|This article needs additional citations for verification. (February 2015)|
A price signal is information conveyed to consumers and producers, via the price charged for a product or service, which provides a signal to increase supply and/or decrease demand for the priced item.
Alternative theories include that prices reflect relative pricing power of producers and consumers – for example, a monopoly may set prices so as to maximize monopoly profit, regardless of actual costs of supply or demand, while a cartel may engage in price fixing. Conversely, on the consumer side, a monopsony may negotiate or demand prices that do not reflect the cost of production.
A long thread in economics (from Aristotle through classical economics into the present) distinguishes between exchange value, use value, price, and (sometimes) intrinsic value. It is frequently argued that the connection between price and other types of value is not as direct as suggested in the theory of price signals, with other considerations playing a part.
Financial speculation – particularly buying or selling assets with borrowed money – can move prices away from their economic fundamentals. Credit bubbles can sometimes distort the price signal mechanism, causing large-scale malinvestment and financial crises. Adherents of the heterodox economic school known as Austrian economics attribute this phenomenon to the interference of central bankers, which they propose to eliminate by introducing full-reserve banking, while the post-Keynsian economists such as Hyman Minsky have described it as a fundamental flaw of capitalism, to be corrected by financial regulation. Both of these schools have been the subject of renewed attention in the Western world since the financial crisis of 2007–2010.
Firms use price discrimination to increase profits by charging different prices to different consumers or groups of consumers. Price discrimination may be regarded as an unfair practice and it is used to drive out competitors