Political status of Transnistria

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Coat of arms of Transnistria.svg
This article is part of a series on the
politics and government of
Transnistria
See also

The political status of Transnistria, a self-proclaimed state on the internationally recognized territory of Moldova, has been disputed since the Transnistrian declaration of independence on September 2, 1990. This declaration sought to establish a Soviet Socialist Republic separate from the Moldavian SSR, while still part of the Soviet Union. Following the breakup of the Soviet Union and Moldova's own declaration of independence in 1991, the PMSSR was transformed into the Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic (PMR), commonly referred to as Transnistria. No United Nations member country recognizes the PMR's bid to sovereignty.

Moldova lost de facto control of Transnistria in 1992, in the wake of the War of Transnistria. Since that time, the PMR has received diplomatic recognition only from Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, three post-Soviet states with minimal recognition themselves.

The two main political parties in Transnistria, the Republican Party (Respublikanskaya Partiya Pridnestroviya) and Renewal (Obnovleniye) oppose any rapprochement with Chişinău. The only political party in the region to favor conditional reintegration with Moldova (on basis of federalization)—the Social Democratic Party headed by former local MP Alexander Radchenko—after 2009 lost its influence and ceased to function. Negotiations under Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) auspices have been ongoing since 1997 based on the premise that better relations are desirable and that the restrictions on communications, movement of people, and trade flows must be removed.

Recognition of the sovereignty of Transnistria[edit]

Only three polities recognize Transnistria's sovereignty, which are themselves largely unrecognized states: Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Artsakh. All four states are members of the Community for Democracy and Rights of Nations.

Historical status of Transnistria[edit]

Administrative divisions of actual Transnistria.

Although ethnic Moldavians have historically made up a large minority of the population, the area was never considered part of the traditional lands of Moldavian settlement.[1] The territory east of the Dniester river belonged to Kievan Rus' and the kingdom of Halych-Volhynia from the ninth to the fourteenth centuries, passing to the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, and then into the hands of Russia in the eighteenth century.

By this time, the Principality of Moldavia had been in existence for almost five hundred years with the Dniester marking its eastern boundary for all this time.

Even with the rise of Romanian irredentism in the nineteenth century, the far reaches of Transylvania were considered the western boundary of the Greater Romanian lands[1] while the Dniester formed the eastern.[2]

Ethnic composition of MASSR, 1926

The national poet Mihai Eminescu, in his famous poem Doina, spoke of a Romania stretching "from the Dniester to the Tisza".

The Soviet Union in the 1930s had an autonomous region of Transnistria inside Ukraine, called the Moldavian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic (MASSR), where nearly half of the population were neolatin speaking people.

Indeed, between 1929 and 1940, Tiraspol was the capital of the Moldavian ASSR, an autonomous republic within Ukrainian SSR, which existed from 1924 to 1940.

During World War II, when Romania, aided by Nazi Germany, for the first time in history took control of Transnistria, it made no attempts to annex the occupied territory and considered it a temporary buffer zone between Greater Romania and the Soviet front line.[3][4]

Position of the PMR government advocates[edit]

According to PMR advocates, the territory to the East of the Dniester River never belonged either to Romania, nor to its predecessors, such as the Principality of Moldavia. This territory was split off from the Ukrainian SSR in a political maneuver of the USSR to become a seed of the Moldavian SSR (in a manner similar to the creation of the Karelo-Finnish SSR). In 1990, the Pridnestrovian Moldavian SSR was proclaimed in the region by a number of conservative local Soviet officials opposed to perestroika. This action was immediately declared void by the then president of the Soviet Union Mikhail Gorbachev.[5]

At the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, Moldova became independent. The Moldovan Declaration of Independence denounced the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact and declared the 2 August 1940 "Law of the USSR on the establishment of the Moldavian SSR" null and void. The PMR side argues that, since this law was the only legislative document binding Transnistria to Moldova, there is neither historical nor legal basis for Moldova's claims over the territories on the left bank of the Dniester.[6] The Transnistrian side also claims that the rights of Moldova's Russian-speaking population are being infringed as Moldovan authorities abolished Russian as a second official language and declared Romanian (Moldovan) to be the country's only official language shortly before the dissolution of the Soviet Union.

A 2010 study conducted by the University of Colorado Boulder showed that the majority of Transnistria's population supports the country's separation from Moldova. According to the study, more than 80% of ethnic Russians and Ukrainians, and 60% of ethnic Moldovans, in Transnistria preferred independence or annexation by Russia rather than reunification with Moldova.[7]

Moldovan position[edit]

The Republic of Moldova considers itself the rightful successor state to the Moldavian SSR (which was guaranteed the right to secession from the Soviet Union under the last version of Soviet Constitution). By the principle of territorial integrity, Moldova claims that any form of secession from the state without the consent of the central Moldovan government is illegal.

It considers the current Transnistria-based PMR government to be illegitimate and not the rightful representative of the region's population, which has a Moldovan plurality (39.9% as of 1989). The Moldovan side insists that Transnistria cannot exist as an independent political entity and must be reintegrated into Moldova.

According to Moldovan sources, the political climate in Transnistria does not allow the free expression of the will of the people of the region and supporters of reintegration of Transnistria in Moldova are subjected to harassment, arbitrary arrests and other types of intimidation from separatist authorities.

Despite the self-proclaimed independence of the region, the majority of the population (400,000 out of 542,000) took Moldovan citizenship,[8] which Moldova considers to be a sign that the majority of the population opposes separatism. However, it should be noted that, due to Transnistria's limited recognition as a state, Transnistrians cannot travel internationally with a Transnistrian passport. Therefore, it is possible that many Transnistrians possess a Moldovan passport for practical reasons, rather than as an expression of wishing to reunify with Moldova.[citation needed]

Territorial issues[edit]

During the 1992 War of Transnistria some villages in the central part of Transnistria which geographically are situated on the eastern bank of Dniester, rebelled against the new separatist Transnistria (PMR) authorities and since then have been under effective Moldovan control. These localities are: commune Cocieri (including village Vasilievca), commune Molovata Nouă (including village Roghi), commune Corjova (including village Mahala), commune Coşniţa (including village Pohrebea), commune Pîrîta, and commune Doroţcaia. The village of Corjova is in fact divided between PMR and Moldovan central government areas of control. Roghi is also controlled by the PMR authorities.

At the same time, some areas which are situated on the right bank of the Dniester are under PMR control. These areas consist of the city of Bender with its suburb Proteagailovca, the communes Gîsca, Chiţcani (including villages Mereneşti and Zahorna), and the commune of Cremenciug, formally[clarification needed] in the Căuşeni District, situated south of the city of Bender.

The breakaway PMR authorities also claim the communes of Varniţa, in the Anenii Noi District, a northern suburb of Bender, and Copanca, in the Căuşeni District, south of Chiţcani, but these villages remain under Moldovan control.

Incidents[edit]

These territorial disputes led to tense situations several times. In 2005 PMR Militia entered Vasilievca, which is located over the strategic road linking Tiraspol and Rîbniţa, but withdrew after a few days.[9][10] In 2006 there were tensions around Varniţa. In 2007 there was a confrontation between Moldovan and PMR forces in the Dubăsari-Cocieri area; however, there were no casualties.

The mayor of the village of Corjova, which is under Moldovan control, was arrested by the PMR militsia (police) together with a councillor of Moldovan-controlled part of the Dubăsari district on 13 May 2007.[11]

United Nations Resolution A/72/L.58[edit]

Results of the United Nations General Assembly vote about the withdrawal of foreign soldiers in Transnistria.
  In favour
  Against
  Abstained
  Absent when the vote took place
  Non-UN member

On June 22, 2018, the Republic of Moldova submitted a UN resolution that calls for "Complete and unconditional withdrawal of foreign military forces from the territory of the Republic of Moldova, including Transnistria."[12]

In favour (64) Abstaining (83) Against (15) Absent (31)
 Albania
 Andorra
 Australia
 Austria
 Azerbaijan
 Bahamas
 Belgium
 Belize
 Botswana
 Bulgaria
 Canada
 Costa Rica
 Croatia
 Cyprus
 Czech Republic
 Denmark
 Djibouti
 El Salvador
 Estonia
 Finland
 France
 Georgia
 Germany
 Guyana
 Honduras
 Hungary
 Iceland
 Ireland
 Jamaica
 Japan
 Latvia
 Liechtenstein
 Lithuania
 Luxembourg
 Macedonia
 Maldives
 Malta
 Marshall Islands
 Micronesia
 Monaco
 Moldova
 Montenegro
 Netherlands
 New Zealand
 Papua New Guinea
 Poland
 Portugal
 Samoa
 San Marino
 Saudi Arabia
 Slovakia
 Slovenia
 Spain
 Sweden
  Switzerland
 Turkey
 Ukraine
 United Kingdom
 United States
 Vanuatu
 Algeria
 Angola
 Antigua and Barbuda
 Argentina
 Bahrain
 Bangladesh
 Benin
 Bhutan
 Bosnia and Herzegovina
 Brazil
 Brunei
 Burkina Faso
 Cabo Verde
 Cameroon
 Central African Republic
 Chad
 Chile
 China
 Colombia
 Comoros
 Dominican Republic
 Ecuador
 Egypt
 Equatorial Guinea
 Eritrea
 Ethiopia
 Fiji
 Ghana
 Guatemala
 Guinea
 Guinea-Bissau
 India
 Indonesia
 Iraq
 Israel
 Ivory Coast
 Jordan
 Kazakhstan
 Kenya
 Kiribati
 Kuwait
 Kyrgyzstan
 Laos
 Liberia
 Madagascar
 Malawi
 Malaysia
 Mali
 Mexico
 Mongolia
 Morocco
 Namibia
 Nauru
   Nepal
 Nigeria
 Oman
 Pakistan
 Paraguay
 Peru
 Philippines
 Qatar
 Rwanda
 Saint Lucia
 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
 Sao Tome and Principe
 Senegal
 Seychelles
 Sierra Leone
 Singapore
 South Africa
 South Korea
 Sri Lanka
 Suriname
 Thailand
 Togo
 Trinidad and Tobago
 Tunisia
 Tuvalu
 United Arab Emirates
 Uruguay
 Vietnam
 Armenia
 Belarus
 Bolivia
 Burundi
 Cuba
 Iran
 Myanmar
 Nicaragua
 North Korea
 Russia
 South Sudan
 Sudan
 Syria
 Venezuela
 Zimbabwe
 Afghanistan
 Cambodia
 Democratic Republic of the Congo
 Dominica
 Gabon
 Gambia
 Grenada
 Haiti
 Lesotho
 Libya
 Mauritania
 Mauritius
 Mozambique
 Niger
 Palau
 Panama
 Republic of the Congo
 Saint Kitts and Nevis
 Serbia
 Solomon Islands
 Somalia
 Swaziland
 Tajikistan
 Tanzania
 Timor-Leste
 Tonga
 Turkmenistan
 Uganda
 Uzbekistan
 Yemen
 Zambia
Observer States:  Holy See and  State of Palestine

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ a b Charles King: The Moldovans, Hoover Institution Press, Stanford, California, 1999, page 180
  2. ^ Nicolas Dima's history of Moldova, published in 1991 as part of a series of East European Monographs, Boulder, Distributed by Columbia University Press, New York.
  3. ^ Charles King: "The Moldovans", Hoover Institution Press, Stanford, California, 1999, page 93
  4. ^ Memoirs of Gherman Pântea, mayor of Odessa 1941–1944, in ANR-DAIC, d.6
  5. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2010-09-27. Retrieved 2010-09-18.
  6. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2007-06-17. Retrieved 2010-09-18.
  7. ^ "How people in South Ossetia, Abkhazia and Transnistria feel about annexation by Russia". Washington Post. Retrieved 2016-12-17.
  8. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2007-10-08. Retrieved 2007-07-16.
  9. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2006-05-14. Retrieved 2006-12-23.
  10. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2005-03-18. Retrieved 2007-01-20.
  11. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2007-09-27. Retrieved 2016-02-08.
  12. ^ http://www.un.org/en/ga/72/resolutions.shtml

References[edit]

  1. Oleksandr Pavliuk, Ivanna Klympush-Tsintsadze. The Black Sea Region: Cooperation and Security Building. EastWest Institute. ISBN 0-7656-1225-9.
  2. Janusz Bugajski. Toward an Understanding of Russia: New European Perspectives. p. 102. ISBN 0-87609-310-1.
  3. "Transnistria: alegeri nerecunoscute". Ziua. December 13, 2005. Archived from the original on June 30, 2006.
  4. James Hughes, Gwendolyn Sasse (editors) (ed.). Ethnicity and Territory in the Former Soviet Union: Regions in conflict. Routledge Ed. ISBN 0-7146-5226-1.

External links[edit]

Transnistrian side[edit]

Moldovan side[edit]

Others[edit]

International organizations[edit]

Ukrainian side[edit]

Romanian side[edit]