Economic surplus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Producer surplus)
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is about consumers' and producers' surplus. For information about other surpluses, see Surplus.
Graph illustrating consumer (red) and producer (blue) surpluses on a supply and demand chart

In mainstream economics, economic surplus, also known as total welfare or Marshallian surplus (named after Alfred Marshall), refers to two related quantities. Consumer surplus or consumers' surplus is the monetary gain obtained by consumers because they are able to purchase a product for a price that is less than the highest price that they would be willing to pay. Producer surplus or producers' surplus is the amount that producers benefit by selling at a market price that is higher than the least that they would be willing to sell for; this is roughly equal to profit (since producers are not normally willing to sell at a loss, and are normally indifferent to selling at a breakeven price).

In Marxian economics, the term surplus may also refer to surplus value, surplus product and surplus labour.

Overview[edit]

Economist Paul A. Baran introduced the concept of "economic surplus" to deal with novel complexities raised by the dominance of monopoly capital. With Paul Sweezy, Baran elaborated the importance of this innovation, its consistency with Marx's labor concept of value, and supplementary relation to Marx's category of surplus value.[1]

On a standard supply and demand diagram, consumer surplus is the area (triangular if the supply and demand curves are linear) above the equilibrium price of the good and below the demand curve. This reflects the fact that consumers would have been willing to buy a single unit of the good at a price higher than the equilibrium price, a second unit at a price below that but still above the equilibrium price, etc., yet they in fact pay just the equilibrium price for each unit they buy.

Likewise, in the supply-demand diagram, producer surplus is the area below the equilibrium price but above the supply curve. This reflects the fact that producers would have been willing to supply the first unit at a price lower than the equilibrium price, the second unit at a price above that but still below the equilibrium price, etc., yet they in fact receive the equilibrium price for all the units they sell.

Consumer surplus[edit]

Consumer surplus is the difference between the maximum price a consumer is willing to pay and the actual price they do pay. If a consumer would be willing to pay more than the current asking price, then they are getting more benefit from the purchased product than they initially paid. An example of a good with generally high consumer surplus is drinking water. People would pay very high prices for drinking water, as they need it to survive. The difference in the price that they would pay, if they had to, and the amount that they pay now is their consumer surplus. Note that the utility of the first few liters of drinking water is very high (as it prevents death), so the first few litres would likely have more consumer surplus than subsequent liters.

The maximum amount a consumer would be willing to pay for a given quantity of a good is the sum of the maximum price they would pay for the first unit, the (lower) maximum price they would be willing to pay for the second unit, etc. Typically these prices are decreasing; they are given by the individual demand curve. For a given price the consumer buys the amount for which the consumer surplus is highest, where consumer surplus is the sum, over all units, of the excess of the maximum willingness to pay over the equilibrium (market) price. The consumer's surplus is highest at the largest number of units for which, even for the last unit, the maximum willingness to pay is not below the market price

The aggregate consumers' surplus is the sum of the consumer's surplus for all individual consumers. This can be represented graphically as shown in the above graph of the market demand and supply curves.

The concept[edit]

According to Law of diminishing marginal Utility, after a certain point, the satisfaction derived by the consumer, after each successive unit, derived become lesser and lesser. When he buys more and more, even though his total utility may keep increasing up to certain point, his marginal utility will keep decreasing, We may be willing to offer higher price for many goods but the actual price may be less. Consumer’s surplus indicates the difference between the Price we would be willing to offer and the price we actually offered.[2] If the consumer buys three units of commodity at Re one per unit, the first unit offers more satisfaction than the second unit and the second unit offers more satisfaction than the third unit. Since he would have purchased all the three units at the same price the satisfaction he had derived for second and first unit would have been more than the price offered and this difference is called Consumer’s surplus.[3] The utility he derives from a product is the gain and the price he pays is the loss he sustains while buying a product. He will buy any product as long as his satisfaction or utility which is his gain is more than the price he pays for which is his loss.[4] As soon as both match he will stop buying such products. In real life there are several things where the person derives consumer’s surplus. For example, he secures maximum from certain cheaper products like salt, newspaper, electricity etc. It is often said that the behaviour of the market, forces us to reveal our personal preferences is an extremely important one and this opinion gets strengthened by this concept of Consumer’s Surplus.[5]

Definition[edit]

The Consumer’s surplus, may thus be defined, as the excess utility obtained by the consumer over utility foregone or disutility suffered. It is measured by the difference between the maximum price which the consumer is willing to pay for a commodity rather than go without it and the price he actually pays for it. In the words of Dr Marshall “ the excess of price which a person would be willing to pay rather than go without the thing, over that which he actually does pay is the economic measure of this surplus of satisfaction. It may be called Consumer’s surplus”

Measuring Consumer’s surplus[edit]

The table and the diagram below explain process of measuring consumer’s surplus

Sugar Kilos Marginal Utility/Price Rs Actual Price Rs Consumer's Surplus
1 80 30 50
2 70 30 40
3 60 30 30
4 50 30 20
5 40 30 10
6 30 30 0
Consumer's Surplus

Marginal utility mentioned in the table indicates the marginal utility derived from every unit of the product. This is the price we are willing to offer to the product which is the potential price. Whereas in the market we offer the market price which is the actual price. The difference between the potential price and the actual price is the consumer’s surplus.

In the graph, ‘X’ axis measures the Units of Sugar and the ‘Y” Axis indicates the utility or the price. The shaded portion indicates the surplus derived from each unit of product. When he buys the sixth unit of sugar the marginal utility tend to become zero. He will buy no more In the market if the price increases the Consumer’s surplus will decrease and if the price decreases the consumer’s surplus will increase.

Calculation from supply and demand[edit]

The consumer surplus (individual or aggregated) is the area under the (individual or aggregated) demand curve and above a horizontal line at the actual price (in the aggregated case: the equilibrium price). If the demand curve is a straight line, the consumer surplus is the area of a triangle:

Where Pmkt is the equilibrium price (where supply equals demand), Qmkt is the total quantity purchased at the equilibrium price and Pmax is the price at which the quantity purchased would fall to 0 (that is, where the demand curve intercepts the price axis). For more general demand and supply functions, these areas are not triangles but can still be found using integral calculus. Consumer surplus is thus the definite integral of the demand function with respect to price, from the market price to the maximum reservation price (i.e. the price-intercept of the demand function):

where

This shows that if we see a rise in the equilibrium price and a fall in the equilibrium quantity, then consumer surplus falls.

Distribution of benefits when price falls[edit]

When supply of a good expands, the price falls (assuming the demand curve is downward sloping) and consumer surplus increases. This benefits two groups of people: Consumers who were already willing to buy at the initial price benefit from a price reduction; also they may buy more and receive even more consumer surplus, and additional consumers who were unwilling to buy at the initial price but will buy at the new price and also receive some consumer surplus.

Consider an example of linear supply and demand curves. For an initial supply curve S0, consumer surplus is the triangle above the line formed by price P0 to the demand line (bounded on the left by the price axis and on the top by the demand line). If supply expands from S0 to S1, the consumers' surplus expands to the triangle above P1 and below the demand line (still bounded by the price axis). The change in consumer's surplus is difference in area between the two triangles, and that is the consumer welfare associated with expansion of supply.

Some people were willing to pay the higher price P0. When the price is reduced, their benefit is the area in the rectangle formed on the top by P0, on the bottom by P1, on the left by the price axis and on the right by line extending vertically upwards from Q0.

The second set of beneficiaries are consumers who buy more, and new consumers, those who will pay the new lower price (P1) but not the higher price (P0). Their additional consumption makes up the difference between Q1 and Q0. Their consumer surplus is the triangle bounded on the left by the line extending vertically upwards from Q0, on the right and top by the demand line, and on the bottom by the line extending horizontally to the right from P1.

Rule of one-half[edit]

The rule of one-half estimates the change in consumer surplus for small changes in supply with a constant demand curve. Note that in the special case where the consumer demand curve is linear, consumer surplus is the area of the triangle bounded by the vertical line Q=0, the horizontal line and the linear demand curve. Hence, the change in consumer surplus is the area of the trapezoid with i) height equal to the change in price and ii) mid-segment length equal to the average of the ex-post and ex-ante equilibrium quantities. Following the figure above,

Application[edit]

  1. It helps us to make comparison about people’s welfare between two places. People living in urban areas due to variety of products being offered tend to have more consumer’s surplus in comparison to rural areas.
  2. It helps us to measure the benefits of International trade. If the importers tend to enjoy higher amount of Consumer’s surplus, the country stand to gain
  3. This concept helps to explain the doctrine of Value in Use and Value in Exchange
  4. This also help the Monopolists while fixing the price for their product.The must not be overzealous and must fix the price in such a way that the consumer enjoys certain amount of Consumer’s surplus
  5. it helps Government to evolve a suitable taxation policy and helps them in identifying products which could be taxed. Tax must be levied in such a way that the consumer tend to enjoy consumer’s surplus.
  6. It helps to understand the superiority of Direct Tax over indirect Tax. When direct tax is levied the person has room to shift his burden to other sources, whereas in the case of indirect tax, if it is going to affect the consumer’s surplus of the product which attracts tax, the consumer will abstain from buying the product as well.

where:

  • CS = consumers' surplus
  • Q0 and Q1 are, respectively, the quantity demanded before and after a change in supply
  • P0 and P1 are, respectively, the prices before and after a change in supply

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Baran, P.A. & Sweezy, P.M. (2012). "Some Theoretical Implications". Monthly Review. 64 (3).
  2. ^ Roger Arnold, Economics, 1989, West Publishing Company, ISBN 0-314-06589-X
  3. ^ Paul A Samuelson, William D Nordhaus, Indian adoption by Sudip Chauhuri, Anindya Sen, Economics, 2015, McGraw Hill Education ( India) Private Ltd. ISBN 978-0-07-070071-0, ISBN 0-07-070071-0
  4. ^ ML Seth, Principles of Economics( Macro and Micro Ecconomics, Lakshmi Narayan Agarwal Educational Publishers.Agra,1979,
  5. ^ Karl E Case, Ray C Fair, Principles of Economics, 2002, Pearson Education (Singapore) Pte Ltd., ISBN 81-7808-587-9

Further reading[edit]