Political science

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Political scientist)

  Geographic areas without data

Political science is the scientific study of politics. It is a social science dealing with systems of governance and power, and the analysis of political activities, political institutions, political thought and behavior, and associated constitutions and laws.[1]

Modern political science can generally be divided into the five sub-disciplines of political philosophy, political methodology, comparative politics, international relations, public policy and public administration. [2] [3] [4] Other notable subdisciplines are domestic politics and government, political economy, while many other subject-matter areas can be constructed by combining the skills and practices of the other sub-disciplines at different levels to solve specific problems or understand specific phenomena.[5] [4] Furthermore, political science is related to, and draws upon, the fields of economics, law, sociology, history, philosophy, human geography, anthropology (including political anthropology), and psychology.

Political science is methodologically diverse and appropriates many methods originating in psychology, social research, and political philosophy. Approaches include positivism, interpretivism, rational choice theory, behaviouralism, structuralism, post-structuralism, realism, institutionalism, and pluralism. Political science, as one of the social sciences, uses methods and techniques that relate to the kinds of inquires sought: primary sources, such as historical documents and official records, and secondary sources, such as scholarly journal articles, survey research, statistical analysis, case studies, experimental research, and model building.



A world map distinguishing countries of the world as federations (green) from unitary states (blue), a work of political science

As a social science, contemporary political science started to take shape in the latter half of the 19th century and began to separate itself from political philosophy and history.[6] Into the late 19th century, it was still uncommon that political science was considered a distinct field from history.[6] The term "political science" was not always distinguished from political philosophy, and the modern discipline has a clear set of antecedents including also moral philosophy, political economy, political theology, history, and other fields concerned with normative determinations of what ought to be and with deducing the characteristics and functions of the ideal state.

The advent of political science as a university discipline was marked by the creation of university departments and chairs with the title of political science arising in the late 19th century. The designation "political scientist" is commonly used to denote someone with a doctorate or master's degree in the field.[7] Integrating political studies of the past into a unified discipline is ongoing, and the history of political science has provided a rich field for the growth of both normative and positive political science, with each part of the discipline sharing some historical predecessors. The American Political Science Association and the American Political Science Review were founded in 1903 and 1906, respectively, in an effort to distinguish the study of politics from economics and other social phenomena. APSA membership rose from 204 in 1904 to 1,462 in 1915.[6] APSA members played a key role in setting up political science departments that were distinct from history, philosophy, law, sociology, and economics.[6]

The journal Political Science Quarterly was established in 1886 by the Academy of Political Science. In the inaugural issue of Political Science Quarterly, Munroe Smith defined political science as "the science of the state. Taken in this sense, it includes the organization and functions of the state, and the relation of states one to another."[8]

As part of a UNESCO initiative to promote political science in the late 1940s, the International Political Science Association was founded in 1949, as well as national associations in France in 1949, Britain in 1950, and West Germany in 1951.[6]

Behavioural revolution and new institutionalism[edit]

In the 1950s and the 1960s, a behavioral revolution stressing the systematic and rigorously scientific study of individual and group behavior swept the discipline. A focus on studying political behavior, rather than institutions or interpretation of legal texts, characterized early behavioral political science, including work by Robert Dahl, Philip Converse, and in the collaboration between sociologist Paul Lazarsfeld and public opinion scholar Bernard Berelson.

The late 1960s and early 1970s witnessed a takeoff in the use of deductive, game-theoretic formal modelling techniques aimed at generating a more analytical corpus of knowledge in the discipline. This period saw a surge of research that borrowed theory and methods from economics to study political institutions, such as the United States Congress, as well as political behavior, such as voting. William H. Riker and his colleagues and students at the University of Rochester were the main proponents of this shift.

Despite considerable research progress in the discipline based on all the kinds of scholarship discussed above, it has been observed that progress toward systematic theory has been modest and uneven.[9]

21st century[edit]

In 2000, the Perestroika Movement in political science was introduced as a reaction against what supporters of the movement called the mathematicization of political science. Those who identified with the movement argued for a plurality of methodologies and approaches in political science and for more relevance of the discipline to those outside of it.[10]

Some evolutionary psychology theories argue that humans have evolved a highly developed set of psychological mechanisms for dealing with politics. However, these mechanisms evolved for dealing with the small group politics that characterized the ancestral environment and not the much larger political structures in today's world. This is argued to explain many important features and systematic cognitive biases of current politics.[11]


Political science is a social study concerning the allocation and transfer of power in decision making, the roles and systems of governance including governments and international organizations, political behaviour, and public policies. It measures the success of governance and specific policies by examining many factors, including stability, justice, material wealth, peace, and public health. Some political scientists seek to advance positive theses (which attempt to describe how things are, as opposed to how they should be) by analysing politics; others advance normative theses, such as by making specific policy recommendations. The study of politics and policies can be closely connected—for example, in comparative analyses of which types of political institutions tend to produce certain types of policies.[12] Political science provides analysis and predictions about political and governmental issues.[13] Political scientists examine the processes, systems and political dynamics of countries and regions of the world, often to raise public awareness or to influence specific governments.[13]

Political scientists may provide the frameworks from which journalists, special interest groups, politicians, and the electorate analyze issues. According to Chaturvedy,

Political scientists may serve as advisers to specific politicians, or even run for office as politicians themselves. Political scientists can be found working in governments, in political parties, or as civil servants. They may be involved with non-governmental organizations (NGOs) or political movements. In a variety of capacities, people educated and trained in political science can add value and expertise to corporations. Private enterprises such as think tanks, research institutes, polling and public relations firms often employ political scientists.[14]

Country-specific studies[edit]

Political scientists may study political phenomena within one specific country; for example, they may study just the politics of the United States[15] or just the politics of China.[16]

Political scientists look at a variety of data, including constitutions, elections, public opinion, and public policy, foreign policy, legislatures, and judiciaries. Political scientists will often focus on the politics of their own country; for example, a political scientist from Indonesia may become an expert in the politics of Indonesia.[17]

Anticipating crises[edit]

The theory of political transitions,[18] and the methods of analyzing and anticipating[19] crises,[20] form an important part of political science. Several general indicators of crises and methods were proposed for anticipating critical transitions.[21] Among them, one statistical indicator of crisis, a simultaneous increase of variance and correlations in large groups, was proposed for crisis anticipation and may be successfully used in various areas.[22] Its applicability for early diagnosis of political crises was demonstrated by the analysis of the prolonged stress period preceding the 2014 Ukrainian economic and political crisis. There was a simultaneous increase in the total correlation between the 19 major public fears in the Ukrainian society (by about 64%) and in their statistical dispersion (by 29%) during the pre-crisis years.[23] A feature shared by certain major revolutions is that they were not predicted. The theory of apparent inevitability of crises and revolutions was also developed.[24]

The study of major crises, both political crises and external crises that can affect politics, is not limited to attempts to predict regime transitions or major changes in political institutions. Political scientists also study how governments handle unexpected disasters, and how voters in democracies react to their governments' preparations for and responses to crises.[25]

Subfields and Cognate fields[edit]


Many political scientists conduct research in the areas described below:[26]

  • Political philosophy: Concerned with the foundations of political community and institutions, while focusing on human nature and the moral purposes of political association.
  • Political methodology: Studies the philosophical bases of social science, political science, empirical research design and analysis.
  • Comparative politics: Compares contemporary political systems and discovers general laws and theories.
  • International relations: Concerned with developing an understanding of why states and non-state international actors interact.
  • Public Policy and Administration (encompassing both Public Policy and Public Administration): studies the implementation of public policy, administration of government establishment (public governance), management of non-profit establishment (nonprofit governance), and prepares civil servants, especially those in administrative positions for working in the public sector, voluntary sector, some industries in the private sector dealing with government relations and regulatory affairs, and those working as think tank researchers. As a "field of inquiry with a diverse scope" whose fundamental goal is to "advance management and policies so that government can function." Some of the various definitions which have been offered for the term are: "the management of public programs"; the "translation of politics into the reality that citizens see every day"; and "the study of government decision making, the analysis of the policies themselves, the various inputs that have produced them, and the inputs necessary to produce alternative policies."
    • Program evaluation: a systematic method for collecting, analyzing, and using information to answer questions about projects, policies, and programs,[27] particularly about their effectiveness and efficiency. In both the public and private sectors, stakeholders often want to know whether the programs they are funding, implementing, voting for, receiving, or objecting to are producing the intended effect. While program evaluation first focuses on this definition, important considerations often include how much the program costs per participant, how the program could be improved, whether the program is worthwhile, whether there are better alternatives, whether there are unintended outcomes, and whether the program goals are appropriate and useful.[28]
    • Policy analysis: a technique used in public administration to enable civil servants, activists, and others to examine and evaluate the available options to implement the goals of laws and elected officials.

Some political science departments also classify methodology as well as scholarship on the domestic politics of a particular country as distinct fields. In the United States, American politics is often treated as a separate subfield. In contrast to this traditional classification, some academic departments organize scholarship into thematic categories, including political philosophy, political behaviour (including public opinion, collective action, and identity), and political institutions (including legislatures and international organizations). Political science conferences and journals often emphasize scholarship in more specific categories. The American Political Science Association, for example, has 42 organized sections that address various methods and topics of political inquiry.[29]

Cognate fields[edit]

Research methods[edit]

Political science is methodologically diverse; political scientists approach the study of politics from a host of different ontological orientations and with a variety of different tools. Because political science is essentially a study of human behaviour, in all aspects of politics, observations in controlled environments are often challenging to reproduce or duplicate, though experimental methods are increasingly common (see experimental political science).[30] Citing this difficulty, former American Political Science Association President Lawrence Lowell once said "We are limited by the impossibility of experiment. Politics is an observational, not an experimental science."[19] Because of this, political scientists have historically observed political elites, institutions, and individual or group behaviour in order to identify patterns, draw generalizations, and build theories of politics.

Like all social sciences, political science faces the difficulty of observing human actors that can only be partially observed and who have the capacity for making conscious choices, unlike other subjects, such as non-human organisms in biology, minerals in geoscience, chemical elements in chemistry, stars in astronomy, or particles in physics. Despite the complexities, contemporary political science has progressed by adopting a variety of methods and theoretical approaches to understanding politics, and methodological pluralism is a defining feature of contemporary political science.

Empirical political science methods include the use of field experiments,[31] surveys and survey experiments,[32] case studies,[33] process tracing,[34][35] historical and institutional analysis,[36] ethnography,[37] participant observation,[38] and interview research.[39]

Political scientists also use and develop theoretical tools like game theory and agent-based models to study a host of political systems and situations.[40]

Political theorists approach theories of political phenomena with a similar diversity of positions and tools, including feminist political theory, historical analysis associated with the Cambridge school, and Straussian approaches.

Political science may overlap with topics of study that are the traditional focuses of other social sciences—for example, when sociological norms or psychological biases are connected to political phenomena. In these cases, political science may either inherit their methods of study or develop a contrasting approach.[41] For example, Lisa Wedeen has argued that political science's approach to the idea of culture, originating with Gabriel Almond and Sidney Verba and exemplified by authors like Samuel P. Huntington, could benefit from aligning more closely with the study of culture in anthropology.[41] In turn, methodologies that are developed within political science may influence how researchers in other fields, like public health, conceive of and approach political processes and policies.[42]


Political science, possibly like the social sciences as a whole, can be described "as a discipline which lives on the fault line between the 'two cultures' in the academy, the sciences and the humanities."[43] Thus, in most American colleges, especially liberal arts colleges it would be located within the school or college of arts and sciences, if no separate college of arts and sciences exist or if the college or university prefers that it be in a separate constituent college or academic department, political science may be a separate department housed as part of a division or school of humanities or liberal arts[44] while at some universities, especially research universities and in particular those that have a strong cooperation between research, undergraduate, and graduate faculty with a stronger more applied emphasis in public administration, political science would be taught by the university's public policy school. Aspects of political science can be taught as part of a liberal arts education, as part of a professional development education, or as part of both. Whereas classical political philosophy is primarily defined by a concern for Hellenic and Enlightenment thought, political scientists are also marked by a great concern for "modernity" and the contemporary nation state, along with the study of classical thought, and as such share more terminology with sociologists (e.g., structure and agency).

Most United States colleges and universities offer BA programs in political science. MA or MAT and PhD or EdD programs are common at larger universities. The term political science is more popular in North America than elsewhere; other institutions, especially those outside the United States, see political science as part of a broader discipline of political studies, politics, or government. While political science implies the use of the scientific method, political studies implies a broader approach, although the naming of degree courses does not necessarily reflect their content.[citation needed] Separate programs (often professional degrees) in international relations, public policy, and public administration, are not uncommon at both the undergraduate and postgraduate levels, although most but not all undergraduate level education in these sub-fields are generally found in academic concentration within a political science academic major. Master's-level programs in public administration are professional degrees covering public policy along with other applied subjects; they are often seen as more linked to politics than any other discipline, which may be reflected by being housed in that department.[45]

The main national honor society for college and university students of government and politics in the United States is Pi Sigma Alpha, while Pi Alpha Alpha is a national honor society specifically designated for public administration.


There are different genres of writings in political sciences; including but not limited to:[46]

  • Argument essays and research papers
  • Political theory writing
  • Responses to articles, texts, events thoughts and reflective papers

The most common piece of writing in political sciences are research papers, which investigate an original research question.[47]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ "Definition from Lexico powered by Oxford University Press. Retrieved 23 February 2020". Archived from the original on 30 December 2019. Retrieved 23 February 2020.
  2. ^ "What is Political Science? | Department of Political Science | University of Washington". www.polisci.washington.edu. Archived from the original on 26 October 2021. Retrieved 25 September 2021.
  3. ^ "Prospective Students | Schar School of Policy and Government". schar.gmu.edu. Retrieved 6 September 2020.
  4. ^ a b Caramani, ed. (2020). Comparative politics (Fifth ed.). Oxford. ISBN 978-0198820604. OCLC 1144813972.
  5. ^ Roskin, Michael G. (11 August 2005). "Political Science". Encyclopaedia Britannica. Archived from the original on 31 January 2021. Retrieved 30 January 2021.
  6. ^ a b c d e Bevir, Mark (2022). "A History of Political Science". Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781009043458. ISBN 978-1009043458.
  7. ^ Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. "How to Become a Political Scientist". Archived from the original on 27 June 2018. Retrieved 13 September 2016.
  8. ^ Smith, Munroe (1886). "Introduction: The Domain of Political Science". Political Science Quarterly. 1 (1): 2. doi:10.2307/2139299. JSTOR 2139299. Archived from the original on 18 January 2022. Retrieved 18 January 2022.
  9. ^ Kim Quaile Hill, "In Search of General Theory," Journal of Politics 74 (October 2012), 917–31.
  10. ^ Perestroika!: The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science. Yale University Press. 2005. ISBN 978-0300130201. Archived from the original on 20 August 2020. Retrieved 24 May 2016.
  11. ^ Michael Bang Petersen. "The evolutionary psychology of mass politics". In Roberts, S.C. (2011). Roberts, S. Craig (ed.). Applied Evolutionary Psychology. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199586073.001.0001. ISBN 978-0199586073.
  12. ^ Roller, Edeltraud (2005). The Performance of Democracies: Political Institutions and Public Policy. Oxford University Press.
  13. ^ a b Maddocks, Krysten Godfrey (26 June 2020). "What is Political Science All About?". www.snhu.edu. Archived from the original on 25 September 2021. Retrieved 25 September 2021.
  14. ^ Chaturvedy, J.C. (2005). Political Governance: Political theory. Isha Books. p. 4. ISBN 978-8182053175. Archived from the original on 4 September 2015. Retrieved 28 October 2014.
  15. ^ Benjamin Ginsberg; Theodore J. Lowi; Margaret Weir; et al. (December 2012). We the People: An Introduction to American Politics. W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0393921106.
  16. ^ Oi, Jean C. (1989). State and Peasant in Contemporary China: The Political Economy of Village Government. University of California Press. p. xvi.
  17. ^ "Sekelumit Prof. Dr. Miriam Budiardjo" (in Indonesian). Indonesian Political Science Association. 25 October 2013. Archived from the original on 29 September 2020. Retrieved 1 October 2020.
  18. ^ Acemoglu D., Robinson J.A. "A theory of political transitions." Archived 9 August 2020 at the Wayback Machine American Economic Review. 2001 Sep 1:938–63.
  19. ^ a b Lowell, A. Lawrence. 1910. "The Physiology of Politics Archived 9 August 2020 at the Wayback Machine." American Political Science Review 4: 1–15.
  20. ^ McClelland C.A. "The Anticipation of International Crises: Prospects for Theory and Research." Archived 9 August 2020 at the Wayback Machine International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 1, Special Issue on International Crisis: Progress and Prospects for Applied Forecasting and Management (March 1977), pp. 15–38
  21. ^ Scheffer M., Carpenter S.R., Lenton T.M., et al. "Anticipating critical transitions." Archived 4 September 2020 at the Wayback Machine Science. 2012 Oct 19; 338(6105):344–48.
  22. ^ Gorban, A.N.; Smirnova, E.V.; Tyukina, T.A. (August 2010). "Correlations, risk and crisis: From physiology to finance". Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications. 389 (16): 3193–3217. arXiv:0905.0129. Bibcode:2010PhyA..389.3193G. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2010.03.035. S2CID 276956. Archived from the original on 3 April 2022. Retrieved 23 May 2017.
  23. ^ Rybnikov, S.R.; Rybnikova, N.A.; Portnov, B.A. (March 2017). "Public fears in Ukrainian society: Are crises predictable?". Psychology & Developing Societies. 29 (1): 98–123. doi:10.1177/0971333616689398. S2CID 151344338. Archived from the original on 3 April 2022. Retrieved 23 May 2017.
  24. ^ Kuran T. "Sparks and prairie fires: A theory of unanticipated political revolution." Archived 9 August 2020 at the Wayback Machine Public Choice, Vol. 61, No. 1 (April 1989), pp. 41–74
  25. ^ Andrew Healy; Neil Malhotra (2009). "Myopic Voters and Natural Disaster Policy". American Political Science Review. 103 (3): 387–406. doi:10.1017/S0003055409990104. S2CID 32422707.
  26. ^ "What is Political Science? | Department of Political Science | University of Washington". www.polisci.washington.edu. Archived from the original on 26 October 2021. Retrieved 25 September 2021.
  27. ^ Administration for Children and Families (2010) The Program Manager's Guide to Evaluation Archived 25 August 2012 at the Wayback Machine. Chapter 2: What is program evaluation?.
  28. ^ Shackman, Gene (11 February 2018). "What Is Program Evaluation: A Beginner's Guide". SSRN 3060080.
  29. ^ Organized Sections APSA(subscription required) Archived 25 November 2010 at the Wayback Machine
  30. ^ Druckman, James; Green, Donald; et al., eds. (2011). Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521174558.
  31. ^ Nahomi Ichino; Noah L. Nathan (May 2013). "Crossing the Line: Local Ethnic Geography and Voting in Ghana". American Political Science Review. 107 (2): 344–361. doi:10.1017/S0003055412000664. S2CID 9092626.
  32. ^ "The Progress and Pitfalls of Using Survey Experiments in Political Science". Oxford Research Encyclopedia. Oxford: Oxford University Press. February 2020.
  33. ^ Skocpol, Theda (1979). States and Social Revolutions. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521294997.
  34. ^ Mahoney, James (2 March 2012). "The Logic of Process Tracing Tests in the Social Sciences". Sociological Methods & Research. 41 (4): 570–597. doi:10.1177/0049124112437709. S2CID 122335417.
  35. ^ Zaks, Sherry (July 2017). "Relationships Among Rivals (RAR): A Framework for Analyzing Contending Hypotheses in Process Tracing". Political Analysis. 25 (3): 344–362. doi:10.1017/pan.2017.12. S2CID 125814475.
  36. ^ Thelen, Kathleen (1999). "Historical institutionalism in comparative politics". Annual Review of Political Science. 2: 369–404. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369.
  37. ^ Brodkin, Evelyn Z. (January 2017). "The Ethnographic Turn in Political Science: Reflections on the State of the Art". PS: Political Science & Politics. 50 (1): 131–134. doi:10.1017/S1049096516002298. S2CID 152094822.
  38. ^ Cramer, Katherine J. (2016). The Politics of Resentment. University of Chicago Press.
  39. ^ Layna Mosley, ed. (2013). Interview Research in Political Science. Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-0801478635.
  40. ^ Fiorina, Morris P. (February 1975). "Formal Models in Political Science". American Journal of Political Science. 19 (1): 133–159. doi:10.2307/2110698. JSTOR 2110698.
  41. ^ a b Wedeen, Lisa (December 2002). "Conceptualizing Culture: Possibilities for Political Science". The American Political Science Review. 95 (4): 713–728. doi:10.1017/S0003055402000400. S2CID 145130880.
  42. ^ Nicole F. Bernier; Carole Clavier (1 March 2011). "Public health policy research: making the case for a political science approach". Health Promotion International. 26 (1): 109–116. doi:10.1093/heapro/daq079. PMID 21296911.
  43. ^ Stoner, J.R. (22 February 2008). "Political Science and Political Education". Paper presented at the annual meeting of the APSA Teaching and Learning Conference (APSA), San Jose Marriott, San Jose, California. Archived from the original on 30 November 2009. Retrieved 19 October 2011. …although one might allege the same for social science as a whole, political scientists receive funding from and play an active role in both the National Science Foundation and the National Endowment for the Humanities [in the United States].
  44. ^ See, e.g., the department of Political Science Archived 19 March 2009 at the Wayback Machine at Marist College, part of a Division of Humanities before that division became the School of Liberal Arts (c. 2000).
  45. ^ Vernardakis, George (1998). Graduate education in government. University Press of America. p. 77. ISBN 978-0761811718. Archived from the original on 4 September 2015. Retrieved 17 June 2015. …existing practices at Harvard University, the University of California at Berkeley, and the University of Michigan.
  46. ^ Schmidt, Diane E. (14 January 2019), "Political Inquiry", Writing in Political Science, New York: Routledge, pp. 1–25, doi:10.4324/9781351252843-1, ISBN 978-1351252843, archived from the original on 3 April 2022, retrieved 25 September 2021
  47. ^ "Political Science". The Writing Center • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Archived from the original on 25 September 2021. Retrieved 25 September 2021.

Further reading[edit]

  • The Evolution of Political Science (November 2006). APSR Centennial Volume of American Political Science Review. Apsanet. 4 February 2009.
  • Alter, Karen J., et al. "Gender and status in American political science: Who determines whether a scholar is noteworthy?." Perspectives on Politics 18.4 (2020): 1048–1067. online
  • Atchison, Amy L, ed. Political Science Is for Everybody : An Introduction to Political Science. University of Toronto Press, 2021.
  • Badie, Bertrand, et al. International Encyclopedia of Political Science. SAGE, 2011.
  • Berlin, Mark Stephen, and Anum Pasha Syed. "The Middle East and North Africa in Political Science Scholarship: Analyzing Publication Patterns in Leading Journals, 1990–2019". International Studies Review 24.3 (2022): viac027.
  • Blatt, Jessica. Race and the Making of American Political Science University of Pennsylvania Press, 2018.
  • Breuning, Marijke, Joseph Bredehoft, and Eugene Walton. "Promise and performance: an evaluation of journals in International Relations." International Studies Perspectives 6.4 (2005): 447–461. online
  • Frickel, Scott. "Political scientists". Sociological Forum 33#1 (2018).
  • Garand, James C., and Micheal W. Giles. "Journals in the discipline: a report on a new survey of American political scientists". PS: Political Science & Politics 36.2 (2003): 293–308. online
  • Gerardo L. Munck and Richard Snyder, eds. Passion, Craft, and Method in Comparative Politics. (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007)
  • Goodin, R.E.; Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. A New Handbook of Political Science. (Oxford University Press, 1996). ISBN 0198294719.
  • Goodin, Robert E, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Political Science. Oxford University Press, 2011.
  • Hochschild, Jennifer L. "Race and Class in Political Science" Michigan Journal of Race and Law, 2005 11(1): 99–114.
  • Hunger, Sophia, and Fred Paxton. "What's in a buzzword? A systematic review of the state of populism research in political science". Political Science Research and Methods (2021): 1–17. online
  • Katznelson, Ira, et al. Political Science: The State of the Discipline. W.W. Norton, 2002.
  • Kellstedt, Paul M, and Guy D Whitten. The Fundamentals of Political Science Research Third ed., Cambridge University Press, 2018.
  • Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, ed. The State of Political Science in Western Europe (Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publisher 2007). ISBN 978-3866490451.
  • Kostova, Dobrinka, et al. "Determinants and Diversity of Internationalisation in Political Science: The Role of National Policy Incentives". European Political Science (2022): 1–14. online
  • Lowndes, Vivien, et al., editors. Theory and Methods in Political Science. Fourth ed., Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.
  • Noel, Hans (2010-10-14 | DOI Ten Things Political Scientists Know that You Don't) "Ten Things Political Scientists Know that You Don't" The Forum: Vol. 8: Iss. 3, Article 12.
  • Morlino, Leonardo, et al. Political Science: A Global Perspective. Sage, 2017.
  • Nisonger, Thomas E. "Journals of the Century in Political Science and International Relations". in Journals of the Century (Routledge, 2019) pp. 271–288.
  • Peez, Anton. "Contributions and blind spots of constructivist norms research in international relations, 1980–2018: A systematic evidence and gap analysis". International Studies Review 24.1 (2022): viab055. online
  • Raadschelders, Jos CN, and Kwang‐Hoon Lee. "Trends in the study of public administration: Empirical and qualitative observations from Public Administration Review, 2000–2009." Public Administration Review 71.1 (2011): 19–33. online
  • Roskin, M. et al. Political Science: An Introduction (14th ed. Pearson, 2020). excerpt
  • Schram, S.F.; Caterino, B., eds. Making Political Science Matter: Debating Knowledge, Research, and Method. (New York University Press, 2006).
  • Schubert,Glendon A. (1958) The Theory of "The Public Interest" in Judicial Decision-Making – JSTOR 2109163
  • —— (1958) The Study of Judicial Decision-Making as an Aspect of Political Behavior – JSTOR 1951981
  • —— (1959) Quantitative Analysis of Judicial Behavior
  • Shively, W. Phillips, and David Schultz. Power and choice: An introduction to political science (Rowman & Littlefield, 2022).
  • Simon, Douglas W., and Joseph Romance. The challenge of politics: an introduction to political science (CQ press, 2022).
  • Tausch, Arno, "For a globally visible political science in the 21st Century. Bibliometric analyses and strategic consequences" (2021). Available at SSRN: For a globally visible political science in the 21st Century. Bibliometric analyses and strategic consequences
  • Taylor, C. L., & Russett, B. M. Eds.. Karl W. Deutsch: Pioneer in the Theory of International Relations (Springer, 2020). excerpt
  • Tronconi, Filippo, and Isabelle Engeli. "The networked researcher, the editorial manager, and the traveller: the profiles of international political scientists and the determinants of internationalisation". European Political Science (2022): 1–14. [1]
  • Van Evera, Stephen. Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Cornell University Press, 1997. excerpt
  • Weber, Erik, et al. "Thinking about laws in political science (and beyond)". Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 52.1 (2022): 199–222.
  • Zippelius, Reinhold (2003). Geschichte der Staatsideen (History of political Ideas), 10th ed. Munich: C.H. Beck. ISBN 3406494943.
  • Zippelius, Reinhold (2010). Allgemeine Staatslehre, Politikwissenschaft (Political Science), 16th ed. Munich: C.H. Beck. ISBN 978-3406603426.

External links[edit]

Professional organizations[edit]

Further reading[edit]

Library guides[edit]