In electromagnetism, absolute permittivity is the measure of resistance that is encountered when forming an electric field in a medium. In other words, permittivity is a measure of how an electric field affects, and is affected by, a dielectric medium. The permittivity of a medium describes how much electric field (more correctly, flux) is 'generated' per unit charge in that medium. More electric flux exists in a medium with a low permittivity (per unit charge) because of polarization effects. Permittivity is directly related to electric susceptibility, which is a measure of how easily a dielectric polarizes in response to an electric field. Thus, permittivity relates to a material's ability to resist an electric field (while unfortunately the word stem "permit" suggests the inverse quantity).
In electromagnetism, the electric displacement field D represents how an electric field E influences the organization of electric charges in a given medium, including charge migration and electric dipole reorientation. Its relation to permittivity in the very simple case of linear, homogeneous, isotropic materials with "instantaneous" response to changes in electric field is
In general, permittivity is not a constant, as it can vary with the position in the medium, the frequency of the field applied, humidity, temperature, and other parameters. In a nonlinear medium, the permittivity can depend on the strength of the electric field. Permittivity as a function of frequency can take on real or complex values.
In SI units, permittivity is measured in farads per meter (F/m or A2·s4·kg−1·m−3). The displacement field D is measured in units of coulombs per square meter (C/m2), while the electric field E is measured in volts per meter (V/m). D and E describe the interaction between charged objects. D is related to the charge densities associated with this interaction, while E is related to the forces and potential differences.
Its value is
Constants c0 and μ0 are defined in SI units to have exact numerical values, shifting responsibility of experiment to the determination of the meter and the ampere. (The approximation in the second value of ε0 above stems from π being an irrational number.)
The linear permittivity of a homogeneous material is usually given relative to that of free space, as a relative permittivity εr (also called dielectric constant, although this sometimes only refers to the static, zero-frequency relative permittivity). In an anisotropic material, the relative permittivity may be a tensor, causing birefringence. The actual permittivity is then calculated by multiplying the relative permittivity by ε0:
where χ (frequently written χe) is the electric susceptibility of the material.
where ε0 is the electric permittivity of free space.
The susceptibility of a medium is related to its relative permittivity εr by
So in the case of a vacuum,
The electric displacement D is related to the polarization density P by
Dispersion and causality
In general, a material cannot polarize instantaneously in response to an applied field, and so the more general formulation as a function of time is
That is, the polarization is a convolution of the electric field at previous times with time-dependent susceptibility given by χ(Δt). The upper limit of this integral can be extended to infinity as well if one defines χ(Δt) = 0 for Δt < 0. An instantaneous response would correspond to a Dirac delta function susceptibility χ(Δt) = χ δ(Δt).
This frequency dependence of the susceptibility leads to frequency dependence of the permittivity. The shape of the susceptibility with respect to frequency characterizes the dispersion properties of the material.
Moreover, the fact that the polarization can only depend on the electric field at previous times (i.e. effectively χ(Δt) = 0 for Δt < 0), a consequence of causality, imposes Kramers–Kronig constraints on the susceptibility χ(0).
As opposed to the response of a vacuum, the response of normal materials to external fields generally depends on the frequency of the field. This frequency dependence reflects the fact that a material's polarization does not respond instantaneously to an applied field. The response must always be causal (arising after the applied field) which can be represented by a phase difference. For this reason, permittivity is often treated as a complex function of the (angular) frequency of the applied field ω: (since complex numbers allow specification of magnitude and phase). The definition of permittivity therefore becomes
- D0 and E0 are the amplitudes of the displacement and electric fields, respectively,
- i is the imaginary unit, i2 = −1.
The response of a medium to static electric fields is described by the low-frequency limit of permittivity, also called the static permittivity εs (also εDC ):
At the high-frequency limit, the complex permittivity is commonly referred to as ε∞. At the plasma frequency and above, dielectrics behave as ideal metals, with electron gas behavior. The static permittivity is a good approximation for alternating fields of low frequencies, and as the frequency increases a measurable phase difference δ emerges between D and E. The frequency at which the phase shift becomes noticeable depends on temperature and the details of the medium. For moderate fields strength (E0), D and E remain proportional, and
Since the response of materials to alternating fields is characterized by a complex permittivity, it is natural to separate its real and imaginary parts, which is done by convention in the following way:
- ε’ is the real part of the permittivity, which is related to the stored energy within the medium;
- ε” is the imaginary part of the permittivity, which is related to the dissipation (or loss) of energy within the medium;
- δ is the loss angle.
The choice of sign for time-dependence, exp(-iωt), dictates the sign convention for the imaginary part of permittivity. The signs used here correspond to those commonly used in physics, whereas for the engineering convention one should reverse all imaginary quantities.
The complex permittivity is usually a complicated function of frequency ω, since it is a superimposed description of dispersion phenomena occurring at multiple frequencies. The dielectric function ε(ω) must have poles only for frequencies with positive imaginary parts, and therefore satisfies the Kramers–Kronig relations. However, in the narrow frequency ranges that are often studied in practice, the permittivity can be approximated as frequency-independent or by model functions.
At a given frequency, the imaginary part of leads to absorption loss if it is positive (in the above sign convention) and gain if it is negative. More generally, the imaginary parts of the eigenvalues of the anisotropic dielectric tensor should be considered.
In the case of solids, the complex dielectric function is intimately connected to band structure. The primary quantity that characterizes the electronic structure of any crystalline material is the probability of photon absorption, which is directly related to the imaginary part of the optical dielectric function ε(ω). The optical dielectric function is given by the fundamental expression:
In this expression, Wc,v(E) represents the product of the Brillouin zone-averaged transition probability at the energy E with the joint density of states, Jc,v(E); φ is a broadening function, representing the role of scattering in smearing out the energy levels. In general, the broadening is intermediate between Lorentzian and Gaussian; for an alloy it is somewhat closer to Gaussian because of strong scattering from statistical fluctuations in the local composition on a nanometer scale.
According to the Drude model of magnetized plasma, a more general expression which takes into account the interaction of the carriers with an alternating electric field at millimeter and microwave frequencies in an axially magnetized semiconductor requires the expression of the permittivity as a non-diagonal tensor. (see also Electro-gyration).
If vanishes, then the tensor is diagonal but not proportional to the identity and the medium is said to be a uniaxial medium, which has similar properties to a uniaxial crystal.
Classification of materials
|Classification of materials based on permittivity|
|εr”/εr’||Current conduction||Field propagation|
|≪ 1||low-conductivity material
|≈ 1||lossy conducting material||lossy propagation medium|
|≫ 1||high-conductivity material
Materials can be classified according to their complex-valued permittivity ε, upon comparison of its real ε’ and imaginary ε" components (or, equivalently, conductivity, σ, when it's accounted for in the latter). A perfect conductor has infinite conductivity, σ=∞, while a perfect dielectric is a material that has no conductivity at all, σ=0; this latter case, of real-valued permittivity (or complex-valued permittivity with zero imaginary component) is also associated with the name lossless media. Generally, when σ/(ωε’) ≪ 1 we consider the material to be a low-loss dielectric (nearly though not exactly lossless), whereas σ/(ωε’) ≫ 1 is associated with a good conductor; such materials with non-negligible conductivity yield a large amount of loss that inhibit the propagation of electromagnetic waves, thus are also said to be lossy media. Those materials that do not fall under either limit are considered to be general media.
In the case of a lossy medium, i.e. when the conduction current is not negligible, the total current density flowing is:
- σ is the conductivity of the medium;
- ε’ is the real part of the permittivity.
- is the complex permittivity
In this formalism, the complex permittivity is defined as:
In general, the absorption of electromagnetic energy by dielectrics is covered by a few different mechanisms that influence the shape of the permittivity as a function of frequency:
- First, are the relaxation effects associated with permanent and induced molecular dipoles. At low frequencies the field changes slowly enough to allow dipoles to reach equilibrium before the field has measurably changed. For frequencies at which dipole orientations cannot follow the applied field because of the viscosity of the medium, absorption of the field's energy leads to energy dissipation. The mechanism of dipoles relaxing is called dielectric relaxation and for ideal dipoles is described by classic Debye relaxation.
- Second are the resonance effects, which arise from the rotations or vibrations of atoms, ions, or electrons. These processes are observed in the neighborhood of their characteristic absorption frequencies.
The above effects often combine to cause non-linear effects within capacitors. For example, dielectric absorption refers to the inability of a capacitor that has been charged for a long time to completely discharge when briefly discharged. Although an ideal capacitor would remain at zero volts after being discharged, real capacitors will develop a small voltage, a phenomenon that is also called soakage or battery action. For some dielectrics, such as many polymer films, the resulting voltage may be less than 1-2% of the original voltage. However, it can be as much as 15 - 25% in the case of electrolytic capacitors or supercapacitors.
At low frequencies, molecules in polar dielectrics are polarized by an applied electric field, which induces periodic rotations. For example, at the microwave frequency, the microwave field causes the periodic rotation of water molecules, sufficient to break hydrogen bonds. The field does work against the bonds and the energy is absorbed by the material as heat. This is why microwave ovens work very well for materials containing water. There are two maxima of the imaginary component (the absorptive index) of water, one at the microwave frequency, and the other at far ultraviolet (UV) frequency. Both of these resonances are at higher frequencies than the operating frequency of microwave ovens.
At moderate frequencies, the energy is too high to cause rotation, yet too low to affect electrons directly, and is absorbed in the form of resonant molecular vibrations. In water, this is where the absorptive index starts to drop sharply, and the minimum of the imaginary permittivity is at the frequency of blue light (optical regime).
At high frequencies (such as UV and above), molecules cannot relax, and the energy is purely absorbed by atoms, exciting electron energy levels. Thus, these frequencies are classified as ionizing radiation.
While carrying out a complete ab initio (that is, first-principles) modelling is now computationally possible, it has not been widely applied yet. Thus, a phenomenological model is accepted as being an adequate method of capturing experimental behaviors. The Debye model and the Lorentz model use a 1st-order and 2nd-order (respectively) lumped system parameter linear representation (such as an RC and an LRC resonant circuit).
The dielectric constant of a material can be found by a variety of static electrical measurements. The complex permittivity is evaluated over a wide range of frequencies by using different variants of dielectric spectroscopy, covering nearly 21 orders of magnitude from 10−6 to 1015 Hz. Also, by using cryostats and ovens, the dielectric properties of a medium can be characterized over an array of temperatures. In order to study systems for such diverse excitation fields, a number of measurement setups are used, each adequate for a special frequency range.
- Low-frequency time domain measurements (10−6-103 Hz)
- Low-frequency frequency domain measurements (10−5-106 Hz)
- Reflective coaxial methods (106-1010 Hz)
- Transmission coaxial method (108-1011 Hz)
- Quasi-optical methods (109-1010 Hz)
- Terahertz time-domain spectroscopy (1011-1013 Hz)
- Fourier-transform methods (1011-1015 Hz)
At infrared and optical frequencies, a common technique is ellipsometry. Dual polarisation interferometry is also used to measure the complex refractive index for very thin films at optical frequencies.
- Acoustic attenuation
- Density functional theory
- Electric-field screening
- Green-Kubo relations
- Green's function (many-body theory)
- Linear response function
- Rotational Brownian motion
- Electromagnetic permeability
- electric constant
- Current practice of standards organizations such as NIST and BIPM is to use c0, rather than c, to denote the speed of light in vacuum according to ISO 31. In the original Recommendation of 1983, the symbol c was used for this purpose. See NIST Special Publication 330, Appendix 2, p. 45 .
- Latest (2006) values of the constants (NIST)
- Dielectric Spectroscopy
- Peter Y. Yu, Manuel Cardona (2001). Fundamentals of Semiconductors: Physics and Materials Properties. Berlin: Springer. p. 261. ISBN 3-540-25470-6.
- José García Solé, Jose Solé, Luisa Bausa, (2001). An introduction to the optical spectroscopy of inorganic solids. Wiley. Appendix A1, pp, 263. ISBN 0-470-86885-6.
- John H. Moore, Nicholas D. Spencer (2001). Encyclopedia of chemical physics and physical chemistry. Taylor and Francis. p. 105. ISBN 0-7503-0798-6.
- Solé, José García; Bausá, Louisa E; Jaque, Daniel (2005-03-22). Solé and Bausa. p. 10. ISBN 3-540-25470-6.
- Hartmut Haug, Stephan W. Koch (1994). Quantum Theory of the Optical and Electronic Properties of Semiconductors. World Scientific. p. 196. ISBN 981-02-1864-8.
- Manijeh Razeghi (2006). Fundamentals of Solid State Engineering. Birkhauser. p. 383. ISBN 0-387-28152-5.
-  Prati E. (2003) "Propagation in gyroelectromagnetic guiding systems", J. of Electr. Wav. and Appl. 17, 8, 1177
- John S. Seybold (2005) Introduction to RF propagation. 330 pp, eq.(2.6), p.22.
- Linfeng Chen, V. V. Varadan, C. K. Ong, Chye Poh Neo (2004). "Microwave theory and techniques for materials characterization". Microwave electronics. Wiley. p. 37. ISBN 0-470-84492-2.
- Mailadil T. Sebastian (2008). Dielectric Materials for Wireless Communication. Elsevier. p. 19. ISBN 0-08-045330-9.
- C.J.F. Bottcher, O.C. von Belle & Paul Bordewijk (1973) Theory of Electric Polarization: Dielectric Polarization, volume 1, (1978) volume 2, Elsevier ISBN 0-444-41579-3 .
- Arthur R. von Hippel (1954) Dielectrics and Waves ISBN 0-89006-803-8
- Arthur von Hippel editor (1966) Dielectric Materials and Applications: papers by 22 contributors ISBN 0-89006-805-4.