Pygmalion and Galatea (1898 film)
|Pygmalion and Galatea|
|Directed by||Georges Méliès|
|20 meters/65 feet|
The sculptor Pygmalion, completing his statue of Galatea, is madly in love with it. To his delight, Galatea comes to life. When he tries to embrace her, however, she magically changes place; then her upper and lower halves come apart, much to Pygmalion's confusion. Galatea's halves join back together again, but just as he is about to kiss her at last, she steps back onto her pedestal and becomes a statue again.
The Pygmalion myth had long been popular with theatrical illusionists. Pygmalion and Galatea was the first film adaptation of the story; many others followed it in the silent era and beyond. Méliès and Jehanne d'Alcy play the roles of Pygmalion and Galatea in the film.
Ideas from the myth returned in later films by Méliès, including The Brahmin and the Butterfly (1901), in which the woman's power and freedom of choice are emphasized, and which Jennifer Forrest summarized as "a Pygmalion and Galatea scenario gone wrong"; The Drawing Lesson, or the Living Statue (1903), in which a mischievous magician creates an equally mischievous Galatea to bewilder a drawing instructor; and Ten Ladies in One Umbrella (1903), in which a Pygmalion-like Méliès conjures up women in front of a sign labeled "Galathea Theater".
Release and survival
François de la Bretèque described the film as "a metaphor on the image-maker, in other words the film-maker: the one who tries to give life to the simulacra engendered by his imagination". Allison de Fren highlighted the implicit drama between the on-screen artist (played by Méliès) attempting to create a permanent work of art, and the off-screen filmmaker (also Méliès) playing magical tricks on him: "Even Pygmalion, that rare soul whose encounter with a living statue ends happily, is in Méliès's reinterpretation confronted with a Galatea who refuses to be contained."
Gaby Wood called Pygmalion and Galatea "a perfect metaphor for the magic of moving film. Everything that was wrapped up in the medium's early days is there: the desires, the fears, the superstitions, the power and the hysterical zaniness of its first jagged steps."
- Hammond, Paul (1974). Marvellous Méliès. London: Gordon Fraser. p. 138. ISBN 0900406380.
- Mattelart, Armand (1996). The Invention of Communication. University of Minnesota Press. p. 5. ISBN 9780816626977.
- Frazer, John (1979), Artificially Arranged Scenes: The Films of Georges Méliès, Boston: G. K. Hall & Co., p. 87, ISBN 0-8161-8368-6
- Winkler, Martin M. (2014), "Ovid and the Cinema: An Introduction", in Miller, John F.; Newlands, Carole E. (eds.), A Handbook to the Reception of Ovid, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, p. 471
- de Fren, Allison (2014), "The Anatomical Gaze in Tomorrow's Eve", in Evans, Arthur B. (ed.), Vintage Visions: Essays on Early Science Fiction, Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, p. 127
- Forrest, Jennifer (2002), "Aerial Misses and Spectating Messieurs: The Paradox of the Lady Acrobat in the French Fin de Siècle", in Raser, Timothy Bell (ed.), Peripheries of Nineteenth-Century French Studies: Views from the Edge, Newark: University of Delaware Press, pp. 149–50
- Ezra, Elizabeth (2013), "Becoming Women: Cinema, Gender and Technology", in Holmes, Diana; Tarr, Carrie (eds.), A "Belle Epoque"? Women and Feminism in French Society and Culture, 1890–1914, New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 131–2
- Frazer 1979, p. 124
- Stoichita, Victor I. (2008), The Pygmalion Effect: From Ovid to Hitchcock, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, p. 237
- de Fren 2014, p. 153
- James, Paula (2011), Ovid's Myth of Pygmalion on Screen: In Pursuit of the Perfect Woman, London: Continuum International, p. 197