A quad antenna is a type of directional wire radio antenna used on the HF and VHF bands. Like a Yagi-Uda antenna ("Yagi"), a quad consists of a driven element and parasitic elements; however in a quad, each of these elements takes the form of a loop of wire, which may be square, round, or some other shape. It is used by radio amateurs on the HF and VHF amateur bands.
- 1 History
- 2 Advantages over a Yagi-Uda
- 3 Disadvantages compared to other antennas
- 4 The E-Z-O variation
- 5 References
- 6 External links
The quad antenna is a development of several inventions.
In 1924, Moses Jacobson patented a loop antennas with rhombic shape.
In 1938, George Brown et al. patented a loop antenna with rhombic shape and quarterwave sides.
In 1951 Clarence C. Moore, W9LZX, a Christian Missionary and engineer at HCJB (a shortwave missionary radio station high in the Andean Mountains) developed and patented a two-turn loop antenna that he called a "quad". He developed this antenna to resolve issues caused by large coronal discharges while using a beam antenna in the thin air of higher altitudes. Moore describes his antenna as "a pulled-open folded dipole". While the main point of Moore's patent was the two turn single loop design which is not the antenna termed "quad" today, the patent does include a mention and illustration of a two element unidirectional "quad", and describes the time when the full wave loop concept was developed:
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a loop antenna having an even number of turns of a length of one or more wave lengths around each turn in which substantially no voltage components are present and the only voltage existing is that due to the impedance between the adjacent loops.
We took about one hundred pounds of engineering reference books with us on our short vacation to Posoraja, Ecuador during the summer of 1942, determined that with the help of God we could solve our problem. There on the floor of our bamboo cottage we spread open all the reference books we had brought with us and worked for hours on basic antenna design. Our prayers must have been answered, for gradually as we worked the vision of a quad-shaped antenna gradually grew with the new concept of a loop antenna having no ends to the elements, and combining relatively high transmitting impedance and high gain.
Moore's design eliminated interference from coronal discharge. "End effect", which is inherent with the Yagi, is absent in a quad because its elements have no ends. But other advantages appeared. The higher impedance mentioned in the quote above translates to lower current and thus lower loss on the transmission lines, and gain is higher than that of a Yagi.
In 1957 James Sherriff McCaig patented what we know as a "cubical" (two-element) multi-band quad antenna.
In 1969 Werner Boldt invented the DJ4VM quad.
In 1971 Hans F. Ruckert invented the "Mono-Loop Tri-Band Cubical Quad" .
Advantages over a Yagi-Uda
It is easy to change polarization from vertical to horizontal.
It is easier to build a multiband quad antenna, than a multiband Yagi antenna.
The 2-element quad has almost the same gain as a 3-element Yagi: about 7.5 dB over a dipole. Likewise, a 3-element quad has more gain than a 3-element Yagi. However, adding quad elements produces diminishing returns. Quoting from William Orr, "Whereas parasitic beams having twenty or thirty parasitic directors are efficient, high gain antennas, it would seem ... that maximum practical number of parasitic loop elements for the quad array is limited to four or five." (Orr, p. 48)
Radiation resistance is affected by antenna height above ground, element spacing, and environmental conditions. However, values will be higher than for a Yagi and more closely matched to a 50 Ohm coaxial feed.
Lower boom height
"A two-element, three-band quad, with elements mounted only 35 feet above ground, will give good performance in situations where a triband Yagi will not."
William Orr's book shows a 10-15-20 meter, 2-element Quad with boom length of 6′10″.
Interaction between antennas of a multiband quad are quite low, even when fed with a single feed line. (Orr, 1959, pg. 63)
Lower radiation angle
According to K0SR the claim that quads "open the band earlier", which suggests that they exhibit a lower angle of radiation than Yagis, has persisted for 50 years in spite of the fact that computer models disagree. He posits that the vertical sides of each element actually radiate the low angle component.
Disadvantages compared to other antennas
If tuned for maximum gain, the bandwidth for a 3-element quad antenna is limited: Deviation from the design frequency will unbalance the near-resonance condition of the parasitic elements. However, lengthening the director elements, thereby sacrificing approximately 1 dB gain, allows for much broader bandwidth.
A quad is a 3 dimensional antenna so maintenance can be difficult. Even with a tilt over tower, tall ladders or a bucket truck may be needed. There are devices that will allow the tilting of the tower to the ground to work on a cubical quad antenna, rotator, or tower. It works by letting the quad loops swivel out of the way. When the tower is in the operational position the elements are locked into position (the locking mechanism is powered by gravity).
The E-Z-O variation
In 2008, Daniel Mills, N8PPQ, designed an antenna that may be an improvement over the quad design. His E-Z-O antenna uses flexible dielectric tubes rather than rigid poles to support the electrical elements. He claims slightly higher gain over the quad due to its roughly circular form.
The magnitude of the dielectric effect on the outside band elements was surprising. Experimentation was required to establish optimum element lengths. Referencing literature was not to be found. As reported at http://www.eryptick.net/unisold/antennexarticles/diecon.htm, "As far as we are aware, there has been no reported work on encasing loop antennas in dielectric."
- U.S. Patent 1747008, Antenna. http://www.google.com/patents/US1747008
- U.S. Patent 2207781, Ultra high frequency antenna. http://www.google.com/patents/US2207781
- U.S. Patent 2537191. http://www.google.com/patents/US2537191
- GB Patent 850974 Improvements relating to composite aerials. http://www.puertobalsillas.com/radio/GB850974A.pdf GB850974A
- Swiss Patent 384644, Vollgespeiste Richtantenne für Kurz- und Ultrakurzwellen. http://www.puertobalsillas.com/radio/384644.pdf 384644
- Die Swiss-Quad-Antenne DL-QTC, 1963/10, page 454.
- Ham Radio August 1969 page 41-46
- CQ, Januari, 1971,page 41-43.
- Orr, William I, & Stuart D. Cowan. (1959). All About Cubical Quad Antennas. Radio Publications. ISBN 0-933616-03-1, ISBN 978-0-933616-03-5, LCCN 82080282.
- ARRL. The ARRL Antenna Book. 17th edition, Chapter 12, p. 12-1 to 12-13.
- Orr, William I. (1996). The W6SAI HF Antenna Handbook. ISBN 978-0-943016-15-3.
- ARRL. (Jan/Feb 2008). National Contest Journal. p. 5.
- Antenas Cúbicas Quad antennas page info by EA1DDO, in Spanish.
- Quad Antenna Gallery Large Quad Antenna gallery with +300 photos.
- N8PPQ N8PPQ's circular quad antenna.
- N6ACH N6ACH quad antenna calculator.
- Cubical quad tutorial