Purushamedha

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Purushamedha (or, 'Naramedha') is a Śrauta ritual of human sacrifice, closely related to the Ashvamedha.[1] The Vajasaneyi Samhita-Sataphana Brahmana-Katyayana Srauta Sutra sequence of White Yajur Veda texts contains the most details.[1] Whether actual human sacrifice was taking place has been debated since Colebrooke brought the issue under attention in 1805. He regarded it as a symbolic ritual.[2] Since there is no inscriptural or other record of Purushamedha ever being performed, some scholars suggest it was invented simply to round out sacrificial possibilities.[1] Asko Parpola suggests actual human sacrifices are described in Vedic texts, while the Brahmanas show the practice diminishing.[3] In Shatapatha Brahmana 13.6.2, an ethereal voice intervenes to halt the proceedings.[1] The dhatupatha of Aṣṭādhyāyī by Pāṇini defines the root medha as synergizing the energy to perform something fruitfull. Naramedha simply means dedicating life for a spiritual or social cause.

Historical development[edit]

During the Vedic period[edit]

Scholars doubt the Purushamedha was ever performed.[1][note 1][4] According to Jan Houben, the actual occurrence of human sacrifice would be difficult to prove, since the relevant pieces of evidence would be small in number.[5]

Rise of Sramanic religions[edit]

According to Jan Houben, the early Vedic period was followed by a period of embarrassment about violence in rituals. This period corresponds to the rise of Sramanic religions such as Buddhism and Jainism, both of which place emphasis on non-violence (ahimsa). This period also corresponds to the composition of the Shatapatha Brahmana, which states that the victims of a Purushamedha are supposed to be released, and the composition of the Chandogya Upanishad, which lists non-violence as a virtue.[5][6]

Mimamsa movement[edit]

According to Jan Houben, the Sramanic period was followed by another period where Vedic ritualists tried to defend their actions against Buddhist and Jain criticism. This period corresponds to the rise of the Mimamsa school of philosophy, which claimed that the Vedas were the sole authority regarding matters of dharma. This movement culminated in the 7th century CE with the writings of Kumarila Bhatta and Prabhakara.[5]

Medieval period[edit]

By the 10th century, the Purushamedha was included in lists of Kali-varjyas, or actions which were prohibited for the Kali Yuga. This suggests that human sacrifice had become obsolete by the time the texts were composed. However, it also suggests that the Purushamedha may have in some cases consummated with the actual sacrificing of a human. That is, the existence of inclusion of the prohibition in the list of Kali-varjyas demonstrates that at least one author seriously feared the possibility that a ritual practitioner might take the description of the ritual as a moral license to perform the rite to the extent of murder and cannibalism. This is a plausible reason to include it in the list of Kali-varjyas, even if it was a purely symbolic ceremony during the period of the composition of the Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa.[5] Whether or not the rite ever consummated in the slaughter of a human and the consumption of their flesh, however, remains so far a matter of scholarly speculation.

Performance in Hindu epics[edit]

The Aitareya Brahmana tells the story of a sacrifice carried out by King Harischandra. The childless king asked Varuna to provide him with a son, and in return, Varuna asks him to sacrifice the child to him. Harischandra delays the performance of the sacrifice and allows his son, named Rohita, to grow older. Eventually, Rohita wanders into the forest to find a substitute for himself. He comes across a poor Brahmin named Ajigarta, who sells his son Sunahsepa to him. Sunahsepa is bound to the stake, but he frees himself by reciting some mantras that were taught to him by Vishvamitra.[7] This story is reproduced in the Bhagavata Purana.[8]

In Vedanta and the Puranas[edit]

Human sacrifice and cannibalism are explicitly condemned in the Bhagavata Purana (5.26.31). The Chandogya Upanishad (3.16) states that the Purushamedha is actually a metaphor for life itself, and it compares the various stages of life to the oblations that are offered. Meanwhile, the Brahmanda Purana tells a story where "mahamamsa", literally meaning "great flesh", used for the term human flesh was used in the story of Lalita-Mahutmya. "We shall prepare the sacrificial fire in accordance with the injunction of a Mahayaga. O Suras, We shall worship the greatest Shakti by means of Mahamamsa." [9]

Views[edit]

Helmer Ringgren regarded that the traces of Purushameda are not clearly detectable.[10]

Dayananda Saraswati, founder of Arya Samaj has rejected any kind of human or animal sacrifice in vedik yagyas.

In November 2000, a modern version of Purushamedha was organised by All World Gayatri Pariwar at Shantikunj Haridwar marking completion of 12 year Yugsandhi Mahapurascharana. In this program, named as Srijan Sankalp Vibhuti Mahayagya, participants had to tie themselves with Yup and take an oath to spend their life for social cause as a sacrifice.[11] Yagya was performed on 1551 kundas on the bank of holy Ganges and was attended by four million devotees.

See also[edit]

Historical Vedic religion

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ pg. 237 "There is no inscriptional or other record that a purusamedha was ever performed, leading some scholars to suggest it was simply invented to round out sacrificial possibilities."

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d e Knipe 2015, p. 237.
  2. ^ Parpola (2007) p. 159
  3. ^ I therefore discuss first a few important textual references and their interpretation, hoping to establish beyond reasonable doubt that Vedic texts do indeed attest to real human sacrifices performed within the memory preserved by the authors, and that by the time of the Brahmana texts, the actual practice of bloody offering had already begun to diminish. Parpola (2007) p. 161
  4. ^ Oliver Leaman (2006), Encyclopedia of Asian Philosophy, Routledge, ISBN 978-0415172813, page 557, Quote: "It should be mentioned that although provision is made for human sacrifice (purusha-medha) this was purely symbolic and did not involve harm to anyone".
  5. ^ a b c d Violence Denied: Violence, Non-Violence, and the Rationalization of Violence in South Asian Cultural History. pp. 120–124, 133, 153. 
  6. ^ Chandogya Upanishad, 3.17.4
  7. ^ Parpola (2007) pp. 161–164
  8. ^ Bhagavata Purana, Canto 9, Chapter 7
  9. ^ Brahmanda Purana, Section IV, Section 12, Verse 66
  10. ^ "Paths to the Divine: Ancient and Indian", by Vensus A. George, p. 169, ISBN 9781565182486
  11. ^ Akhand Jyoti. Akhand Jyoti Sansthan, Mathura. 64 (1): 59–62. January 2001.  Missing or empty |title= (help)

Sources[edit]

Printed sources[edit]

  • Knipe, David M. (2015), Vedic Voices: Intimate Narratives of a Living Andhra Tradition, Oxford: Oxford University Press 
  • Parpola, A. 'Human Sacrifice in India in Vedic Times and Before' in Bremmer, J.N. (2007): The Strange World of Human Sacrifice, Peeters

Web sources[edit]