In mathematics, the Peter–Weyl theorem is a basic result in the theory of harmonic analysis, applying to topological groups that are compact, but are not necessarily abelian. It was initially proved by Hermann Weyl, with his student Fritz Peter, in the setting of a compact topological group G (Peter & Weyl 1927). The theorem is a collection of results generalizing the significant facts about the decomposition of the regular representation of any finite group, as discovered by F. G. Frobenius and Issai Schur.
The theorem has three parts. The first part states that the matrix coefficients of irreducible representations of G are dense in the space C(G) of continuous complex-valued functions on G, and thus also in the space L2(G) of square-integrable functions. The second part asserts the complete reducibility of unitary representations of G. The third part then asserts that the regular representation of G on L2(G) decomposes as the direct sum of all irreducible unitary representations. Moreover, the matrix coefficients of the irreducible unitary representations form an orthonormal basis of L2(G). In the case that G is the group of unit complex numbers, this last result is simply a standard result from Fourier series.
- 1 Matrix coefficients
- 2 Decomposition of a unitary representation
- 3 Decomposition of square-integrable functions
- 4 Consequences
- 5 See also
- 6 References
A matrix coefficient of the group G is a complex-valued function φ on G given as the composition
where π : G → GL(V) is a finite-dimensional (continuous) group representation of G, and L is a linear functional on the vector space of endomorphisms of V (e.g. trace), which contains GL(V) as an open subset. Matrix coefficients are continuous, since representations are by definition continuous, and linear functionals on finite-dimensional spaces are also continuous.
This first result resembles the Stone–Weierstrass theorem in that it indicates the density of a set of functions in the space of all continuous functions, subject only to an algebraic characterization. In fact, the matrix coefficients of tensor product form a unital algebra invariant under complex conjugation because the product of two matrix coefficients is a matrix coefficient of the tensor product representation, and the complex conjugate is a matrix coefficient of the dual representation. Hence the theorem follows directly from the Stone–Weierstrass theorem if the matrix coefficients separate points, which is obvious if G is a matrix group (Knapp 1986, p. 17). Conversely, it is a consequence of the theorem that any compact Lie group is isomorphic to a matrix group (Knapp 1986, Theorem 1.15).
A corollary of this result is that the matrix coefficients of G are dense in L2(G).
Decomposition of a unitary representation
The second part of the theorem gives the existence of a decomposition of a unitary representation of G into finite-dimensional representations. Now, intuitively groups were conceived as rotations on geometric objects, so it is only natural to study representations which essentially arise from continuous actions on Hilbert spaces. (For those who were first introduced to dual groups consisting of characters which are the continuous homomorphisms into the circle group, this approach is similar except that the circle group is (ultimately) generalised to the group of unitary operators on a given Hilbert space.)
Let G be a topological group and H a complex Hilbert space.
A continuous action ∗ : G × H → H, gives rise to a continuous map ρ∗ : G → HH (functions from H to H with the strong topology) defined by: ρ∗(g)(v) = ∗(g,v). This map is clearly an homomorphism from G into GL(H), the homeomorphic automorphisms of H. Conversely, given such a map, we can uniquely recover the action in the obvious way.
Thus we define the representations of G on a Hilbert space H to be those group homomorphisms, ρ, which arise from continuous actions of G on H. We say that a representation ρ is unitary if ρ(g) is a unitary operator for all g ∈ G; i.e., for all v, w ∈ H. (I.e. it is unitary if ρ : G → U(H). Notice how this generalises the special case of the one-dimensional Hilbert space, where U(C) is just the circle group.)
Given these definitions, we can state the second part of the Peter–Weyl theorem (Knapp 1986, Theorem 1.12):
Peter–Weyl Theorem (Part II). Let ρ be a unitary representation of a compact group G on a complex Hilbert space H. Then H splits into an orthogonal direct sum of irreducible finite-dimensional unitary representations of G.
Decomposition of square-integrable functions
To state the third and final part of the theorem, there is a natural Hilbert space over G consisting of square-integrable functions, L2(G); this makes sense because Haar measure exists on G. Calling this Hilbert space H, the group G has a unitary representation ρ on H by acting on the left, via
The final statement of the Peter–Weyl theorem (Knapp 1986, Theorem 1.12) gives an explicit orthonormal basis of L2(G). Roughly it asserts that the matrix coefficients for G, suitably renormalized, are an orthonormal basis of L2(G). In particular, L2(G) decomposes into an orthogonal direct sum of all the irreducible unitary representations, in which the multiplicity of each irreducible representation is equal to its degree (that is, the dimension of the underlying space of the representation). Thus,
where Σ denotes the set of (isomorphism classes of) irreducible unitary representations of G, and the summation denotes the closure of the direct sum of the total spaces Eπ of the representations π.
More precisely, suppose that a representative π is chosen for each isomorphism class of irreducible unitary representation, and denote the collection of all such π by Σ. Let be the matrix coefficients of π in an orthonormal basis, in other words
for each g ∈ G. Finally, let d(π) be the degree of the representation π. The theorem now asserts that the set of functions
is an orthonormal basis of L2(G).
Restriction to class functions
A function on G is called a class function if for all and in G. The space of class functions forms a closed subspace of , and therefore a Hilbert space in its own right. Within the space of matrix coefficients for a fixed representation is the character of , defined by
In the notation above, the character is the sum of the diagonal matrix coefficients:
An important consequence of the preceding result is the following:
- Theorem: The characters of the irreducible representations of G form an orthonormal basis for the space of square-integrable class functions on G.
An example: 
A simple but helpful example is the case of the group of complex numbers of magnitude 1, . In this case, the irreducible representations are one-dimensional and given by
There is then a single matrix coefficient for each representation, the function
The last part of the Peter–Weyl theorem then asserts in this case that these functions form an orthonormal basis for . In this case, the theorem is simply a standard result from the theory of Fourier series.
For any compact group G, we can regard the decomposition of in terms of matrix coefficients as a generalization of the theory of Fourier series. Indeed, this decomposition is often referred to as a Fourier series.
An example: SU(2)
We use the standard representation of the group SU(2) as
Thus, SU(2) is represented as the 3-sphere sitting inside . The irreducible representations of SU(2), meanwhile, are labeled by a non-negative integer and can be realized as the natural action of SU(2) on the space of homogeneous polynomials of degree in two complex variables. The matrix coefficients of the th representation are hyperspherical harmonics of degree , that is, the restrictions to of homogeneous harmonic polynomials of degree in and . The key to verifying this claim is to compute that for any two complex numbers and , the function
is harmonic as a function of .
In this case, finding an orthonormal basis for consisting of matrix coefficients amounts to finding an orthonormal basis consisting of hyperspherical harmonics, which is a standard construction in analysis on spheres.
Linearity of compact Lie groups
One important consequence of the Peter–Weyl theorem is the following:
- Theorem: Every compact Lie group has a faithful finite-dimensional representation and is therefore isomorphic to a closed subgroup of for some .
Structure of compact topological groups
From the Peter–Weyl theorem, one can deduce a significant general structure theorem. Let G be a compact topological group, which we assume Hausdorff. For any finite-dimensional G-invariant subspace V in L2(G), where G acts on the left, we consider the image of G in GL(V). It is closed, since G is compact, and a subgroup of the Lie group GL(V). It follows by a theorem of Élie Cartan that the image of G is a Lie group also.
If we now take the limit (in the sense of category theory) over all such spaces V, we get a result about G: Because G acts faithfully on L2(G), G is an inverse limit of Lie groups. It may of course not itself be a Lie group: it may for example be a profinite group.
- Peter, F.; Weyl, H. (1927), "Die Vollständigkeit der primitiven Darstellungen einer geschlossenen kontinuierlichen Gruppe", Math. Ann., 97: 737–755, doi:10.1007/BF01447892.
- Bump, Daniel (2004), Lie groups, Springer, ISBN 0-387-21154-3.
- Hall, Brian C. (2015), Lie Groups, Lie Algebras, and Representations: An Elementary Introduction, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 222 (2nd ed.), Springer, ISBN 978-3319134666.
- Hazewinkel, Michiel, ed. (2001) , "Peter-Weyl theorem", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, Springer Science+Business Media B.V. / Kluwer Academic Publishers, ISBN 978-1-55608-010-4
- Knapp, Anthony (1986), Representation theory of semisimple groups, Princeton University Press, ISBN 0-691-09089-0.
- Knapp, Anthony W. (2002), Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction, Progress in Mathematics, 140 (2nd ed.), Boston: Birkhäuser, ISBN 0-8176-4259-5.
- Mostow, G.D. (1961), "Cohomology of topological groups and solvmanifolds", Ann. of Math., Annals of Mathematics, 73 (1): 20–48, doi:10.2307/1970281, JSTOR 1970281
- Palais, R.S.; Stewart, T.E. (1961), "The cohomology of differentiable transformation groups", Amer. J. Math., The Johns Hopkins University Press, 83 (4): 623–644, doi:10.2307/2372901, JSTOR 2372901.