The examples and perspective in this article deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject. (March 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Proton therapy equipment at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota
|Synonyms||proton beam therapy|
In the field of medical procedures, proton therapy, or proton radiotherapy, is a type of particle therapy that uses a beam of protons to irradiate diseased tissue, most often in the treatment of cancer. The chief advantage of proton therapy over other types of external beam radiotherapy is that as a charged particle the dose is deposited over a narrow range of depth, and there is minimal exit dose.
- 1 Description
- 2 History
- 3 Application
- 4 Comparison with other treatments
- 5 Side effects and risks
- 6 Costs
- 7 Treatment centers
- 8 United Kingdom
- 9 See also
- 10 References
- 11 Further reading
- 12 External links
Proton therapy is a type of external beam radiotherapy that uses ionizing radiation. In proton therapy, medical personnel use a particle accelerator to target a tumor with a beam of protons. These charged particles damage the DNA of cells, ultimately killing them by stopping their reproduction. Cancerous cells are particularly vulnerable to attacks on DNA because of their high rate of division and their reduced abilities to repair DNA damage. Some cancers with specific defects in DNA repair may be more sensitive to proton radiation.
Because of their relatively large mass, protons have little lateral side scatter in the tissue; the beam does not broaden much, stays focused on the tumor shape, and delivers only low-dose side effects to surrounding tissue. All protons of a given energy have a certain penetration range; very few protons penetrate beyond that distance. Furthermore, the dose delivered to tissue is maximized only over the last few millimeters of the particle’s range; this maximum is called the Bragg peak, often referred to as the SOBP.
To treat tumors at greater depths, the proton accelerator must produce a beam with higher energy, typically given in eV or electron volts. Accelerators used for proton therapy typically produce protons with energies in the range of 70 to 250 MeV. Adjusting proton energy during the treatment maximizes the cell damage the proton beam causes within the tumor. Tissue closer to the surface of the body than the tumor receives reduced radiation, and therefore reduced damage. Tissues deeper in the body receive very few protons, so the dosage becomes immeasurably small.
In most treatments, protons of different energies with Bragg peaks at different depths are applied to treat the entire tumor. These Bragg peaks are shown as thin blue lines in the figure to the right. The total radiation dosage of the protons is called the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP), shown as a heavy dashed blue line in figure to the right. It is important to understand that, while tissues behind (or deeper than) the tumor receive almost no radiation from proton therapy, the tissues in front of (shallower than) the tumor receive radiation dosage based on the SOBP.
Most installed proton therapy systems utilise isochronous cyclotrons. Cyclotrons are considered simple to operate, reliable and can be made compact, especially with the use of superconducting magnets. Synchrotrons can also be used, with the advantage of easier production at varying energies. Linear accelerators, as used for photon radiation therapy, are becoming commercially available as limitations of size and cost are resolved.
The first suggestion that energetic protons could be an effective treatment method was made by Robert R. Wilson in a paper published in 1946 while he was involved in the design of the Harvard Cyclotron Laboratory (HCL). The first treatments were performed with particle accelerators built for physics research, notably Berkeley Radiation Laboratory in 1954 and at Uppsala in Sweden in 1957. In 1961, a collaboration began between HCL and the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) to pursue proton therapy. Over the next 41 years, this program refined and expanded these techniques while treating 9,116 patients before the cyclotron was shut down in 2002. The world's first hospital-based proton therapy center was a low energy cyclotron centre for ocular tumours at the Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology in the UK, opened in 1989, followed in 1990 at the Loma Linda University Medical Center (LLUMC) in Loma Linda, California. Later, The Northeast Proton Therapy Center at Massachusetts General Hospital was brought online, and the HCL treatment program was transferred to it during 2001 and 2002. By 2010 these facilities were joined by an additional seven regional hospital-based proton therapy centers in the United States alone, and many more worldwide.
Physicians use protons to treat conditions in two broad categories:
- Disease sites that respond well to higher doses of radiation, i.e., dose escalation. In some instances, dose escalation has demonstrated a higher probability of "cure" (i.e., local control) than conventional radiotherapy. These include, among others, uveal melanoma (ocular tumors), skull base and paraspinal tumors (chondrosarcoma and chordoma), and unresectable sarcomas. In all these cases proton therapy achieves significant improvements in the probability of local control over conventional radiotherapy. In treatment of ocular tumors, proton therapy also has high rates of maintaining the natural eye.
- Treatments where proton therapy's increased precision reduces unwanted side effects by lessening the dose to normal tissue. In these cases, the tumor dose is the same as in conventional therapy, so there is no expectation of an increased probability of curing the disease. Instead, the emphasis is on reducing the integral dose to normal tissue, thus reducing unwanted effects.
Irreversible long-term side effects of conventional radiation therapy for pediatric cancers have been well documented and include growth disorders, neurocognitive toxicity, ototoxicity with subsequent effects on learning and language development, and renal, endocrine and gonadal dysfunctions. Radiation-induced secondary malignancy is another very serious adverse effect that has been reported. As there is no exit dose when using proton radiation therapy, the dose to surrounding normal tissues can be significantly limited, reducing the acute toxicity which positively impacts the risk for these long-term side effects. Cancers requiring craniospinal irradiation, for example, benefit from the absence of exit dose with proton therapy: dose to the heart, mediastinum, bowel, bladder and other tissues anterior to the vertebrae is eliminated, resulting in a reduction of acute thoracic, gastrointestinal and bladder side effects.
In prostate cancer cases, the issue is less clear. Some published studies found a reduction in long term rectal and genito-urinary damage when treating with protons rather than photons (meaning X-ray or gamma ray therapy). Others showed a small difference, limited to cases where the prostate is particularly close to certain anatomical structures. The relatively small improvement found may be the result of inconsistent patient set-up and internal organ movement during treatment, which offsets most of the advantage of increased precision. One source suggests that dose errors around 20% can result from motion errors of just 2.5 mm (0.098 in). and another that prostate motion is between 5–10 mm (0.20–0.39 in).
However, the number of cases of prostate cancer diagnosed each year far exceeds those of the other diseases referred to above, and this has led some, but not all, facilities to devote a majority of their treatment slots to prostate treatments. For example, two hospital facilities devote roughly 65% and 50% of their proton treatment capacity to prostate cancer, while a third devotes only 7.1%.
Overall worldwide numbers are hard to compile, but one example states that in 2003 roughly 26% of proton therapy treatments worldwide were for prostate cancer.
Proton therapy for ocular (eye) tumors is a special case since this treatment requires only comparatively low energy protons (about 70 MeV). Owing to this low energy requirement, some particle therapy centers only treat ocular tumors. Proton, or more generally, hadron therapy of tissue close to the eye affords sophisticated methods to assess the alignment of the eye that can vary significantly from other patient position verification approaches in image guided particle therapy. Position verification and correction must ensure that the radiation spares sensitive tissue like the optic nerve to preserve the patient’s vision.
Head and neck tumors
Proton particles do not deposit exit dose, which allows proton therapy to spare normal tissues distal to the tumor target. This is particularly useful for treating head and neck tumors because of the anatomic constraints encountered in nearly all cancers in this region. The dosimetric advantage unique to proton therapy translates into toxicity reduction. For recurrent head and neck cancer requiring reirradiation, proton therapy is able to maximize a focused dose of radiation to the tumor while minimizing dose to surrounding tissues which results in a minimal acute toxicity profile, even in patients who have received multiple prior courses of radiotherapy.
Lymphoma (Tumors of lymphatic tissue)
Although chemotherapy is the primary treatment for patients with lymphoma, consolidative radiation is often used in Hodgkin lymphoma and aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma, while definitive treatment with radiation alone is used in a small fraction of lymphoma patients. Unfortunately, treatment-related toxicities caused by chemotherapy agents and radiation exposure to healthy tissues are major concerns for lymphoma survivors. Advanced radiation therapy technologies such as proton therapy may offer significant and clinically relevant advantages such as sparing important organs at risk and decreasing the risk for late normal tissue damage while still achieving the primary goal of disease control. This is especially important for lymphoma patients who are being treated with curative intent and have long life expectancies following therapy.
An increasing amount of data reported has shown that proton therapy has great potential to increase therapeutic tolerance for patients with GI malignancies. The possibility of decreasing radiation dose to organs at risk may also help facilitate chemotherapy dose escalation or allow for new chemotherapy combinations. Proton therapy will play a decisive role in the context of ongoing intensified combined modality treatments for GI cancers. The following review presents the benefits of proton therapy in treating hepatocellular carcinoma, pancreatic cancer and esophageal cancer.
Comparison with other treatments
The issue of when, whether, and how best to apply this technology is controversial. As of 2012 there have been no controlled trials to demonstrate that proton therapy yields improved survival or other clinical outcomes (including impotence in prostate cancer) compared to other types of radiation therapy, although a five-year study of prostate cancer is underway at Massachusetts General Hospital.[needs update]
NHS Choices has stated:
We cannot say with any conviction that proton beam therapy is “better” overall than radiotherapy. (...) Some overseas clinics providing proton beam therapy heavily market their services to parents who are understandably desperate to get treatment for their children. Proton beam therapy can be very costly and it is not clear whether all children treated privately abroad are treated appropriately.
The figure at the right of the page shows how beams of X-rays (IMRT; left frame) and beams of protons (right frame), of different energies, penetrate human tissue. A tumor with a sizable thickness is covered by the IMRT spread out Bragg peak (SOBP) shown as the red lined distribution in the figure. The SOBP is an overlap of several pristine Bragg peaks (blue lines) at staggered depths.
Megavoltage X-ray therapy has less "skin scarring potential" than proton therapy: X-ray radiation at the skin, and at very small depths, is lower than for proton therapy. One study estimates that passively scattered proton fields have a slightly higher entrance dose at the skin (~75%) compared to therapeutic megavoltage (MeV) photon beams (~60%). X-ray radiation dose falls off gradually, unnecessarily damaging tissue deeper in the body and damaging the skin and surface tissue opposite the beam entrance. The differences between the two methods depends on the:
- Width of the SOBP
- Depth of the tumor
- Number of beams that treat the tumor
The X-ray advantage of reduced damage to skin at the entrance is partially counteracted by damage to skin at the exit point.
Since X-ray treatments are usually done with multiple exposures from opposite sides, each section of skin is exposed to both entering and exiting X-rays. In proton therapy, skin exposure at the entrance point is higher, but tissues on the opposite side of the body to the tumor receive no radiation. Thus, X-ray therapy causes slightly less damage to the skin and surface tissues, and proton therapy causes less damage to deeper tissues in front of and beyond the target.
An important consideration in comparing these treatments is whether the equipment delivers protons via the scattering method (historically, the most common) or a spot scanning method. Spot scanning can adjust the width of the SOBP on a spot-by-spot basis, which reduces the volume of normal (healthy) tissue inside the high dose region. Also, spot scanning allows for intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT), which determines individual spot intensities using an optimization algorithm that lets the user balance the competing goals of irradiating tumors while sparing normal tissue. Spot scanning availability depends on the machine and the institution. Spot scanning is more commonly known as pencil-beam scanning and is available on IBA, Hitachi, Mevion (known as hyperscan and not US FDA approved as of 2015) and Varian.
Physicians base the decision to use surgery or proton therapy (or any radiation therapy) on the tumor type, stage, and location. In some instances, surgery is superior (such as cutaneous melanoma), in some instances radiation is superior (such as skull base chondrosarcoma), and in some instances they are comparable (for example, prostate cancer). In some instances, they are used together (e.g., rectal cancer or early stage breast cancer). The benefit of external beam proton radiation lies in the dosimetric difference from external beam X-ray radiation and brachytherapy in cases where the use of radiation therapy is already indicated, rather than as a direct competition with surgery. However, in the case of prostate cancer, the most common indication for proton beam therapy, no clinical study directly comparing proton therapy to surgery, brachytherapy, or other treatments has shown any clinical benefit for proton beam therapy. Indeed, the largest study to date showed that IMRT compared with proton therapy was associated with less gastrointestinal morbidity.
Side effects and risks
Proton therapy is a type of external beam radiotherapy, and shares risks and side effects of other forms of radiation therapy. However the dose outside of the treatment region can be significantly less for deep-tissue tumors than X-ray therapy, because proton therapy takes full advantage of the Bragg peak. Proton therapy has been in use for over 40 years, and is a mature treatment technology. However, as with all medical knowledge, understanding of the interaction of radiation (proton, X-ray, etc.) with tumor and normal tissue is still imperfect.
Historically, proton therapy has been expensive. An analysis published in 2003 determined the relative cost of proton therapy is approximately 2.4 times that of X-ray therapies. However, newer, more compact proton beam sources can be 4–5 times cheaper and offer more accurate three-dimensional targeting. Thus the cost is expected to reduce as better proton technology becomes more widely available. An analysis published in 2005 determined that the cost of proton therapy is not unrealistic and should not be the reason for denying patients access to the technology. In some clinical situations, proton beam therapy is clearly superior to the alternatives.
A study in 2007 expressed concerns about the effectiveness of proton therapy for treating prostate cancer, but with the advent of new developments in the technology, such as improved scanning techniques and more precise dose delivery ('pencil beam scanning'), this situation may change considerably. Amitabh Chandra, a health economist at Harvard University, stated, "Proton-beam therapy is like the death star of American medical technology... It's a metaphor for all the problems we have in American medicine.” However, another study has shown that proton therapy in fact brings cost savings. The advent of second generation, and much less expensive, proton therapy equipment which emerged by 2012 may change opinions.
As of July 2017, there are over 75 particle therapy facilities worldwide, with at least 41 others under construction. As of June 2018, there are 27 operational proton therapy centers in the United States. As of the end of 2015 more than 154,203 patients had been treated.
One hindrance to universal use of the proton in cancer treatment is the size and cost of the cyclotron or synchrotron equipment necessary. Several industrial teams are working on development of comparatively small accelerator systems to deliver the proton therapy to patients. Among the technologies being investigated are superconducting synchrocyclotrons (also known as FM Cyclotrons), ultra-compact synchrotrons, dielectric wall accelerators, and linear particle accelerators.
|Institution||Location||Year of first treatment||Comments|
|Loma Linda University Medical Center||Loma Linda, CA||1990||First hospital-based facility in USA; uses Spread Out Bragg's Peak (SOBP)|
|Crocker Nuclear Laboratory||Davis, CA||1994||Ocular treatments only (low energy accelerator); at University of California, Davis|
|Francis H. Burr Proton Center||Boston, MA||2001||At Massachusetts General Hospital and formerly known as NPTC; continuation of Harvard Cyclotron Laboratory/MGH treatment program that began in 1961; Manufactured by Ion Beam Applications|
|University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute-Jacksonville||Jacksonville, FL||2006||The UF Health Proton Therapy Institute is a part of a non-profit academic medical research facility. It is the first treatment center in the Southeast U.S. to offer proton therapy. Manufactured by Ion Beam Applications|
|University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center||Houston, TX||2006|
|ProCure Proton Therapy Center of Oklahoma||Oklahoma City, OK||2009||4 treatment rooms, Proteus PLUS system manufactured by Ion Beam Applications|
|Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center||Warrenville, IL||2010||4 treatment rooms, Proteus PLUS system manufactured by Ion Beam Applications|
|Roberts Proton Therapy Center||Philadelphia, PA||2010||The largest proton therapy center in the world, the Roberts Proton Therapy Center, which is a part of Penn's Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania Health System; 5 treatment rooms, Proteus PLUS system manufactured by Ion Beam Applications|
|Hampton University Proton Therapy Institute||Hampton, VA||2010||5 treatment rooms, Proteus PLUS system manufactured by Ion Beam Applications|
|ProCure Proton Therapy Center||Somerset, NJ||2012||4 treatment rooms, Proteus PLUS system manufactured by Ion Beam Applications|
|SCCA Proton Therapy Center||Seattle, WA||2013||At Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; part of Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; 4 treatment rooms, Proteus PLUS system manufactured by Ion Beam Applications|
|Siteman Cancer Center||St. Louis, MO||2013||First of the new single suite, ultra-compact, superconducting synchrocyclotron, lower cost facilities to treat a patient using the Mevion Medical system's S250.|
|Provision Proton Therapy Center||Knoxville, TN||2014||3 treatment rooms, Proteus PLUS system manufactured by Ion Beam Applications|
|California Protons Cancer Therapy Center||San Diego, CA||2014||(5 suites, all using pencil-beam scanning precision also called IMPT) Manufactured by Varian Medical Systems |
|Ackerman Cancer Center||Jacksonville, FL||2015||Ackerman Cancer Center is the world's first private, physician-owned practice to provide proton therapy, in addition to conventional radiation therapy and on-site diagnostic services.|
|The Laurie Proton Therapy Center||New Brunswick, NJ||2015||The Laurie Proton Therapy Center, part of Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, is home to the world’s third MEVION S250 Proton Therapy System.|
|Texas Center for Proton Therapy||Dallas Fort Worth, TX||2015||A collaboration by "Texas Oncology and The US Oncology Network, supported by McKesson Specialty Health, and Baylor Health Enterprises"; three pencil beam rooms and cone beam CT imaging. 3 treatment rooms, Proteus PLUS system manufactured by Ion Beam Applications|
|Mayo Clinic Cancer Center||Phoenix, AZ||2016||4 treatment rooms. Manufactured by Hitachi. |
|Mayo Clinic Jacobson Building||Rochester, MN||2015||4 treatment rooms. Manufactured by Hitachi. |
|The Marjorie and Leonard Williams Center for Proton Therapy||Orlando, FL||2016||http://www.ufhealthcancerorlando.com/centers/proton-therapy-center|
|Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute||Liberty Township, OH||2016||Collaboration of University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center|
|Maryland Proton Treatment Center||Baltimore, MD||2016||5 treatment rooms, all using pencil-beam scanning; affiliated with the University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center.|
|Miami Cancer Institute||Miami, FL||2017||3 treatment rooms, all using pencil-beam scanning Manufactured by Ion Beam Applications|
|Beaumont Proton Therapy Center||Royal Oak, MI||2017||Single treatment room, Proteus ONE system manufactured by Ion Beam Applications|
|Emory Proton Therapy Center||Atlanta, GA||2018 (estimated)||Five treatment rooms, ProBeam Superconducting Cyclotron manufactured by Varian Medical Systems|
|St. Jude Red Frog Events Proton Therapy Center||Memphis, TN|
|UAB Proton Therapy Center||Birmingham, AL||2020 (Estimated)|
The Indiana University Health Proton Therapy Center in Bloomington, Indiana opened in 2004 and ceased operations in 2014.
Outside the USA
|Institution||Maximum energy (MeV)||Year of first treatment||Location|
|Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, low-energy for ocular||62||1989||Liverpool, United Kingdom|
|Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center||230||2009||Heidelberg, Germany|
|Westdeutsches Protonentherapiezentrum||230||2013||Essen, Germany|
|Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin||72||1998||Berlin, Germany|
|Rinecker Proton Therapy Center||250||2009||Munich, Germany|
|PTC Uniklinikum||230||2014||Dresden, Germany|
|Wanjie Proton Therapy Center||230||2004||Zibo, China|
|Medipolis Proton Therapy and Research Center||235||2011||Kagoshima, Japan|
|Proton Medical Research Center University of Tsukuba||250||2001||Tsukuba, Japan|
|Research Center for Charged Particle Therapy||350-400||1994||Chiba, Japan|
|Centre de protonthérapie de l'Institut Curie||235||1991||Orsay, France|
|Centre Antoine Lacassagne||63||1991||Nice, France|
|Paul Scherrer Institute||250||1984||Villigen, Switzerland|
|Instytut Fizyki Jądrowej||60||2011||Kraków, Poland|
|Centrum Cyklotronowe Bronowice||230||2015||Kraków, Poland|
|Centro di Protonterapia, APSS Trento||230||2014||Trento, Italy|
|Centro di adroterapia oculare||60||2002||Catania, Italy|
|Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica||250||2011||Pavia, Italy|
|Proton Therapy Center, Prague||230||2012||Prague, Czech Republic|
|Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center||230||2014||Shanghai, China|
|Proton Therapy Center, Korea National Cancer Center||230||2007||Seoul, Korea|
|SMC Proton Therapy Center||230||2015||Seoul, Korea|
|Proton and Radiation Therapy Center, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital||230||2015||Taipei, Taiwan|
|A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Centre||250||2016||Obninsk, Russia|
|Holland Particle Therapy Centre||245||2017||Delft, Netherlands|
|Clinical Proton Therapy Center Dr. Berezin Medical Institute||250||2017||Saint-Petersburg, Russia|
|UMC Groningen Protonen Therapie Centrum||230||2018||Groningen, Netherlands|
In 2013 the British government announced that £250 million had been budgeted to establish two centers for advanced radiotherapy, to open in 2018 at the Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust in Manchester and University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. These would offer high-energy proton therapy, currently unavailable in the UK, as well as other types of advanced radiotherapy, including intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). In 2014, only low-energy proton therapy was available in the UK, at the Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust in Merseyside. But NHS England has paid to have suitable cases treated abroad, mostly in the US. Such cases have risen from 18 in 2008 to 122 in 2013, 99 of whom were children. The cost to the National Health Service averaged around £100,000 per case.
A company named Advanced Oncotherapy plc and its subsidiary ADAM, a spin-off from CERN, are developing a linear proton therapy accelerator to be installed among others in London. In 2015 they signed a deal with Howard de Walden Estate to install a machine in Harley Street, the heart of private medicine in London. First patient treatment at Harley Street is expected in the second half of 2020.
- Particle therapy
- Charged particle therapy
- Fast neutron therapy
- Boron neutron capture therapy
- Linear energy transfer
- Electromagnetic radiation and health
- Ionizing radiation
- List of oncology-related terms
- Adapted , Levin W. P., Kooy H., Loeffler J. S., DeLaney T. F. (2005). "Proton Beam Therapy". British Journal of Cancer. 93: 849–854. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602754. PMC 2361650. PMID 16189526.
- Jakel O (2007). "State of the Art in Hadron Therapy". AIP Conference Proceedings. 958 (1): 70–77. doi:10.1063/1.2825836.
- "Zap! You're Not Dead." Economist, 8 September 2007. 384 (8545):13–14.
- Liu Q (2015). "Lung Cancer Cell Line Screen Links Fanconi Anemia/BRCA Pathway Defects to Increased Relative Biological Effectiveness of Proton Radiation". Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys. 91 (5): 1081–1089. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.12.046.
- Metz, James (2006-07-31). "Differences Between Protons and X-rays". Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania. Archived from the original on 2008-12-17. Retrieved 2008-02-04.
the beam then stops, resulting in virtually no radiation to the tissue beyond the target—or no "exit dose"
- Camphausen, K. A.; Lawrence, R. C. (2008). "Principles of Radiation Therapy". In Pazdur, R.; Wagman, L. D.; Camphausen, K. A.; Hoskins, W. J. (eds.) Cancer Management: A Multidisciplinary Approach. 11th ed. Archived 2013-10-04 at the Wayback Machine.
- Smith, Alfred R. (26 January 2009). "Vision 20∕20: Proton therapy". Medical Physics. 36 (2): 556–568. Bibcode:2009MedPh..36..556S. doi:10.1118/1.3058485. PMID 19291995.
- Degiovanni, Alberto; Amaldi, Ugo (June 2015). "History of hadron therapy accelerators". Physica Medica. 31 (4): 322–332. doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.03.002. PMID 25812487.
- Peach, K; Wilson, P; Jones, B (December 2011). "Accelerator science in medical physics". The British Journal of Radiology. 84 (special_issue_1): S4–S10. doi:10.1259/bjr/16022594. PMC 3473892. PMID 22374548.
- Liu, Hui; Chang, Joe Y. (5 May 2011). "Proton therapy in clinical practice". Chinese Journal of Cancer. 30 (5): 315–326. doi:10.5732/cjc.010.10529. PMC 4013396. PMID 21527064.
- Owen, Hywel; Lomax, Antony; Jolly, Simon (February 2016). "Current and future accelerator technologies for charged particle therapy". Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment. 809: 96–104. Bibcode:2016NIMPA.809...96O. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2015.08.038.
- "Radiological Use of Fast Protons", R. R. Wilson, Radiology, 47:487-491 (1946)
- Richard Wilson, "A Brief History of the Harvard University Cyclotrons", Harvard University Press, 2004, pp 9
- "PTCOG: Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group". Ptcog.web.psi.ch. Retrieved 2009-09-03.
- "Particle therapy facilities in operation". Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group. 2013-08-27. Retrieved 2014-09-01.
- "Particle therapy facilities in operation". Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group. Retrieved 2010-04-27.
- Levy, Richard P.; Blakely, Eleanor A.; et al. (March 2009). "The current status and future directions of heavy charged particle therapy in medicine". AIP Conference Proceedings. 1099 (410). doi:10.1063/1.3120064.
- Hug E. B.; et al. (1999). ": Proton radiation therapy for chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base". J. Neurosurg. 91: 432–439. doi:10.3171/jns.1999.91.3.0432.
- Gragoudas, Evangelos; et al. (2002). "Evidence-based estimates of outcomes in patients treated for intraocular melenoma". Arch. Ophthalmol. 120 (12): 1665–1671. doi:10.1001/archopht.120.12.1665.
- Munzenrider J. E.; Liebsch N. J. (1999). "Proton radiotherapy for tumors of the skull base". Strahnlenther. Onkol. 175: 57–63. doi:10.1007/bf03038890.
- "Proton Therapy for Ocular Tumors". ucsf.edu. Department of Radiation Oncology; University of California, San Francisco. Retrieved 2017-10-05.
- "TREATING PEDIATRIC TUMORS WITH PROTON THERAPY". IBA White paper. October 2015.
- Slater, J. D.; et al. (2004). "Proton therapy for prostate cancer; the initial Loma Linda University experience". Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 59: 348–352. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.10.011.
- Zietman, A. L.; et al. (2005). "Comparisons of conventional-dose vs. high-dose conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a randomized controlled trial". JAMA. 294 (10): 1233–1239. doi:10.1001/jama.294.10.1233. PMID 16160131.
- deCrevoisier, R.; et al. (2005). "Increased risk of biochemical and local failure in patients with distended rectum on the planning CT for prostate cancer radiotherapy". Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 62 (4): 965–973. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.11.032. PMID 15989996.
- Lambert; et al. (2005). "Intrafractional motion during proton beam scanning". Phys. Med. Biol. 50: 4853–4862. Bibcode:2005PMB....50.4853L. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/50/20/008.
- Byrne, Thomas E. (2005). "A Review of Prostate Motion with Considerations for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer". Medical Dosimerty. 30 (3): 155–161. doi:10.1016/j.meddos.2005.03.005.
- Van Dyk, Jacob (1999). The modern technology of radiation oncology: A Compendium for Medical Physicists and Radiation Oncologists. Medical Physics Publishing Corporation. p. 826. ISBN 9780944838389.
Proton Patient Summary - Inception Through December 1998...Prostate...2591 64.3%
- "The Promise of Proton-Beam Therapy". U.S. News and World Report. 2008-04-16. Retrieved 2008-02-20.
- Delaney, T (2011). "Francis H. Burr Proton Therapy Center" (PDF of PowerPoint presentation). Massachusetts General Hospital; Harvard Medical School – via Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group.
- Sisterson, Janet (December 2005). "Ion beam therapy in 2004". Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research; Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 241 (1–4): 713–716. Bibcode:2005NIMPB.241..713S. doi:10.1016/j.nimb.2005.07.121.
- Selby, Boris Peter; et al. (2007). "Pose estimation of eyes for particle beam treatment of tumors" (PDF). Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin (Medical Image Processing). Munich: Springer Berlin Heidelberg: 368–373.
- "TREATING HEAD AND NECK CARCINOMA WITH PROTON THERAPY". IBA White paper:.
- "TREATING HODGKIN AND NON-HODGKIN LYMPHOMA WITH PROTON THERAPY". IBA White paper. September 2016.
- "TREATING GASTROINTESTINAL MALIGNANCY WITH PROTON THERAPY". IBA White paper. September 2016.
- Tepper, Joel E.; Blackstock, A. William (20 October 2009). "Editorial: Randomized Trials and Technology Assessment". Annals of Internal Medicine. 151 (8): 583–584. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-8-200910200-00146. PMID 19755346.
- Boulton, Guy (March 30, 2008). "High cost; of high tech; Outlay vs. benefit of expensive medical devices questioned". Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Retrieved 2009-09-03.
Despite that controversy, roughly a dozen proton therapy centers have been proposed throughout the country, including northern Illinois.
- Whelan, David; Langreth, Robert (March 16, 2009). "The $150 Million Zapper: Does every cancer patient really need proton-beam therapy?". Forbes. Retrieved 2009-09-03.
- Terasawa, Teruhiko; Dvorak, Tomas; Ip, Stanley; Raman, Gowri; Lau, Joseph; Trikalinos, Thomas A. (20 October 2009). "Systematic Review: Charged-Particle Radiation Therapy for Cancer". Annals of Internal Medicine. 151 (8): 556–565. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-8-200910200-00145. PMID 19755348.
- Johnson, Carolyn Y. (May 14, 2012). "Proton beams vs. radiation: 5-year MGH study seeks definitive answers about costly prostate cancer treatment". Boston Globe – via boston.com.
- "Particle Beam Radiation Therapies for Cancer: Policymaker Summary Guide". U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. September 14, 2009. Retrieved 2009-10-09.
- "Particle Beam Radiation Therapies for Cancer Final Research Review". U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. September 14, 2009.
- Feldstein, Dan (Oct 23, 2005). "M.D. Anderson private venture raises questions/ Proton-therapy benefits at center won't merit costs of care, some say". chron.com. Houston Chronicle. Retrieved 2009-10-01.
M.D. Anderson officials estimate that when patients on all types of insurance and payment plans are mixed together, proton delivery will cost an average of $37,000 per patient for prostate treatment, compared with $29,000 for IMRT and $21,000 for standard radiation. The amount excludes doctor fees, which will be roughly the same for each.
- Emanuel, Ezekiel J.; Pearson, S. D. (2012-01-02). "It Costs More, but Is It Worth More?". The New York Times: The Opinion Pages. New York. Retrieved 2012-01-03.
- Cox, Jeremy (2009-11-23). "UF Proton Therapy Institute study shows positive outcomes". Jacksonville.com. Retrieved 2009-12-22.
- Smith, Joan (6 September 2014). "Ashya King: This story isn't quite what it seems". The Independent. Retrieved 2017-10-05.
- "What is proton beam therapy?". NHS.uk. Crown. September 3, 2014. Retrieved 2017-10-05.
- "Introducing Hyperscan". mevion.com. Mevion Medical Systems. 2015-04-19.
- Sheets, NC; Goldin, GH; Meyer, AM; Wu, Y; et al. (April 18, 2012). "Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, proton therapy, or conformal radiation therapy and morbidity and disease control in localized prostate cancer". The Journal of the American Medical Association. 307 (15): 1611–20. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.460. PMC 3702170. PMID 22511689.
- Goitein, M.; Jermann, M. (2003). "The Relative Costs of Proton and X-ray Radiation Therapy". Clinical Oncology. 15: S37–50. doi:10.1053/clon.2002.0174.
- Bassett, Anne. "Siteman Cancer Center Treats First Patient With First-of-Its-Kind Proton Therapy System". PRWeb.com (Press release). Barnes-Jewish Hospital. Retrieved 2017-10-05.
- Roland, Denise (September 25, 2013). "God particle technology to cancer patients". The Telegraph. Retrieved 2017-10-05.
- Lievens, Y.; Van den Bogaert, W; et al. (2005). "Proton beam therapy: Too expensive to become true?". Radiotherapy and Oncology. 75: 131–133. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2005.03.027. PMID 15890422.
- St Clair, W. H.; Adams, J. A.; Bues, M.; Fullerton, B. C.; La Shell, S.; Kooy, H. M.; Loeffler, J. S.; Tarbell, N. J. (2004). "Advantage of protons compared to conventional X-ray or IMRT in the treatment of a pediatric patient with medulloblastoma". Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 58: 727–734. doi:10.1016/S0360-3016(03)01574-8. PMID 14967427.
- Merchant, T. E.; Hua, C. H.; Shukla, H.; Ying, X.; Nill, S.; Oelfke, U. (2008). "Proton versus photon radiotherapy for common pediatric brain tumors: comparison of models of dose characteristics and their relationship to cognitive function". Pediatr. Blood Cancer. 51: 110–117. doi:10.1002/pbc.21530. PMID 18306274.
- Konski A.; Speier W.; Hanlon A.; Beck J. R.; Pollack A. (2007). "Is proton beam therapy cost effective in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the prostate?". J. Clin. Oncol. 25: 3603–3608. doi:10.1200/jco.2006.09.0811.
- Nguyen, P. L.; Trofimov, A.; Zietman, A. L. (June 22, 2008). "Proton-Beam vs. Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy, Which Is Best for Treating Prostate Cancer?". Oncology (Williston Park). 22 (7): 748–54, discussion 754, 757. PMID 18619120.
- Langreth, Robert (March 26, 2012). "Prostate Cancer Therapy Too Good to Be True Explodes Health Cost". Bloomberg.com. Retrieved 2013-05-16.
- Lundkvist, J.; Ekman, M.; Ericsson, S. R.; Jönsson, B.; Glimelius, B. (2005a). "Cost-effectiveness of proton radiation in the treatment of childhood medulloblastoma". Cancer. 103: 793–801. doi:10.1002/cncr.20844.
- "Mevion Medical Systems continues Manufacturing Ramp Up". MarketWatch.com. 2012-11-01. Archived from the original on 2013-10-29. Retrieved 2012-11-29.
- "Particle therapy facilities in operation". PTCOG.ch. Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group. July 2017. Retrieved 2017-10-06.
- "Particle therapy facilities under construction". PTCOG.ch. Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group. June 2017. Retrieved 2017-10-06.
- "Statistics of patients treated in particle therapy facilities worldwide:". PTCOG.ch. Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group. 2016. Retrieved 2017-10-06.
- Matthews, J. N. A. (March 2009). "Accelerators shrink to meet growing demand for proton therapy". Physics Today. p. 22.
- Nafziger, Brendon (March 20, 2012). "N.J. proton therapy center opens today". DotMed.com. Retrieved 2012-03-30.
- "Proton Therapy Treatment and Research Center". Loma Linda University Medical Center. Retrieved 2013-11-05.
- "Cyclotron Services". crocker.udavis.edu. University of California, Davis, Crocker Nuclear Laboratory. Retrieved 2017-10-05.
- "Best proton therapy centers - IBA proton therapy". iba-worldwide.com. Retrieved 2018-03-16.
- "Proton Therapy Jacksonville | Cancer Treatment". University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute. Retrieved 2013-11-05.
- "Proton Therapy Center". University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Retrieved 2013-11-05.
- "Oklahoma Proton Therapy Treatment Center". ProCure. Retrieved 2013-11-05.
- "Proton Therapy at Penn Medicine". Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine. Retrieved 2013-11-05.
- "New Jersey Proton Therapy Treatment Center". ProCure. Retrieved 2013-11-05.
- "Elegant and Precise". Mevion Medical Systems. Retrieved 2015-04-19.
- "Introducing the Mevion S250". Mevion. Retrieved 2015-04-19.
- "Proton therapy cancer treatment center opens, first of its kind in Tennessee". WATE-TV. Archived from the original on 2014-01-26. Retrieved 2014-01-25.
- "California Protons Cancer Therapy Center". California Protons Cancer Therapy Center. Retrieved 2017-12-18.
- "Oncology, Solutions, Proton Therapy". Varian Medical Systems. Retrieved 2015-04-19.
- "Texas Center for Proton Therapy Treats First Patient with Isocentric Cone Beam CT and Pencil Beam Scanning" (Press release). Irving, Texas: McKesson. May 9, 2016. Retrieved 2017-10-05.
- "Mayo Clinic Cancer Center". mayoclinic.org. Mayo Clinic.
- "Hitachi "PROBEAT-V" Advanced Proton Beam Therapy System Now In Use at Mayo Clinic in Arizona" (Press release). Tokyo, Japan: Hitachi. March 15, 2016. Retrieved 2018-05-01.
- "Mayo Clinic launches Proton Beam Therapy Program". mayoclinic.org. Mayo Clinic. Retrieved 2017-10-05.
- "Hitachi's Advanced Proton Beam Therapy System "PROBEAT-V" Begins Treatments at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN" (Press release). Tokyo, Japan: Hitachi. September 15, 2015. Retrieved 2018-05-01.
- "Proton Therapy at University of Cincinnati Medical Center". uchealth.com. University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, UC Health. Retrieved 2017-10-05.
- "Pediatric Proton Therapy Center". cincinnatichildrens.org. Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. Retrieved 2017-10-05.
- "Proton Therapy Treats Cancer Differently". mdproton.com. Maryland Proton Treatment Center. Retrieved 2017-10-05.
- "Proton Therapy at Miami Cancer Institute". baptisthealth.net. Baptist Health South Florida. Retrieved 2017-10-05.
- "Emory Proton Therapy Center Fact Sheet" (PDF). winshipcancer.emory.edu. Emory Winship Cancer Institute. Retrieved 2018-03-05.
- "Proton Therapy". TRIUMF.ca. Retrieved 2017-10-05.
- "Proton therapy". clatterbridgecc.nhs.uk. Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust. Archived from the original on 2014-01-15. Retrieved 2017-10-05.
- "Manchester and London proton beam therapy units confirmed", Press release, Press Association, Cancer Research UK, 1 August 2013
- "Ashya King case: What is proton beam therapy?" BBC news story with NHS England figures, 31 August 2014
- "NeoStem (Amex: NBS) 15M units Prices at $0.40 per unit for $6M Public Offering". proactiveinvestors.co.uk. Retrieved 2015-08-11.
- "ADVANCED ONCOTHERAPY PLC Investor presentation and Update".
- "Construction begins on UK's first proton beam therapy cancer treatment centre". Wales on line. 18 January 2016. Retrieved 2016-12-24.
77 Bortfeld, Thomas R. and Jay S. Loeffler (2017) Three ways to make proton therapy affordable. Nature 549, 451–453 (28 September 2017) doi:10.1038/549451a
- Greco C.; Wolden S. (Apr 2007). "Current status of radiotherapy with proton and light ion beams". Cancer. 109 (7): 1227–38. doi:10.1002/cncr.22542. PMID 17326046.
- "Use of Protons for Radiotherapy", A.M. Koehler, Proc. of the Symposium on Pion and Proton Radiotherapy, Nat. Accelerator Lab., (1971).
- A.M. Koehler, W.M. Preston, "Protons in Radiation Therapy: comparative Dose Distributions for Protons, Photons and Electrons Radiology 104(1):191–195 (1972).
- "Bragg Peak Proton Radiosurgery for Arteriovenous Malformation of the Brain" R.N. Kjelberg, presented at First Int. Seminar on the Use of Proton Beams in Radiation Therapy, Moskow (1977).
- Austin-Seymor, M.J. Munzenrider, et al. "Fractionated Proton Radiation Therapy of Cranial and Intracrainial Tumors" Am. J. of Clinical Oncology 13(4):327–330 (1990).
- "Proton Radiotherapy", Hartford, Zietman, et al. in Radiotheraputic Management of Carcinoma of the Prostate, A. D'Amico and G.E. Hanks. London, UK, Arnold Publishers: 61–72 (1999).
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Proton therapy.|