Post-traumatic growth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Post-traumatic growth

In psychology, Posttraumatic growth (PTG) or benefit finding is a concept describing positive psychological change experienced as a result of adversity and other challenges in order to rise to a higher level of functioning.[1] These circumstances represent significant challenges to the adaptive resources of the individual, and pose significant challenges to their way of understanding the world and their place in it.[1] Posttraumatic growth involves "life-changing" psychological shifts in thinking and relating to the world, that contribute to a personal process of change, that is deeply meaningful.[1]


The general understanding that suffering and distress can potentially yield positive change is thousands of years old.[1] For example, some of the early ideas and writing of the ancient Hebrews, Greeks, and early Christians, as well as some of the teachings of Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam[2] and the Baháʼí Faith[3] contain elements of the potentially transformative power of suffering. Attempts to understand and discover the meaning of human suffering represent a central theme of much philosophical inquiry and appear in the works of novelists, dramatists and poets.[2]

Traditional psychology's equivalent to thriving is resilience, which is reaching the previous level of functioning before a trauma, stressor, or challenge. The difference between resilience and thriving is the recovery point – thriving goes above and beyond resilience, and involves finding benefits within challenges.[4]

The term "posttraumatic growth" was coined by psychologists at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte.[5] According to Tedeschi, as many as 89% of survivors report at least one aspect of posttraumatic growth, such as a renewed appreciation for life.[6]

Variants of the idea have included Crystal Park's proposed stress related growth model, which highlighted the derived sense of meaning in the context of adjusting to challenging and stressful situations,[7] and Joseph and Linley's proposed adversarial growth model, which linked growth with psychological wellbeing.[8] According to the adversarial growth model, whenever an individual is experiencing a challenging situation, they can either integrate the traumatic experience into their current belief system and worldviews or they can modify their beliefs based on their current experiences.[9] If the individual positively accommodates the trauma-related information and assimilates prior beliefs, psychological growth can occur following adversity.[9]


Posttraumatic growth occurs with the attempts to adapt to highly negative sets of circumstances that can engender high levels of psychological distress such as major life crises, which typically engender unpleasant psychological reactions.[1] Growth does not occur as a direct result of trauma; rather, it is the individual's struggle with the new reality in the aftermath of trauma that is crucial in determining the extent to which posttraumatic growth occurs.[1] Encouragingly, reports of growth experiences in the aftermath of traumatic events far outnumber reports of psychiatric disorders, since continuing personal distress and growth often coexist.[1]

As far as predictors of posttraumatic growth, a number of factors have been associated with adaptive growth following exposure to a trauma. Spirituality has been shown to highly correlate with posttraumatic growth and in fact, many of the most deeply spiritual beliefs are a result of trauma exposure (O'Rourke 2008). Social support has been well documented as a buffer to mental illness and stress response. In regards to posttraumatic growth, not only are high levels of pre-exposure social support associated with growth, but there is some neurobiological evidence to support the idea that support will modulate a pathological response to stress in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) pathway in the brain (Ozbay 2007). As Richard G. Tedeschi and other posttraumatic growth researchers have found, the ability to accept situations that cannot be changed is crucial for adapting to traumatic life events. They call it "acceptance coping", and have determined that coming to terms with reality is a significant predictor of posttraumatic growth.[10] It is also alleged, though currently under further investigation, that opportunity for emotional disclosure can lead to posttraumatic growth though did not significantly reduce post-traumatic stress symptomology (Slavin-Spenny 2010). Gender roles did not reliably predict posttraumatic growth though are indicative of the type of trauma that an individual experiences. Women tend to experience victimization on a more individual and interpersonal level (e.g. sexual victimization) while men tend to experience more systemic and collective traumas (e.g. military and combat). Given that group dynamics appear to play a predictive role in posttraumatic growth, it can be argued that the type of exposure may indirectly predict growth in men (Lilly 2012).

Posttraumatic growth and personality[edit]

Historically, personality traits have been depicted as being stable following the age of 30.[11] Since 1994, research findings suggested that personality traits can change in response to life transition events during middle and late adulthood.[12] Life transition events may be related to work, relationships, or health. Moderate amounts of stress were associated with improvements in the traits of mastery and toughness.[13] Individuals experiencing moderate amounts of stress were found to be more confident about their abilities and had a better sense of control over their lives. Further, moderate amounts of stress were also associated with better resilience, which can be defined as successful recovery to baseline following stress.[14] An individual who experienced moderate amounts of stressful events was more likely to develop coping skills, seek support from their environment, and experience more confidence in their ability to overcome adversity.[13]

Posttraumatic growth[edit]

Posttraumatic growth refers to positive personality change following traumatic life events.[15] Experiencing a traumatic event can have a transformational role in personality among certain individuals and facilitate growth.[16] For example, individuals who have experienced trauma have been shown to exhibit greater optimism, positive affect, and satisfaction with social support, as well as increases in the number of social supportive resources.[16] Similarly, research reveals personality changes among spouses of terminal cancer patients suggesting such traumatic life transitions facilitated increases in interpersonal orientation, prosocial behaviors, and dependability scores.[17]

Importantly, experiencing a traumatic life event per se does not lead to posttraumatic growth.[9][7] Not everyone who experiences a traumatic event will directly develop posttraumatic growth. Rather, an individual’s emotional response to the traumatic event is significant in determining the long-term outcome of that trauma.[15] The outcome of traumatic events can be negatively impacted by factors occurring during and after the trauma, potentially increasing the risk of developing posttraumatic stress disorder, or other mental health difficulties.[18]

Further, characteristics of the trauma and personality dynamics of the individual experiencing the trauma each independently contributed to posttraumatic growth.[19] If the amounts of stress are too low or too overwhelming, a person cannot cope with the situation. Personality dynamics can either facilitate or impede posttraumatic growth, regardless of the impact of traumatic events.[19]

Mixed findings[edit]

Research of posttraumatic growth is emerging in the field of personality psychology, with mixed findings.[20] Several researchers examined posttraumatic growth and its associations with the big five personality model. Posttraumatic growth was found to be associated with greater agreeableness, openness, and extraversion.[21] Agreeableness relates to interpersonal behaviors which include trust, altruism, compliance, honesty, and modesty.[22] Individuals who are agreeable are more likely to seek support when needed and to receive it from others. Higher scores on the agreeableness trait can facilitate the development of posttraumatic growth.

Individuals who score high on openness scales are more likely to be curious, open to new experiences, and emotionally responsive to their surroundings.[23]  It is hypothesized that following a traumatic event, individuals who score high on openness would more readily reconsider their beliefs and values that may have been altered.[24] Openness to experiences is thus key for facilitating posttraumatic growth.[15] Individuals who score high on extraversion were more likely to adopt more problem-solving strategies, cognitive restructuring, and seek more support from others.[25] Individuals who score high on extraversion use coping strategies that enable posttraumatic growth.[26] Research among veterans and among children of prisoners of war suggested that openness and extraversion contributed to posttraumatic growth.[27][28]

Research among community samples suggested that openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness contributed to posttraumatic growth.[29] Individuals who score high on conscientiousness tend to be better at self-regulating their internal experience, have better impulse control, and are more likely to seek achievements across various domains.[30] The conscientiousness trait has been associated with better problem-solving and cognitive restructuring.[25] As such, individuals who are conscientious are more likely to better adjust to stressors and exhibit posttraumatic growth.

Other research among bereaved caregivers and among undergraduates indicated that posttraumatic growth was associated with extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness.[17][31] As such, the findings linking the big five personality traits with posttraumatic growth are mixed.

Trauma types, personality dynamics, and posttraumatic growth[edit]

Recent research is examining the influence of trauma types and personality dynamics on posttraumatic growth.[19] Individuals who aspire to standards and orderliness are more likely to develop posttraumatic growth and better overall mental health.[19] It is hypothesized that such individuals can better process the meaning of hardships as they experience moderate amounts of stress. This tendency can facilitate positive personal growth. On the other hand, it was found that individuals who have trouble in regulating themselves are less likely to develop posttraumatic growth and more likely to develop trauma-spectrum disorders and mood disorders.[19] This is in line with past research that suggested that individuals who scored higher on self-discrepancy were more likely to score higher on neuroticism and exhibit poor coping.[32] Neuroticism relates to an individual’s tendency to respond with negative emotions to threat, frustration, or loss.[23] As such, individuals with high neuroticism and self-discrepancy are less likely to develop posttraumatic growth. Research has highlighted the important role that collective processing of emotional experiences has on posttraumatic growth. Those who are more capable of engaging with their emotional experiences due to crisis and trauma, and make meaning of these are more likely to increase in their resilience and community engagement following the disaster. Furthermore, collective processing of these emotional experiences leads to greater individual growth and collective solidarity and belongingness. [33]


Results seen in people that have experienced posttraumatic growth include some of the following: greater appreciation of life; changed sense of priorities; warmer, more intimate relationships; greater sense of personal strength; and recognition of new possibilities or paths for one's life and spiritual development.[34] Two personality characteristics that may affect the likelihood that people can make positive use of the aftermath of traumatic events that befall them include extraversion and openness to experience.[35] Also, optimists may be better able to focus attention and resources on the most important matters, and disengage from uncontrollable or unsolvable problems.[1] The ability to grieve and gradually accept trauma could also increase the likelihood of growth.[1] It also benefits a person to have supportive others that can aid in posttraumatic growth by providing a way to craft narratives about the changes that have occurred, and by offering perspectives that can be integrated into schema change.[36] These relationships help develop narratives; these narratives of trauma and survival are always important in posttraumatic growth because the development of these narratives forces survivors to confront questions of meaning and how answers to those questions can be reconstructed.[37] Individual differences in coping strategies set some people on a maladaptive spiral, whereas others proceed on an adaptive spiral.[38] With this in mind, some early success in coping could be a precursor to posttraumatic growth.[38] A person's level of confidence could also play a role in her or his ability to persist into growth or, out of lack of confidence, give up.[1]

In 2011 Iversen and Christiansen & Elklit suggested that predictors of growth have different effects on PTG on micro-, meso-, and macro level, and a positive predictor of growth on one level can be a negative predictor of growth on another level. This might explain some of the inconsistent research results within the area.[39]

Posttraumatic growth has been studied in children to a lesser extent. A review by Meyerson and colleagues found various relations between social and psychological factors and posttraumatic growth in children and adolescents, but concluded that fundamental questions about its value and function remain.[40]

Theories and findings[edit]


In general, research in psychology shows that people are resilient overall. For example, Southwick and Charney, in a study of 250 prisoners of war from Vietnam, showed that participants developed much lower rates of depression and PTSD symptoms than expected.[41] Donald Meichenbaum[42] estimated that 60% of North Americans will experience trauma in their lifetime, and of these while no one is unscathed, some 70% show resilience and 30% show harmful effects.[43] Similarly, 68 million women of the 150 million in America will be victimized over their lifetime, but only 10% will suffer insofar as they must seek help from mental health professionals.[44]

In general, traditional psychology's approach to resiliency as exhibited in the studies above is a problem-oriented one, assuming that PTSD is the problem and that resiliency just means to avoid or fix that problem in order to maintain baseline well-being. This type of approach fails to acknowledge any growth that might occur beyond the previously set baseline, however. Positive psychology's idea of thriving attempts to reconcile that failure. A meta-analysis of studies[45] done by Shakespeare-Finch[46] in this area indicates that there is actually an association between PTSD symptoms and posttraumatic growth. The null hypothesis that there is no relationship between the two was rejected for the study. The correlation between the two was significant and was found to be dependent upon the nature of the event and the person's age. For example, survivors of sexual assault show less posttraumatic growth than survivors of natural disaster. Ultimately, however, the meta-analysis serves to show that PTSD and posttraumatic growth are not mutually exclusive ends of a recovery spectrum and that they may actually co-occur during a successful process to thriving.[47]

It is important to note that while aspects of resilience and growth aid an individual's psychological well-being, they are not the same thing. Dr. Richard Tedeschi and Dr. Erika Felix specifically note that resilience suggests bouncing back and returning to one's previous state of being, whereas post-traumatic growth fosters a transformed way of being or understanding for an individual. Often, traumatic or challenging experiences force an individual to re-evaluate core beliefs, values, or behaviors on both cognitive and emotional levels; the idea of post-traumatic growth is therefore rooted in the notion that these beliefs, values, or behaviors come with a new perspective and expectation after the event. Thus, post-traumatic growth centers around the concept of change, whereas resilience suggests the return to previous beliefs, values, or lifestyles.


To understand the significance of thriving in the human experience, it is important to understand its role within the context of trauma and its separation from traditional psychology's idea of resilience. Implicit in the idea of thriving and resilience both is the presence of adversity. O'Leary and Ickovics created a four-part diagram of the spectrum of human response to adversity, the possibilities of which include: succumbing to adversity, surviving with diminished quality of life, resiliency (returning to baseline quality of life), and thriving.[48] Thriving includes not only resiliency, but an additional further improvement over the quality of life previous to the adverse event.

Thriving in positive psychology definitely aims to promote growth beyond survival, but it is important to note that some of the theories surrounding the causes and effects of it are more ambiguous. Literature by Carver indicates that the concept of thriving is a difficult one to define objectively. He makes the distinction between physical and psychological thriving, implying that while physical thriving has obvious measurable results, psychological thriving does not as much. This is the origin of much ambiguity surrounding the concept. Carver lists several self-reportable indicators of thriving: greater acceptance of self, change in philosophy, and a change in priorities. These are factors that generally lead a person to feel that they have grown, but obviously are difficult to measure quantitatively.[4]

The dynamic systems approach to thriving attempts to resolve some of the ambiguity in the quantitative definition of thriving, citing thriving as an improvement in adaptability to future trauma based on their model of attractors and attractor basins.[4] This approach suggests that reorganization of behaviors is required to make positive adaptive behavior a more significant attractor basin, which is an area the system shows a tendency toward.

In general, as pointed out by Carver, the idea of thriving seems to be one that is hard to remove from subjective experience. However, work done by Meichenbaum to create his Posttraumatic Growth Inventory helps to set forth a more measurable map of thriving. The five fields of posttraumatic growth that Meichenbaum outlined include: relating to others, new possibilities, personal strength, spiritual change, and appreciation for life. Though literature that addresses "thriving" specifically is sparse, there is much research in the five areas Meichenbaum cites as facilitating thriving, all of which supports the idea that growth after adversity is a viable and significant possibility for human well-being.

Aspects of post-traumatic growth[edit]

Another attempt at quantitatively charting the concept of thriving is via the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory.[34] The inventory has 21 items and is designed to measure the extent to which one experiences personal growth after adversity. The inventory includes elements from five key areas: relating to others, new possibilities, personal strength, spiritual change, and appreciation for life.[49] These five categories are reminiscent of the subjective experiences Carver struggled to quantify in his own literature on thriving, but are imposed onto scales to maintain measurability. When considering the idea of thriving from the five-point approach, it is easier to place more research from psychology within the context of thriving. Additionally, a short form version of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory has been created with only 10 items, selecting two questions for each of the five subscales.[50][51] Studies have been conducted to better understand the validity of this scale and some have found that self-reported measures of posttraumatic growth are unreliable. Frazier et al. (2009) reported that further improvement could be made to this inventory to better capture actual change.[52]

One of the key facets of posttraumatic growth set forth by Meichenbaum is relating to others. Accordingly, much work has been done to indicate that social support resources are extremely important to the facilitation of thriving. House, Cohen, and their colleagues indicate that perception of adequate social support is associated with improved adaptive tendency. This idea of better adaptive tendency is central to thriving in that it results in an improved approach to future adversity. Similarly, Hazan and Shaver reason that social support provides a solid base of security for human endeavor. The idea of human endeavor here is echoed in another of Meichenbaum's facets of posttraumatic growth, new possibilities, the idea being that a person's confidence to "endeavor" in the face of novelty is a sign of thriving.[4]

Concurrent with a third facet of Meichenbaum's posttraumatic growth, personal strength, a meta analysis of six qualitative studies done by Finfgeld focuses on courage as a path to thriving. Evidence from the analysis indicates that the ability to be courageous includes acceptance of reality, problem-solving, and determination. This not only directly supports the significance of personal strength in thriving, but can also be drawn to Meichenbaum's concept of "new possibilities" through the idea that determination and adaptive problem-solving aid in constructively confronting new possibilities. Besides this, it was found in Finfgeld's study that courage is promoted and sustained by intra- and interpersonal forces, further supporting Meichenbaum's concept of "relating to others" and its effect on thriving.[53]

On Meichenbaum's idea of appreciation for life, research done by Tyson on a sample of people 2–5 years into grieving processing reveals the importance of creating meaning. The studies show that coping with bereavement optimally does not only involve just "getting over it and moving on", but should also include creating meaning to facilitate the best recovery. The study showed that stories and creative forms of expression increase growth following bereavement.[54] This evidence is supported strongly by work done by Michael and Cooper focused on facets of bereavement that facilitate growth including "the age of the bereaved", "social support", "time since death", "religion", and "active cognitive coping strategies".[4] The idea of coping strategies is echoed through the importance thriving places on improving adaptability. The significance of social support to growth found by Michael and Cooper clearly supports Meichenbaum's concept of "relating to others". Similarly, the significance of religion echoes Meichenbaum's "spiritual change" facet of posttraumatic growth.

Positive psychology[edit]

Posttraumatic growth can be seen as a form of positive psychology.[55]

Positive disintegration[edit]

The theory of positive disintegration[56] by Kazimierz Dąbrowski is a theory that postulates that symptoms such as psychological tension and anxiety could be signs that a person might be in positive disintegration.The theory proposes that this can happen when an individual rejects previously adopted values (relating to their physical survival and their place in society), and adopts new values that are based on the higher possible version of who they can be. Rather than seeing disintegration as a negative state, the theory proposes that is a transient state which allows an individual to grow towards their personality ideal. The theory stipulates that individuals who have a high development potential (i.e. those with overexcitabilities), have a higher chance of re-integrating at a higher level of development, after disintegration. Scholarly work is needed to ascertain whether disintegrative processes, as specified by the theory, are traumatic, and whether reaching higher intergration, e.g. Level IV (directed multilevel disintegration) or V (secondary integration), can be equated to posttraumatic growth.

Criticisms and concerns[edit]

Concerns include that evidence of post-traumatic growth is very limited, and that it may be an illusion.[57][58][59][60]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Tedeshi, R.G., & Calhoun, L.G. (2004). Posttraumatic Growth: Conceptual Foundation and Empirical Evidence. Philadelphia, PA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  2. ^ a b Tedeschi, R.G., & Calhoun, L.G. (1995). Trauma and Transformation: Growing in the Aftermath of Suffering. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  3. ^ Abdu'l-Bahá on Suffering and Tests, Baháʼí International Community, accessed Jul 14 2013.
  4. ^ a b c d e Carver C (2010). "Resilience and Thriving: Issues, Models, and Linkages". Journal of Social Issues. 54 (2): 245–266. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1998.tb01217.x.
  5. ^ Michaela Haas, "Bouncing Forward: Transforming Bad Breaks into Breakthroughs," Atria/Enliven, 2015
  6. ^ Michaela Haas. "What is Posttraumatic Growth?".
  7. ^ a b Park CL (March 2010). "Making sense of the meaning literature: an integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events". Psychological Bulletin. 136 (2): 257–301. doi:10.1037/a0018301. PMID 20192563.
  8. ^ Linley PA, Joseph S (February 2004). "Positive change following trauma and adversity: a review". Journal of Traumatic Stress. 17 (1): 11–21. doi:10.1023/b:jots.0000014671.27856.7e. PMID 15027788. S2CID 19585205.
  9. ^ a b c Joseph S, Linley PA (2005). "Positive Adjustment to Threatening Events: An Organismic Valuing Theory of Growth Through Adversity". Review of General Psychology. 9 (3): 262–280. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.9.3.262. S2CID 145267293.
  10. ^ Michaela Haas, Bouncing Forward:Transforming Bad Breaks into Breakthroughs, Atria/Enliven, 2015, ISBN 150111512X
  11. ^ Terracciano A, Costa PT, McCrae RR (August 2006). "Personality plasticity after age 30". Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin. 32 (8): 999–1009. doi:10.1177/0146167206288599. PMC 2680603. PMID 16861305.
  12. ^ Roberts BW, Mroczek D (February 2008). "Personality Trait Change in Adulthood". Current Directions in Psychological Science. 17 (1): 31–35. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00543.x. PMC 2743415. PMID 19756219.
  13. ^ a b Seery MD, Holman EA, Silver RC (December 2010). "Whatever does not kill us: cumulative lifetime adversity, vulnerability, and resilience". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 99 (6): 1025–41. doi:10.1037/a0021344. PMID 20939649.
  14. ^ Seery, Mark D. (December 2011). "Resilience". Current Directions in Psychological Science. 20 (6): 390–394. doi:10.1177/0963721411424740. ISSN 0963-7214.
  15. ^ a b c "COMMENTARIES on "Posttraumatic Growth: Conceptual Foundations and Empirical Evidence"". Psychological Inquiry. 15 (1): 19–92. January 2004. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1501_02. ISSN 1047-840X. S2CID 219731112.
  16. ^ a b Park CL, Cohen LH, Murch RL (March 1996). "Assessment and prediction of stress-related growth". Journal of Personality. 64 (1): 71–105. CiteSeerX doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00815.x. PMID 8656319.
  17. ^ a b Hoerger M, Chapman BP, Prigerson HG, Fagerlin A, Mohile SG, Epstein RM, Lyness JM, Duberstein PR (August 2014). "Personality Change Pre- to Post- Loss in Spousal Caregivers of Patients with Terminal Lung Cancer". Social Psychological and Personality Science. 5 (6): 722–729. doi:10.1177/1948550614524448. PMC 4299658. PMID 25614779.
  18. ^ Brewin CR, Andrews B, Valentine JD (2000). "Meta-analysis of risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed adults". Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 68 (5): 748–766. doi:10.1037/0022-006x.68.5.748. ISSN 0022-006X. PMID 11068961.
  19. ^ a b c d e Shuwiekh H, Kira IA, Ashby JS (May 2018). "What are the personality and trauma dynamics that contribute to posttraumatic growth?". International Journal of Stress Management. 25 (2): 181–194. doi:10.1037/str0000054. ISSN 1573-3424.
  20. ^ Jayawickreme E, Blackie LE (July 2014). "Post-traumatic Growth as Positive Personality Change: Evidence, Controversies and Future Directions" (PDF). European Journal of Personality. 28 (4): 312–331. doi:10.1002/per.1963. ISSN 0890-2070. S2CID 142603170.
  21. ^ Linley PA, Joseph S (February 2004). "Positive change following trauma and adversity: a review". Journal of Traumatic Stress. 17 (1): 11–21. doi:10.1023/B:JOTS.0000014671.27856.7e. PMID 15027788. S2CID 19585205.
  22. ^ Costa PT, McCrae RR, Dye DA (1991). "Facet Scales for Agreeableness and Conscientiousness: A Revision of the NEO Personality Inventory". Personality and Individual Differences. 12 (9): 887–898. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(91)90177-d. ISSN 0191-8869.
  23. ^ a b Costa PT, McCrae RR (1992). "Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory". Psychological Assessment. 4 (1): 5–13. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5. ISSN 1040-3590.
  24. ^ Calhoun LG, Tedeschi RG, Cann A, Hanks EA (2010-09-01). "Positive Outcomes Following Bereavement: Paths to Posttraumatic Growth". Psychologica Belgica. 50 (1–2): 125. doi:10.5334/pb-50-1-2-125. ISSN 2054-670X.
  25. ^ a b Connor-Smith JK, Flachsbart C (December 2007). "Relations between personality and coping: a meta-analysis". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 93 (6): 1080–107. CiteSeerX doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.1080. PMID 18072856.
  26. ^ "The Effects of Personality, Social Support and Religiosity on Posttraumatic Growth". Retrieved 2019-01-09.
  27. ^ Staugaard SR, Johannessen KB, Thomsen YD, Bertelsen M, Berntsen D (April 2015). "Centrality of positive and negative deployment memories predicts posttraumatic growth in danish veterans" (PDF). Journal of Clinical Psychology. 71 (4): 362–77. doi:10.1002/jclp.22142. PMID 25522344.
  28. ^ Zerach G (July 2015). "Secondary growth among former prisoners of war's adult children: The result of exposure to stress, secondary traumatization, or personality traits?". Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. 7 (4): 313–23. doi:10.1037/tra0000009. PMID 26147516.
  29. ^ Karanci AN, Işıklı S, Aker AT, Gül Eİ, Erkan BB, Ozkol H, Güzel HY (2012-06-05). "Personality, posttraumatic stress and trauma type: factors contributing to posttraumatic growth and its domains in a Turkish community sample". European Journal of Psychotraumatology. 3 (1): 17303. doi:10.3402/ejpt.v3i0.17303. PMC 3402104. PMID 22893832.
  30. ^ McCrae RR, John OP (June 1992). "An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications". Journal of Personality. 60 (2): 175–215. CiteSeerX doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x. PMID 1635039.
  31. ^ Owens GP (October 2016). "Predictors of Posttraumatic Growth and Posttraumatic Stress Symptom Severity in Undergraduates Reporting Potentially Traumatic Events". Journal of Clinical Psychology. 72 (10): 1064–76. doi:10.1002/jclp.22309. PMID 27062393.
  32. ^ Rice KG, Ashby JS, Slaney RB (December 2007). "Perfectionism and the five-factor model of personality". Assessment. 14 (4): 385–98. CiteSeerX doi:10.1177/1073191107303217. PMID 17986656. S2CID 35108731.
  33. ^ Kieft, J.; Bendell, J (2021). "The responsibility of communicating difficult truths about climate influenced societal disruption and collapse: an introduction to psychological research". Institute for Leadership and Sustainability (IFLAS) Occasional Papers. 7: 1–39.
  34. ^ a b Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG (July 1996). "The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: measuring the positive legacy of trauma". Journal of Traumatic Stress. 9 (3): 455–71. doi:10.1002/jts.2490090305. PMID 8827649.
  35. ^ Costa PT, McCrae RR (1992). "Normal Personality Assessment In Clinical Practice: The NEW Personality Inventory". Psychological Assessment. 4: 5–13. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5.
  36. ^ Neimeyer RA (2001). Meaning Reconstruction and the Experience of Loss. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  37. ^ McAdams DP (1993). The Stories We Live By: Personal Myths and the Making of the Self. New York: Morrow.
  38. ^ a b Aldwin CM (1994). Stress, Coping, and Development. New York: Guilford.
  39. ^ Iversen TN, Christiansen DM, Elklit A (December 2011). "Forskellige prædiktorer for posttraumatisk vækst på mikro-, meso-og makroniveau". Psyke & Logos. 32 (2): 28.
  40. ^ Meyerson DA, Grant KE, Carter JS, Kilmer RP (August 2011). "Posttraumatic growth among children and adolescents: a systematic review". Clinical Psychology Review. 31 (6): 949–64. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2011.06.003. PMID 21718663.
  41. ^ Southwick SM, Charney DS (October 2012). "The science of resilience: implications for the prevention and treatment of depression". Science. 338 (6103): 79–82. Bibcode:2012Sci...338...79S. doi:10.1126/science.1222942. PMID 23042887. S2CID 40958656.
  42. ^ "Seven Questions for Donald Meichenbaum".
  43. ^ Roadmap to Resilience, 2012
  44. ^ Tan S (2013). "Resilience and posttraumatic growth: Empirical evidence and clinical applications from a christian perspective". Journal of Psychology and Christianity. 32 (4): 358–364.
  45. ^ Shakespeare-Finch J, Lurie-Beck J (March 2014). "A meta-analytic clarification of the relationship between posttraumatic growth and symptoms of posttraumatic distress disorder" (PDF). Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 28 (2): 223–9. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.10.005. PMID 24291397.
  46. ^ Browse By Person: Shakespeare-Finch, Jane
  47. ^ Shakespeare-Finch J, Lurie-Beck J (March 2014). "A meta-analytic clarification of the relationship between posttraumatic growth and symptoms of posttraumatic distress disorder" (PDF). Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 28 (2): 223–9. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.10.005. PMID 24291397.
  48. ^ O'Leary VE, Ickovics JR (1995). "Resilience and thriving in response to challenge: an opportunity for a paradigm shift in women's health". Women's Health. 1 (2): 121–42. PMID 9373376.
  49. ^ Meichenbaum D, Calhoun LG, Tedeschi RG (2006). Handbook of posttraumatic growth: Research and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. pp. 355–368.
  50. ^ Cann A, Calhoun LG, Tedeschi RG, Taku K, Vishnevsky T, Triplett KN, Danhauer SC (March 2010). "A short form of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory". Anxiety, Stress, and Coping. 23 (2): 127–37. doi:10.1080/10615800903094273. PMID 19582640. S2CID 7854444.
  51. ^ Kaur N, Porter B, LeardMann CA, Tobin LE, Lemus H, Luxton DD (April 2017). "Evaluation of a modified version of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory-Short Form". BMC Medical Research Methodology. 17 (1): 69. doi:10.1186/s12874-017-0344-2. PMC 5399389. PMID 28427350.
  52. ^ Frazier P, Tennen H, Gavian M, Park C, Tomich P, Tashiro T (July 2009). "Does self-reported posttraumatic growth reflect genuine positive change?". Psychological Science. 20 (7): 912–9. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02381.x. PMID 19515115. S2CID 13243589.
  53. ^ Finfgeld DL (November 1999). "Courage as a process of pushing beyond the struggle". Qualitative Health Research. 9 (6): 803–14. doi:10.1177/104973299129122298. PMID 10662260. S2CID 21043932.
  54. ^ Tyson J (2013). "Turning a tragedy into a tribute: A literature review of creating meaning after loss of a loved one". Illness, Crisis, & Loss. 21 (4): 325–340. doi:10.2190/IL.21.4.e. S2CID 147024690.
  55. ^ "What is PTG: The Science of Post-Traumatic Growth". 2010-01-16.
  56. ^ Schläppy, Marie-Lise (2019). "Understanding Mental Health Through the Theory of Positive Disintegration: A Visual Aid". Frontiers in Psychology. 10: 1291. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01291. PMC 6558145. PMID 31214091.
  57. ^ "The Trouble with Post-Traumatic Growth".
  58. ^ Frazier, Patricia; Tennen, Howard; Gavian, Margaret; Park, Crystal; Tashiro, Ty (2009). "Does self-reported posttraumatic growth reflect genuine positive change?". Psychological Science. SAGE Publications. 20 (7): 912–919. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02381.x. PMID 19515115. S2CID 13243589.
  59. ^
  60. ^ Blix, Ines; Birkeland, Marianne Skogbrott; Hansen, Marianne Bang; Heir, Trond (2016). "Posttraumatic Growth—An Antecedent and Outcome of Posttraumatic Stress". Clinical Psychological Science. 4 (4): 620–628. doi:10.1177/2167702615615866. S2CID 146429612.


External links[edit]