Portal talk:Animation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Featured portal The Animation Portal is a featured portal, which means it has been identified as one of the best portals on Wikipedia. If you see a way this portal can be updated or improved without compromising previous work, please feel free to contribute.
Portal milestones
Date Process Result
June 8, 2011 Peer review Reviewed
February 25, 2012 Featured portal candidate Promoted
Current status: Featured portal
WikiProject Animation (Rated Portal-class)
WikiProject icon This page is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.
 Portal  This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 
 
edit·history·watch·refresh Stock post message.svg To-do list for Portal:Animation:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Misuse of terms such as "CGI" "computer graphic imagery" and "traditional".[edit]

It has come to my attention that wikipedia has a lot of articles referring to digitally created 2D animation as "traditional animation" or "traditional art" and referring to "CGI" only when it comes to 3D animation. Even methods such as flash and ToonBoom don't appear to be referred to as CGI, but at the least they aren't being called traditional either(though pages like Flash Animation are still using "traditional" wrong).

The use of things such as digital ink is literally creating imagery on a computer, and even most "analog art"/actual traditional art is still most likely animated on a computer these days, making the animation not traditional. It is primarily for this reason that I propose that this inaccuracy be rectified. Mattwo7 (talk) 02:47, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

@Mattwo7: This page is really only for discussing improvements to Portal:Animation. To discuss this issue with the editors most interested in computer animation, you'd do better to post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Animation. -- John of Reading (talk) 05:59, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
I see. They don't really make this sort of thing very clear...Mattwo7 (talk) 08:02, 19 June 2015 (UTC)