Portal talk:Systems science

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Systems (Rated Portal-class)
WikiProject icon This page is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.
 Portal  This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This page is within the field of Systems.

The start of this Systems science portal on 27 August 2007[edit]

A start has been made with this Portal:Systems science. The portal templates are designed, the first content is stored and the portal is activated. Now the portal is in need of some more information from the field. Everybody can contribute by nominating or creating selected articles, pictures, systems scientists and "did you know" statements. - Mdd 12:33, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

See also:

Systems science portal in the science bar[edit]

The systems science portal is added into the science bar, which is implemented in other mayor portals. -- Mdd (talk) 14:46, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Portal systems science Wikimedia[edit]

The next template doesn't seems to work": {{Portal:Systems science/Wikimedia}}

But I can find the problem here -- Mdd (talk) 21:21, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

I have rewritten the whole template. -- Mdd (talk) 14:00, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

References to organizations interested in the subject[edit]


Is it a good idea to links the organizations, especially educational ones that are interested in systems thinking, theory, practice? There is already an article, although I think it needs to be enhanced as well.
Thanks for your time.

Harshal (talk) 18:38, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

The picture[edit]

I am not sure why we are using that particular diagram to represent the whole field. For a start not all systems science is complex adaptive systems so it doesn't qualify on those grounds. CAS is post a lot of the names in the associated articles anyway. Secondly it's not representative of CAS theory. It's one distorts synthesis based on reading two books. Its not referenced, published or authoritative. We would surely be bett picking something more abstract and generic. Happy to look for one b it wanted to check for first.----Snowded TALK 14:09, 5 September 2012 (UTC)