Planar ternary ring

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

In mathematics, an algebraic structure consisting of a non-empty set and a ternary mapping may be called a ternary system. A planar ternary ring (PTR) or ternary field is special type of ternary system used by Hall (1943) to construct projective planes by means of coordinates. A planar ternary ring is not a ring in the traditional sense.

There is wide variation in the terminology. Planar ternary rings or ternary fields as defined here have been called by other names in the literature, and the term "planar ternary ring" can mean a variant of the system defined here. The term "ternary ring" often means a planar ternary ring, but it can also simply mean a ternary system.


A planar ternary ring is a structure where is a set containing at least two distinct elements, called 0 and 1, and is a mapping which satisfies these five axioms:

  1. ;
  2. ;
  3. , there is a unique such that : ;
  4. , there is a unique , such that ; and
  5. , the equations have a unique solution .

When is finite, the third and fifth axioms are equivalent in the presence of the fourth.[1]

No other pair (0', 1') in can be found such that still satisfies the first two axioms.

Binary operations[edit]


Define .[2] The structure is a loop with identity element 0.


Define . The set is closed under this multiplication. The structure is also a loop, with identity element 1.

Linear PTR[edit]

A planar ternary ring is said to be linear if . For example, the planar ternary ring associated to a quasifield is (by construction) linear.[citation needed]

Connection with projective planes[edit]

Coordinates of a projective plane to establish a planar ternary ring

Given a planar ternary ring , one can construct a projective plane with point set P and line set L as follows:[3][4] (Note that is an extra symbol not in .)


  • , and
  • .

Then define, , the incidence relation in this way:

Every projective plane can be constructed in this way, starting with an appropriate planar ternary ring. However, two nonisomorphic planar ternary rings can lead to the construction of isomorphic projective planes.

Conversely, given any projective plane π, by choosing four points, labelled o, e, u, and v, no three of which lie on the same line, coordinates can be introduced in π so that these special points are given the coordinates: o = (0,0), e = (1,1), v = () and u = (0).[5] The ternary operation is now defined on the coordinate symbols (except ) by y = T(x,a,b) if and only if the point (x,y) lies on the line which joins (a) with (0,b). The axioms defining a projective plane are used to show that this gives a planar ternary ring.

Linearity of the PTR is equivalent to a geometric condition holding in the associated projective plane.[6]

Related algebraic structures[edit]

PTR's which satisfy additional algebraic conditions are given other names. These names are not uniformly applied in the literature. The following listing of names and properties is taken from Dembowski (1968, p. 129).

A linear PTR whose additive loop is associative (and thus a group ), is called a cartesian group. In a cartesian group, the mappings

, and

must be permutations whenever . Since cartesian groups are groups under addition, we revert to using a simple "+" for the additive operation.

A quasifield is a cartesian group satisfying the right distributive law: . Addition in any quasifield is commutative.

A semifield is a quasifield which also satisfies the left distributive law:

A planar nearfield is a quasifield whose multiplicative loop is associative (and hence a group). Not all nearfields are planar nearfields.


  1. ^ Hughes & Piper 1973, p. 118, Theorem 5.4
  2. ^ In the literature there are two versions of this definition. This is the form used by Hall (1959, p. 355), Albert & Sandler (1968, p. 50), and Dembowski (1968, p. 128), while is used by Hughes & Piper (1973, p. 117), Pickert (1975, p. 38), and Stevenson (1972, p. 274). The difference comes from the alternative ways these authors coordinatize the plane.
  3. ^ R. H. Bruck, Recent Advances in the Foundations of Euclidean Plane Geometry, (1955) Appendix I.
  4. ^ Hall 1943, p.247 Theorem 5.4
  5. ^ This can be done in several ways. A short description of the method used by Hall (1943) can be found in Dembowski (1968, p. 127).
  6. ^ Dembowski 1968, p. 129