||This article includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. (October 2011)|
Promoting adversaries refers to an un-officiated self-organizing tactical relationship between opposing organizations (which can be countries, terrorist organizations, businesses, religious institutions, etc. and mixes of any of these, i.e. terrorist org. vs. country) in which both opposing sides prefer performing non-consensual acts on each other, for reasons that exceed or do not involve attempting to use the non-consensual acts to extract - some might say extort - the concessions that would result from the opposing sides recognizing each other's abilities and the nature and degree of each other's desires, hereinafter known as "strength", for the sake of the inherent value of the concessions. The opposing sides, have, in effect, made a deal to fight each other, instead of or in addition to concessions, but simply because for whatever or no reason, even when they are familiar with each other's strength, they prefer fighting each other than making any even remotely available peace. Promoting adversaries requires neither side to be finally defeated throughout the relationship, because both sides actually prefer the relationship to continue and thus both sides to keep existing and fighting each other. Meanwhile, both sides usually take losses, so for obvious reasons by doing this both sides could be taking losses for what is, in the end, more or less its own sake.
The tactic is to the preference of both sides, even though it occurs between opposing organizations.
Promoting adversaries in military, politics, and economics
Promoting adversaries works within a tendency where those opposed are increasingly polarized. When the tactic is used, it has the effect of making those involved in the relationship even more extreme than they were to begin with. Fundamentalist groups become more fanatical ... and nations, agencies, militaries & political parties become more repressive and authoritarian -- as the promoting adversaries drags on.
It is argued by some that the modern day guerrilla tactic of suicide bombing emerged from conditions in which one or more promoting adversaries relationships developed.
In George Orwell's book Nineteen Eighty-Four, with typical or worse than typical command-economy style technological and industrial incompetence, the three remaining superpowers left in the world use high-intensity conventional total war against each other indefinitely. What reason, if any, they have for doing so is not quite clear. It could simply be for conquest and realpolitik in international relations. At first it appears to be for some sort of propaganda purpose, using the desperation and nationalism of the war to preserve some trace of persuasiveness of the propaganda in favor of their policies. However, that is not necessarily their actual strategy, because they have deliberately made their propaganda even more utterly unconvincing than it already is, and making sure that the population is constantly exposed to thorough and proficient, though still entirely obvious historical revision, and are exposed to introductions to Goldberg's political views for the sake of testing the population, making sure to provoke any potential dissidents into dissenting so that potential dissidents can be caught. The superpowers consider using nuclear weapons against each other's cities, not for retaliation, but for conquest, but decide to wait until they are "ready", which likely means that they do not yet consider it acceptable to finally destroy each other, perhaps because they are promoting adversaries.
Promoting adversaries in pop culture and public relations
This tactic is dynamically similar to certain publicity techniques, and so can be used by individuals and products seeking to gain/concentrate power or wealth as well.
Some examples include:
- Donald Trump vs. Rosie O'Donnell
- Paris Hilton vs. Nicole Richie
- Paris Hilton vs. Lindsay Lohan
- Keith Olbermann of MSNBC vs. Bill O'Reilly of Fox News
As well as aspects of manufactured conflict for ratings purposes on many "reality" shows on TV...
"Promoting Adversaries" has also been parodied most recently by Stephen Colbert on his show, The Colbert Report, in which Stephen's brand of Ben & Jerry's ice cream (AmeriCone Dream) is pitted against Willie Nelson's brand of Ben & Jerry's ice cream (Country Peach Cobbler). Of course, this public 'conflict' generates advertising for both products, which are owned by the same company.
Promoting adversaries is a similar concept to the term frenemy.
- Hage, Rawi; "The Killing Formula." Macleans,21 July 2006.