Progress trap

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

A progress trap is the condition human societies experience when, in pursuing progress through human ingenuity, they inadvertently introduce problems they do not have the resources or political will to solve, for fear of short-term losses in status, stability or quality of life.[1] This prevents further progress and sometimes leads to societal collapse.

The syndrome appears to have been first described by Walter Von Krämer, in his series of 1989 articles[2] under the title Fortschrittsfalle Medizin. The specific neologism "progress trap" was introduced independently in 1990 by Daniel B. O'Leary with his study of the behavioral aspects of this condition: The Progress Trap - Science, Humanity and Environment[3].

The term later gained attention following the historian and novelist Ronald Wright's 2004 book and Massey Lecture series A Short History of Progress, in which he sketches world history so far as a succession of progress traps. With the documentary film version of Wright's book Surviving Progress, backed by Martin Scorsese, the concept achieved wider recognition.


While the idea is not new, Wright identifies the central problem as being one of scale and political will. According to him, the error is often to extrapolate from what appears to work well on a small scale to a larger scale, which depletes natural resources and causes environmental degradation. Large-scale implementation also tends to be subject to diminishing returns. As overpopulation, erosion, greenhouse gas emissions or other consequences become apparent, society is destabilized.

In a progress trap, those in positions of authority are unwilling to make changes necessary for future survival. To do so they would need to sacrifice their current status and political power at the top of a hierarchy. They may also be unable to raise public support and the necessary economic resources, even if they try. Deforestation and erosion in ancient Greece may be an example of the latter.

A new source of natural resources can provide a reprieve. The European discovery and exploitation of the "New World" is one example of this, but seems unlikely to be repeated today. Present global civilization has covered the planet to such an extent there are no new resources in sight. Wright concludes that if not averted by some other means, collapse will be on a global scale, if or when it comes. Current economic crises, population problems and global climate change are symptoms that highlight the interdependence of current national economies and ecologies.

The problem has deep historical roots, probably dating back to the origins of life on Earth 3.8 billion years ago. In the early Stone Age, improved hunting techniques in vulnerable areas caused the extinction of many prey species, leaving the enlarged populace without an adequate food supply. The only apparent alternative, agriculture, also proved to be a progress trap. Salination, deforestation, erosion and urban sprawl led to disease, malnutrition and so forth, hence shorter lives.[citation needed]

Almost any sphere of technology can prove to be a progress trap, as in the example of medicine and its possibly inadequate response to the drawbacks of the high-density agricultural practices (e.g. factory farming) it has enabled. Wright uses weapon technology gradually reaching the threat of total nuclear destruction to illustrate this point. Ultimately, Wright strives to counter at least the Victorian notion of "modernity" as unconditionally a good thing.

Relativity of history. The curvature of historical time[edit]

Historical time is an entity different from chronological time. In fact, historical time is measured on the basis of a scientific criterion of progress, relating to the civilization process. A reliable knowledge of the human condition will allow to place each historical event on a diagram, which relates the chronological time to the historical time, where the latter is defined by progress, or by regress, in the civilization process. Naturally, it will be necessary to know how to define, with objective criteria, and precisely, what impact each historical event has on the civilization process. The analysis of history (of the so-called: "civilizations"), that is, that part of human history that refers to the concept of the state, can actually become" teacher of life ", if it uses the scientific method; if he will also be able to use scientific knowledge, developed in the fields of physical-mathematical sciences, adapted to the specific characteristics of social disciplines, and if he will be able to analyze the aspects of history that allow to grasp the meaning of the human condition, will be able to grasp its evolutionary dynamics , in its effective value, in terms of a real progress in the degree of civilization. The actual evolution of the human condition appears to be quite distinct, and distant, from a psychic evolution (which remains to be demonstrated if it really happened, since the species "homo sapiens" exists), although an evolution takes place constantly in the field psychological, which, however, is strictly dependent (having not yet managed to be its motor, or cause) from the evolution of the society in which individuals find themselves living. In turn, the evolution of society depends on factors that have nothing to do with human nature and with the evolution, or progress, of technical-scientific knowledge. [4]

Behavioral causes[edit]

In Escaping the progress trap, O'Leary finds that, besides vested interests and socioeconomic compliance, individual behavior is a significant contributing factor to progress traps, which are not limited to technology. This can be verified in terms of new information from the neurosciences, notably lateralization of brain function, where the short-term goals of a man-made world are increasingly favoured over long-term global interests. His study of this shows how institutions and societies can become committed to an exclusive form of technocratic rationalism. In this scenario, humans diverge from a default interdependence with nature with the result that short-term technical preoccupations slowly inhibit creativity and long-term problem solving, thus compromising long-term interests.

Where advances are created by technical specialization and are harmful; such as desertification resulting from mismanaged irrigation; this trend compounds itself and can be irreversible, with collapse resulting. Classic cases would be Sumer and the Indus Valley civilization where output-raising irrigation canals and logging slowly combined to make the fields far too salty to continue supporting the harvests on which the populations relied.

Other examples, such as Seymour Cray's overspecialized Control Data Corporation or the Medieval Church's rejection of Roger Bacon's science follow the pattern: The mode of development itself excluded solutions to problems arising from that development. In a contemporary context, unabated oil consumption in a time of climate change is an illustration of the problem; sustainable development is viewed as a solution.

According to O'Leary, avoiding the progress trap pattern can be achieved by ensuring, through education and cultural vitality, that individuals and societies do not become preeminently technocratic. Citing research into creativity and resiliency theory, he argues that the intuitive side of the mind/brain must thrive, so that lateral thinking will be an option for seeing and preventing progress traps. Spelling this out in scientific terms may be necessary for policymakers to take notice.

Iain McGilchrist's 2009 book The Master and His Emissary, provides neurological insight into behaviors where excessive attention to short-term interests might compromise long-term interests.


Aurora Picture Show, a microcinema in Houston, Texas has released a collection of "informational videos by artists who use recent technological tools for purposes other than what they were designed to do and, in some instances, in direct opposition to their intended use". The title of the DVD is At your service: Escaping the Progress Trap.[5]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Meek Lange, Margaret (2011), "Progress", in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2011 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved 2018-11-01
  2. ^ Von Krämer, W. Fortschrittsfalle Medizin (Medical progress traps), Der Spiegel, 13 March 1989
  3. ^ O'Leary, D. The Progress Trap - Science, Humanity and Environment, Archived presentation, Global Ecopolitics, July 1990
  4. ^
  5. ^ Grover, A. At your service: Escaping the Progress Trap, Artlies Magazine Archived 2009-11-15 at the Wayback Machine, included with the Spring '08 issue of Art Lies Contemporary Art Magazine


Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]