Political dynasties in the Philippines

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Coat of arms of the Philippines.svg
This article is part of a series on the
politics and government of
the Philippines

Political Dynasties have long been a feature of the Philippine political landscape. They are typically characterized as families that have established their political or economic dominance in a province and have coordinated efforts to move on to involvement in national government or other positions of national political prominence. Political dynasties usually have a strong, consolidated support base concentrated around the province in which they are dominant. Members of such dynasties usually do not limit their involvement to strictly political activities, and have been found participating in business or culture-related activities.

Political dynasties started emerging after the Philippine Revolution when the First Republic of the Philippines was established. With the decline of Spain's economic power and international prestige in the 19th century, the expansion of British and American influence around the world, and the political current of emergent nationalism among the children of the economically enfranchised bourgeois, the power of the peninsulares', or Spanish-born aristocracy declined propitiously. Following the defeat of the Spanish in the Spanish–American War, the surviving members of the Spanish or Spanish-sanctioned landholding elite and the newly ascendant merchant elite, who were mostly foreign expatriates or of Chinese origin, formed a de facto aristocracy to replace the power vacuum the Spanish had left.

Aristocracy survived and prospered under the American colonial regime, and remained a permanent fixture in Philippine society even following the independence of the Philippines was finally confirmed following the devastation of the Philippines under the Japanese occupation of the Philippines during World War II. Over the years, political dynasties continued to adapt, as newer dynasties emerged to fill power vacuums left behind by the extinction of older dynasties. The majority of the available positions in Philippine government are currently held by members of these political dynasties. Notable Philippine political dynasties include the Aquino, Marcos, Arroyo, Binay, Duterte, and Roxas families.

There has been a lot of debate regarding the effects political dynasties have on the political and economic status of Philippine society. Despite the negative reaction of the populace towards political dynasties and the association between dynastic activities and corruption,[1] there are no laws that restrict the presence of political dynasties in the Philippines.

Definition[edit]

Political dynasties refer to family units with members involved in government activities. In the Philippines, political dynasties refer to groups of politicians who come from the same family. The group in question is usually associated with a certain province or city, which members of the family have led or represented for successive generations. This can occur in two ways. One way is for members of a family to occupy a same certain government position in every term. Once the term of the member of a political dynasty runs out, a relative of the incumbent will run in his stead, thus ensuring political dominance. The second way is for a number of family members to occupy government positions at the same time.[1] As of the moment, there are no legal documents or laws that officially define a political dynasty in the Philippines. There have been bills that attempt to define a political dynasty such as the Anti-Dynasty Bill. However, such attempt usually miscarry and end in failure, as proven by the defeat of the Anti-Dynasty Bill in Philippine Congress on February 2, 2016.

Philippine laws[edit]

The 1987 Constitution of the Philippines states in Article II Section 26, "The State shall guarantee equal access to opportunities for public service, and prohibit political dynasties as may be defined by law."

Despite the provision in the Constitution, no law has been concerning the status of political dynasties in the Philippines. The closest explicit mention of political dynasties in Philippine law can be seen in Republic Act 7160 or the Local Government Code, where Book I, Title Two, Chapter 1, Section 43 states the term limit of local government officials. However, it does not include any limitations on the running of the incumbent's family relations or on the holding of multiple political positions by members of the same family.

(a) The term of office of all local elective officials elected after the effectivity of this Code shall be three (3) years, starting from noon of June 30, 1992 or such date as may be provided for by law, except that of elective Barangay officials: Provided, That all local officials first elected during the local elections immediately following the ratification of the 1987 Constitution shall serve until noon of June 30, 1992.

(b) No local elective official shall serve for more than three (3) consecutive terms in the same position. Voluntary renunciation of the office for any length of time shall not be considered as an interruption in the continuity of service for the full term for which the elective official concerned was elected. (c) The term of office of Barangay officials and members of the Sangguniang kabataan shall be for three (3) years, which shall begin after the regular election of Barangay officials on the second Monday of May 1994.

Several bills have been filed in relation to the prohibition of political dynasties, and are currently pending to be approved by the Congress. Many have called for the Congress to pass the Anti-Dynasty Law, but this bill has been passed over by each Congress since 1987.

On January 24, 2011, Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago filed Senate Bill 2649 which prohibits political dynasties from holding or running for elected local government positions. The bill disqualifies the following candidates from running for local government positions:

  • relatives of an incumbent elected official running for re-election up to the second degree of consanguinity, and are planning to run in the same province in the same election as the elected official
  • relatives of an incumbent elected official that holds a national position up to the second degree of consanguinity, and are planning to run in the province of origin of the elected official
  • persons that are not relatives of an elected official that are candidates to the same position in the same province in the same election but are related to each other up to the second degree of consanguinity.

The bill also prohibits relatives within the prohibited civil degree of relationship of an incumbent from succeeding to the incumbent’s position, except for the positions of Punong Barangay and Sangguniang Barangay.

Three bills were filed in the House of Representatives which are also in relation to the prohibition of political dynasties, which are similar in content to Senate Bill 2649:

  1. House Bill 172 filed on July 1, 2013, by representatives under the Bayan Muna, Gabriela, ACT, Anakpawis and Kabataan party lists.
  2. House Bill 837 filed on July 2, 2013, by Representative Erlinda Santiago of the 1-SAGIP party list.
  3. House Bill 2911 filed on September 18, 2013, by Representative Oscar Rodriguez from the 3rd district of Pampanga.

On December 16, 2013, the House of Representatives Committee on Suffrage and Electoral Reforms agreed to replace the three House bills into a single bill filed as House Bill 3587.

Statistics of Philippine political dynasties[edit]

Due to the increasing number of political dynasties in the Philippines, majority of the positions in government are held by politicians that are members of political dynasties. In fact, in the years 1995-2007, an average of 31.3% of all congressmen and 23.1% of governors were replaced by relatives. In the 1995 elections, of the 83 congressmen elected on to their third term, 36 of them were replaced by a relative in the succeeding elections. The term "relative" here referring to anyone with a familial connection such as a wife, a son or daughter, a cousin, etc. In many of these cases, the people who would eventually go on to take their place had no previous political background or experience save their familial connection.[2]

In a study done in 2012 by economists Beja, Mendoza, Venida, and Yap, it was estimated that 40% of all provinces in the Philippines have a provincial governor and congressman that are related in some way.[2] Another 2014 study done by Querubin of the Department of Politics in New York University indicated that an estimate 50-70% of all politicians are involved or associated in a political dynasty within the Philippines, including local government units. In the same study, it was concluded that approximately 70% of all jurisdiction-based legislators in the current Congress are involved in a political dynasty, with 40% of them having ties to legislators who belonged to as far as 3 Congresses prior. It is also said that 77% of legislators between the ages of 26-40 are also dynastic, which indicates that the second and third generations of political dynasties in the Philippines have begun their political careers as well.[3]

In order to analyze patterns of political dynasties within the 15th Congress, categories were formed according to the number of familial ties each politician had to politicians belonging to previous Congresses:

Category 1: Those with ties to the 12th, 13th, 14th and 15th Congress as well as at least one family member elected into a local government unit between the years 2001 and 2010

Category 2: Those with familial connections to at least one person belonging to the 12th, 13th, or 14th Congress

Category 3: Those who share kinship with at least one person belonging to the 12th, 13th, or 14th dynasty, or at least one relative with a local government unit (LGU) position from the 2001, 2004, or 2007 elections

Category 4: Those with at least one relation in the 12th, 13th, or 14th Congress or holding a local government unit (LGU) position in the elections in between 2001 and 2010

In a population of 229 legislators in the 15th Congress, 155 of them are classified as belonging to the fourth category. Of those 155, 144 of them also belong to the third category. 84 of the 144 belong in the second category, and of the 84, 10 belong to the first category.[3]

Critical reception[edit]

Various writers wrote articles that analyze and critique politicians that fall under the domain of a political dynasty. Often, these articles hold these said persons and families in a critical light.[4] Although political dynasties have already been present in the Philippines for a significant period of time, the public has only recently started clamoring for a change in system.[5] The public support for the bill against political dynasties has steadily increased because the president, while part of a dynasty himself, fully supports the passage of the Anti-Dynasty Bill.[6] In a provincial scale, political dynasties are often held in higher regard- contrasted with dynasties that oversee a wider public, where reception is mostly negative. A study that used empirical data correlated political dynasty presence with socio-economic development. This study stated that "this partial correlation coefficient finds a positive relationship between poverty incidence and the proportion of political dynasties in each province." Although the study found a correlation, this does not determine whether it is a causal relationship since poverty is multifaceted.[7]

Influence[edit]

Negative[edit]

One of the more notable theories concerning the negative effects of political dynasties is a political "Carnegie Effect", named after Andrew Carnegie. The "Carnegie Effect" is based on Carnegie’s decision to give all his wealth to non-family members, where he argues that his son might have less incentive of working hard if he were to be assured of his father’s wealth.[8] This idea of inherited wealth and connections discouraging future generations to work hard can also be attributed to dynastic politicians. Dynastic politicians have a significant advantage from the start of their political career They have a statistically higher probability, due to factors like popularity and incumbency advantage, to win elections when pitted against politicians with no such political networks. Dynastic politicians also have generally lower educational attainment, because of their reliance on dynastic connections rather than bureaucratic or academic competence for their position.[9]

There is also significant evidence to suggest that Philippine political dynasties use their political dominance over their respective regions to enrich themselves, using methods such as graft or outright bribery of legislators. These kinds of situations arise as conflicts of interests- political dynasties often hold significant economic power in a province- and their interests are overrepresented due to dynastic politics.[10] Another negative effect of political dynasties is that political dynasties tend to be for the status quo and develop interests largely separate from the people they were supposed to be serving. Dynastic candidates, being almost exclusively from the upper classes, are naturally biased towards defending their own vested economic interests, which presents conflict of interest problems. Political dynasties also prevent challengers with potentially effective policy ideas from being able to take office, which limits the capacity for bureaucratic responsiveness and administrative effectiveness and adaptation to new ideas.

Positive[edit]

Political dynasties also have extra incentive to develop their own jurisdictions. Based on Mancur Olson's theory of political governance or the "Roving Bandits vs. Stationary Bandits" theory, dynastic politicians are more likely to pursue long-term development oriented strategies since they expect to hold power and benefit from their position for longer. This is usually set in contrast to non-dynastic politicians who would, under this theory, have less incentive to develop due to their limited term. Political dynasties can gain benefits either directly or indirectly through their relatives.[11] Political dynasties are also responsible for the increase in women’s political participation in politics. Female politicians hailing from political dynasties can easily get into politics due to their connections.[11] Political dynasties have the advantage of continuity. The more control the family has over the government unit, the more members of the family can occupy positions of power. Political dynasties can use this continuity by promoting and enacting laws and ordinances that are long term in nature; with only a slim chance of other candidates outside of the dynasty interfering with the plans.

Notable Philippine political dynasties[edit]

Ampatuan[edit]

The Ampatuan family has exercised political crowd control over the Maguindanao region since 2001, with several of its members holding positions in government. The family’s patriarch, Andal Ampatuan Sr., was elected Governor of Maguindanao in 2001. His sons, Andal Ampatuan Jr. and Zaldy Ampatuan, were the former mayor of Datu Unsay and former Governor of ARMM respectively.[12] 80 members of the Ampatuan clan ran for governmental positions during the 2013 elections.[13] The Ampatuans' rise to power is attributed to support received from former President Gloria Arroyo.[14] As a result of their connection, the Ampatuans won Arroyo a large majority of votes from Maguindanao during the 2004 Presidential elections. The Arroyo administration’s issuance of Executive Order 546 then allowed the Ampatuans to form their own private army, also known as civilian volunteer organizations.[15]

Despite their prominence in Maguindanao, the Ampatuans were generally unheard of outside of the region until the infamous 2009 Maguindanao Massacre. They are considered the main suspects behind the massacre that killed 57 people. The victims had been on their way to file the candidacy of Esmael "Toto" Mangudadatu for the 2010 elections when they were stopped by an armed convoy. They were later abducted and murdered; some victims were also reported to have been raped.[16][17] After the discovery of the mass graves, President Arroyo declared martial law in Maguindanao.[18] 198 people, including Andal Ampatuan Sr. and Andal Ampatuan Jr., were charged with murder.[19] Charges against some of the suspects have been dropped in the years since. Andal Ampatuan Sr., suspected to be the mastermind behind the massacre, died on July 17, 2015.[20] The trial remains ongoing today.

Aquino[edit]

The Aquinos are a political family that originated from Tarlac. The dynasty began with Servillano Aquino, a general during the Philippine Revolution and delegate of the Malolos Congress. His son, Benigno "Igno" Aquino, Sr., was a Speaker in the House of Representatives during the Second Philippine Republic. He was charged and arrested for collaborating with the Japanese during World War II. Nowadays, the Aquinos are oftentimes viewed as opponents of the Marcos family, mainly due to the actions of Benigno "Ninoy" Aquino, Jr. A former Governor of Tarlac who has his critical views against the Marcoses resulting to a family-political feud. However, he was convicted for murder and possession of firearms. He was also charged for collaborating with the Moro secessionist in Malaysia and held responsible for leading a communist insurgency in which leads to various of massacres. He was imprisoned and was sentenced to death but was pardoned and exiled to the US by President Ferdinand Marcos for his recovery after suffering from heart attack. On August 21, 1983, few days upon his recovery and decision to run for presidency, he returned to the Philippines. Upon leaving the plane, Ninoy was assassinated on the tarmac in the Manila International Airport. An estimated two million Filipinos attended his funeral procession. After his death, his wife, Corazon Aquino, became more active in politics. She was a key figure during the People Power Revolution. Cory later became the first female President of the Philippines after beating Ferdinand Marcos in the snap elections. However, this is brought up oligarchy and democracy. Her death in 2009 garnered widespread public support reminiscent of her husband’s; this support is one of the major reasons why her son, Benigno "Noynoy" Aquino III, won the 2010 presidential elections. Other active politicians from the Aquino family include Paolo Benigno "Bam" Aquino, the youngest ever Senator in the 16th Philippine Congress.

Estrada[edit]

The Estrada political dynasty began with Joseph "Erap" Ejercito Estrada, who began as a successful film actor. The popularity Estrada gained from acting would prove to be valuable when he pursued a career in politics. He served as the Mayor of San Juan from 1969-1986, Senator from 1987-1992, and Vice President from 1992-1998. He later succeeded Fidel to be the 13th President of the Philippines. During his term, Estrada's wife and First Lady, Loi Estrada, served as Senator. Allegations of corruption under his administration led to an impeachment trial, which was discontinued after the court voted against opening an envelope possibly containing incriminating evidence. This resulted in the four-day-long Second People Power Revolution.[21] His resignation from presidency was declared soon afterwards. Despite this, the absolute pardon given by former President Arroyo allowed Estrada to run for and eventually became the Mayor of Manila in 2013.[22]

Many other members of the Estrada dynasty are still active in politics, particularly in San Juan. Among these are his sons, Jinggoy Estrada and JV Ejercito, who both served as Mayor of San Juan. JV's mother, Guia Gomez, is the current Mayor.[23] Jinggoy Estrada himself has been a member of the Senate since 2004. He is currently under trial for his alleged involvement in the multi-billion peso pork barrel scam.[24]

Marcos[edit]

The Marcoses are one of the most well-known political dynasties in the Philippines. The dynasty started with Mariano Marcos, a lawyer from Ilocos Norte who was a member of the House of Representatives back in 1925. Ilocos remains to be the Marcoses’ political stronghold today.

The dynasty was at its most prominent during the presidency of Ferdinand Marcos, son of Mariano Marcos. Ferdinand is one of the most controversial figures in Philippine history, due his declaration of martial law and the numerous human rights violations and rampant corruption of public funds during his rule. He and his father, Mariano Marcos, were also convicted for the murder of their political rival, Julio Nalundasan, who was killed by a sniper while brushing his teeth at his home on September 20, 1935.[25] Ferdinand Marcos supposedly declared Martial law to suppress the widespread of communism and civil strife. However, he used it to suppress dissent, and consolidate power through the ratification of a new constitution. Marcos family members also held several governmental positions during this period and were involved in the misuse of public funds.[26] Though they were exiled as a result of the People Power Revolution, the Marcos family has since regained power and is currently active in Philippine politics. Imelda Marcos, wife of Ferdinand and former first lady, is currently a district representative of the second district of Ilocos Norte. Marcos’ daughter, Imee Marcos, is a governor of Ilocos Norte. His son, Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr., was a former senator who was a candidate for vice president in the 2016 national elections.[27] The Marcoses currently cannot set foot in any United States territory because of a contempt judgement regarding their human rights violations.[28]

Roxas[edit]

The Roxas political dynasty started with Manuel Roxas, the fifth President of the Philippines. Before being President, he served as the Governor of Capiz (now named Roxas City). As a descendant of Antonia Róxas y Ureta, he is also related to the Zobel de Ayalas, a prominent business family. His son, Gerardo Roxas, served as a representative of the First District of Capiz and Senator. His grandson, Mar Roxas, was a former Senator and Department of Interior and Local Government Secretary. He lost the Vice Presidency in 2010, and lost the Presidency in 2016 elections.

The Duterte family[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b Mendoza, Ronald U. (October 1, 2013). "POLITICAL DYNASTIES AND POVERTY: EVIDENCE FROM THE PHILIPPINES" (PDF). 12th National Convention on Statistics. 
  2. ^ a b Mendoza, Ronald U.; Beja, Edsel L.; Venida, Victor Soriano; Yap, David. "An Empirical Analysis of Political Dynasties in the 15th Philippine Congress". doi:10.2139/ssrn.1969605. 
  3. ^ a b Querubin, Pablo (2012-01-01). "Political Reform and Elite Persistence: Term Limits and Political Dynasties in the Philippines". Rochester, NY. SSRN 2108036Freely accessible. 
  4. ^ "'It Runs In The Family' The Making Of Political Dynasties In The Philippines | University of the Philippines System Website". www.up.edu.ph. Retrieved 2015-10-30. 
  5. ^ "What is wrong with political dynasties?". GMA News Online. Retrieved 2015-10-30. 
  6. ^ "SONA 2015: President Aquino calls for passage of anti-dynasty law". cnn. Retrieved 2015-10-30. 
  7. ^ Mendoza, Ronald U.; Jr, Edsel L. Beja; Venida, Victor S.; Yap, David B. (2012-12-01). "Inequality in democracy: Insights from an empirical analysis of political dynasties in the 15th Philippine Congress". Philippine Political Science Journal. 33 (2): 132–145. doi:10.1080/01154451.2012.734094. ISSN 0115-4451. 
  8. ^ "Family Firms Need Professional Management". Harvard Business Review. Retrieved 2015-10-30. 
  9. ^ Daniele, Gianmarco, and Benny Geys. "Born in the Purple: Political Dynasties and Politicians' Human Capital." June 1, 2014. Accessed September 29, 2015.
  10. ^ "What is wrong with political dynasties?". GMA News Online. Retrieved 2015-11-08. 
  11. ^ a b "BusinessWorld | Family affairs: The two faces of political dynasties". www.bworldonline.com. Retrieved 2015-10-30. 
  12. ^ "The bloody life and times of Andal Ampatuan Sr.". philstar.com. Retrieved 2015-11-06. 
  13. ^ "Reporting Political Dynasties". Media and Elections. Retrieved 2015-11-06. 
  14. ^ Conde, Carlos H. (2009-12-10). "The Making of a Massacre in the Philippines". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2015-11-06. 
  15. ^ "Amid the fighting, the clan rules in Maguindanao | Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism". pcij.org. Retrieved 2015-11-06. 
  16. ^ Rauhala, Emily. "Five Years After Maguindanao". TIME.com. Retrieved 2015-11-06. 
  17. ^ McIndoe, Alastair (2009-11-27). "Behind the Philippines' Maguindanao Massacre". Time. ISSN 0040-781X. Retrieved 2015-11-06. 
  18. ^ "Arroyo declares martial law in Maguindanao province". GMA News Online. Retrieved 2015-11-06. 
  19. ^ "DOJ probes 50 new suspects in Maguindanao Massacre". Rappler. Retrieved 2015-11-06. 
  20. ^ "Maguindanao massacre suspect Ampatuan Sr dead". Rappler. Retrieved 2015-11-06. 
  21. ^ "Estrada's aborted impeachment trial haunts Senate". newsinfo.inquirer.net. Retrieved 2015-11-08. 
  22. ^ "Estrada wins: SC junks disqualification case". Rappler. Retrieved 2015-11-08. 
  23. ^ "Erap: We're not a dynasty in San Juan City". philstar.com. Retrieved 2015-11-08. 
  24. ^ "Will Jinggoy Estrada get out of jail?". Rappler. Retrieved 2015-11-08. 
  25. ^ "Murder most foul: Marcos' youthful exuberance". 
  26. ^ "The curse called 'Political Dynasty'". Rappler. Retrieved 2015-10-29. 
  27. ^ "Bongbong Marcos running for vice president in 2016". cnn. Retrieved 2015-10-29. 
  28. ^ "Marcoses lose US appeal".