Doppler spectroscopy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Radial velocity method)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Diagram showing how a smaller object (such as an extrasolar planet) orbiting a larger object (such as a star) could produce changes in position and velocity of the latter as they orbit their common center of mass (red cross).
Doppler spectroscopy detects periodic shifts in radial velocity by recording variations in the color of light from the host star. When a star moves towards the Earth, its spectrum is blueshifted, while it is redshifted when it moves away from us. By analyzing these spectral shifts, astronomers can deduce the gravitational influence of extrasolar planets.

Doppler spectroscopy (also known as the radial-velocity method, or colloquially, the wobble method) is an indirect method for finding extrasolar planets and brown dwarfs from radial-velocity measurements via observation of Doppler shifts in the spectrum of the planet's parent star.

669 extrasolar planets (about 29.6% of the total) were discovered using Doppler spectroscopy, as of April 2016.[1]


Exoplanets discovered by year (as of February 2014). Those discovered using radial velocity are shown in black, whilst all other methods are in light grey.

Otto Struve proposed in 1952 the use of powerful spectrographs to detect distant planets. He described how a very large planet, as large as Jupiter, for example, would cause its parent star to wobble slightly as the two objects orbit around their center of mass.[2] He predicted that the small Doppler shifts to the light emitted by the star, caused by its continuously varying radial velocity, would be detectable by the most sensitive spectrographs as tiny redshifts and blueshifts in the star's emission. However, the technology of the time produced radial-velocity measurements with errors of 1,000 m/s or more, making them useless for the detection of orbiting planets.[3] The expected changes in radial velocity are very small – Jupiter causes the Sun to change velocity by about 12.4 m/s over a period of 12 years, and the Earth's effect is only 0.1 m/s over a period of 1 year – so long-term observations by instruments with a very high resolution are required.[3][4]

Advances in spectrometer technology and observational techniques in the 1980s and 1990s produced instruments capable of detecting the first of many new extrasolar planets. The ELODIE spectrograph, installed at the Haute-Provence Observatory in Southern France in 1993, could measure radial-velocity shifts as low as 7 m/s, low enough for an extraterrestrial observer to detect Jupiter's influence on the Sun.[5] Using this instrument, astronomers Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz identified 51 Pegasi b, a "Hot Jupiter" in the constellation Pegasus.[6] Although planets had previously been detected orbiting pulsars, 51 Pegasi b was the first planet ever found orbiting a main-sequence star, and the first detected using Doppler spectroscopy.

In November 1995, the scientists published their findings in the journal Nature; the paper has since been cited over 1,000 times. Since that date, over 700 exoplanet candidates have been identified, and most have been detected by Doppler search programs based at the Keck, Lick, and Anglo-Australian Observatories (respectively, the California, Carnegie and Anglo-Australian planet searches), and teams based at the Geneva Extrasolar Planet Search.[7]

Beginning in the early 2000s, a second generation of planet-hunting spectrographs permitted far more precise measurements. The HARPS spectrograph, installed at the La Silla Observatory in Chile in 2003, can identify radial-velocity shifts as small as 0.3 m/s, enough to locate many rocky, Earth-like planets.[8] A third generation of spectrographs is expected to come online in 2017. With measurement errors estimated below 0.1 m/s, these new instruments would allow an extraterrestrial observer to detect even Earth.[9]


Properties (mass and semimajor axis) of planets discovered through 2013 using radial velocity, compared (light gray) with planets discovered using other methods.

A series of observations is made of the spectrum of light emitted by a star. Periodic variations in the star's spectrum may be detected, with the wavelength of characteristic spectral lines in the spectrum increasing and decreasing regularly over a period of time. Statistical filters are then applied to the data set to cancel out spectrum effects from other sources. Using mathematical best-fit techniques, astronomers can isolate the tell-tale periodic sine wave that indicates a planet in orbit.[6]

If an extrasolar planet is detected, a minimum mass for the planet can be determined from the changes in the star's radial velocity. To find a more precise measure of the mass requires knowledge of the inclination of the planet's orbit. A graph of measured radial velocity versus time will give a characteristic curve (sine curve in the case of a circular orbit), and the amplitude of the curve will allow the minimum mass of the planet to be calculated using the binary mass function.

The Bayesian Kepler periodogram is a mathematical algorithm, used to detect single or multiple extrasolar planets from successive radial-velocity measurements of the star they are orbiting. It involves a Bayesian statistical analysis of the radial-velocity data, using a prior probability distribution over the space determined by one or more sets of Keplerian orbital parameters. This analysis may be implemented using the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method.

The method has been applied to the HD 208487 system, resulting in an apparent detection of a second planet with a period of approximately 1000 days. However, this may be an artifact of stellar activity.[10][11] The method is also applied to the HD 11964 system, where it found an apparent planet with a period of approximately 1 year. However, this planet was not found in re-reduced data,[12][13] suggesting that this detection was an artifact of the Earth's orbital motion around the Sun.[citation needed]

Although radial-velocity of the star only gives a planet's minimum mass, if the planet's spectral lines can be distinguished from the star's spectral lines then the radial-velocity of the planet itself can be found and this gives the inclination of the planet's orbit and therefore the planet's actual mass can be determined. The first non-transiting planet to have its mass found this way was Tau Boötis b in 2012 when carbon monoxide was detected in the infra-red part of the spectrum.[14]


Doppler Shift vs Time.jpg

The graph to the right illustrates the sine curve using Doppler spectroscopy to observe the radial velocity of an imaginary star which is being orbited by a planet in a circular orbit. Observations of a real star would produce a similar graph, although eccentricity in the orbit will distort the curve and complicate the calculations below.

This theoretical star's velocity shows a periodic variance of ±1 m/s, suggesting an orbiting mass that is creating a gravitational pull on this star. Using Kepler's third law of planetary motion, the observed period of the planet's orbit around the star (equal to the period of the observed variations in the star's spectrum) can be used to determine the planet's distance from the star () using the following equation:


  • r is the distance of the planet from the star
  • G is the gravitational constant
  • Mstar is the mass of the star
  • Pstar is the observed period of the star

Having determined , the velocity of the planet around the star can be calculated using Newton's law of gravitation, and the orbit equation:

where is the velocity of planet.

The mass of the planet can then be found from the calculated velocity of the planet:

where is the velocity of parent star. The observed Doppler velocity, , where i is the inclination of the planet's orbit to the line perpendicular to the line-of-sight.

Thus, assuming a value for the inclination of the planet's orbit and for the mass of the star, the observed changes in the radial velocity of the star can be used to calculate the mass of the extrasolar planet.

Radial-velocity comparison tables[edit]

Planet Mass Distance
Radial velocity
Jupiter 1 28.4 m/s
Jupiter 5 12.7 m/s
Neptune 0.1 4.8 m/s
Neptune 1 1.5 m/s
Super-Earth (5 M⊕) 0.1 1.4 m/s
Alpha Centauri Bb (1.13 ± 0.09 M⊕;) 0.04 0.51 m/s (1[15])note 1
Super-Earth (5 M⊕) 1 0.45 m/s
Earth 0.09 0.30 m/s
Earth 1 0.09 m/s

Ref:[16] Notice 1: Most precise vradial measurements ever recorded. ESO's HARPS spectrograph was used.[15]

note 1: unconfirmed and disputed

Planet Planet Type
Semimajor Axis
Orbital Period
Radial velocity
Detectable by:
51 Pegasi b Hot Jupiter 0.05 4.23 days 55.9[17] First-generation spectrograph
55 Cancri d Gas giant 5.77 14.29 years 45.2[18] First-generation spectrograph
Jupiter Gas giant 5.20 11.86 years 12.4[19] First-generation spectrograph
Gliese 581c Super-Earth 0.07 12.92 days 3.18[20] Second-generation spectrograph
Saturn Gas giant 9.58 29.46 years 2.75 Second-generation spectrograph
Alpha Centauri Bb; unconfirmed and disputed Terrestrial planet 0.04 3.23 days 0.510[21] Second-generation spectrograph
Neptune Ice giant 30.10 164.79 years 0.281 Third-generation spectrograph
Earth Habitable planet 1.00 365.26 days 0.089 Third-generation spectrograph (likely)
Pluto Dwarf planet 39.26 246.04 years 0.00003 Not detectable

For MK-type stars with planets in the habitable zone[edit]

Stellar mass
Planetary mass
0.10 1.0 8×104 M8 0.028 168 6
0.21 1.0 7.9×103 M5 0.089 65 21
0.47 1.0 6.3×102 M0 0.25 26 67
0.65 1.0 1.6×101 K5 0.40 18 115
0.78 2.0 4.0×101 K0 0.63 25 209


The major limitation with Doppler spectroscopy is that it can only measure movement along the line-of-sight, and so depends on a measurement (or estimate) of the inclination of the planet's orbit to determine the planet's mass. If the orbital plane of the planet happens to line up with the line-of-sight of the observer, then the measured variation in the star's radial velocity is the true value. However, if the orbital plane is tilted away from the line-of-sight, then the true effect of the planet on the motion of the star will be greater than the measured variation in the star's radial velocity, which is only the component along the line-of-sight. As a result, the planet's true mass will be greater than measured.

To correct for this effect, and so determine the true mass of an extrasolar planet, radial-velocity measurements can be combined with astrometric observations, which track the movement of the star across the plane of the sky, perpendicular to the line-of-sight. Astrometric measurements allows researchers to check whether objects that appear to be high mass planets are more likely to be brown dwarfs.[3]

A further disadvantage is that the gas envelope around certain types of stars can expand and contract, and some stars are variable. This method is unsuitable for finding planets around these types of stars, as changes in the stellar emission spectrum caused by the intrinsic variability of the star can swamp the small effect caused by a planet.

The method is best at detecting very massive objects close to the parent star — so-called "hot Jupiters" – which have the greatest gravitational effect on the parent star, and so cause the largest changes in its radial velocity. Hot Jupiters have the greatest gravitational effect on their host stars because they have relatively small orbits and large masses. Observation of many separate spectral lines and many orbital periods allows the signal to noise ratio of observations to be increased, increasing the chance of observing smaller and more distant planets, but planets like the Earth remain undetectable with current instruments.

Left: A representation of a star orbited by a planet. All the movement of the star is along the viewer's line-of-sight; Doppler spectroscopy will give a true value of the planet's mass.
Right: In this case none of the star's movement is along the viewer's line-of-sight and the Doppler spectroscopy method will not detect the planet at all.

See also[edit]


  1. ^ "Confirmed Planets". Retrieved 2016-04-22.
  2. ^ O. Struve (1952). "Proposal for a project of high-precision stellar radial velocity work". The Observatory. 72 (870): 199–200. Bibcode:1952Obs....72..199S.
  3. ^ a b c "Radial velocity method". The Internet Encyclopedia of Science. Retrieved 2007-04-27.
  4. ^ A. Wolszczan (Spring 2006). "Doppler spectroscopy and astrometry – Theory and practice of planetary orbit measurements" (PDF). ASTRO 497: "Astronomy of Extrasolar Planets" lectures notes. Penn State University. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-12-17. Retrieved 2009-04-19. External link in |website= (help)
  5. ^ "A user's guide to Elodie archive data products". Haute-Provence Observatory. May 2009. Retrieved 26 October 2012.
  6. ^ a b Mayor, Michel; Queloz, Didier (1995). "A Jupiter-mass companion to a solar-type star". Nature. 378 (6555): 355–359. Bibcode:1995Natur.378..355M. doi:10.1038/378355a0. ISSN 1476-4687. OCLC 01586310. (Subscription required (help)). Cite uses deprecated parameter |subscription= (help)
  7. ^ R.P. Butler; et al. (2006). "Catalog of Nearby Exoplanets" (PDF). Astrophysical Journal. 646 (2–3): 25–33. arXiv:astro-ph/0607493. Bibcode:2006ApJ...646..505B. doi:10.1086/504701. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-07-07.
  8. ^ Mayor; et al. (2003). "Setting New Standards With HARPS" (PDF). ESO Messenger. 114: 20.
  9. ^ "ESPRESSO - Searching for other Worlds". Centro de Astrofísica da Universidade do Porto. 2009-12-16. Archived from the original on 2010-10-17. Retrieved 2010-10-26.
  10. ^ P.C. Gregory (2007). "A Bayesian Kepler periodogram detects a second planet in HD 208487". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 374 (4): 1321–1333. arXiv:astro-ph/0609229. Bibcode:2007MNRAS.374.1321G. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11240.x.
  11. ^ Wright, J. T.; Marcy, G. W.; Fischer, D. A; Butler, R. P.; Vogt, S. S.; Tinney, C. G.; Jones, H. R. A.; Carter, B. D.; et al. (2007). "Four New Exoplanets and Hints of Additional Substellar Companions to Exoplanet Host Stars". The Astrophysical Journal. 657 (1): 533–545. arXiv:astro-ph/0611658. Bibcode:2007ApJ...657..533W. doi:10.1086/510553.
  12. ^ P.C. Gregory (2007). "A Bayesian periodogram finds evidence for three planets in HD 11964". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 381 (4): 1607–1616. arXiv:0709.0970. Bibcode:2007MNRAS.381.1607G. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12361.x.
  13. ^ Wright, J.T.; Upadhyay, S.; Marcy, G. W.; Fischer, D. A.; Ford, Eric B.; Johnson, John Asher (2009). "Ten New and Updated Multi-planet Systems, and a Survey of Exoplanetary Systems". The Astrophysical Journal. 693 (2): 1084–1099. arXiv:0812.1582. Bibcode:2009ApJ...693.1084W. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/693/2/1084.
  14. ^ Weighing The Non-Transiting Hot Jupiter Tau BOO b, Florian Rodler, Mercedes Lopez-Morales, Ignasi Ribas, 27 June 2012
  15. ^ a b "Planet Found in Nearest Star System to Earth". European Southern Observatory. 16 October 2012. Retrieved 17 October 2012.
  16. ^ a b "ESPRESSO and CODEX the next generation of RV planet hunters at ESO". Chinese Academy of Sciences. 2010-10-16. Archived from the original on 2011-07-04. Retrieved 2010-10-16.
  17. ^ "51 Peg b". Exoplanets Data Explorer.
  18. ^ "55 Cnc d". Exoplanets Data Explorer.
  19. ^ Endl, Michael. "The Doppler Method, or Radial Velocity Detection of Planets". University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved 26 October 2012.[permanent dead link]
  20. ^ "GJ 581 c". Exoplanets Data Explorer.
  21. ^ "alpha Cen B b". Exoplanets Data Explorer.
  22. ^ "An NIR laser frequency comb for high precision Doppler planet surveys". Chinese Academy of Sciences. 2010-10-16. Retrieved 2010-10-16.[dead link]

External links[edit]