The examples and perspective in this USA may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. (March 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
In government contracting, a prevailing wage is defined as the hourly wage, usual benefits and overtime, paid to the majority of workers, laborers, and mechanics within a particular area. This is usually the union wage.:
Prevailing wage may also include other payments such as apprenticeship and industry promotion.
In the United States, the Davis–Bacon Act of 1931 and related amendments pertain to federally funded projects. There are also 32 states that have state prevailing wage laws, also known as "little Davis-Bacon Acts". The rules and regulations vary from state to state.
As of 2016, the prevailing wage requirement, codified in the Davis-Bacon Act, increases the cost of federal construction projects by an average of $1.4 billion per year.:
"Prevailing wages" were first established shortly after the Civil War in 1866 when the National Labor Union called on Congress to mandate an eight-hour workday. In 1869, President Grant issued a proclamation establishing the 8-hour day for government workers. Although the Congress had not yet established its authority to regulate private economic matters because of prevailing legal doctrines, it could regulate its own contracts and the targeted public works as a means to indirectly influence other labor markets. Because construction workers at the time were paid on a daily rather than hourly basis, the establishment of an eight-hour day without a reduction of the daily wage rate formally incentivized public works contractors to improve the efficiency and productivity of their workforce rather than the length of their day in order to complete their projects on time.
In 1891 Kansas was the first state to pass a "prevailing wage" for its own public works projects, and over the next thirty years was followed by seven other states (New York 1894, Oklahoma 1909, Idaho 1911, Arizona 1912, New Jersey 1913, Massachusetts 1914, and Nebraska 1923) in establishing minimum labor standards for public works construction. In the midst of the Great Depression, beginning in 1931 and prior to the end of World War II, twenty additional states passed their own prevailing wage laws. In 1931 Congress passed the Davis–Bacon Act after 14 earlier attempts, the Federal Prevailing Wage law that remains in force, bar a few suspensions, to this day.
Federal rates are calculated based on regulations established by the US Department of Labor. According to Code of Federal Regulations, "The prevailing wage shall be the wage paid to the majority (more than 50 percent) of the laborers or mechanics in the classification on similar projects in the area during the period in question. If the same wage is not paid to a majority of those employed in the classification, the prevailing wage shall be the average of the wages paid, weighted by the total employed in the classification." State level rates are calculated using various methods including an average of all wage rates paid, the mode, or based on collectively bargained rates.
In the Davis–Bacon Act all federal government construction contracts, and most contracts for federally assisted construction over $2,000, must include provisions for paying workers on-site no less than the locally prevailing wages and benefits paid on similar projects. The Streamlining Claims Processing for Federal Contractor Employees Act (H.R. 2747; 113th Congress), if passed, would make the United States Department of Labor responsible for enforcing this act (instead of the Government Accountability Act) and ensuring that federal contractors did receive the prevailing wage.
According to the non-partisan federal Congressional Budget Office, as of 2016 the Davis-Bacon Act increases the cost of federal construction projects by an average of $1.4 billion per year ($13 billon over 9 years).:
In California, prevailing wage increases the cost of construction, with workers paid prevailing wage making approximately 50% more in hourly rates, and getting approximately double the benefits of non-prevailing wage workers.: The contribution of prevailing wage requirements to overall construction costs has been estimated to be as large as a 40% increase in costs.:
Supporters suggest that prevailing wage laws seek to prevent public construction projects from destabilizing a local construction industry[further explanation needed] and to advance other priorities such as workforce development. It also reduces the chance that government-funded are paying less than a living wage.
Opponents of prevailing wage laws suggest that such laws hurt free market competition and causes costs to escalate on public projects, as many calculations to determine the prevailing wage tend to identify union wages and benefits as the benchmark in a given community. They suggest that this does not lead to any tangible benefit to justify the increased cost, either increasing the amount of taxes or decreasing the number of public projects that may be undertaken.
- Compensation of employees
- Labour in Economics
- Living wage
- Labor power
- McNamara–O'Hara Service Contract Act
- Wage labour
- Wage share
- Wage slavery
- Working class
- Dillon, Liam (May 12, 2017). "Here's how construction worker pay is dominating California's housing debate". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on June 1, 2017. Retrieved May 9, 2019.
- For example, in Washington State the Department of Labor & Industries establishes the prevailing wage.
- "Options for Reducing the Deficit: 2017 to 2026; Repeal the Davis-Bacon Act". Congressional Budget Office. December 8, 2016. Archived from the original on January 6, 2017. Retrieved April 22, 2019.
- "Today in History - August 20". Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. 20540 USA. Retrieved March 27, 2019.
- "May 19, 1869: Proclamation Establishing Eight Hour Workday". October 20, 2016.
- Philips, Peter. "Kentucky's Prevailing Wage Law" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on October 5, 2011. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
- "Title 29 §1 Code of Federal Regulations".
- "Foreign Labor Certification". United States Department of Labor. Retrieved February 26, 2012.
- "H.R. 2747 - Summary". United States Congress. Retrieved September 12, 2013.