There are many causes of power failures in an electricity network. Examples of these causes include faults at power stations, damage to electric transmission lines, substations or other parts of the distribution system, a short circuit, cascading failure, fuse or circuit breaker operation.
Power failures are particularly critical at sites where the environment and public safety are at risk. Institutions such as hospitals, sewage treatment plants, and mines will usually have backup power sources such as standby generators, which will automatically start up when electrical power is lost. Other critical systems, such as telecommunication, are also required to have emergency power. The battery room of a telephone exchange usually has arrays of lead–acid batteries for backup and also a socket for connecting a generator during extended periods of outage.
Types of power outage
Power outages are categorized into three different phenomena, relating to the duration and effect of the outage:
- A transient fault is a loss of power typically caused by a fault on a power line. Power is automatically restored once the fault is cleared.
- A brownout is a drop in voltage in an electrical power supply. The term brownout comes from the dimming experienced by lighting when the voltage sags. Brownouts can cause poor performance of equipment or even incorrect operation.
- A blackout is the total loss of power to an area and is the most severe form of power outage that can occur. Blackouts which result from or result in power stations tripping are particularly difficult to recover from quickly. Outages may last from a few minutes to a few weeks depending on the nature of the blackout and the configuration of the electrical network.
Rolling blackouts occur when demand for electricity exceeds supply, and allow some customers to receive power at the required voltage at the expense of other customers who get no power at all. They are a common occurrence in developing countries, and may be scheduled in advance or occur without warning. They have also occurred in developed countries, for example in the California electricity crisis of 2000–2001, when government deregulation destabilized the wholesale electricity market. Blackouts are also used as a public safety measure, such as to prevent a gas leak from catching fire (for example, power was cut to several towns in response to the Merrimack Valley gas explosions), or to prevent wildfires around poorly maintained transmission lines (such as during the 2019 California power shutoffs).
Protecting the power system from outages
In power supply networks, the power generation and the electrical load (demand) must be very close to equal every second to avoid overloading of network components, which can severely damage them. Protective relays and fuses are used to automatically detect overloads and to disconnect circuits at risk of damage.
Under certain conditions, a network component shutting down can cause current fluctuations in neighboring segments of the network leading to a cascading failure of a larger section of the network. This may range from a building, to a block, to an entire city, to an entire electrical grid.
Modern power systems are designed to be resistant to this sort of cascading failure, but it may be unavoidable (see below). Moreover, since there is no short-term economic benefit to preventing rare large-scale failures, researchers have expressed concern that there is a tendency to erode the resilience of the network over time, which is only corrected after a major failure occurs. In a 2003 publication, Carreras and co-authors claimed that reducing the likelihood of small outages only increases the likelihood of larger ones. In that case, the short-term economic benefit of keeping the individual customer happy increases the likelihood of large-scale blackouts.
The Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources held a hearing in October 2018 to examine "black start", the process of restoring electricity after a system-wide power loss. The hearing's purpose was for Congress to learn about what the backup plans are in the electric utility industry in the case that the electric grid is damaged. Threats to the electrical grid include cyberattacks, solar storms, and severe weather, among others. For example, the "Northeast Blackout of 2003" was caused when overgrown trees touched high-voltage power lines. Around 55 million people in the U.S. and Canada lost power, and restoring it cost around $6 billion.
Protecting computer systems from power outages
Computer systems and other electronic devices containing logic circuitry are susceptible to data loss or hardware damage that can be caused by the sudden loss of power. These can include data networking equipment, video projectors, alarm systems as well as computers. To protect computer systems against this, the use of an uninterruptible power supply or 'UPS' can provide a constant flow of electricity if a primary power supply becomes unavailable for a short period of time. To protect against surges (events where voltages increase for a few seconds), which can damage hardware when power is restored, a special device called a surge protector that absorbs the excess voltage can be used.
Restoring power after a wide-area outage
Restoring power after a wide-area outage can be difficult, as power stations need to be brought back online. Normally, this is done with the help of power from the rest of the grid. In the total absence of grid power, a so-called black start needs to be performed to bootstrap the power grid into operation. The means of doing so will depend greatly on local circumstances and operational policies, but typically transmission utilities will establish localized 'power islands' which are then progressively coupled together. To maintain supply frequencies within tolerable limits during this process, demand must be reconnected at the same pace that generation is restored, requiring close coordination between power stations, transmission and distribution organizations.
Blackout inevitability and electric sustainability
It has been argued on the basis of historical data and computer modeling that power grids are self-organized critical systems. These systems exhibit unavoidable disturbances of all sizes, up to the size of the entire system. This phenomenon has been attributed to steadily increasing demand/load, the economics of running a power company, and the limits of modern engineering.
While blackout frequency has been shown to be reduced by operating it further from its critical point, it generally isn’t economically feasible, causing providers to increase the average load over time or upgrade less often resulting in the grid moving itself closer to its critical point. Conversely, a system past the critical point will experience too many blackouts leading to system-wide upgrades moving it back below the critical point. The term critical point of the system is used here in the sense of statistical physics and nonlinear dynamics, representing the point where a system undergoes a phase transition; in this case the transition from a steady reliable grid with few cascading failures to a very sporadic unreliable grid with common cascading failures. Near the critical point the relationship between blackout frequency and size follows a power-law distribution.
Cascading failure becomes much more common close to this critical point. The power-law relationship is seen in both historical data and model systems. The practice of operating these systems much closer to their maximum capacity leads to magnified effects of random, unavoidable disturbances due to aging, weather, human interaction etc. While near the critical point, these failures have a greater effect on the surrounding components due to individual components carrying a larger load. This results in the larger load from the failing component having to be redistributed in larger quantities across the system, making it more likely for additional components not directly affected by the disturbance to fail, igniting costly and dangerous cascading failures. These initial disturbances causing blackouts are all the more unexpected and unavoidable due to actions of the power suppliers to prevent obvious disturbances (cutting back trees, separating lines in windy areas, replacing aging components etc.). The complexity of most power grids often makes the initial cause of a blackout extremely hard to identify.
Leaders are dismissive of system theories that conclude that blackouts are inevitable, but do agree that the basic operation of the grid must be changed. The Electric Power Research Institute champions the use of smart grid features such as power control devices employing advanced sensors to coordinate the grid. Others advocate greater use of electronically controlled high-voltage direct current (HVDC) firebreaks to prevent disturbances from cascading across AC lines in a wide area grid.
In 2002, researchers at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Power System Engineering Research Center of the University of Wisconsin (PSerc), and the University of Alaska Fairbanks proposed a mathematical model for the behavior of electrical distribution systems. This model has become known as the OPA model, a reference to the names of the authors' institutions. OPA is a cascading failure model. Other cascading failure models include Manchester, Hidden failure, CASCADE, and Branching. The OPA model was quantitatively compared with a complex networks model of a cascading failure – Crucitti–Latora–Marchiori (CLM) model, showing that both models exhibit similar phase transitions in the average network damage (load shed/demand in OPA, path damage in CLM), with respect to transmission capacity.
Mitigation of power outage frequency
The effects of trying to mitigate cascading failures near the critical point in an economically feasible fashion are often shown to not be beneficial and often even detrimental. Four mitigation methods have been tested using the OPA blackout model:
- Increase critical number of failures causing cascading blackouts – Shown to decrease the frequency of smaller blackouts but increase that of larger blackouts.
- Increase individual power line max load – Shown to increase the frequency of smaller blackouts and decrease that of larger blackouts.
- Combination of increasing critical number and max load of lines – Shown to have no significant effect on either size of blackout. The resulting minor reduction in the frequency of blackouts is projected to not be worth the cost of the implementation.
- Increase the excess power available to the grid – Shown to decrease the frequency of smaller blackouts but increase that of larger blackouts.
In addition to the finding of each mitigation strategy having a cost-benefit relationship with regards to frequency of small and large blackouts, the total number of blackout events was not significantly reduced by any of the above-mentioned mitigation measures.
In 2015, one of the solutions proposed to reduce the impact of power outage was introduced by M.S. Saleh.
Key performance indicators
Utilities are measured on three specific performance measures:
- System Average Interruption Duration Index, measured in minutes
- Customer Average Interruption Duration Index, measured in minutes
- Customer Average Interruption Frequency Index
- 2019 Venezuelan blackouts
- 2019 Java blackout
- 2012 India blackouts
- 2003 Italy blackout
- 2011 Southwest blackout
- 2019 California power shutoffs
- Brittle Power
- Coronal mass ejection
- Critical infrastructure protection
- Electromagnetic pulse (EMP)
- Energy conservation
- Internet outage
- List of major power outages
- List of energy storage projects
- New York City blackout of 1977
- Northeast blackout of 1965
- Northeast blackout of 2003
- Outage management system
- Proactive cyber defence
- Renewable energy
- Rolling blackout
- Self-organized criticality control
- Smart grid
- Uninterruptible power supply
- "Blackout: Govt Announces 'Phase Wise' Power Restoration, Asks Nation to Exercise Patience". The Wallet. January 10, 2021. Retrieved January 10, 2020.
- Carreras, B. A.; Lynch, V. E.; Newman, D. E.; Dobson, I. (2003). "Blackout Mitigation Assessment in Power Transmission Systems" (PDF). 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Hawaii. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 1, 2011.
- Kovaleski, Dave (October 15, 2018). "Senate Hearing Examines Electric Industry's Ability to Restore Power after System-wide Blackouts". Daily Energy Insider. Retrieved October 23, 2018.
- Dobson, I.; Chen, J.; Thorp, J.; Carreras, B.; Newman, D. Examining Criticality of Blackouts in Power System Models with Cascading Events. 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'02), January 7–10, 2002. Big Island, Hawaii. Archived from the original on September 12, 2003. Retrieved August 17, 2003.
- Carreras, B. A.; Lynch, V. E.; Dobson, I.; Newman, D. E. Dynamics, Criticality and Self-organization in a Model for Blackouts in Power Transmission Systems (PDF). Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, January 2002, Hawaii.
- Hoffmann, H.; Payton, D. W. (2014). "Suppressing cascades in a self-organized-critical model with non-contiguous spread of failures" (PDF). Chaos, Solitons and Fractals. 67: 87–93. Bibcode:2014CSF....67...87H. doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2014.06.011.
- Carreras, B. A.; Newman, D. E.; Dobson, I.; Poole, A. B. (2000). Initial Evidence for Self-Organized Criticality in Electric Power System Blackouts (PDF). Proceedings of Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January 4–7, 2000, Maui, Hawaii. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 29, 2003. Retrieved August 17, 2003.
- Dobson, Ian; Carreras, Benjamin A.; Lynch, Vickie E.; Newman, David E. (2007). "Complex systems analysis of series of blackouts: Cascading failure, critical points, and self-organization". Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science. 17 (2). doi:10.1063/1.2737822.
- Saleh, M. S.; Althaibani, A.; Esa, Y.; Mhandi, Y.; Mohamed, A. A. (October 2015). Impact of clustering microgrids on their stability and resilience during blackouts. 2015 International Conference on Smart Grid and Clean Energy Technologies (ICSGCE). pp. 195–200. doi:10.1109/ICSGCE.2015.7454295. ISBN 978-1-4673-8732-3.
- Fairley, Peter (2004). "The Unruly Power Grid". IEEE Spectrum. 41 (8): 22–27. doi:10.1109/MSPEC.2004.1318179. Retrieved June 24, 2012.
- "Power Systems Engineering Research Center". Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System. 2014. Retrieved June 23, 2015.
- Carreras, B. A.; Lynch, V. E.; Dobson, I.; Newman, D. E. (2002). "Critical points and transitions in an electric power transmission model for cascading failure blackouts" (PDF). Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science. 12 (4): 985. Bibcode:2002Chaos..12..985C. doi:10.1063/1.1505810. ISSN 1054-1500.
- Dobson, I.; Carreras, B. A.; Lynch, V. E.; Newman, D. E. (2001). "An initial model for complex dynamics in electric power system blackouts". Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. p. 710. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2001.926274. ISBN 978-0-7695-0981-5.
- Nedic, Dusko P.; Dobson, Ian; Kirschen, Daniel S.; Carreras, Benjamin A.; Lynch, Vickie E. (2006). "Criticality in a cascading failure blackout model". International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 28 (9): 627. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.375.2146. doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2006.03.006.
- Crucitti, P.; Latora, V.; Marchiori, M. (2004). "TModel for cascading failures in complex networks" (PDF). Physical Review E. 69 (4 Pt 2): 045104. arXiv:cond-mat/0309141. Bibcode:2004PhRvE..69d5104C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.69.045104. PMID 15169056.
- Cupac, V.; Lizier, J.T.; Prokopenko, M. (2013). "Comparing dynamics of cascading failures between network-centric and power flow models". International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems. 49: 369–379. doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.01.017.
- Motter, Adilson E. (2004). "Cascade Control and Defense in Complex Networks". Physical Review Letters. 93 (9): 098701. arXiv:cond-mat/0401074. Bibcode:2004PhRvL..93i8701M. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.098701. PMID 15447153.
Media related to Electric power blackouts at Wikimedia Commons