Suppose that Xt is a real-valued stochastic process defined on a probability space and with time index t ranging over the non-negative real numbers. Its quadratic variation is the process, written as [X]t, defined as
where P ranges over partitions of the interval [0,t] and the norm of the partition P is the mesh. This limit, if it exists, is defined using convergence in probability. Note that a process may be of finite quadratic variation in the sense of the definition given here and its paths be nonetheless almost surely of infinite 2-variation for every t>0 in the classical sense of taking the supremum of the sum over all partitions; this is in particular the case for Brownian Motion.
More generally, the covariation (or cross-variance) of two processes X and Y is
The covariation may be written in terms of the quadratic variation by the polarization identity:
Finite variation processes
A process X is said to have finite variation if it has bounded variation over every finite time interval (with probability 1). Such processes are very common including, in particular, all continuously differentiable functions. The quadratic variation exists for all continuous finite variation processes, and is zero.
This statement can be generalized to non-continuous processes. Any càdlàg finite variation process X has quadratic variation equal to the sum of the squares of the jumps of X. To state this more precisely, the left limit of Xt with respect to t is denoted by Xt-, and the jump of X at time t can be written as ΔXt = Xt - Xt-. Then, the quadratic variation is given by
The proof that continuous finite variation processes have zero quadratic variation follows from the following inequality. Here, P is a partition of the interval [0,t], and Vt(X) is the variation of X over [0,t].
By the continuity of X, this vanishes in the limit as goes to zero.
where B is a Brownian motion. Any such process has quadratic variation given by
Quadratic variations and covariations of all semimartingales can be shown to exist. They form an important part of the theory of stochastic calculus, appearing in Itô's lemma, which is the generalization of the chain rule to the Itô integral. The quadratic covariation also appears in the integration by parts formula
which can be used to compute [X,Y].
Alternatively this can be written as a Stochastic Differential Equation:
All càdlàg martingales, and local martingales have well defined quadratic variation, which follows from the fact that such processes are examples of semimartingales. It can be shown that the quadratic variation [M] of a general locally square integrable martingale M is the unique right-continuous and increasing process starting at zero, with jumps Δ[M] = ΔM2, and such that M2 − [M] is a local martingale. A proof of existence of [M] (without using stochastic calculus) is given in Karandikar–Rao (2014).
This result holds whenever M is a càdlàg square integrable martingale and H is a bounded predictable process, and is often used in the construction of the Itô integral.
Another important result is the Burkholder–Davis–Gundy inequality. This gives bounds for the maximum of a martingale in terms of the quadratic variation. For a local martingale M starting at zero, with maximum denoted by Mt* ≡ sups≤ t|Ms|, and any real number p ≥ 1, the inequality is
Here, cp < Cp are constants depending on the choice of p, but not depending on the martingale M or time t used. If M is a continuous local martingale, then the Burkholder–Davis–Gundy inequality holds for any p > 0.
An alternative process, the predictable quadratic variation is sometimes used for locally square integrable martingales. This is written as <M>t, and is defined to be the unique right-continuous and increasing predictable process starting at zero such that M2 − <M> is a local martingale. Its existence follows from the Doob–Meyer decomposition theorem and, for continuous local martingales, it is the same as the quadratic variation.