Publius Cornelius Sulla
Despite being Sulla's nephew, Publius does not seem have played a prominent role in either the civil wars or the dictatorship of his famous uncle. However, he may indeed have served as a junior officer during this time, alongside his contemporary Lucius Sergius Catiline, who definitely did serve with distinction in the Sullan Civil Wars. Publius was later to be closely associated with Catiline, and it is possible that it was as fellow officers under his uncle that this association began.
In 81 BC, during the dictatorship of his uncle, Cicero records that Publius used what influence he had through his close familial connection to beg mercy for several of the proscribed, and was indeed successful in having them saved. Following the death of Lucius Cornelius Sulla in 78 BC, Publius likely inherited a portion of his estate.
Consulship scandal and First Catilinarian Conspiracy
Having presumably worked his way up the cursus honorum, achieving the pre-requisite offices of quaestor and praetor at an earlier date, in 66 BC Sulla stood for election to the consulship (to assume office in 65 BC). Sulla was elected consul by the unanimous vote of all the centuries and with Publius Autronius as his colleague. However, the two were not to enjoy their success for long as soon after the result had been declared Lucius Manlius Torquatus and Lucius Aurelius Cotta, who had both stood against Sulla in the election and lost, accused those who had defeated them of bribery. Impeached on this charge, Sulla and Autronius were tried, convicted and, under the Lex Acilia Calpurnia, deprived of their office and expelled from the Senate.
A second round of elections were held in which Torquatus and Cotta were successful, replacing those they had removed as the consuls-designate for 65 BC. It was now that the so-called First Catilinarian Conspiracy was allegedly hatched.
It is alleged by Sallust that Lucius Sergius Catiline, a friend of both Sulla and Autronius, attempted to stand in the second round of elections against Torquatus and Cotta but was prevented in doing so because he had only recently emerged from a trial for extortion and, although he had been acquitted, was not permitted to stand for any office until three weeks had elapsed. This was the second time Catiline had been denied his chance at the consulship, and, incensed, he formed a conspiracy along with the deposed Sulla and Autronius, as well as Gnaeus Piso, against Cotta and Torquatus. The plan was apparently no less than to murder the two new Consuls-Elect on the very day they were to assume office, 1 January 65 BC, and to seize the government and Consulship for themselves. The preparations of the conspirators were however detected and they first postponed their planned coup to February, before abandoning it all together; the conspiracy therefore coming to naught.
There is much doubt as to whether the First Catilinarian Conspiracy ever took place at all, and that it was instead later invented to blacken Catiline further following the Second Catilinarian Conspiracy. Or, an alternative view is that Catiline himself was not involved, but Sulla and Autronius on their own plotted the assassination of their rivals. In any case, no attempt was made on the lives of Cotta or Torquatus and the two assumed the consulship which had, for the briefest of moments, been Sulla's.
Implication in the Second Catilinarian Conspiracy
Following the disgrace of his conviction and expulsion from the Senate, Sulla's political career and reputation was completely destroyed and he could play no further part in public life. Humiliated and impoverished, it would be understandable if Sulla did indeed join the disreputable circle of desperate and dissolute nobles gathering around Catiline, as he reputedly did. These men were hungry for the rightful power they thought they were being denied and thus formed the Second Catilinarian Conspiracy.
Both Sulla and his brother, Servius, as well as his former colleague Autronius, were implicated in the conspiracy but, if they were really involved we cannot know. In 62, following the failure of the Conspiracy in late 63 and Catiline's death in January 62, Sulla was accused of complicity in the Conspiracy by the son of the man who had stolen his consulship, another Lucius Manlius Torquatus, and put on trial. But, having Marcus Tullius Cicero and Quintus Hortensius, the two greatest orators of their time leading his defence, Sulla was acquitted. This was the occasion for Cicero delivering his Pro Sulla speech. Neither Sulla's brother, Servius, or Autronius were so fortunate, as Cicero believed them both to be guilty and refused their similar requests for defence.
Career in Caesar's Civil War
In 49 BC, when Julius Caesar crossed the Rubicon and ignited civil war, Sulla chose to support him, unlike his cousin Faustus Sulla who joined the Senatorial Faction. Given a command in the Caesarian army, Sulla accompanied him on his campaign in Greece against Pompey. At Dyrrachium, Sulla was left in charge of Caesar's camp and successfully repulsed a Pompeian attack which broke through the fortifications while the main bulk of the army was elsewhere fighting with Caesar. Upon driving the Pompeians back, Sulla determined not to pursue and instead withdrew back to the camp. Caesar remarks in his commentaries that if Sulla had instead pursued the fleeing enemy and followed up on his victory the entire Civil War might have been ended on that day, however he does not blame Sulla's cautious conduct and his decision to stay in the camp which it was his responsibility to protect.
His reputation no doubt somewhat recovered from the disgrace of 66 BC by his success in the civil war, Publius Cornelius Sulla died in 45 BC.
- Cassius Dio, 36.42.3
- Sallust, Conspiracy of Catiline, 17.
- Cassius Dio, 36.42.3
- Cicero, Pro Sulla, 26.
- Cicero, Pro Sulla, 32.
- Cassius Dio, 36.44.3
- Sallust, 18.2
- Cassius Dio, 36.44.3
- Sallust, Conspiracy of Catiline, 18.
- Cicero, Pro Sulla
- Cicero, Pro Sulla, 2.
- Caesar, Civil War, 3.51
- Caesar, Civil War, 3.51.
- Caesar, Civil War, 3.89
This article needs additional citations for verification. (November 2014) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)