Portal talk:Current events
| For further information about Portal:Current events, see How the Current events page works. For the template visible on the main page, see Template:In the news. To report concerns and disputes regarding current events please use P:CE/N |
| The dynamic subpages of Current events are: |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Current events page. |
|
| Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 |
| Portal:Current events—more specifically, the portal's complex framework—is fully protected, and has been since August 2010, prior to which it was semi-protected. Changes to this page can only be made by administrators. To request a change be made to the portal, please use {{edit protected}} followed by your request to bring it to the attention of an administrator. Please update a day's current events by clicking on "Edit" in the header for that day. |
| This page is laid out and designed as part of a set of pages. To discuss the set as a whole, see Wikipedia talk:Contents. For more information on Wikipedia's contents system as a whole, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Contents. |
| This page is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
| Portal:Current events is a reader-facing page intended for viewing by non-editors. Please prioritize their needs when adjusting its design, and move editor-facing elements to other pages. |
| This talk page is automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. Any threads with no replies in 30 days may be automatically moved. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
Daily pageviews of Portal:Current events |
COVID-19 daily increase[edit]
Is the daily increase in COVID-19 cases at the sub-national level (such as Victoria, Australia) included in Recent Events? I thought only the national level should be included. Tensa Februari (talk) 07:20, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- There are more items about Covid than all other topics combined, today. Is it really worth mentioning that "The total amount of cases of COVID-19 in Fiji since the start of the pandemic has surpassed 52,000"? PoangSitter (talk) 23:48, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
External links in the news[edit]
I've added an entry on Bosnia and Herzegovina. Is it my correct understanding that linking to someone's official report in the current events on the topic is not allowed here? The report is here.
An example of how it would have been integrated is here: The IPCC publishes a report warning of failure to conform to emission reduction targets set in the Paris accords.
Thanks in advance. Szmenderowiecki (talk) 15:10, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 10 November 2021[edit]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
"The Standing Committee on Vaccination recommends that people aged under 30 years old should only received the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine due to higher risk of heart inflamation with Moderna vaccines among young people. (DW)"
change "received" to "receive" Gtag10 (talk) 22:23, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Misinformation on the page for 8 hours[edit]
An anonymous IP added the claim that "vials containing the smallpox virus" had been discovered in Pennsylvania. This claim stayed on the page for 8 hours! The actual story is that a lab worker at a Merck facility found 15 "questionable vials" labeled "smallpox" and "vaccinia" while cleaning out a freezer. As the smallpox vaccine is made from a virus called vaccinia, the most probable explanation is that the vials contained smallpox vaccine, not smallpox. Regardless, it is irresponsible for us to publish such conspiracy-inducing headlines without solid sources to back them up. If no one is checking the statements on this page for accuracy, especially surprising or outlandish ones, we should not be allowing anonymous IPs to edit it. Nosferattus (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
I think the same as you. But there are users who get annoyed when you delete US-centric news… _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 22:09, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Kyle Rittenhouse verdict[edit]
User:Elijahandskip has been repeatedly removing this from the November 19, 2021 current events page citing a discussion that occurred on the talk page for the wiki article 2021. That discussion clearly did not end in a consensus and has utterly no bearing on whether or not the Rittenhouse trial is posted here on the current events page.XavierGreen (talk) 20:40, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Well I typing a discussion on November 19th talk page about whether Kyle Rittenhouse’s trial is “internationally notable” and saw that XavierGreen already started one. A similar discussion took place on Talk:2021, where editors had a consensus that it was not internationally notable, but I guess we have to have a duplicate discussion here. I am going to ping editors that participated in that discussion, ITN nomination of it, and WP Current events. (PINGS: @Alsoriano97:, @Jim Michael:, @Black Kite:, @Thescrubbythug:, @CaptainEek:, @Andise1:, @Jayron32:, @Masem:, @Joseph2302:, @BD2412:, @GreatCaesarsGhost:, @Brigade Piron:.) Elijahandskip (talk) 20:47, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- It doesn't have international notability, nor is it on ITN or 2021. However, it's easily important enough for CE, which doesn't require any of those things. Jim Michael (talk) 22:13, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- There is a very firm consensus on the 2021 page against the inclusion of the Rittenhouse trial, and in favour of it being added to 2021 in the United States. However, as Jim Michael already said, that has no bearing on whether or not it should be included on CE, which has different standards for inclusion than the yearly pages. Thescrubbythug (talk) 22:35, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 19 November 2021[edit]
| It is requested that an edit be made to the fully protected portal at Portal:Current events. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, so that an editor unfamiliar with the subject matter could complete the requested edit immediately.
Edit requests to fully protected pages should only be used for edits that are either uncontroversial or supported by consensus. If the proposed edit might be controversial, discuss it on the protected page's talk page before using this template. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request. When the request has been completed or denied, please add the |
Remove "I, Jeffman12345, am back." because it is not notable. Gtag10 (talk) 22:47, 19 November 2021 (UTC)