# Pentagonal tiling

(Redirected from Pentagon tiling)

In geometry, a pentagonal tiling is a tiling of the plane where each individual piece is in the shape of a pentagon.

A regular pentagonal tiling on the Euclidean plane is impossible because the internal angle of a regular pentagon, 108°, is not a divisor of 360°, the angle measure of a whole turn. However, they can tile the hyperbolic plane and the sphere; the latter produces a tiling topologically equivalent to the dodecahedron.

## Monohedral convex pentagonal tilings

An example pentagonal tile with angle labels A,B,C,D, and E, and edge length labels a,b,c,d, and e

Fifteen types of convex pentagons are known to tile the plane monohedrally (i.e. with one type of tile).[1] The most recent one was discovered in 2015. This list has been shown to be complete by Rao (2017) (result subject to peer-review). Bagina (2011) showed that there are only eight edge-to-edge convex types, a result obtained independently by Sugimoto (2012).

Michaël Rao [2] of the École normale supérieure de Lyon claimed on 1 May 2017 to have found the proof that there are in fact no more than these 15 monohedral convex pentagonal tilings.[3] Rao's paper is available for peer-review.[4] As of 11 July 2017, the first half of the proof had been independently verified (computer code available[5]) by Thomas Hales, a professor of mathematics at the University of Pittsburgh.[6] As of December 2017, the proof was not yet fully peer-reviewed.

Each enumerated tiling family contains pentagons that belong to no other type; however, some individual pentagons may belong to multiple types. In addition, some of the pentagons in the known tiling types also permit alternative tiling patterns beyond the standard tiling exhibited by all members of its type.

The sides of length a, b, c, d, e are directly clockwise from the angles at vertices A, B, C, D, E respectively. (Thus, A, B, C, D, E are opposite to d, e, a, b, c respectively.)

15 monohedral pentagonal tiles
1 2 3 4 5

B+C=180°
A+D+E=360°

c=e
B+D=180°

a = b, d = c + e
A = C = D = 120°

b = c, d = e
B = D = 90°

a = b, d = e
A = 60°, D = 120°
6 7 8 9 10

a = d = e, b = c
B + D = 180°, 2B = E

b = c = d = e
B + 2E = 2C + D = 360°

b = c = d = e
2B + C = D + 2E = 360°

b = c = d = e
2A + C = D + 2E = 360°

a = b = c + e
A = 90°, B + E = 180°, B + 2C = 360°
11 12 13 14 15

2a + c = d = e
A = 90°, 2B + C = 360°
C + E = 180°

2a = d = c + e
A = 90°, 2B + C = 360°
C + E = 180°

d = 2a = 2e
B = E = 90°, 2A + D = 360°

2a = 2c = d = e
A = 90°, B ≈ 145.34°, C ≈ 69.32°,
D ≈ 124.66°, E ≈ 110.68°
(2B + C = 360°, C + E = 180°).

a = c = e, b = 2a
A = 150°, B = 60°, C = 135°, D = 105°, E = 90°

Many of these monohedral tile types have degrees of freedom. These freedoms include variations of internal angles and edge lengths. In the limit, edges may have lengths that approach zero or angles that approach 180°. Types 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 13 allow parametric possibilities with nonconvex prototiles.

Periodic tilings are characterised by their wallpaper group symmetry, for example p2 (2222) is defined by four 2-fold gyration points. This nomenclature is used in the diagrams below, where the tiles are also colored by their k-isohedral positions within the symmetry.

A primitive unit is a section of the tiling that generates the whole tiling using only translations, and is as small as possible.

### Reinhardt (1918)

Reinhardt (1918) found the first five types of pentagonal tile. All five can create isohedral tilings, meaning that the symmetries of the tiling can take any tile to any other tile (more formally, the automorphism group acts transitively on the tiles).

B. Grünbaum and G. C. Shephard have shown that there are exactly twenty-four distinct "types" of isohedral tilings of the plane by pentagons according to their classification scheme.[7] All use Reinhardt's tiles, usually with additional conditions necessary for the tiling. There are two tilings by all type 2 tiles, and one by all of each of the other four types. Fifteen of the other eighteen tilings are by special cases of type 1 tiles. Nine of the twenty-four tilings are edge-to-edge.[8]

There are also 2-isohedral tilings by special cases of type 1, type 2, and type 4 tiles, and 3-isohedral tilings, all edge-to-edge, by special cases of type 1 tiles. There is no upper bound on k for k-isohedral tilings by certain tiles that are both type 1 and type 2, and hence neither on the number of tiles in a primitive unit.

The wallpaper group symmetry for each tiling is given, with orbifold notation in parentheses. A second lower symmetry group is given if tile chirality exists, where mirror images are considered distinct. These are shown as yellow and green tiles in those cases.

#### Type 1

There are many tiling topologies that contain type 1 pentagons. Five example topologies are given below.

Tilings of pentagon type 1
p2 (2222) cmm (2*22) cm (*×) pmg (22*) pgg (22×) p2 (2222) cmm (2*22)
p1 (°) p2 (2222) p2 (2222)
2-tile primitive unit 4-tile primitive unit

B + C = 180°
A + D + E = 360°

a = c, d = e
A + B = 180°, A + D + E = 360°

a = c
A + B = 180°, C + D + E = 360°

a = e
B + C = 180°, A + D + E = 360°

d = c + e
A = 90°, C + D = 180°
2B + C = 360°
B + E = 270°

#### Type 2

These type 2 examples are isohedral. The second is an edge-to-edge variation. They both have pgg (22×) symmetry. If mirror image protile tiles (yellow and green) are considered distinct, the symmetry is p2 (2222).

Type 2
pgg (22×)
p2 (2222)
4-tile primitive unit

c = e
B + D = 180°

c = e, d = b
B + D = 180°

#### Types 3, 4, and 5

Type 3 Type 4 Type 5
p3 (333) p31m (3*3) p4 (442) p4g (4*2) p6 (632)
3-tile primitive unit 4-tile primitive unit 6-tile primitive unit 18-tile primitive unit

a = b, d = c + e
A = C = D = 120°

b = c, d = e
B = D = 90°

a = b, d = e
A = 60°, D = 120°

a = b = c, d = e
A = 60°, B = 120°, C = 90°
D = 120°, E = 150°

### Kershner (1968) Types 6, 7, 8

Kershner (1968) found three more types of pentagonal tile, bringing the total to eight. He claimed incorrectly that this was the complete list of pentagons that can tile the plane.

These examples are 2-isohedral and edge-to-edge. Type 8 has chiral pairs of tiles, which are colored as pairs in yellow-green and the other as two shades of blue. The pgg symmetry is reduced to p2 with distinct chiral pairs. The pgg symmetry is reduced to p2 when chiral pairs are considered distinct.

Type 6 Type 6
(Also type 5)
Type 7 Type 8
p2 (2222) pgg (22×) pgg (22×)
p2 (2222) p2 (2222)

a = d = e, b = c
B + D = 180°, 2B = E

a = d = e, b = c
B = 60°, A = C = D = E = 120°

b = c = d = e
B + 2E = 2C + D = 360°

b = c = d = e
2B + C = D + 2E = 360°

4-tile primitive unit

4-tile primitive unit

8-tile primitive unit

8-tile primitive unit

### James (1975) Type 10

In 1975 Richard E. James III found a ninth type, after reading about Kershner's results in Martin Gardner's "Mathematical Games" column in Scientific American magazine of July 1975 (reprinted in Gardner (1988)). It is indexed as type 10. The tiling is 3-isohedral and non-edge-to-edge.

Type 10
p2 (2222) cmm (2*22)

a=b=c+e
A=90, B+E=180°, B+2C=360°

a=b=2c=2e
A=B=E=90°, C=D=135°

6-tile primitive unit

### Rice (1977) Types 9,11,12,13

Marjorie Rice, an amateur mathematician, discovered four new types of tessellating pentagons in 1976 and 1977.[8][9]

All four tilings are 2-isohedral. The chiral pairs of tiles are colored in yellow and green for one isohedral set, and two shades of blue for the other set. The pgg symmetry is reduced to p2 when the chiral pairs are considered distinct.

The tiling by type 9 tiles is edge-to-edge, but the others are not.

Each primitive unit contains eight tiles.

Type 9 Type 11 Type 12 Type 13
pgg (22×)
p2 (2222)

b=c=d=e
2A+C=D+2E=360°

2a+c=d=e
A=90°, 2B+C=360°
C+E=180°

2a=d=c+e
A=90°, 2B+C=360°
C+E=180°

d=2a=2e
B=E=90°, 2A+D=360°

8-tile primitive unit

8-tile primitive unit

8-tile primitive unit

8-tile primitive unit

### Stein (1985) Type 14

A 14th convex pentagon type was found by Rolf Stein in 1985.[10]

The tiling is 3-isohedral and non-edge-to-edge. It has completely determined tiles, with no degrees of freedom. Some exact equations are: ${\displaystyle b=a{\sqrt {\frac {11{\sqrt {57}}-25}{8}}}}$, ${\displaystyle \sin(B)={\frac {{\sqrt {57}}-3}{8}}}$, ${\displaystyle \cos(B)=-{\sqrt {\frac {3{\sqrt {57}}-1}{32}}}}$, ${\displaystyle \tan(B)=-{\frac {1}{4}}{\sqrt {3{\sqrt {57}}-15}}}$. Other relations can easily be deduced.

The primitive units contain six tiles respectively. It has p2 (2222) symmetry.

 2a=2c=d=eA=90°, B≈145.34°, C≈69.32°,D≈124.66°, E≈110.68°(2B+C=360°, C+E=180°). 6-tile primitive unit

### Mann/McLoud/Von Derau (2015) Type 15

University of Washington Bothell mathematicians Casey Mann, Jennifer McLoud-Mann, and David Von Derau discovered a 15th monohedral tiling convex pentagon in 2015 using a computer algorithm.[11] The paper was published in October 2015.[12]

It is 3-isohedral and non-edge-to-edge, drawn with 6 colors, 2 shades of 3 colors, representing chiral pairs of the three isohedral positions. The pgg symmetry is reduced to p2 when the chiral pairs are consided distinct.

It has completely determined tiles, with no degrees of freedom. The primitive units contain twelve tiles respectively. It has pgg (22×) symmetry, and p2 (2222) if chiral pairs are considered distinct.

In July 2017 Michaël Rao completed a computer-assisted proof showing that there are no other types of convex pentagons that can tile the plane. The complete list of convex polygons that can tile the plane includes the above 15 pentagons, three types of hexagons, and all quadrilaterals and triangles.[13] A consequence of this proof is that no convex polygon exists that tiles the plane only aperiodically, since all of the above types allow for a periodic tiling.

 (Larger image) a=c=e, b=2a, d=√2 + √3aA=150°, B=60°, C=135°D=105°, E=90° 12-tile primitive unit

### Nonperiodic monohedral pentagons tilings

Nonperiodic monohedral pentagonal tilings can also be constructed, like the example below with 6-fold rotational symmetry by Michael Hirschhorn. Angles are A = 140°, B = 60°, C = 160°, D = 80°, E = 100°. [14]

In 2016 it could be shown by Bernhard Klaassen that every discrete rotational symmetry type can be represented by a monohedral pentagonal tiling from the same class of pentagons.[15][16] Two examples for 5-fold and 7-fold symmetry are shown below. Such tilings are possible for any type of n-fold rotational symmetry with n>2.

 5-fold rotational symmetry in a monohedral pentagonal tiling Hirschhorn's 6-fold rotational symmetry monohedral pentagonal tiling 7-fold rotational symmetry in a monohedral pentagonal tiling

## Dual uniform tilings

There are three isohedral pentagonal tilings generated as duals of the uniform tilings, those with 5-valence vertices. They represent special higher symmetry cases of the 15 monohedral tilings above. Uniform tilings and their duals are all edge-to-edge. These dual tilings are also called Laves tilings. The symmetry of the uniform dual tilings is the same as the uniform tilings. Because the uniform tilings are isogonal, the duals are isohedral.

cmm (2*22) p4g (4*2) p6 (632)
Prismatic pentagonal tiling
Instance of type 1[17]
Cairo pentagonal tiling
Instance of type 4[17][18]
Floret pentagonal tiling
Instance of types 1, 2 and 5[17]

120°, 120°, 120°, 90°, 90°
V3.3.3.4.4

120°, 120°, 90°, 120°, 90°
V3.3.4.3.4

120°, 120°, 120°, 120°, 60°
V3.3.3.3.6

### Dual k-uniform tilings

The k-uniform tilings with valence-5 vertices also have pentagonal dual tilings, containing the same three shaped pentagons as the semiregular duals above, but contain a mixture of pentagonal types. A k-uniform tiling has a k-isohedral dual tiling and are represented by different colors and shades of colors below.

For example these 2, 3, 4, and 5-uniform duals are all pentagonal:[19][20]

2-isohedral 3-isohedral
p4g (4*2) pgg (22×) p2 (2222) p6 (*632)
4-isohedral 5-isohedral
pgg (22×) p2 (2222) p6m (*632)
5-isohedral
pgg (22×) p2 (2222)

## Pentagonal/hexagonal tessellation

Pentagonal subdivisions of a hexagon

Pentagons have a peculiar relationship with hexagons. As demonstrated graphically below, some types of hexagons can be subdivided into pentagons. For example, a regular hexagon bisects into two type 1 pentagons. Subdivision of convex hexagons is also possible with three (type 3), four (type 4) and nine (type 3) pentagons.

By extension of this relation, a plane can be tessellated by a single pentagonal prototile shape in ways that generate hexagonal overlays. For example:

 Planar tessellation by a single pentagonal prototile (type 1) with overlays of regular hexagons (each comprising 2 pentagons). Planar tessellation by a single pentagonal prototile (type 3) with overlays of regular hexagons (each comprising 3 pentagons). Planar tessellation by a single pentagonal prototile (type 4) with overlays of semiregular hexagons (each comprising 4 pentagons). Planar tessellation by a single pentagonal prototile (type 3) with overlays of two sizes of regular hexagons (comprising 3 and 9 pentagons respectively).

## Non-convex pentagons

Periodic tiling by the sphinx

With pentagons that are not required to be convex, additional types of tiling are possible. An example is the sphinx tiling, an aperiodic tiling formed by a pentagonal rep-tile.[21] The sphinx may also tile the plane periodically, by fitting two sphinx tiles together to form a parallelogram and then tiling the plane by translates of this parallelogram,[21] a pattern that can be extended to any non-convex pentagon that has two consecutive angles adding to 2π, thus satisfying the condition(s) of convex Type 1 above.

It is possible to divide an equilateral triangle into three congruent non-convex pentagons, meeting at the center of the triangle, and to tile the plane with the resulting three-pentagon unit.[22] A similar method can be used to subdivide squares into four congruent non-convex pentagons, or regular hexagons into six congruent non-convex pentagons, and then tile the plane with the resulting unit.

## Regular pentagonal tilings in non-Euclidean geometry

A dodecahedron can be considered a regular tiling of 12 pentagons on the surface of a sphere, with Schläfli symbol {5,3}, having three pentagons around each vertex.

In the hyperbolic plane, there are tilings of regular pentagons, for instance order-4 pentagonal tiling, {5,4}, having four pentagons around each vertex. Higher order regular tilings {5,n} can be constructed on the hyperbolic plane, ending in {5,∞}.

Sphere Hyperbolic plane

{5,3}

{5,4}

{5,5}

{5,6}

{5,7}

{5,8}
...{5,∞}

## Irregular hyperbolic plane pentagonal tilings

There are an infinite number of dual uniform tilings in hyperbolic plane with isogonal irregular pentagonal faces. They have face configurations as V3.3.p.3.q.

Order p-q floret pentagonal tiling
7-3 8-3 9-3 ... 5-4 6-4 7-4 ... 5-5

V3.3.3.3.7
V3.3.3.3.8 V3.3.3.3.9
V3.3.4.3.5
V3.3.4.3.6 V3.3.4.3.7 V3.3.5.3.5
Polygonal hyperbolic binary tiling with 60-120-60-120-120 degree pentagons

The binary tiling can be made into a pentagonal tiling if you replace the horocyclic edges by line segments.

## References

1. ^ Tilings and Patterns, Sec. 9.3 Other Monohedral tilings by convex polygons
2. ^ Michaël Rao
3. ^ Exhaustive search of convex pentagons which tile the plane
4. ^ [1]
5. ^ [2]
6. ^ [3]
7. ^
8. ^ a b
9. ^ "Tessellations - Intriguing Tessellations". google.com. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
10. ^
11. ^ Bellos, Alex (11 August 2015). "Attack on the pentagon results in discovery of new mathematical tile". The Guardian.
12. ^ Mann, Casey; McLoud-Mann, Jennifer; David Von Derau (2015). "Convex pentagons that admit $i$-block transitive tilings". arXiv: [math.MG].
13. ^ Wolchover, Natalie (11 July 2017). "Pentagon Tiling Proof Solves Century-Old Math Problem". Quanta Magazine.
14. ^ Tiling the Plane with Congruent Pentagons, Doris Schattschneider, Mathematics Magazine, January 1978, Fig 12
15. ^ Klaassen, Bernhard (2016). "Rotationally symmetric tilings with convex pentagons and hexagons". Elemente der Mathematik. 71 (4): 137–144. arXiv:. doi:10.4171/em/310. ISSN 0013-6018.
16. ^ Klaassen, Bernhard (2016). "Rotationally Symmetric Tilings with Convex Pentagons and Hexagons". arXiv: [math.MG].
17. ^ a b c Reinhardt, Karl (1918), Über die Zerlegung der Ebene in Polygone, Dissertation Frankfurt am Main (in German), Borna-Leipzig, Druck von Robert Noske, pp. 77–81 (caution: there is at least one obvious mistake within this paper, i.e. γ+δ angle sum needs to equal π, not 2π for the first two tiling types defined on page 77)
18. ^ Cairo pentagonal tiling generated by a pentagon type 4 query and by a pentagon type 2 tiling query on wolframalpha.com (caution: the wolfram definition of pentagon type 2 tiling does not correspond with type 2 defined by Reinhardt in 1918)
19. ^
20. ^ n-uniform tilings, Brian Galebach
21. ^ a b
22. ^

Bibliography