# Programmable metallization cell

The programmable metallization cell, or PMC, is a novel non-volatile computer memory developed at Arizona State University. PMC have been identified as an emerging research device of interest by the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors for its ability to scale, in performance, beyond NAND Flash memory.[1] PMC is one of a number of technologies being developed to replace the widely used Flash memory, providing a combination of longer lifetimes, lower power, and better memory density. Infineon Technologies, who licensed the technology in 2004, refers to it as conductive-bridging RAM, or CBRAM. CBRAM® became a registered trademark of Adesto Technologies in 2011.[2] NEC has a variant called “Nanobridge” and Sony calls their version “electrolytic memory”.

The PMC technology was developed by Dr. Michael Kozicki, professor of electrical engineering at Arizona State University.[3][4][5][6][7][8]In 1996, Axon Technologies was founded to commercialize the PMC technology.[9]

## Description

PMC is a two terminal resistive memory technology developed at Arizona State University. PMC is an electrochemical metallization memory that relies on redox reactions to form and dissolve a conductive filament.[10] The state of the device is determined by the resistance across the two terminals. The existence of a filament between the terminals produces a low resistance state (LRS) while the absence of a filament results in a high resistance state (HRS). A PMC device is made of two solid metal electrodes, one relatively inert (e.g., tungsten or nickel) the other electrochemically active (e.g., silver or copper), with a thin film of solid electrolyte between them.

The PMC technology has been licensed to Infineon (Qimonda), Micron Technology, and Adesto Technologies, and several other large semiconductor companies. OEMs have also shown interest in the new technology.[11]

## Device operation

The resistance state of a PMC is controlled by the formation (programming) or dissolution (erasing) of a metallic conductive filament between the two terminals of the cell. A formed filament is a fractal tree like structure.

### Filament formation

PMC rely on the formation of a metallic conductive filament to transition to a low resistance state (LRS). The filament is created by applying a positive voltage bias (V) to the anode contact (active metal) while grounding the cathode contact (inert metal). The positive bias oxidizes the active metal (M):

M → M+ + e

The applied bias generates an electric field between the two metal contacts. The ionized (oxidized) metal ions migrate along the electric field toward the cathode contact. At the cathode contact, the metal ions are reduced:

M+ + e → M

As the active metal deposits on the cathode, the electric field increases between the anode and the deposit. The evolution of the local electric field (E) between the growing filament and the anode can be simplistically related to the following:

${\displaystyle E=-{\frac {V}{d}}}$

where d is the distance between the anode and the top of the growing filament. The filament will grow to connect to the anode within a few nanoseconds.[12] Metal ions will continue to be reduced at the filament until the voltage is removed, broadening the conductive filament and decreasing the resistance of the connection over time. Once the voltage is removed, the conductive filament will remain, leaving the device in a LRS.

The conductive filament may not be continuous, but a chain of electrodeposit islands or nanocrystals.[13] This is likely to prevail at low programming currents (less than 1 μA) whereas higher programming current will lead to a mostly metallic conductor.

### Filament dissolution

A PMC can be "erased" into a high resistance state (HRS) by appling a negative voltage bias to the anode. The redox process used to create the conductive filament is reversed and the metal ions migrate along the reversed electric field to reduce at the anode contact. With the filament removed, the PMC is analogous to parallel plate capacitor with a high resistance of several MΩ to GΩ between the contacts.

An individual PMC can be read by applying a small voltage across the cell. As long as the applied read voltage is less than both the programming and erasing voltage threshold, the direction of the bias is not significant.

## Technology comparison

### CBRAM vs. metal-oxide RRAM

CBRAM® differs from metal-oxide ReRAM in that for CBRAM® metal ions dissolve readily in the material between the two electrodes, while for metal-oxides, the material between the electrodes requires a high electric field causing local damage akin to dielectric breakdown, producing a trail of conducting defects (sometimes called a "filament"). Hence for CBRAM®, one electrode must provide the dissolving ions, while for metal-oxide RRAM, a one-time "forming" step is required to generate the local damage.

### CBRAM vs. NAND Flash

The primary form of solid-state non-volatile memory in use today is Flash memory, which is finding use in most roles that used to be filled by hard drives. Flash, however, has a number of problems that have led to many efforts to introduce products to replace it.

Flash is based on the floating gate concept, essentially a modified transistor. Conventional Flash transistors have three connections, the source, drain and gate. The gate is the essential component of the transistor, controlling the resistance between the source and drain, and thereby acting as a switch. In the floating gate transistor, the gate is attached to a layer that traps electrons, leaving it switched on (or off) for extended periods of time. The floating gate can be re-written by passing a large current through the emitter-collector circuit.

It is this large current that is Flash's primary drawback, and for a number of reasons. For one, each application of the current physically degrades the cell, such that the cell will eventually be unwritable. Write cycles on the order of 105 to 106 are typical, limiting Flash applications to roles where constant writing is not common. The current also requires an external circuit to generate, using a system known as a charge pump. The pump requires a fairly lengthy charging processes so that writing is much slower than reading; the pump also requires much more power. Flash is thus an "asymmetrical" system, much more so than conventional RAM or hard drives.

Another problem with Flash is that the floating gate suffers leakage that slowly releases the charge. This is countered through the use of powerful surrounding insulators, but these require a certain physical size in order to be useful and also require a specific physical layout, which is different from the more typical CMOS layouts, which required several new fabrication techniques to be introduced. As Flash scales rapidly downward in size the charge leakage increasingly becomes a problem, which has led to several predictions of Flash's ultimate demise. However, massive market investment has driven development of Flash at rates in excess of Moore's Law, and semiconductor fabrication plants using 30 nm processes were brought online in late 2007.

In contrast to Flash, PMC writes with relatively low power and at high speed. The speed is inversely related to the power applied (to a point, there are mechanical limits), so the performance can be tuned for various roles. Additionally, the writing process is "almost infinitely reversible",[14] making PMC much more universally applicable than Flash.

PMC, in theory, can scale to sizes much smaller than Flash, theoretically as small as a few ion widths wide. Copper ions are about 0.75 angstroms,[15] so line widths on the order of nanometers seem possible. PMC is also much simpler in layout than Flash, which should lead to simpler construction and lower costs.[14] Whether or not these advantages can be brought to market remains to be seen; the wide variety of other "Flash killers" have so far always been behind the technology curve of Flash's massive investment. However, as the CEO of one licensee claimed, "No other technology can deliver the orders-of-magnitude improvement in power, performance and cost that this memory can."[14]

## History of development

Early experimental PMC systems were based on silver-doped germanium selenide glasses. Work turned to silver-doped germanium sulfide electrolytes and then to the copper-doped germanium sulfide electrolytes.[12] There has been renewed interest in silver-doped germanium selenide devices due to their high, high resistance state. Copper-doped silicon dioxide glass PMC are also being developed, as they are compatible with the CMOS fabrication process.

Axon Technologies has been licensing the basic concept since its formation in 2001. The first licensee was Micron Technology, who started work with PMC in 2002.[16] Infineon followed in 2004,[17] and a number of smaller companies have since joined as well.

In 2011, Adesto Technologies allied with the French company Altis Semiconductor for a partnership in development and manufacturing of CBRAM®.[18] In the same year, the two companies launched the first CBRAM® product.[19] In 2013, Adesto Technologies introduced a sample CBRAM® product in which a 1 megabit part is bound to replace EEPROM. Backed by this success, the company displays its ambition, aiming at a 70 billion dollar market.[20]

## References

1. ^ ITRS Reports
3. ^ U.S. Patent 5,761,115
4. ^ U.S. Patent 6,418,049
5. ^ U.S. Patent 6,487,106
6. ^ U.S. Patent 7,132,675
7. ^ U.S. Patent 7,372,065
8. ^ U.S. Patent 7,728,322
9. ^ Micron Technology Licenses Axon's Programmable Metallization Cell Technology – Business Wire – published 18 january 2002 - viewed 31 march 2014
10. ^ Valov, Ilia; Waser, Rainer; Jameson, John; Kozicki, Michael (June 2011). "Electrochemical metallization memories-fundamentals, applications, prospects". Nanotechnology. 22 (25): 254003. doi:10.1088/0957-4484/22/25/254003.
11. ^ Madrigal, Alexis (2007-10-06). "Terabyte Thumb Drives Made Possible by Nanotech Memory". Wired. Condé Nast Digital.
12. ^ a b Programmable metallization cell memory based on Ag-Ge-S and Cu-Ge-S solid electrolytes
13. ^ M. N. Kozicki et al., Non-Volatile Memory Technology Symposium, 2006, pp. 111-115 (2006).
14. ^ a b c Terabyte Thumb Drives Made Possible by Nanotech Memory
15. ^ Ion Sizes of Common Elements, compare with Co
16. ^ Micron Technology Licenses Axon's Programmable Metallization Cell Technology
17. ^ Axon Technologies Corp. Announces Infineon as New Licensee of Programmable Metallization Cell Nonvolatile Memory Technology
18. ^ Altis et Adesto Technologies annoncent un partenariat sur les technologies Mémoires CBRAM avancées – Business Wire – published 27 june 2011 - viewed 28 march 2014
19. ^ Adesto Technologies Wins DARPA Award to Develop Sub–Threshold Non–Volatile, Embedded CBRAM Memory – ATA Ventures – published in 2012 – viewed 31 march 2014
20. ^ Adesto’s CBRAM targets 70 billion dollar market – Nanalyze – published 30 july 2013 - viewed 31 march 2014