Positive Youth Development
Positive Youth Development (PYD) refers to intentional efforts of other youth, adults, communities, government agencies and schools to provide opportunities for youth to enhance their interests, skills, and abilities. PYD is used in scientific literature and by practitioners who work with youth to refer to programs designed to optimize developmental progress.
PYD differs from other approaches to youth in that it rejects an emphasis on trying to correct what is "wrong" with children's behavior or development. Programs and practitioners seek to empathize with, educate, and engage children in productive activities. While not particularly common in use yet, PYD has been used across the world to address social divisions, such as gender and ethnic differences.
Positive Youth Development originated from ecological systems theory to focus on the strengths of adolescence.  It is also similar conceptually with the principles of positive psychology. Central to its philosophy, the theory of PYD suggests that “if young people have mutually beneficial relations with the people and institutions of their social world, they will be on the way to a hopeful future marked by positive contributions to self, family, community, and civil society.”
The major catalyst for the development of Positive Youth Development came as a response to the negative and punitive methods of the "traditional youth development" approach. The traditional approach makes a connection between the changes occurring during adolescent years and either the beginning or peaking of several important public health and social problems, including homicide, suicide, substance use and abuse, sexually transmitted infections and teen and unplanned pregnancies. Another aspect of the traditional approach lies in that many professionals and mass media contribute to it through the portrayal of adolescents as “inevitable problems” that simply need to be fixed. Specific evidence of this “problem-centered” model is present across professional fields that deal with young people. Many connections can also be made to the current U.S. criminal justice model that favors punishment as opposed to prevention.
The concept and practice of Positive Youth Development “grew from the dissatisfaction with a predominant view that underestimated the true capacities of young people by focusing on their deficits rather than their development potential”. Encouraging the positive development of adolescents can help to lessen the likelihood of such problems arising by easing a healthy transition into adulthood.
PYD focuses on the active promotion of optimal human development, rather than on the scientific study of age related change, distinguishing it from the study of 'child development' or 'adolescent development'. or as solely a means of avoiding risky behaviors. Rather than grounding its developmental approach in the presence of adversity, risk or challenge, a PYD approach considers the potential and capacity of each individual young person. A hallmark of these programs is that they are based on the concept that children and adolescents have strengths and abilities unique to their developmental stage and that they are not merely 'inadequate' or 'undeveloped' adults. Lerner and colleagues write: "The goal of the positive youth development perspective is to promote positive outcomes. This idea is in contrast to a perspective that focuses on punishment and the idea that adolescents are broken".
Positive Youth Development is both a vision, an ideology and a new vocabulary for engaging with youth development. Its tenets can be organized into the 5 C’s which are: competence, confidence, connection, character, and caring. When these 5 C’s are present, the 6th C of “contribution” is realized.
Positive youth development programs typically recognize contextual variability in youths' experience and in what is considered 'healthy' or 'optimal' development for youth in different settings or cultures. This cultural sensitivity reflects the influence of Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory. The influence of ecological systems theory is also seen on the emphasis many youth development programs place on the interrelationship of different social contexts through which the development person moves (e.g. family, peers, school, work, and leisure).
The University of Minnesota's Keys to Quality Youth Development summarizes eight key elements of programs that successfully promote youth development. Such programs are physically and emotionally safe, give youth a sense of belonging and ownership and foster their self-worth, allow them to discover their 'self' (identity, interests, strengths), foster high quality and supportive relations with peers and adults, help youth recognize conflicting values and develop their own, foster the development of new skills, have fun, and have hope for the future.
In addition, programs that employ PYD principles generally have one or more of the following features:
- promote bonding
- foster resilience
- promote social, emotional, cognitive, behavioral, and moral competence
- foster self-determination
- foster spirituality
- foster self-efficacy
- foster clear and positive identity
- foster belief in the future
- provide recognition for positive behavior and opportunities for pro-social involvement
- foster pro-social norms
Using PYD to address stereotypes and inequality
Positive Youth Development principles can be used to address gender inequities through the promotion of programs such as "Girls on the Run." Physical activity-based programs like "Girls on the Run" are being increasingly utilized around the world for their ability to encourage psychological, emotional, and social development for youth. "Girls on the Run" enhances this type of physical activity program by specifically targeting female youth in an effort to reduce the gendered view of a male-dominated sports arena. "Girls on the Run" is a non-profit organization begun in 1996 that distributes a 12-week training program to help girls prepare for a 5k running competition. This particular program is made available to 3rd through 5th grade female students throughout the United States and Canada to be implemented in either school or community-based settings.
Another example of Positive Youth Development principles being utilized to target youth gender inequities can be seen in that of a participatory diagramming approach in Kibera, Kenya. This community development effort enabled participants to feel safe discussing their concerns regarding gender inequities in the community with the dominant male group. This approach also enabled youth to voice their needs and identify potential solutions related to topics like HIV/AIDS and family violence.
Ethnic minorities in the United States
Positive Youth Development can be used to combat negative stereotypes surrounding youth of minority ethnic groups in the U.S. After-school programs have been directly geared to generate increased participation for African American and Latino youth with a focus on academic achievement and increasing high school graduation rates. Studies have found programs targeting African American youth are more effective when they work to bolster a sense of their cultural identity PYD has even been used to help develop and strengthen the cultural identities of American Indian and Alaskan Native youth. PYD methods have been used to provide a supportive setting in which to engage youth in traditional activities. Various programs have been implemented related to sports, language, and arts and crafts.
Models of implementation
The key constructs of PYD listed above have been generally accepted throughout the world with some regional distinctions. For example, a Chinese Positive Youth Development Scale has been developed to conceptualize how these features are applicable to Chinese youth. The Chinese Positive Youth Development Scale was used as a measure in a study of Chinese youth in secondary schools in Hong Kong that indicated positive youth development has a direct impact on life satisfaction and reducing problem behavior for Chinese youth. One specific example of PYD implementation is seen in the project "P.A.T.H.S. (Positive Adolescent Training through Holistic Social Programmes) to Adulthood: A Jockey Club Youth Enhancement Scheme." This program targets junior secondary school students in Hong Kong (Grades 7 through 9 in the North American System). The program is composed of two terms, the first of which is a structured curriculum focusing on the 15 PYD constructs and designed for all students as a "universal prevention initiative." The Tier 2 Program is a more selective prevention model directly targeting students with greater psychosocial needs identified by the school social work service providers. The label "at-risk" is intentionally avoided because the term denotes a very negative stigma in Chinese culture, and therefore discourages participation in the program. It should be noted that while Chinese social work agencies commonly target students with greater psychosocial needs, these PYD programs have rarely undergone thorough systemic evaluation and documentation.
In Portugal, the utility of Positive Youth Development principles in sporting contexts is beginning to be recognized. Several athletic-based programs have been implemented in the country, but more research is necessary to determine their effectiveness at this point.
Latin America and the Caribbean
Positive Youth Development has also been seen in the form of youth volunteer service throughout Latin America and the Caribbean. From Mexico and the Caribbean to Central and South America, this form of implementation has been acknowledged for encouraging both personal and community development, while oftentimes contributing to poverty reduction. It has furthermore been seen as a way of promoting civil engagement through various service opportunities in communities.
Positive Youth Development efforts can be seen in the work of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) in collaboration with various regional governments and the private sector across Latin America and the Caribbean. This work has focused on providing broader educational options, skills training, and opportunities for economically disadvantaged youth to obtain apprenticeships. The ¡Supérate! Centers across El Salvador are one example, as they are supported by USAID in combination with private companies and foundations, and offer expanded education for high-performing students from poorer economic backgrounds. As of 2011, there were 7 centers in El Salvador and USAID expressed plans to expand this model across Central America. In Brazil, the Jovem Plus program offers high-demand skills training for youth in disadvantaged communities in Rio de Janeiro and the northeastern area of the nation. Other programs include the "Youth Movement against Violence" in Guatemala and "Youth Upliftment through Employment" in Jamaica.
U.S. organizations using Positive Youth Development principles
- 4-H (All 50 states)
- Camp Fire
- Chicago Freedom School (Chicago, IL, USA)
- Elementz (Cincinnati, OH, USA)
- Grace Lee Boggs School (Detroit, MI, USA)
- Michigan Youth and Community Program (Detroit Metro area, MI, USA)
- Mikva Challenge (Chicago, IL, USA)
- Neutral Zone (Ann Arbor, MI, USA)
- Skill Set (Rowe, MA, USA)
- Umoja Student Development Corporation (Chicago, IL, USA)
- Urbano Project (Boston, MA, USA)
- YES: Youth Empowerment Solutions (Lansing, MI, USA)
- Youth Leadership Institute (San Francisco, CA, USA)
- Youth On Board (Boston, MA, USA)
- Youth Uprising (Oakland, CA, USA)
- Youth Voice (Detroit)
- D.I.G (Dreams Imagination & Gift Development Program)(South Carolina, Georgia, North Carolina)
- Youth-Nex The University of Virginia Center to Promote Effective Youth Development (Charlottesville, Virginia)
- Native Health Initiative (Albuquerque, NM)
- New Mexico Forum for Youth (Albuquerque, NM)
- School Community Youth Collaborative (Montezuma and Dolores Counties, CO)
- National Indian Youth Leadership Project (Gallup, NM)
- "Positive Youth Development in the U.S.: Research Findings on Evaluations of Positive Youth Development Programs". Retrieved April 9, 2014.
- Damon, William (January 2004). "What Is Positive Youth Development?". Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591: 13–24. doi:10.1177/0002716203260092.
- "Keys to Quality Youth Development". University of Minnesota Extension. Retrieved 16 October 2014.
- Lerner, R.M.; Almerigi, J.B.; Theokas, C.; Lerner, J.V. (2005). "Positive Youth Development". Journal of Early Adolescence 25 (1): 10–16. doi:10.1177/0272431604273211.
- "Healthy People 2020 - Improving the Health of Americans". Retrieved April 9, 2014.
- McNeely, MA, DrPH, Clea; Jayne Blanchard (2009). "The Teen Years Explained: A Guide to Healthy Adolescent Development". Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Adolescent Health.
- Lerner, Richard M.; Jacqueline V. Lerner; Erin Phelps; and Colleagues (2012). "Waves of the Future: The first eight years of the 4-H study of positive youth development".
- McKay, Cassandra; Margaret Sanders; Stephanie Wroblewski (2011-09-15). "Positive Youth Development and School Capacity Building". SSW Journal 36 (1): 16–25.
- "Positive Youth Development in the U.S.: Research Findings on Evaluations of Positive Youth Development Programs: Chapter 1". Retrieved April 9, 2014.
- Iachini, Aidyn L.; Michael W. Beets; Annahita Ball; Mary Lohman (2013). "Process evaluation of "Girls on the Run": Exploring implementation in a physical activity-based positive youth development program". Elsevier 46: 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.05.001.
- Williams, Cheryl; Pamela Petrucka; Sandra Bassendowski; Claire Betker (2014). Ramsey, Dr. Doug, ed. "Participatory diagramming for engaging youth in a gender equity and community development dialogue: An African exemplar". Journal of Rural and Community Development (Brandon University: Rural Development Institute) 9 (2): 191–211. ISSN 1712-8277.
- Fredricks, Jennifer A.; Sandra D. Simpkins (2012). "Promoting Positive Youth Development Through Organized After-School Activities: Taking a Closer Look at Participation of Ethnic Minority Youth". Child Development Perspectives (Connecticut College and Arizona State University) 6 (3): 280–287. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00206.x.
- Travis Jr., Raphael; Tamara G. J. Leech (2013). "Empowerment-Based Positive Youth Development: A New Understanding of Healthy Development for African American Youth". Journal of Research on Adolescence 24 (1): 93–116. doi:10.1111/jora.12062.
- Kenyon, DenYelle Baete; Jessica D. Hanson (2012). "Incorporating Traditional Culture Into Positive Youth Development Programs With American Indian/Alaska Native Youth". Child Development Perspectives (Stanford Research) 6 (12): 272–279. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00227.x.
- Shek, Daniel T.L.; Andrew M.H. Siu; Tak Yan Lee (May 2007). "The Chinese Positive Youth Development Scale: A Validation Study". Research on Social Work Practice 17 (3): 380–391. doi:10.1177/1049731506296196.
- Sun, Rachel C.F.; Daniel T.L. Shek (2012). "Longitudinal Influences of Positive Youth Development and Life Satisfaction on Problem Behavior among Adolescents in Hong Kong". Springer Science 114: 1171–1197. doi:10.1007/s11205-012-0196-4.
- Lee, Tak Yan; Daniel T.L. Shek (2010). "Positive Youth Development Programs Targeting Students with Greater Psychosocial Needs: A Replication". The Scientific World Journal (Scientific World) 10: 261–272. doi:10.1100/tsw.2010.3.
- Esperança, Jorge Manuel; Maria Leonor Regueiras; Robert John Brustad; Antonio Manuel Fonseca (2012). "Um olhar sobre o desenvolvimento positivo dos jovens através do desporto" [A Look at Positive Youth Development through the Sport]. Revista de Psicología del Deporte (in Portuguese) (Universität Autónoma de Barcelona) 22 (2): 481–487. ISSN 1132-239X.
- McBride, PhD, Amanda Moore; Rene Olate, PhD; Lissa Johnson, MSW (2008). "Youth Volunteer Service in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Regional Assessment". CSD Research Report (St. Louis and Buenos Aires, Argentina: Center for Social Development, Washington University and Fundación SES) 33: 34–41. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.08.009.
- Feierstein, Mark (November 2011). "Supporting Positive Youth Development in the Americas". Americas 63 (6): 38–41.
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services-Family and Youth Services Bureau
- Extension Center for Youth Development at the University of Minnesota
- Oregon Commission on Children and Families
- National Resource Center for Youth Development