Piano Sonata No. 2 (Chopin)
|Piano Sonata No. 2|
|by Frédéric Chopin|
Watercolour of Chopin by Maria Wodzińska, 1836
|Other name||Funeral March|
|Duration||About 21-25 minutes|
Frédéric Chopin's Piano Sonata No. 2 in B-flat minor, Op. 35, is a piano sonata in four movements. Chopin completed the work while living in George Sand's manor in Nohant, some 250 km (160 mi) south of Paris, a year before it was published in 1840. It is considered the first of the composer's three mature sonatas (the others being the Piano Sonata No. 3 in B minor, Op. 58 and the Sonata for Piano and Cello in G minor, Op. 65), and one of the greatest piano sonatas of the literature.
The sonata's third movement is Chopin's famous Funeral March (Marche funèbre) which was composed at least two years before the remainder of the work. The composition carries reminiscences of music by Bach and by Beethoven. Chopin reportedly disliked the latter, whose twelfth Piano Sonata also has a funeral march as its third movement. A typical performance of Chopin's second sonata lasts between 21 and 25 minutes, depending on whether the repetition of the first movement's exposition is observed.
While the work gained instant popularity with the public, critical reception was initially more doubtful. Robert Schumann, among other critics, argued that the work was structurally inferior and that Chopin "could not quite handle sonata form", a criticism that did not withstand time. Chopin's second sonata has been recorded by many professional pianists and it is regularly programmed in concerts and piano competitions. The sonata's third movement exists in countless arrangements and is performed at funerals all over the world (including Chopin's own funeral), having become an archetypal evocation of death.
- 1 Historical background
- 2 Movements
- 3 Influences
- 4 Reception and legacy
- 5 Available editions and recordings
- 6 References
- 7 External links
The Piano Sonata No. 2 was written during a time where the sonata lost its overpowering dominance. While the sonatas of Beethoven and Mozart comprised a considerable portion of their compositional output, this is not true of the next generation of composers: Franz Liszt only wrote two sonatas among his dozens of instrumental compositions, Robert Schumann eight (including the Fantasie in C, Op. 17), and Felix Mendelssohn thirteen. Besides the Piano Sonata No. 2, Chopin only wrote three other sonatas: a piano sonata in C minor (Op. posth. 4), written at the age of eighteen; the Piano Sonata No. 3 in B minor (Op. 58); and the Sonata for Piano and Cello in G minor (Op. 65).
The compositional origins of the Piano Sonata No. 2, considered the first mature piano sonata Chopin wrote, are centred on its third movement (Marche funèbre), a funeral march which many scholars indicate was written in 1837. However, Jeffrey Kallberg believes that such indications are because of an autograph manuscript of eight bars of music in D-flat major marked Lento cantabile, apparently written as a gift to an unnamed recipient. The manuscript, which is dated 28 November 1837, would later become part of the trio of the Marche funèbre. However, Kallberg suggests this manuscript may have been intended as the beginning of an earlier attempt of a different slow movement, instead of being part of the Marche funèbre, writing that "it would have been unusual for Chopin to make a gift of a manuscript that, if it did not contain an entire piece, did not at least quote the beginning of it", as almost all of his other presentation manuscripts did. He also suggests that a four-hand arrangement by Julian Fontana of the Marche funèbre may be connected with an abandoned piano sonata for four hands that Chopin wrote in 1835, originally to be published as his op. 28 (which was instead appropriated to the 24 Preludes, Op. 28), therefore raising the possibility that the movement may actually date from 1835 instead of the generally accepted 1837.
Some time after writing the Marche funèbre, Chopin composed the other movements, completing the entire sonata by 1839. In a letter on 8 August 1839, addressed to Fontana, Chopin wrote:
I am writing here a Sonata in B flat minor which will contain my March which you already know. There is an Allegro, then a Scherzo in E flat minor, the March and a short Finale about three pages of my manuscript-paper. The left hand and the right hand gossip in unison after the March. ... My father has written to say that my old sonata [in C minor, Op. 4] has been published[note 1] by [Tobias Haslinger] and that the German critics praise it. Including the ones in your hands I now have six manuscripts. I'll see the publishers damned before they get them for nothing.
Haslinger's unauthorised dissemination of Chopin's early C minor sonata (he had went as far as engraving the work and allowing it to circulate, against the composer's wishes) may have increased the pressure Chopin had to publish a piano sonata, which may explain why Chopin added the other movements to the Marche funèbre to produce a sonata. The work was finished in the summer of 1839 in Nohant (near Châteauroux), in France, and published in May 1840 in London, Leipzig, and Paris. The work was not furnished with a dedication.
Andreas Xenopoulos, piano
Paul Pitman, piano
Andreas Xenopoulos, piano
Paul Pitman, piano
Problems playing these files? See media help.
The sonata comprises four movements:
I. Grave – Doppio movimento
5–7 minutes[note 2]
The first movement is in a modified sonata form[note 3] in B♭ minor and 2
2 time. It opens with a four-bar introduction in the relative major, D♭ major marked Grave, followed by a tempo change to Doppio movimento,[note 4] a key change to the tonic key, and the introduction of an agitated bass accompanimental figure; four bars later, the main theme enters. The main theme, marked agitato, is followed by a second theme, in D♭ major, which is marked piano and sostenuto. In the beginning of the development, all of the themes introduced in the movement appear.[note 5] Later in the development, a seemingly new tune, which is actually an inversion of part of the second theme, is introduced. In the climax of the development, Chopin combines three elements at once: the motifs from the Grave introduction and the main theme in the bass and treble respectively, with crotchet triplets in the middle. In the recapitulation, the principal section containing the main theme does not return, possibly inspired by the older binary sonata form typical of Domenico Scarlatti's keyboard sonatas; instead, only the lyrical second theme returns – but in the tonic's parallel major, B♭ major. The movement is closed with a brilliant 12-bar coda, marked stretto and ending in three B-flat major chords marked fff (fortississimo).
Repeat of the exposition
When the sonata was published in 1840 in the usual three cities of Paris, Leipzig, and London, the London and Paris editions indicated the repeat of the exposition as starting at the very beginning of the movement (at the Grave section). However, the Leizpig edition designed the repeat as beginning at the Doppio movimento section. Although the critical edition published by Breitkopf & Härtel (that was edited, among others, by Franz Liszt, Carl Reinecke, and Johannes Brahms) indicate the repeat similarly to the London and Paris first editions, almost all 20th century editions are similar to the Leizpig edition in this regard. Charles Rosen argues that the repeat of the exposition in the manner perpetrated by the Leizpig edition is a serious error, saying it is "musically impossible" as it interrupts the D-flat major cadence (which ends the exposition) with the B-flat minor accompanimental figure. However, Leikin advocates for excluding the Grave from the repeat of the exposition, citing in part that Karol Mikuli's 1880 complete edition of Chopin contained a repeat sign after the Grave in the first movement of the Piano Sonata No. 2. Mikuli was a student of Chopin from 1844-1848 and also observed lessons Chopin gave to other students - including those where this sonata was taught - and took extensive notes.
Most commercial recordings exclude the Grave from the repetition of the exposition, including those of Vladimir Ashkenazy, Murray Perahia, Maurizio Pollini, Martha Argerich, Evgeny Kissin, and Li Yundi, among others; however, in a live recording from the Chopin International Piano Competition in 2010, Yulianna Avdeeva begins the repetition from the Grave. Other recordings, including those of Sergei Rachmaninoff, Arthur Rubinstein, Vladimir Horowitz, and Garrick Ohlsson, exclude the repetition altogether.
The second movement is a scherzo in E♭ minor and 3
4 time with no tempo indication. Anatole Leikin suggests that the absence of the tempo indication can be explained by the close similarities of this movement and the closing section of the first movement, including the prevalence of repeated octaves and chords in both movements, and the identical cadential phrases. Therefore, the absence of a tempo indication may suggest that there is no new tempo, but instead a mere change of notation (from triplets to triple metre).
The movement is in the conventional scherzo-trio-scherzo form with the trio in G♭ major. The scherzo’s explosive rhythmic and dynamic power, as well as its furious insistence on repeated chords and octaves, places it in the tradition of the scherzo movements of Beethoven. However, unlike Beethoven, whose scherzos are transformed minuets, this scherzo has many defining rhythmic characteristics that make it a transformed mazurka instead. The trio, marked Più lento, has a songlike quality to it with its simple, sensuous melody. Following the return of the scherzo is a coda that is a condensed reprise of the trio and therefore ends the work in the relative major; other works of Chopin that also end in the relative major include the Scherzo No. 2 in B♭ minor (Op. 31) and the Fantaisie in F minor (Op. 49).
III. Marche funèbre: Lento
The third movement, a "stark juxtaposition of funeral march and pastoral trio", is in B♭ minor and 4
4 time, with the trio in the relative major of D♭. The tempo designation, Lento, was not added until after the work's publication in 1840. The movement opens with a melody consisting of just a repeated B♭ for almost three measures accompanied by alternating B♭ (without the third) and G♭ major chords that ring like a funereal bell. This melodic device was also used as the backbone for the main theme of the preceding Scherzo movement and part of the coda of the opening movement. The melody following the repeated B♭, is, as Alan Walker notes, "a strict retrogade" of the first movement's main theme. The trio of the movement, which is in the tonic's relative major, consists of a serene melody accompanied by quavers in the left hand.
The Marche funèbre alone has remained one of Chopin's most popular compositions and has become an archetypal evocation of death. It has been widely arranged for other instrumentations and is performed at funerals all over the world. The English conductor Henry Wood made two orchestrations of the Marche funèbre. One was played at The Proms on four occasions between 1895 and 1904. On the First Night of the 1907 Proms, 17 August 1907, Wood conducted a new version he had written on learning of the death two days earlier of the renowned violinist Joseph Joachim. In 1933, Sir Edward Elgar transposed it into D minor and transcribed it for full orchestra; its first performance was at his own memorial concert the next year. It was also transcribed for large orchestra by the conductor Leopold Stokowski; this version was recorded for the first time by Matthias Bamert.
The Marche funèbre, in an arrangement for orchestra by Napoléon Henri Reber, was played at the graveside during Chopin's own burial at Père Lachaise Cemetery in Paris. It was also used at the state funerals of John F. Kennedy, Sir Winston Churchill, Margaret Thatcher, and those of Soviet leaders, including Leonid Brezhnev.
Although the movement was originally published as Marche funèbre, Chopin changed its title to simply Marche in his corrections of the first Paris edition. In addition, whenever Chopin wrote about this movement in his letters, he referred to it as a "march" instead of a "funeral march".[note 6] Kallberg believes Chopin's removal of the adjective funèbre was possibly motivated by his contempt for descriptive labels of his music. After his London publisher Wessel & Stapleton added unauthorised titles to Chopin’ works, including The Infernal Banquet to his first scherzo in B minor (Op. 20), the composer, in a letter to Fontana, wrote:
Now concerning [Christian Rudolf Wessel], he is an ass and a cheater ... if he has lost on my compositions, it is doubtless due to the stupid titles he has given them in spite of my repeated railings to [Frederic Stapleton]; that if I listened to the voice of my soul, I would have never sent him anything more after those titles.
In 1826, a decade before he wrote this movement, Chopin had composed another Marche funèbre in C minor, which was published posthmously as Op. 72 No. 2.
IV. Finale: Presto
The short, monophonic finale, marked Presto and in 2
2 time, is a perpetuum mobile consisting of parallel octaves played sotto voce e legato (similarly to the Prelude in E♭ minor, Op. 28 No. 14) and not a single rest or chord until the final bars with a sudden fortissimo B♭ octave and a B♭ minor chord ending the whole piece. Garrick Ohlsson remarked that the movement is "extraordinary, because he’s written the weirdest movement he's ever written in his whole life, something which truly looks to the 20th century and post-romanticism and atonality". Additionally, Leikin describes the finale as "probably the most enigmatic piece Chopin ever wrote", and Anton Rubinstein is said to have remarked that the fourth movement is the "wind howling around the gravestones".
It is firmly established that Chopin greatly idolised Bach. His principal training, in both piano playing and composition, came from a study of Bach. This study of Bach was something that he continously advocated to his pupils. Like many of Chopin's works, the Piano Sonata No. 2 shows reminiscences from the music of Bach; in this case, the Prelude from the Suite No. 6 in D major (BWV 1012). A frequently repeated motif of Bach's Prelude is noticeably similar to the main theme of the first movement of Chopin's sonata; in addition, similarly to the Finale of Chopin's sonata, the Prelude is a perpetuum mobile with four groups oquaver triplets per bar.
The Piano Sonata No. 2 also shows reminiscences from the music of Beethoven, something that is uncommon for Chopin's music as he is usually regarded as the Romantic era composer least influenced by Beethoven. Chopin allegedly found much of Beethoven's music distasteful: according to an anecdote by Charles Hallé, the composer described Beethoven's Piano Sonata No. 18 in E♭ major (Op. 31 No. 3) as "vulgar", and Heinrich Neuhaus contends that Chopin could not stand the last movement of the Symphony No. 5 in C minor (Op. 67). However, the piano sonatas of Beethoven, called the "New Testament" of piano music by Hans von Bülow, could not be ignored if Chopin were to make a contribution to the genre of the piano sonata, which was already losing its dominance in the Romantic era.
The Piano Sonata No. 12 in A-flat major (Op. 26), which features a Marcia funèbre as one of its movements, was reportedly Chopin's favourite Beethoven sonata; he played and taught it more than any other Beethoven sonata. The plan of Chopin's sonata - with the slow Marche funèbre movement following the scherzo - directly follows that of Beethoven's Op. 26. However, the first movement of Chopin's sonata is written in sonata form, while the first movement of Beethoven's op. 26 is a set of variations on an original theme. Nonetheless, this did not prevent Chopin from following Beethoven's plan, and the difference in form between their sonatas is relatively insignificant. In addition, the sonata's opening bars allude to the opening of the first movement of Beethoven's Piano Sonata No. 32 in C minor (Op. 111), Beethoven's last. Similarly to Chopin's sonata, Beethoven's Op. 111 begins with a diminished seventh leap in the left hand, which resolves as a leading-tone diminished seventh to the dominant. However, Beethoven's opening develops into a lengthy introduction, while Chopin's opening jumps right into the Doppio movimento via the interrupted cadence. Petty writes that this allowed Chopin to invent a "new future for Beethoven" symbolically, and that this gesture of Chopin's "inscribes Beethoven implicitly into all that follows" in the entire sonata, particularly the Marche funèbre. In addition to this movement, two other works of Chopin also allude to Op. 111: the Étude in C minor (Op. 10 No. 12) and the Polonaise-Fantaisie in A-flat major (Op. 61). The coda of the C minor Étude alludes to the coda of the first movement of Op. 111, and the central section of the Polonaise-Fantaisie contains a triple trill on the dominant of the flat mediant, reminiscent of the central episode of the second movement (Arietta) of Op. 111. Petty suggests that all three of these allusions to Op. 111 are close enough to border on quotation.
Reception and legacy
Although the Piano Sonata No. 2 was quick to gain popularity among the public, it intially confused the critics, who found it lacked cohesion and unity, and remarked that he could not quite handle sonata form. Most of the critical reviews written in the century following the work's publication were negative, although critics were still very complimentary about certain aspects of the sonata. However, recent commentaries suggest that the notions that the work suffers from structural inferiority and that Chopin could not handle sonata form are slowly fading away, and it is now considered one of the greatest piano sonatas of the literature.
The first major criticism, by Robert Schumann, appeared in 1841.[note 7] Schumann was critical of the work. He described the sonata as "four of [his] maddest children under the same roof" and found the title "Sonata" capricious and slightly presumptuous. He also remarked that the Marche funèbre "has something repulsive" about it, and that "an adagio in its place, perhaps in D-flat, would have had a far more beautiful effect". In addition, the finale caused a stir among Schumann and other musicians. Schumann said that the movement "seems more like a mockery than any [sort of] music", and when Felix Mendelssohn was asked for an opinion of it, he commented, "Oh, I abhor it". James Huneker remarked that the four movements of the sonata "have no common life", and that the sonata "is not more a sonata than it is a sequence of ballades and scherzi." Similarly, James Cuthbert Hadden wrote that "the four movements, regarded separately, are admirable, but taken together they have little thematic or other affinity," and also concurred with Schumann's description of the sonata as "four of his maddest children" bound together. Henry Bidou considers the work "not very coherent", and that "Schumann has pointed out the defect in its composition".
Despite the negative reaction to the work, the reception to the Marche funèbre itself was generally positive. Franz Liszt, a friend of Chopin's, writes that the Marche funèbre is "of such penetrating sweetness that we can scarcely deem it of this earth", and Charles Willeby writes that it is by far "the most beautiful and consistent movement" of the work.
Despite the sonata quickly winning popularity with the audience after its publication, it was, along with Chopin's two other mature sonatas, the Piano Sonata No. 3 and the Sonata for Piano and Cello, extremely rarely performed in Poland and other countries in Europe throughout the nineteenth century. Despite this, the Marche funèbre was performed often, both for piano and in transcriptions. It was not until the turn of the century that the sonatas were performed more often. The Piano Sonata No. 2 now continues to regularly appear on concert programs and in classical music competitions, especially the Chopin International Piano Competition.
The sonata, mainly the Marche funèbre, played an influence in a variety of both classical and non-classical compositions written after it. The development of the first movement contains a complex network of leitmotifs that Richard Wagner would similarly bring to fruition in his work Der Ring des Nibelungen (popularly known as the Ring Cycle). The second movement of Erik Satie's Embryons desséchés, entitled "of an Edriophthalma", uses a variation on the Marche funèbre's second theme. Satie labels it "Citation de la célèbre mazurka de SCHUBERT" ("quotation from the celebrated mazurka of Schubert"), but no such piece exists. In addition, the Marche funèbre is sampled in a number of jazz compositions, including Duke Ellington's "Black and Tan Fantasy", and the Canadian electronic dance music musician deadmau5 used the theme from the Marche funèbre in his song Ghosts 'n' Stuff.
Available editions and recordings
Several highly acclaimed editions are available of the Piano Sonata No. 2, most notably the editions of G. Henle Verlag, the edition edited by Ignacy Jan Paderewski, and the Chopin National Edition edited by Jan Ekier. The work has been widely performed and recorded. Two of the earliest commercial recordings of the work were made by Percy Grainger and Sergei Rachmaninoff in 1928 and 1930 respectively. Commercial recordings have also been made by such pianists as Alfred Cortot, Emil Gilels, Vladimir Horowitz, William Kapell, Evgeny Kissin, Arthur Rubinstein, and Chopin International Piano Competition winners Martha Argerich, Yulianna Avdeeva, Maurizio Pollini, Adam Harasiewicz, Li Yundi, and Garrick Ohlsson.
- The Op. 4 was not actually published until after Chopin's death, but the work had already been engraved and begun to circulate.
- 5 minutes if the repetition of the exposition is left out; 7 minutes if the repeat is observed
- "Modified" in that the principal section containing the main theme does not return in the recapitulation.
- From Merriam-Webster Online: Doppio movimento - "twice as fast as the preceding — used as a direction in music"
- The first three bars (106-8) come from the main theme; the next bar (109) from the secondary theme; the following bar from the Grave introduction, and so on.
- In addition to 8 August 1839 letter to Fontana mentioned above, Chopin referred to the movement as just a “march” in a letter to his family dated 8 June 1847
- Schumann's complete written critique is available at Oshry (1999), pp. 88-90
- Leikin (1994), p. 176
- Leikin (1994), p. 177
- Petty (1999), p. 284
- Kallberg (2001), pp. 4-8
- Hedley (1962), pp. 180-182
- "Fryderyk Chopin - Information Centre - Sonata in B flat minor, - Compositions". en.chopin.nifc.pl. Fryderyk Chopin Institute. Retrieved 2 July 2018.
- Jonson (1905), p. 124
- Leikin (2001), p. 570
- Leikin (1994), p. 186
- Leikin (1994), p. 187
- Rosen (1995), p. 279
- Rosen (1995), p. 280
- Leikin (2001), p. 581
- Leikin (1994), p. 187-188
- Leikin (1994), p. 189
- Huneker (1900), p. 297
- Leikin (1994), p. 190
- Boczkowska (2012), p. 217
- Ekier (2013), p. 79
- Leikin (1994), p. 191
- Jonson (1905), p. 125
- Huneker (1895). p. xiii
- See Oleksiak (2005)
- See Kramer (2001)
- BBC Proms Archives. Retrieved 21 October 2014
- Music Web International. Retrieved 21 October 2014
- Fryderyk Chopin – A Chronological Biography Archived 5 February 2009 at the Wayback Machine., accessed 21 May 2007
- John F. Kennedy Presidential Library. Retrieved 1 April 2016
- Kallberg (2001), p. 12
- Hedley (1862), p. 289
- Kallberg (2001), p. 14
- Kallberg (2001), pp. 14-15
- Institute, The Fryderyk Chopin. "Fryderyk Chopin - Information Centre - Funeral March in C minor [Op. 72] - Compositions". en.chopin.nifc.pl. Retrieved 7 July 2018.
- Rosen (1995), p. 285
- "Episode 44: Chopin's Unruly Children". www.radiochopin.org. Retrieved 2018-07-13.
- Thompson, Damian. "Courage, not madness, is the mark of genius". Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 7 December 2013.
- Rosen (1995), p. 285
- Leikin (1994), pp. 191-192
- Petty (1999), p. 281
- Petty (1999), p. 282
- Neuhaus (1993), p. 220
- Leistra-Jones, Karen (1 January 2018). "Hans von Bülow and the Confessionalization of Kunstreligion". The Journal of Musicology. 35 (1): 42–75. doi:10.1525/jm.2018.35.1.42. ISSN 0277-9269.
- Petty (1999), p. 289
- Oshry (1999), pp. 19-20
- Petty (1999), p. 285
- Oshry (1999), p. 89
- Huneker (1900), pp. 295-296
- #Hadden (1903), p. 220
- Oshry (1999), p. 26
- Liszt (1863), p. 26
- Willeby (1892), p. 225
- Chechlińska (1994), p. 230
- Rosen (1995), pp. 467-469
- Potter (2016), pp. 109-111
- Metzer (1997), pp. 139-140
- McCutcheon (2008), p. 168
- Seiffert, Dr. Wolf-Dieter. "G. Henle Publishers | Frédéric Chopin | Piano Sonata b flat minor op. 35". G. Henle Verlag. Retrieved 8 July 2018.
- Chopin, Frederic (1 January 2013). Paderewski, Ignacy Jan, ed. Sonatas: Chopin Complete Works Vol. VI. Warsaw; Place of distribution not identified: PWM Edition. ISBN 9781480390577.
- Ekier (2013)
- Boczkowska, Ewelina (2012). "Chopin's Ghosts". 19th-Century Music. 35 (3): 204–223. doi:10.1525/ncm.2012.35.3.204.
- Chechlińska, Zofia (8 December 1994). "Chopin reception in nineteenth-century Poland". In Samson, Jim. The Cambridge Companion to Chopin. Cambridge Companions to Music. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781139824996.
- Chopin, Frederic (1 January 2013). Ekier, Jan, ed. Sonatas, Op. 35 & 58: Chopin National Edition 10A, Vol. X (Bilingual edition ed.). PWM Edition. ISBN 9781480390782.
- Hadden, James Cuthbert (1903). Chopin. J.M. Dent & Company.
- Hedley, Arthur (1962). Selected Correspondence Of Fryderyk Chopin. Universal Digital Library. Heinemann.
- Huneker, James (1900). Chopin: The Man and His Music. C. Scribner's Sons.
- Huneker, James (1895). "Three Sonatas". Complete works for the piano. By Mikuli, Karol. G. Schirmer. pp. xiii–xiv.
- Jonson, George Charles Ashton (1905). A Handbook to Chopin's Works. Doubleday.
- Kallberg, Jeffrey (2001). "Chopin's March, Chopin's Death". 19th-Century Music. 25 (1): 3–26. doi:10.1525/ncm.2001.25.1.3. JSTOR 10.1525/ncm.2001.25.1.3.
- Karasowski, Maurycy (1879). Frederic Chopin: His Life, Letters, and Works. W. Reeves. p. 338.
- Kelley, Edgar Stillman (1913). Chopin the Composer: His Structural Art and Its Influence on Contemporaneous Music. G. Schirmer.
- Kramer, Lawrence (Spring 2001). "Chopin at the Funeral: Episodes in the History of Modern Death". Journal of the American Musicological Society. University of California Press on behalf of the American Musicological Society. 54 (1): 97–125. doi:10.1525/jams.2001.54.1.97. JSTOR 10.1525/jams.2001.54.1.97.
- Leikin, Anatole (2001). "Repeat with Caution: A Dilemma of the First Movement of Chopin's Sonata op. 35". The Musical Quarterly. 85 (3): 568–582. JSTOR 3600997.
- Leikin, Anatole (8 December 1994). "The sonatas". In Samson, Jim. The Cambridge Companion to Chopin. Cambridge Companions to Music. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781139824996.
- Liszt, Franz (1863). Life of Chopin. Ditson.
- McCutcheon, Mark A. (21 April 2018). The Medium Is the Monster: Canadian Adaptations of Frankenstein and the Discourse of Technology. Athabasca University Press. ISBN 9781771992244.
- Metzer, David (1997). "Shadow Play: The Spiritual in Duke Ellington's "Black and Tan Fantasy"". Black Music Research Journal. 17 (2): 137–158. doi:10.2307/779366. JSTOR 779366.
- Neuhaus, Heinrich (1993). The Art of Piano Playing. Kahn & Averill. ISBN 9781871082456.
- Oleksiak, Wojciech (2015-02-23). "3. Funeral March" in Breaking It Down: Chopin's Funeral March at culture
- Oshry, Jonathan (1999). Shifting Modes of Reception: Chopin's Piano Sonata in B Flat Minor Opus 35 (Master of Music). Royal Northern College of Music. OCLC 441730454. Web version at www
.joshry .com (2010).
- Petty, Wayne C. (Spring 1999). "Chopin and the Ghost of Beethoven". 19th-Century Music. 22 (3): 281–299. JSTOR 746802.
- Potter, Caroline (13 May 2016). Erik Satie: Music, Art and Literature. Routledge. ISBN 9781317141792.
- Rosen, Charles (1995). The Romantic Generation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
- Willeby, Charles (1892). Frederic François Chopin. S. Low, Marston.