Quality assurance (QA) is a way of preventing mistakes and defects in manufactured products and avoiding problems when delivering products or services to customers; which ISO 9000 defines as "part of quality management focused on providing confidence that quality requirements will be fulfilled". This defect prevention in quality assurance differs subtly from defect detection and rejection in quality control and has been referred to as a shift left since it focuses on quality earlier in the process (i.e., to the left of a linear process diagram reading left to right).
The terms "quality assurance" and "quality control" are often used interchangeably to refer to ways of ensuring the quality of a service or product. For instance, the term "assurance" is often used as follows: Implementation of inspection and structured testing as a measure of quality assurance in a television set software project at Philips Semiconductors is described. The term "control", however, is used to describe the fifth phase of the Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control (DMAIC) model. DMAIC is a data-driven quality strategy used to improve processes.
Quality assurance comprises administrative and procedural activities implemented in a quality system so that requirements and goals for a product, service or activity will be fulfilled. It is the systematic measurement, comparison with a standard, monitoring of processes and an associated feedback loop that confers error prevention. This can be contrasted with quality control, which is focused on process output.
Quality assurance includes two principles: "Fit for purpose" (the product should be suitable for the intended purpose); and "right first time" (mistakes should be eliminated). QA includes management of the quality of raw materials, assemblies, products and components, services related to production, and management, production and inspection processes. The two principles also manifest before the background of developing (engineering) a novel technical product: The task of engineering is to make it work once, while the task of quality assurance is to make it work all the time.
Historically, defining what suitable product or service quality means has been a more difficult process, determined in many ways, from the subjective user-based approach that contains "the different weights that individuals normally attach to quality characteristics," to the value-based approach which finds consumers linking quality to price and making overall conclusions of quality based on such a relationship.
Initial efforts to control the quality of production
Royal governments purchasing material were interested in quality control as customers. For this reason, King John of England appointed William de Wrotham to report about the construction and repair of ships. Centuries later, Samuel Pepys, Secretary to the British Admiralty, appointed multiple such overseers to standardize sea rations and naval training.
Prior to the extensive division of labor and mechanization resulting from the Industrial Revolution, it was possible for workers to control the quality of their own products. The Industrial Revolution led to a system in which large groups of people performing a specialized type of work were grouped together under the supervision of a foreman who was appointed to control the quality of work manufactured.
During the time of the First World War, manufacturing processes typically became more complex, with larger numbers of workers being supervised. This period saw the widespread introduction of mass production and piece work, which created problems as workmen could now earn more money by the production of extra products, which in turn occasionally led to poor quality workmanship being passed on to the assembly lines. Pioneers such as Frederick Winslow Taylor and Henry Ford recognized the limitations of the methods being used in mass production at the time and the subsequent varying quality of output. Taylor, utilizing the concept of scientific management, helped separate production tasks into many simple steps (the assembly line) and limited quality control to a few specific individuals, limiting complexity. Ford emphasized standardization of design and component standards to ensure a standard product was produced, while quality was the responsibility of machine inspectors, "placed in each department to cover all operations ... at frequent intervals, so that no faulty operation shall proceed for any great length of time."
Out of this also came statistical process control (SPC), which was pioneered by Walter A. Shewhart at Bell Laboratories in the early 1920s. Shewhart developed the control chart in 1924 and the concept of a state of statistical control. Statistical control is equivalent to the concept of exchangeability developed by logician William Ernest Johnson, also in 1924, in his book Logic, Part III: The Logical Foundations of Science. Along with a team at AT&T that included Harold Dodge and Harry Romig, he worked to put sampling inspection on a rational statistical basis as well. Shewhart consulted with Colonel Leslie E. Simon in the application of control charts to munitions manufacture at the Army's Picatinny Arsenal in 1934. That successful application helped convince Army Ordnance to engage AT&T's George Edwards to consult on the use of statistical quality control among its divisions and contractors at the outbreak of World War II.
After World War II, many countries' manufacturing capabilities that had been destroyed during the war were rebuilt. General Douglas MacArthur oversaw the rebuilding of Japan. He involved two key people in the development of modern quality concepts: W. Edwards Deming and Joseph Juran. They and others promoted the collaborative concepts of quality to Japanese business and technical groups, and these groups used these concepts in the redevelopment of the Japanese economy.
Although there were many people trying to lead United States industries toward a more comprehensive approach to quality, the US continued to apply the Quality Control (QC) concepts of inspection and sampling to remove defective products from production lines, essentially unaware of or ignoring advances in QA for decades.
It is valuable to failure test or stress test a complete consumer product. In mechanical terms this is the operation of a product until it fails, often under stresses such as increasing vibration, temperature, and humidity. This may expose many unanticipated weaknesses in the product, and the data is used to drive engineering and manufacturing process improvements. Often quite simple changes can dramatically improve product service, such as changing to mold-resistant paint or adding lock-washer placement to the training for new assembly personnel.
Statistical control is based on analyses of objective and subjective data. Many organizations use statistical process control as a tool in any quality improvement effort to track quality data. Product quality data is statistically charted to distinguish between common cause variation or special cause variation.
Walter Shewart of Bell Telephone Laboratories recognized that when a product is made, data can be taken from scrutinized areas of a sample lot of the part and statistical variances are then analyzed and charted. Control can then be implemented on the part in the form of rework or scrap, or control can be implemented on the process that made the part, ideally eliminating the defect before more parts can be made like it.
Total quality management
The quality of products is dependent upon that of the participating constituents, some of which are sustainable and effectively controlled while others are not. The process(es) which are managed with QA pertain to Total quality management.
If the specification does not reflect the true quality requirements, the product's quality cannot be guaranteed. For instance, the parameters for a pressure vessel should cover not only the material and dimensions but operating, environmental, safety, reliability and maintainability requirements.
Models and standards
ISO 17025 is an international standard that specifies the general requirements for the competence to carry out tests and or calibrations. There are 15 management requirements and 10 technical requirements. These requirements outline what a laboratory must do to become accredited. Management system refers to the organization's structure for managing its processes or activities that transform inputs of resources into a product or service which meets the organization's objectives, such as satisfying the customer's quality requirements, complying with regulations, or meeting environmental objectives. WHO has developed several tools and offers training courses for quality assurance in public health laboratories.
The Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) model is widely used to implement Process and Product Quality Assurance (PPQA) in an organization. The CMMI maturity levels can be divided into 5 steps, which a company can achieve by performing specific activities within the organization.
During the 1980s, the concept of "company quality" with the focus on management and people came to the fore in the U.S. It was considered that, if all departments approached quality with an open mind, success was possible if management led the quality improvement process.
The company-wide quality approach places an emphasis on four aspects (enshrined in standards such as ISO 9001):
- Elements such as controls, job management, adequate processes, performance and integrity criteria, and identification of records
- Competence such as knowledge, skills, experiences, qualifications
- Soft elements, such as personnel integrity, confidence, organizational culture, motivation, team spirit and quality relationships
- Infrastructure (as it enhances or limits functionality)
The quality of the outputs is at risk if any of these aspects is deficient.
The importance of actually measuring Quality Culture throughout the organization is illustrated by a survey that was done by Forbes Insights in partnership with the American Society for Quality. 75% of senior or C-suite titles believed that their organization exhibits “a comprehensive, group-wide culture of quality.” But agreement with that response dropped to less than half among those with quality job titles. In other words, the further from the C-suite, the less favorable the view of the culture of quality. A survey of more than 60 multinational companies found that those companies whose employees rated as having a low quality culture had increased costs of $67 million/year for every 5000 employees compared to those rated as having a high quality culture.
QA is not limited to manufacturing, and can be applied to any business or non-business activity, including: design, consulting, banking, insurance, computer software development, retailing, investment, transportation, education, and translation.
It comprises a quality improvement process, which is generic in the sense that it can be applied to any of these activities and it establishes a quality culture, which supports the achievement of quality.
In manufacturing and construction activities, these business practices can be equated to the models for quality assurance defined by the International Standards contained in the ISO 9000 series and the specified specifications for quality systems.
In the system of Company Quality, the work being carried out was shop floor inspection which did not reveal the major quality problems. This led to quality assurance or total quality control, which has come into being recently.
QA is very important in the medical field because it helps to identify the standards of medical equipment and services. Hospitals and laboratories make use of external agencies in order to ensure standards for equipment such as X-ray machines, Diagnostic Radiology and AERB. QA is particularly applicable throughout the development and introduction of new medicines and medical devices. The Research Quality Association (RQA) supports and promotes the quality of research in life sciences, through its members and regulatory bodies.
The term product assurance (PA) is often used instead of quality assurance and is, alongside project management and engineering, one of the three primary project functions. Quality assurance is seen as one part of product assurance. Due to the sometimes catastrophic consequences a single failure can have for human lives, the environment, a device, or a mission, product assurance plays a particularly important role here. It has organizational, budgetary and product developmental independence meaning that it reports to highest management only, has its own budget, and does not expend labor to help build a product. Product assurance stands on an equal footing with project management but embraces the customer's point of view.
Software quality assurance refers to monitoring the software engineering processes and methods used to ensure quality. Various methods or frameworks are employed for this, such as ensuring conformance to one or more standards, e.g. ISO 25010 (which supersede ISO/IEC 9126) or process models such as CMMI, or SPICE. In addition, enterprise quality management software is used to correct issues such as supply chain disaggregation and to ensure regulatory compliance; these are vital for medical device manufacturers.
Using contractors or consultants
Consultants and contractors are sometimes employed when introducing new quality practices and methods, particularly where the relevant skills and expertise and resources are not available within the organization. Consultants and contractors will often employ Quality Management Systems (QMS), auditing and procedural documentation writing CMMI, Six Sigma, Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA), Quality Function Deployment (QFD), Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), and Advance Product Quality Planning (APQP).
- Best practice
- Data quality
- Data integrity
- Farm assurance
- GxP, a general term for Good Practice quality guidelines and regulations
- Mission assurance
- Production assurance
- Program assurance
- Quality engineering
- Quality management
- Quality management system
- Ringtest, part of a quality assurance program in which identical samples are analyzed by different laboratories
- Software testing
- Verification and validation
- ISO 9000:2005, Clause 3.2.11
- Larry, Smith (2001). "Shift-Left Testing".
- "Quality Assurance vs Quality Control – Learning Resources – ASQ".
- "ASQ – Practical Quality Assurance for Embedded Software".
- "Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control (DMAIC Approach) – ASQ".
- The Marketing Accountability Standards Board (MASB) endorses this definition as part of its ongoing Common Language in Marketing Project.
- "Quality Assurance vs Quality Control: Definitions & Differences | ASQ". asq.org. Retrieved 2020-11-21.
- Stebbing, L. (1993). Quality Assurance: The Route to Efficiency and Competitiveness (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall. p. 300. ISBN 978-0-13-334559-9.
- Prause, Christian; Bibus, Markus; Dietrich, Carsten; Jobi, Wolfgang (2016). "Software Product Assurance at the German Space Agency". Journal of Software: Evolution and Process. 28 (9): 744–761. doi:10.1002/smr.1779.
- Garvin, D.A. (15 October 1984). "What Does "Product Quality" Really Mean?". MIT Sloan Management Review. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved 29 November 2017.
- ASQ – History of Quality. Retrieved 17 November 2014
- Brooks, F.W. (1925). "William de Wrotham and the Office of Keeper of the King's Ports and Galleys". The English Historical Review. 40 (160): 570–579. doi:10.1093/ehr/XL.CLX.570.
- "Samuel Pepys and the Navy". Royal Museums Greenwich. 2015-08-17. Retrieved 29 November 2017.
- Papp, J. (2014). Quality Management in the Imaging Sciences. Elsevier Health Sciences. p. 372. ISBN 978-0-323-26199-9.
- Wood, J.C.; Wood, M.C., eds. (2003). Henry Ford: Critical Evaluations in Business and Management. 1. Taylor and Francis. p. 384. ISBN 978-0-415-24825-9.
- Barlow, R.E.; Irony, T.Z. (1992). "Foundations of statistical quality control". Current issues in statistical inference: Essays in honor of D. Basu. Institute of Mathematical Statistics Lecture Notes - Monograph Series. 17. pp. 99–112. doi:10.1214/lnms/1215458841. ISBN 978-0-940600-24-9.
- Bergman, B. (2008). "Conceptualistic Pragmatism: A framework for Bayesian analysis?". IIE Transactions. 41 (1): 86–93. doi:10.1080/07408170802322713. S2CID 119485220.
- Zabell, S.L. (1992). "Predicting the unpredictable". Synthese. 90 (2): 205–232. doi:10.1007/BF00485351. S2CID 9416747.
- "Leslie E. Simon 1924". West Point Association of Graduates. Retrieved 29 November 2017.
- Littauer, S.B. (1950). "The Development of Statistical Quality Control in the United States". The American Statistician. 4 (5): 14–20. doi:10.2307/2681449. JSTOR 2681449.
- Milakovich, M. (1995). Improving Service Quality: Achieving High Performance in the Public and Private Sectors. CRC Press. p. 280. ISBN 978-1-884015-45-8.
- "Total Quality". Learn About Quality. American Society for Quality. Retrieved 29 November 2017.
- Evans, James R. (1994) Introduction to Statistical Process Control Archived October 29, 2013, at the Wayback Machine, Fundamentals of Statistical Process Control, pp 1–13
- "journal_8.2.indd" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-04-14. Retrieved 2018-09-21.
- "Statistical Process Control & Process Control Tools – ASQ".
- Thareja, Mannu; Thareja, Priyavrat (February 2007). "The Quality Brilliance Through Brilliant People". Quality World. 4 (2). SSRN 1498550.
- "Quality tools and training". www.euro.who.int. 10 August 2018.
- Praxiom Research Group Limited (16 August 2017). "ISO 9001 Translated Into Plain English". Praxiom Research Group Limited. Retrieved 29 November 2017.
- Hacker, Stephen (2014). "Culture of Quality: Accelerating growth and Performance in the enterprise" (PDF). Forbes Insights. Retrieved 2020-12-26.
- "Creating a Culture of Quality". Harvard Business Review. 2014-04-01. ISSN 0017-8012. Retrieved 2021-01-17.
- Juran, Joseph M.; Godfrey, A. Blanton (1999). Juran's Quality Handbook. McGraw-Hill. p. 22.65. ISBN 007034003X.
- 14:00-17:00. "ISO 13485:2016". ISO. Retrieved 2020-12-26.CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
- "Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)". Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR). Retrieved 2020-12-26.
- "Managing Quality Across the Enterprise: Enterprise Quality Management Solution for Medical Device Companies". Sparta Systems. 2015-02-02.
- Quality Progress, ISSN 0033-524X American Society for Quality
- Quality Assurance in Education, ISSN 0968-4883, Emerald Publishing Group
- Accreditation and Quality Assurance, ISSN 0949-1775
- Food Quality and Preference, ISSN 0950-3293, an official journal of the Sensometric Society and the official journal of the European Sensory Science Society
- Asigurarea Calitatii, ISSN 1224-5410, Romanian Society for Quality Assurance (SRAC)
- Alvaro, Alexandre; De Almeida, Eduardo Santana; De Lemos Meira, Silvio Romero (2007). "A component quality assurance process". Fourth international workshop on Software quality assurance in conjunction with the 6th ESEC/FSE joint meeting – SOQUA '07. p. 94. doi:10.1145/1295074.1295093. ISBN 978-1-59593-724-7. S2CID 15232048.
- Feldman, Stuart (2005). "Quality assurance". Queue. 3: 26. doi:10.1145/1046931.1046943.
- Wagner, Stefan; Meisinger, Michael (2006). "Integrating a model of analytical quality assurance into the V-Modell XT". Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Software quality assurance – SOQUA '06. p. 38. arXiv:1611.01286. doi:10.1145/1188895.1188906. ISBN 978-1-59593-584-7. S2CID 5581699.
- Majcen N., Taylor P. (Editors): Practical examples on traceability, measurement uncertainty and validation in chemistry, Vol 1; ISBN 978-92-79-12021-3, 2010.
- Pyzdek, T, "Quality Engineering Handbook", 2003, ISBN 0-8247-4614-7
- Godfrey, A. B., "Juran's Quality Handbook", 1999, ISBN 0-07-034003-X
- Marselis, R. & Roodenrijs, E. "the PointZERO vision", 2012, ISBN 978-90-75414-55-4
- da Silva, R.B., Bulska, E., Godlewska-Zylkiewicz, B., Hedrich, M., Majcen, N., Magnusson, B., Marincic, S., Papadakis, I., Patriarca, M., Vassileva, E., Taylor, P., Analytical measurement: measurement uncertainty and statistics;ISBN 978-92-79-23070-7, 2012.