- Santas, Constantine (2002). Responding to film: A Text Guide for Students of Cinema Art. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 0-8304-1580-7.
- Seton, Marie (2003). Portrait of a Director: Satyajit Ray. Penguin Books India. ISBN 978-0-14-302972-4.
- Teo, Stephen (2013). The Asian Cinema Experience: Styles, Spaces, Theory. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-57146-3.
- Wood, R (1972). The Apu trilogy. November Books Ltd. ISBN 0-85631-003-4.
- Pather Panchali at the Internet Movie Database
- Pather Panchali at the British Film Institute's Film and TV Database
- Pather Panchali at AllMovie
- Pather Panchali at Rotten Tomatoes
- Pather Panchali at Ray Film and Study Collection University of California – Santa Cruz