|Quantum field theory|
In physics, specifically in relativistic quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, the Pauli–Lubanski pseudovector named after Wolfgang Pauli and Józef Lubański is an operator defined from the momentum and angular momentum, used in the quantum-relativistic description of angular momentum.
It describes the spin states of moving particles. It is the generator of the little group of the Lorentz group, that is the maximal subgroup (with four generators) leaving the eigenvalues of the four-momentum vector Pμ invariant.
Note , and
Wμ evidently satisfies
as well as the following commutator relations,
The scalar WμWμ is a Lorentz-invariant operator, and commutes with the four-momentum, and can thus serve as a label for irreducible representations of the Lorentz group. That is, it can serve as the label for the spin, a feature of the spacetime structure of the representation, over and above the relativistically invariant label PμPμ for the mass of all states in a representation.
It is straightforward to see this in the rest frame of the particle, the above commutator acting on the particle's state amounts to [Wj , Wk] = i εjkl Wl m; hence W→ = mJ→ and W0 = 0, so that the little group amounts to the rotation group,
It is also customary to take W3 to describe the spin projection along the third direction in the rest frame.
In moving frames, decomposing W = (W0, W→) into components (W1, W2, W3), with W1 and W2 orthogonal to P→, and W3 parallel to P→, the Pauli–Lubanski vector may be expressed in terms of the spin vector S→ = (S1, S2, S3) (similarly decomposed) as
is the energy–momentum relation.
The transverse components W1, W2, along with S3, satisfy the following commutator relations (which apply generally, not just to non-zero mass representations),
For particles with non-zero mass, and the fields associated with such particles,
In general, in the case of non-massive representations, two cases may be distinguished. For massless particles,
where K→ is the dynamic mass moment vector. So, mathematically, P2 = 0 does not imply W2 = 0.
- In the more general case, the components of W→ transverse to P→ may be non-zero, thus yielding the family of representations referred to as the cylindrical luxons ("luxon" is another term for "massless particle"), their identifying property being that the components of W→ form a Lie subalgebra isomorphic to the 2-dimensional Euclidean group ISO(2), with the longitudinal component of W→ playing the role of the rotation generator, and the transverse components the role of translation generators. This amounts to a group contraction of SO(3), and leads to what are known as the continuous spin representations. However, there are no known physical cases of fundamental particles or fields in this family.
- In a special case, W→ is parallel to P→; or equivalently W→ × P→ = 0→. For non-zero W→, this constraint can only be consistently imposed for luxons, since the commutator of the two transverse components of W→ is proportional to m2 J→ · P→.
For this family, W 2 = 0 and Wμ = λPμ; the invariant is, instead, (W0)2 = (W3)2, where
so the invariant is represented by the helicity operator
All particles that interact with the Weak Nuclear Force, for instance, fall into this family, since the definition of weak nuclear charge (weak isospin) involves helicity, which, by above, must be an invariant. The appearance of non-zero mass in such cases must then be explained by other means, such as the Higgs mechanism. Even after accounting for such mass-generating mechanisms, however, the photon (and therefore the electromagnetic field) continues to fall into this class, although the other mass eigenstates of the carriers of the electroweak force (the W particle and anti-particle and Z particle) acquire non-zero mass.Neutrinos were formerly considered to fall into this class as well. However, through neutrino oscillations, it is now known that at least two of the three mass eigenstates of the left-helicity neutrino and right-helicity anti-neutrino each must have non-zero mass.
- Center of mass (relativistic)
- Wigner's classification
- Angular momentum operator
- Casimir operator
- Induced representation
- Lubański, J. K. (1942). "Sur la theorie des particules élémentaires de spin quelconque. I". Physica. 9 (3): 310–324. Bibcode:1942Phy.....9..310L. doi:10.1016/S0031-8914(42)90113-7.; Lubanski, J. K. (1942). "Sur la théorie des particules élémentaires de spin quelconque. II". Physica. 9 (3): 325–338. Bibcode:1942Phy.....9..325L. doi:10.1016/S0031-8914(42)90114-9.
- Brown, Lowell S. (1994). Quantum Field Theory. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-46946-3. pp 180–181.
- Wigner, Eugene (1939). "On unitary representations of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group". The Annals of Mathematics. 40 (1): 149–204. Bibcode:1939AnMat..40..149W. doi:10.2307/1968551.
- L.H. Ryder (1996). Quantum Field Theory (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 62. ISBN 0-521-47814-6.
- N.N. Bogolubov (1989). General Principles of Quantum Field Theory (2nd ed.). Springer. p. 273. ISBN 0-7923-0540-X.
- T. Ohlsson (2011). Relativistic Quantum Physics: From Advanced Quantum Mechanics to Introductory Quantum Field Theory. Cambridge University Press. p. 11. ISBN 1-139-50432-0.
- R. Penrose (2005). The Road to Reality. Vintage books. p. 568. ISBN 978-0-09-944068-0.