|This article needs additional citations for verification. (August 2015)|
Anti-abortion or pro-life movements are involved in the abortion debate advocating against the practice of abortion and its legality. Many anti-abortion movements began as countermovements in response to legalization of elective abortions.
By some, especially in the media, the terms used in the debate are seen as political framing: they are terms used to validate one's own stance while invalidating the opposition's. For example, the labels "pro-choice" and "pro-life" imply endorsement of widely held values such as liberty and freedom, while suggesting that the opposition must be "anti-choice" or "anti-life" (alternatively "pro-coercion" or "pro-death"). The Associated Press favors the terms "abortion rights" and "anti-abortion" instead. However, for the "anti-abortion" movement, the term "pro-life" is more than a label (and the same perhaps could be said for the "abortion rights/pro-choice" movement as well). Some in the "pro-life" movement may view the term "anti-abortion" as an inaccurate media label in of itself. For example, not all who would describe themselves as "pro-life" are opposed to abortion if the life of the mother is in certain danger. Also for many in the "Pro-life" movement, the word "life" reflects the core value and truth for which they sincerely believe their causes represents. For many of them, 'life, transcends mere political labels. For it is not only their belief but also their understanding based on biology that a human life begins before birth (i.e. at conception) and that human life is valuable and worthy of protection at all stages (for further reading on self-definition and use of labels see: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/363808/whats-pro-life-anyway-interview and http://www.catholic365.com/article/495/prolife-vs-antiabortion.html).
Around the world
In Europe, abortion has been legalized through parliamentary acts. In Western Europe this has had the effect at once of both more closely regulating the use of abortion, and at the same time mediating and reducing the impact anti-abortion campaigns have had on the law.
The first specifically pro-life organization in France, Laissez-les-vivre-SOS futures mères, was created in 1971 during the debate that was to lead to the Veil Law in 1975. Its main spokesman was the geneticist Jérôme Lejeune. Since 2005, the French pro-life movement has organized an annual March for Life.
In the United Kingdom, the most prominent pro-life organization is the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children. It was formed to "uphold the principle of respect for human life, in particular the life of the unborn child" at the time of the passage of the 1967 Abortion Act which liberalized abortion law. It was the first such organization in the world.
In Liechtenstein an application to legalize abortions was rejected by a slim majority in a referendum in 2011. The opponents, which included Prince Alois, got 500 votes more and eventually settle at 52.3 percent compared with 47.7 percent.
Prince Alois had announced the use of his veto in advance if necessary to prevent the introduction of abortion.
In Spain, over one million demonstrators took part in a march in Madrid in October 2009 to protest plans by the government of José Luis Zapatero to legalize elective abortions and eliminate parental consent restrictions.
In 2010 1,067,315 Spaniards signed a petition against the liberal abortion policy of the socialist government. The petition was launched by the organizations "Derecho a vivir" (right to life) and "Hazteoir" (Let your voice be heard).
The United States pro-life movement formed as a response to the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision. A smaller movement is the consistent life ethic which started in 1983 and opposes all forms of killing including abortion.
The Canadian organization Canada Silent No More advocates legislation prohibiting late-term and partial birth abortions.
In Israel, the major pro-life organization is Efrat. Efrat activists primarily raise funds to relieve the "financial and social pressures" on pregnant women so that they will not terminate their pregnancies. Efrat is not known to do any other kind of activism.
The Chilean movement it's called Siempre por la Vida (always for the life)
- History of abortion law debate
- Philosophical aspects of the abortion debate
- Anti-abortion violence
- Crisis pregnancy center
- Pregnancy from rape#Opposition to legal abortion
- Fetal rights
- Holstein and Gubrium (2008). Handbook of Constructionist Research. Guilford Press.
- Goldstein, Norm, ed. The Associated Press Stylebook. Philadelphia: Basic Books, 2007.
- Outshoorn, Joyce (1996). "The stability of compromise: Abortion politics in Western Europe". In Marianne Givens and Dorothy M. Stetson. Abortion politics: public policy in cross-cultural perspective. Routledge. p. 161.
...parliamentary decision are sustained by political parties which, in comparison to the United States, are deeply rooted in European society. The political parties have managed to regulate and pacify the political reform process, which in the decision-making stage marginalized opposition outside parliament.
- "History". Society for the Protection of Unborn Children.
- "In Liechtenstein bleiben Abtreibungen verboten , 18 September 2011". FOCUS. 2011-09-18. Retrieved 2014-12-17.
- "Radikal für das Leben! , 08 September 2012". Zukunft CH. 2012-09-28. Retrieved 2014-12-17.
- "Agence France Presse, 17 October 2009". Google.com. 2009-10-17. Retrieved 2011-11-16.
- "Spanien: Mehr als eine Million unterschreiben gegen Abtreibung , 23 February 2010". Blaue Narzisse. 2010-02-23. Retrieved 2014-12-17.
- Canada Silent No More
- "Efrat". Friendsofefrat.org. Retrieved 2011-11-16.[dead link]
- "Pro-Choice vs. Pro-Life". Friendsofefrat.org. Retrieved 31 May 2015.