Public distribution system
|This article relies too much on references to primary sources. (March 2010) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
|This article is part of a series on the
politics and government of
Public distribution system (PDS) is an Indian food security system. Established by the Government of India under Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food, and Public Distribution and managed jointly with state governments in India, it distributes subsidized food and non-food items to India's poor. This scheme was launched in India on June 1997. Major commodities distributed include staple food grains, such as wheat, rice, sugar, and kerosene, through a network of fair price shops (also known as ration shops) established in several states across the country. Food Corporation of India, a Government-owned corporation, procures and maintains the PDS.
In coverage and public expenditure, it is considered to be the most important food security network. However, the food grains supplied by the ration shops are not enough to meet the consumption needs of the poor or are of inferior quality. The average level of consumption of PDS grains in India is only 1 kg per person / month. The PDS has been criticised for its urban bias and its failure to serve the poorer sections of the population effectively. The targeted PDS is costly and gives rise to much corruption in the process of extricating the poor from those who are less needy. Today, India has the largest stock of grain in the world besides China, the government spends Rs. 750 billion ($13.6 billion) per year, almost 1 percent of GDP, yet 21% remain undernourished. Distribution of food grains to poor people throughout the country is managed by state governments. As of date there are about 500,000 Fair Price Shops (FPS) across India.
The central and state governments shared the responsibility of regulating the PDS. While the central government is responsible for procurement, storage, transportation, and bulk allocation of food grains, state governments hold the responsibility for distributing the same to the consumers through the established network of Fair Price Shops (FPSs). State governments are also responsible for operational responsibilities including allocation and identification of families below poverty line, issue of ration cards, supervision and monitoring the functioning of FPSs[clarification needed]. Under PDS scheme, each family below the poverty line is eligible for 35 kg of rice or wheat every month, while a household above the poverty line is entitled to 15 kg of foodgrain on a monthly basis.
A below poverty line (BPL) card holder should be given 35 kg of food grain and the card holder above the poverty line should be given 15 kg of food grain as per the norms of PDS. However, there are concerns about the efficiency of the distribution process.
Public distribution shop
A public distribution shop, also known as fair price shop (FPS), is a part of India's public distribution system established by Government of India which distributes rations at a subsidized price to the poor. Locally these are known as "ration shops" and chiefly sell wheat, rice, kerosene and sugar at a price lower than the market price at a price called Issue Price. Other essential commodities may also be sold. To buy items one must have a ration card(pink card). These shops are operated throughout the country by joint assistance of central and state government. The item from these shops are much cheaper but are of average quality. Ration shops are now present in most localities, villages towns and cities. India has 478,000 shops constituting the largest distribution network in the world.
The introduction of rationing in India dates back to the 1940s Bengal famine. This rationing system was revived in the wake of acute food shortage during the early 1960s, before the Green Revolution.It involves 2 types- RPDS and TPDS.
Fallouts of PDS
||This article contains embedded lists that may be better presented using prose. (September 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
|This section does not cite any sources. (January 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
The public distribution system of India is not without its defects. With a coverage of around 400 million below-poverty-line (BPL) families, a review of the PDS has discovered the following structural shortcomings and disturbances:
- Growing instances of the consumers receiving inferior quality food grains in ration shops.
- Deceitful dealers replace good supplies received from the F.C.I(Food Corporation of India) with inferior stock and sell FCI stock in the black market.
- Illicit fair price shop owners have been found to create large number of bogus cards to sell food grains in the open market.
- Many FPS dealers resort to malpractice, illegal diversions of commodities, holding and black marketing due to the minimum salary received by them.
- Numerous malpractices make safe and nutritious food inaccessible and unaffordable to many poor thus resulting in their food insecurity.
- Identification of households to be denoted status and distribution to granted PDS services has been highly irregular and diverse in various states. The recent development of Aadhar UIDAI cards has taken up the challenge of solving the problem of identification and distribution of PDs services along with Direct Cash Transfers.
- Regional allocation and coverage of FPS are unsatisfactory and the core objective of price stabilization of essential commodities has not met.
- There is no set criteria as to which family is BPL and which is APL .This non ambiguity gives massive scope for corruption and fallouts in PDS systems because those who are actually meant to be benefitted are not able to taste the fruits of PDS.
Several schemes have augmented the number of people aided by PDS, but the number is extremely low. Poor supervision of FPS and lack of accountability have spurred middlemen who consume a good proportion of the stock meant for the poor. There is also no clarity as to which families should be included in the BPL list and which excluded. This results in the genuinely poor being excluded whilst the ineligible get several cards. Awareness about the presence of the PDS and FPS to poverty-stricken societies, namely the rural poor has been dismal.
The stock assigned to a single family cannot be bought in installments. This is a decisive barrier to the efficient functioning and overall success of PDS in India. Many BPL families are not able to acquire ration cards either because they are seasonal migrant workers or because they live in unauthorized colonies. A lot of families also mortgage their ration cards for money. Lack of clarity in the planning and structuring of social safety and security programs in India has resulted in the creation of numerous cards for the poor. Limited information about the overall use of cards has discouraged BPL families from registering for new cards and increased illegal creation of cards by such families to ensure maximum benefit for the family members.
To improve the current system of the PDS, the following suggestions are furnished for:
- Vigilance squad should be strengthened to detect corruption, which is an added expenditure for taxpayers.
- Personnel-in-charge of the department should be chosen locally.
- Margin of profit should be increased for honest business, in which case the market system is more apt anyway.
- F.C.I. and other prominent agencies should provide quality food grains for distribution, which is a tall order for an agency that has no real incentive to do so.
- Frequent checks & raids should be conducted to eliminate bogus and duplicate cards, which is again an added expenditure and not full proof.
- The Civil Supplies Corporation should open more fair price shops in rural areas.
- The fair price dealers seldom display rate chart and quantity available in the block-boards in front of the shop. This should be enforced.
In aggregate, only about 42% of subsidised grains issued by the central pool reach the target group, according to a Planning Commission study released in March 2008.
Food stamps given to the needy and to the underprivileged by issue of coupons, vouchers, electronic card transfer etc. they can purchase commodities at any shop or outlet. The state government would then pay back the grocery shops for the stamps said the finance minister in his budget. But the United Progressive alliance, which came to power in 2004, decided on a common minimum programme (CMP) and on the agenda was food and nutrition security. Under that the government had plans to strengthen the food security program DS.
However, finance minister Arun Jately in his budget speech went contrary to the idea proposed in the CMP and proposed the idea of the food stamp scheme. He has proposed to try the scheme in few districts of India to see its viability. In the CMP the government had proposed that if it is viable it would universalise the PDS; if food stamps are introduced it would be a targeted public distribution system. A group of about 40 economists have cautioned the NAC headed by Sonia Gandhi against the food security bill as it would put an additional burden on the ex-chequer. They instead have advised to go ahead and experiment with food stamps and other alternative methods and pointed out the flaws in PDS. This set of economists hail from institutes like Delhi School of Economics, Indian Statistical Institute, Jawaharlal Nehru University, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Centre for Development Studies, Harvard, MIT, Columbia, Princeton, London School of Economics, University of British Columbia, University of California and University of Warwick. In a landmark judgment, Delhi High Court has ruled that fair price shops cannot be allotted to a below poverty line (BPL) card holder.
Aaj Tak news channel on 14 October 2013 performed a sting operation on PDS named Operation Black. It shows how the distribution reaches to mills instead of fair price shops. Interestingly, all the documentation via computerisation is clean.
NDTV did a show which documented how the Government of Chhattisgarh's food department managed to fix its broken system so that the diversion of grain came down from about 50% in 2004-5 to about 10% in 2009-10.
Research on the PDS suggests (as these two programmes show) that the situation varies quite a lot across the country.
Distribution of food stamps
- It will reduce India's dependence on buffer stock for price stabilization and in turn reduce cost
- It provides incentive must to deregulate the domestic market and thus will induce private entrepreneurs
- There is an immense need to develop appropriate marketing infrastructure and institutions to deal with trade in agricultural commodities. ( Kaushik Basu 2007)
- Appropriate policy changes are a must, for instance, in the post WTO period the international prices of wheat and rice came to their lowest levels. But in India due to high MSP’s the prices were relatively high. Thus as a result importing was cheaper than buying from the domestic market. As a result, the government levied 50% tariff on wheat and 80% percent tariff on rice which further resulted in one of the outlandish incidents in the Indian history that was accumulation of buffer stocks which were exported which, incidentally, came back for sale at high MSP’s for instance in 2002-03, the government sold 1.6 million tones to exporters but actual exports were only 0.682 million tones 
The government may have to set up a complete system for the same or would have to put this responsibility on post office, banks or such other institutions. In this process there could be leakages which are a matter of concern. Also there would be a burden which would come on the poor class who has to benefit from the same of going and collecting the food stamps.
- Direct Benefit Transfer
- Subsidies in India
- Malnutrition in India
- SCOSTA, Indian Smart Card Operating System Standard for Transport Application evolved during 2002-2003
- National Food Security Act, 2013
- As Grain Piles Up, India’s Poor Still Go Hungry, New York Times, June 7, 2012
- "5.17 The Public Distribution System is -------" (PDF). Budget of India (2000-2001). 2000.
- "Public Distribution System". Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution (India).
- "UP foodgrain scam trail leads to Nepal, Bangladesh". The Times of India. 11 December 2010.
- "Public Distribution System". Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution (India).
- Planning Commission 11th FYP document: Nutrition and Social Safety Net, on PDS and Defects and shortcomings
- Press Information Bureau Report on Food Security and revamp of PDS food grain Quality Control
- Planning Commission 9th FYP on FPS and malpractices
- Shambhu Blogpost on Secondary Data evidence on nutritional defects
- Government of India in a fix over illegal creation of ration cards
- "Public Distribution System in India". INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT, AHMEDABAD. Retrieved 5 October 2011.
- "NATIONAL COMMON MINIMUM PROGRAMME OF THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA" (PDF). Retrieved 27 September 2011.
- "Targeted(http://www.hindu.com/2004/08/03/stories/2004080300331000.htm)". The Hindu.
- "Food Stamps: A Model for India" (PDF). CENTRE FOR CIVIL SOCIETY. Retrieved 27 September 2011.
- "Allow alternatives to PDS, say experts". The Indian Express. Retrieved 27 September 2011.
- "Delhi HC says Fair price shop can't be allotted to BPL card holders". IANS. news.biharprabha.com. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
- "Operation Black by AAJ TAK NEWS Channel". AAJ TAK. Retrieved 14 October 2013.
- Truth vs Hype: The Hunger Project http://www.ndtv.com/video/player/truth-vs-hype/truth-vs-hype-the-hunger-project/277857
- PDS - Department of Food and Public Distribution, Official website at Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution
- Public Distribution System (PDS), in 10th Plan at Planning Commission of India
- Public Distribution System: Introduction at Right to Food Campaign
- Food Banking India at Delhi FoodBanking Network
-  at Operation Black by Aaj Tak
- Excess Food Stocks, PDS and Procurement Policy Working Paper No. 5/2002-PC, by Arvind Virmani and P.V. Rajeev, Planning Commission, Government of India, December 2001