||This article may require copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling. Also for lot of duplicate statements across different sections. Arrangement order of sections.. (April 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
|By transport mode|
|Tram · Rapid transit
Miniature · Scale model
|By size (list)|
|Change of gauge|
|Break-of-gauge · Dual gauge ·
Conversion (list) · Bogie exchange · Variable gauge
|North America · South America · Europe · Australia|
All vehicles on a network must have running gear that is compatible with the track gauge, and in the earliest days of railways the selection of a proposed railway's gauge was a key issue.
As the dominant parameter determining interoperability, it is still frequently used as a descriptor of a route or network.
There is a distinction between the nominal gauge and actual gauge at some locality, due to divergence of track components from the nominal. Railway engineers use a device, like a caliper, to measure the actual gauge, and this device is also referred to as a track gauge.
The terms structure gauge and loading gauge have little connection with track gauge. They are both widely used, but imprecise, terms. Structure gauge describes the cross-section envelope into which new or altered structures (bridges, lineside equipment etc.) must not encroach. Loading gauge is the corresponding cross-sectional profile within which rail vehicles and their loads must be contained. If an exceptional load or a new type of vehicle is being assessed to run, it must conform to the route's loading gauge.
- 1 Nominal track gauge
- 2 Units
- 3 Advantages and disadvantages of different track gauges
- 4 Maintenance standards
- 5 Selection of gauge
- 6 Terminology
- 7 Dominant gauges
- 8 Future
- 9 Temporary way – permanent way
- 10 Timeline
- 11 See also
- 12 Notes
- 13 References
- 14 External links
Nominal track gauge
The nominal track gauge is the distance between the inner faces of the rails. In current practice, it is specified at a certain distance below the rail head as the inner faces of the rail head (the gauge faces) are not necessarily vertical.
Rolling stock on the network must have running gear (wheelsets) that are compatible with the gauge, and therefore the gauge is a key parameter in determining interoperability, but there are many others—see below. In some cases in the earliest days of railways, the railway company saw itself as an infrastructure provider only, and independent hauliers provided wagons suited to the gauge. Colloquially the wagons might be referred to as "four-foot gauge wagons", say, if the track had a gauge of four feet. This nominal value does not equate to the flange spacing, as some freedom is allowed for.
An infrastructure manager might specify new or replacement track components at a slight variation from the nominal gauge for pragmatic reasons.
Imperial units were established in United Kingdom by The Weights and Measures Act of 1824. The United States customary units for length did not agree with the Imperial system until 1959, when one International yard was defined as 0.9144 meters, i.e. 1 foot as 0.3048 meter and 1 inch as 25.4 mm.
The list shows the Imperial and other units that have been used for track gauge definitions:
|Unit||SI-equivalent||Track gauge example|
|Imperial feet||304.8 mm|
|Castilian feet||278.6 mm||6 Castilian feet =1,672 mm (5 ft 5 13⁄16 in)
(2 Castilian feet = 558 mm, 1 ft 9 31⁄32 in)
|Portuguese feet||332.8 mm||5 Portuguese feet = 1,664 mm (5 ft 5 1⁄2 in)|
|Swedish feet||296.904 mm||3 Swedish feet =891 mm (2 ft 11 3⁄32 in)
2.7 Swedish feet =802 mm (2 ft 7 9⁄16 in)
|Prussian feet (Rheinfuß)||313.85 mm||2 1⁄2 Prussian feet =785 mm (2 ft 6 29⁄32 in)|
|Austrian fathom||1520 mm||1⁄2 Austrian fathom =760 mm (2 ft 5 15⁄16 in)|
Advantages and disadvantages of different track gauges
When selecting a gauge, there is always a trade-off between different pros and cons:
- Narrow Gauge:
- Pros: tighter turning radius, lower cost, less demanding right-of-way and construction
- Cons: lower speed, less stability, less load carrying capacity
- Broad Gauge:
- Pros: Higher speed, stability and capacity
- Cons: wider turning radius, higher cost, more demanding right-of-way and construction
One generally wants higher speed, greater stability and larger capacity, and one wants lower cost and tighter turning radius, but there is an inverse relationship between these factors. In addition, there are other constraints, such as the load-carrying capacity of axles, which can be problematic with an excessively wide gauge .
Narrow gauge railways usually cost less to build because they are usually lighter in construction, using smaller cars and locomotives (smaller loading gauge), as well as smaller bridges, smaller tunnels (smaller structure gauge) and tighter curves. Narrow gauge is thus often used in mountainous terrain, where the savings in civil engineering work can be substantial. It is also used in sparsely populated areas, with low potential demand, and for temporary railways that will be removed after short-term use, such as for construction, the logging industry, the mining industry, or large-scale construction projects, especially in confined spaces (see Temporary way – permanent way).
Broader gauge railways are generally more expensive to build.
There is no single perfect gauge, because different environments and economic considerations come into play. A narrow gauge is superior if one's main considerations are economy and tight curvature (e.g. Japan relies on the 3 ft 6 in (1,067 mm) gauge due to its mountainous terrain). For direct, unimpeded routes with high traffic, a broad gauge may be preferable (which is why the BART train system uses 5 ft 6 in (1,676 mm) gauge ). The Standard, Russian, and 4 ft 6 in (1,372 mm) gauges are designed to strike a reasonable balance between these factors .
In addition to the general trade-off, another important factor is standardization. Once a standard has been chosen, and equipment, infrastructure, and training calibrated to that standard, conversion becomes difficult and expensive. This also makes it easier to adopt an existing standard than to invent a new one. This is true of many technologies, including railroad gauges. The reduced cost, greater efficiency, and greater economic opportunity offered by the use of a common standard explains why a small number of gauges predominate worldwide.
Infrastructure owners specify permitted variances from the nominal gauge, and the required interventions when non-compliant gauge is detected. For example, the Federal Railroad Administration in the USA specifies that the actual gauge of track that is rated for a maximum of 60 mph (96.6 km/h) must be between 4 ft 8 in (1,422 mm) and 4 ft 9.5 in (1,460 mm).
Selection of gauge
Early track technology
In the earliest days of railways, single wagons were manhandled on timber rails, almost always in connection with mineral extraction, within a mine or quarry leading from it. Guidance was not at first provided except by human muscle power, but later a number of methods of guiding the wagons were employed. The rails had to be at a spacing that suited the wagon wheels.
The timber rails wore rapidly and later flat cast-iron plates were provided to limit the wear. In some localities, the plates were made L-shaped, the upstand of the L providing the guidance; this is generally referred to as a "plateway".
As the guidance of the wagons was improved, short strings of wagons could be connected and pulled by horses, and the track could be extended from the immediate vicinity of the mine or quarry, typically to a navigable waterway. The wagons were built to a consistent pattern and the track would be made to suit the wagons: the gauge was more critical. The Penydarren Tramroad of 1802 in South Wales, a plateway, spaced these at 4 ft 4 in (1,321 mm) over the outside of the upstands.
The Penydarren Tramroad probably carried the first journey by a locomotive, in 1804, and it was successful for the locomotive, but unsuccessful for the track: the plates were not strong enough to carry its weight. A considerable progressive step was made when cast iron edge rails were first employed; these had the major axis of the rail section configured vertically, giving a much stronger section to resist bending forces, and this was further improved when fish-belly rails were introduced.
Edge rails required a close match between rail spacing and the configuration of the wheelsets, and the importance of the gauge was reinforced. Railways were still seen as local concerns: there was no appreciation of a future connection to other lines, and selection of the track gauge was still a pragmatic decision based on local requirements and prejudices, and probably determined by existing local designs of (road) vehicles.
Thus, the Monkland and Kirkintilloch Railway (1826) in the West of Scotland used 4 ft 6 in (1,372 mm); the Dundee and Newtyle Railway (1831) in the north-east of Scotland adopted 4 ft 6 1⁄2 in (1,384 mm); the Redruth and Chasewater Railway (1825) in Cornwall chose 4 ft (1,219 mm).
The Stockton and Darlington Railway
Locomotives were being developed in the first decades of the nineteenth century; they took various forms, but George Stephenson developed a successful locomotive on the Killingworth Wagonway, where he worked. His designs were so successful that they became the standard, and when the Stockton and Darlington Railway was opened in 1825, it used his locomotives, with the same gauge as the Killingworth line, 4 ft 8 in (1,422 mm).
The Stockton and Darlington line was immensely successful, and when the Liverpool and Manchester Railway, the first intercity line, was promoted (it opened in 1830), it used the same gauge. It was also hugely successful, and the gauge (now eased to 4 ft 8 1⁄2 in or 1,435 mm), became the automatic choice: "standard gauge".
The Liverpool and Manchester was quickly followed by other trunk railways, with the Grand Junction Railway and the London and Birmingham Railway forming a huge critical mass of standard gauge. When Bristol promoters planned a line from London, they employed the innovative engineer Isambard Kingdom Brunel. He decided on a wider gauge, to give greater stability, and the Great Western Railway adopted a gauge of 7 ft (2,134 mm), later eased to 7 ft 1⁄4 in (2,140 mm). This became known as broad gauge. The GWR was successful and became greatly extended, directly and through friendly associated companies, widening the scope of broad gauge.
At the same time, other parts of Britain built railways to standard gauge, and British technology was exported to European countries and parts of North America, also using standard gauge. Britain polarised into areas that had broad gauge lines or standard gauge lines. In this context, standard gauge was referred to as narrow gauge to indicate the contrast. Some smaller concerns selected other non-standard gauges: the Eastern Counties Railway adopted 5 ft (1,524 mm). Most of them converted to standard gauge at an early date, but the GWR's broad gauge continued to grow.
The larger railway companies wished to expand geographically, and large areas were considered to be under their control. When a new independent line was proposed to open up an unconnected area, the gauge was crucial in determining the allegiance that the line would adopt: if it was broad gauge, it must be friendly to the Great Western railway; if narrow (standard) gauge, it must favour the other companies. The battle to persuade or coerce that choice became very intense, and became referred to as "the gauge wars".
As passengers and freight between the gauges became increasingly important, the difficulty of moving from one gauge to the other — the break of gauge – became more prominent and more objectionable. In 1845 a Royal Commission on Railway Gauges was created to look into the growing problem and this led to the Regulating the Gauge of Railways Act 1846, which forbade the construction of broad gauge lines unconnected with the broad gauge network, and the broad gauge network was eventually converted—a process called gauge conversion—to standard, progressively until 1892. The same Act mandated the gauge of 5 ft 3 in (1,600 mm) for use in Ireland.
Gauge selection in other countries
As railways were built in other countries, the gauge selected was pragmatic; the track would have to fit the rolling stock. If locomotives were imported from elsewhere, especially in the early days, the track would be built to fit them. In some cases standard gauge was adopted, but many countries or companies chose a different gauge as their national gauge, either by governmental policy, or as a matter of individual choice. Government officials in Spain and Russia were concerned that the rail lines they were planning could be used by an invader, and purposely chose gauges that were different from their neighbors.
Narrow gauges were widely used in mountainous regions as construction costs tended to be lower and they provided for tighter turns that were often required.
To keep the rail traffic compatible within a network, not only the track gauge needs to be the same, but also the couplers, at least for locomotive hauled vehicles. For this reason, all the standard gauge railways in Europe use the standard buffers and chain coupler for locomotive hauled vehicles, while narrow gauge railways use a variation of couplers, since they often are isolated from each other, so standardisation doesn't matter. Similarly standard gauge railways in North America, Canada and Mexico included, use the janney coupler or the compatible tightlock coupling for locomotive hauled equipment.
The terms standard gauge, broad gauge and narrow gauge do not have any fixed meaning. A "standard" gauge is only standard in a geographical region where it is dominant, but it is generally understood to be 1,435 mm (4 ft 8 1⁄2 in). An infrastructure owner would be ill-advised to order track materials simply as "standard gauge", but would normally specify the required critical dimensions of the components.
Broad gauge and narrow gauge are relative to the generally adopted standard.
In British practice, the space between the rails of a track is colloquially referred to as the "four-foot", and the space between two tracks the "six-foot", descriptions relating to the respective dimensions.
In common usage the term "standard gauge" refers to 1,435 mm (4 ft 8 1⁄2 in).
The term medium gauge had different meanings throughout history, depending on the local dominant gauge in use.
- In Australia, 3 ft 6 in (1,067 mm) and 3 ft (914 mm) gauge railways are classified as medium gauge in order to make a distinction with standard gauge and the narrow gauges such as the widely used 2 ft (610 mm) gauge sugar-cane railways.
- In 1847, the 1,600 mm (5 ft 3 in) Irish gauge was considered a medium gauge compared to Brunel's 7 ft 1⁄4 in (2,140 mm) broad gauge and the 1,435 mm (4 ft 8 1⁄2 in) narrow gauge, nowadays being standard gauge.
- In North America medium gauge was 5 ft 6 in (1,676 mm) track gauge, also called "Canada Gauge".
- In Indian subcontinent, 1,000 mm (3 ft 3 3⁄8 in) metre gauge  was also called medium gauge in contrast to 5 ft 6 in (1,676 mm) broad gauge and 2 ft 6 in (762 mm) and 2 ft (610 mm) narrow gauges.
During the period known as "the Battle of the Gauges", Stephenson's standard gauge was commonly known as "narrow gauge", while Brunel's railway's 7 ft 1⁄4 in (2,140 mm) gauge was termed "broad gauge".
As the gauge of a railway is reduced the costs of construction can be reduced since narrow gauges allow smaller-radius curves, allowing obstacles to be avoided rather than having to be built over or through (valleys and hills); the reduced cost is particularly noticeable in mountainous regions, and many narrow gauge railways were built in Wales, the Rocky Mountains of North America, Central Europe and South America.
The most widely used narrow gauges on public railways are
- 1,067 mm (3 ft 6 in) (Southern and Central Africa, Indonesia, Japan, Taiwan, Philippines, parts of Australia, New Zealand, Honduras and Costa Rica.)
- 1,000 mm (3 ft 3 3⁄8 in) metre gauge (East Africa, South America and Central Europe).
Break of gauge
Through operation between railway networks with different gauges was originally impossible; goods had to be transhipped and passengers had to change trains. This was obviously a major obstacle to convenient transport, and in Great Britain, led to political intervention.
On narrow gauge lines, Rollbocks or transporter wagons are used: standard gauge wagons are carried on narrow gauge lines on these special vehicles, generally with rails of the wider gauge to enable those vehicles to roll on and off at transfer points.
On the Transmongolian Railway, Russia and Mongolia use 1,520 mm (4 ft 11 27⁄32 in) while China uses standard gauge. At the border, each carriage is lifted and its bogies are changed. The operation can take several hours for a whole train of many carriages.
Other examples include crossings into or out of the former Soviet Union: Ukraine/Slovakia border on the Bratislava-L'viv train, and the Romania/Moldova border on the Chişinău-Bucharest train.
A system developed by Talgo and Construcciones y Auxiliar de Ferrocarriles (CAF) of Spain uses variable gauge wheelsets; at the border between France and Spain, through passenger trains are drawn slowly through apparatus that alters the gauge of the wheels, which slide laterally on the axles. This is fully described in Automatic Gauge Changeover for Trains in Spain.
A similar system is used between China and Central Asia, and between Poland and Ukraine, using the SUW 2000 and INTERGAUGE variable axle systems. China and Poland use standard gauge, while Central Asia and Ukraine use 1,520 mm (4 ft 11 27⁄32 in).
Where a railway corridor is used by trains of two gauges, mixed gauge (or dual gauge) track can be provided, in which three rails are supported in the same track structure. This arose particularly when individual railway companies chose different gauges and were subsequently required to share a route; this is most commonly found at the approaches to city terminals, where land space is limited.
Trains of different gauges sharing the same track can save considerable expense compared to using separate tracks for each gauge, but introduces complexities in track maintenance and signalling, and may require speed restrictions for some trains. If the difference between the two gauges is large enough, for example between 1,435 mm (4 ft 8 1⁄2 in) standard gauge and 3 ft 6 in (1,067 mm), three-rail dual-gauge is possible, but if not, for example between 3 ft 6 in (1,067 mm) and 1,000 mm (3 ft 3 3⁄8 in) metre gauge, four-rail triple-gauge is used. Dual-gauge rail lines are used in Switzerland, Australia, Argentina, Brazil, Japan, North Korea, Spain, Tunisia and Vietnam.
On the GWR, there was an extended period between political intervention in 1846 that prevented major expansion of its 7 ft 1⁄4 in (2,140 mm) broad gauge[note 1] and the final gauge conversion to standard gauge in 1892.
During this period, there were many locations where practicality required mixed gauge operation, and in station areas, the track configuration was extremely complex. This was compounded by the fact that the common rail had to be at the platform side in stations, so in many cases, standard-gauge trains needed to be switched from one side of the track to the other at the approach. A special fixed point arrangement was devised for the purpose, where the track layout was simple enough. Jenkins and Langley give an illustration and description.
In some cases, mixed gauge trains operated, conveying wagons of both gauges. For example, MacDermot says:
In November 1871 a novelty in the shape of a mixed-gauge goods train was introduced between Truro and Penzance. It was worked by a narrow-gauge engine, and behind the narrow-gauge trucks came a broad-gauge match-truck with wide buffers and sliding shackles, followed by the broad-gauge trucks. Such trains continued to run in West Cornwall until the abolition of the Broad Gauge; they had to stop or come down to walking pace at all stations where fixed points existed and the narrow portion side-stepped to right or left.
|Gauge||Name||Installation (km)||Installation (miles)||Usage|
|1,000 mm (3 ft 3 3⁄8 in)||Metre gauge||95,000||59,000||Argentina (11,000 km or 6,800 mi), Brazil (23,489 km or 14,595 mi), Bolivia, northern Chile, Switzerland (RhB, MOB, BOB, MGB), East Africa
(approx. 7% of the world's railways)
|1,067 mm (3 ft 6 in)||Three foot six inch gauge||112,000||70,000||Southern and Central Africa, Nigeria (most), Indonesia, Japan, Taiwan, Philippines, New Zealand, Queensland Australia, Western Australia
(approx. 9% of the world's railways)
|1,435 mm (4 ft 8 1⁄2 in)||Standard gauge||720,000||450,000||Albania, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Croatia, Cuba, Czech Republic, Denmark, Djibouti, Ethiopia, France, Germany, Great Britain (United Kingdom), Greece, Hungary, India (Only used in MRTS), Indonesia, Italy, Israel, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Mexico, Montenegro, Netherlands, North Korea, Norway, Panama, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United States, Uruguay, Venezuela, Also private companies' lines and JR high-speed lines in Japan. High-speed lines in Taiwan.
(approx. 55% of the world's railways)
|1,520 mm (4 ft 11 27⁄32 in)||Russian gauge||220,000||140,000||Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Finland, Estonia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Mongolia, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan.
(approx. 17.2% of the world's railways; all contiguous — redefined from 1,524 mm (5 ft))
|1,524 mm (5 ft)||Finnish gauge||5,865||3,644||Finland (contiguous to and generally compatible with 1,520 mm (4 ft 11 27⁄32 in))|
|1,600 mm (5 ft 3 in)||Irish gauge||9,800||6,100||Ireland, Northern Ireland (United Kingdom) (1,800 km or 1,100 mi), and in Australia mainly Victoria and some South Australia Victorian gauge (4,017 km or 2,496 mi), Brazil (4,057 km or 2,521 mi)|
|1,668 mm (5 ft 5 21⁄32 in)||Iberian gauge||15,394||9,565||Portugal, Spain. Sometimes referred to as Iberian gauge. In Spain the Administrador de Infraestructuras Ferroviarias (ADIF) managed 11,683 km of this gauge and 22 km of mixed gauge at end of 2010. The Portuguese Rede Ferroviária Nacional (REFER) managed 2,650 km of this gauge of this track at the same date.|
|1,676 mm (5 ft 6 in)||Indian gauge||134,008||83,269||India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Argentina, Chile, BART in the United States San Francisco Bay Area
(approx. 11.37% of the world's railways)
Total for each type of gauge.
Further convergence of rail gauge use seems likely, as countries seek to build inter-operable networks, and international organisations seek to build macro-regional and continental networks. The European Union has set out to develop inter-operable freight and passenger rail networks across its area, and is seeking to standardise gauge, signalling and electrical power systems. As countries build High-speed rails, they also tend to converge these rails' gauge to standard gauge, with the exceptions of Uzbekistan and Russia.
EU funds have been dedicated to assist Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia in the building of some key railway lines (Rail Baltica) of standard gauge, and to assist Spain and Portugal in the construction of high-speed lines to connect Iberian cities to one another and to the French high-speed lines. The EU has developed plans for improved freight rail links between Spain, Portugal, and the rest of Europe.
The United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP) is planning a Trans-Asian Railway that will link Europe and the Pacific, with a Northern Corridor from Europe to the Korean Peninsula, a Southern Corridor from Europe to Southeast Asia, and a North–South corridor from Northern Europe to the Persian Gulf. All these would encounter breaks of gauge as they cross Asia. Current plans have mechanized facilities at the breaks of gauge to move containers from train to train rather than widespread gauge conversion.
East African Railway Master Plan
The East African Railway Master Plan is a proposal for rebuilding and expanding railway lines connecting Ethiopia, Djibouti, Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi, Tanzania, South Sudan and beyond. The plan is managed by infrastructure ministers from participating East African Community countries in association with transport consultation firm CPCS Transcom. Older railways are of 1,000 mm (3 ft 3 3⁄8 in) metre gauge or 3 ft 6 in (1,067 mm) gauge. Newly rebuilt lines will use Standard gauge. The standard gauge Addis Ababa-Djibouti and Mombasa-Nairobi railways are scheduled to begin regular freight and passenger services in 2017.
- Lines for iron ore to Kribi in Cameroon are likely to be 1,435 mm (4 ft 8 1⁄2 in) standard gauge with a likely connection to the same port from the 1,000 mm (3 ft 3 3⁄8 in) metre gauge Cameroon system. This line owned by Sundance Resources may be shared with Legend Mining.
Nigeria's railways are mostly 3 ft 6 in (1,067 mm) Cape gauge. The Lagos–Kano Standard Gauge Railway is a gauge conversion project by the Nigerian Government to create a north-south standard gauge rail link. The first converted segment, between Abuja and Kaduna, was completed in July 2016.
- 2008: Proposed link between Venezuela and Colombia 
- 2008: Venezuela via Brazil to Argentina – standard gauge
- 2008: A proposed metre gauge line across Southern Paraguay to link Argentina at Resistencia to Brazil at Cascavel; both those lines are 1,000 mm (3 ft 3 3⁄8 in) metre gauge, and the new line would allow "bioceanic" running from the Atlantic port of Paranaguá in Brazil to that of Antofagasta in Chile on the Pacific.
Temporary way – permanent way
The temporary way is the temporary track often used for construction, replaced by the permanent way (the structure consisting of the rails, fasteners, sleepers/ties and ballast (or slab track), plus the underlying subgrade) when construction nears completion. In many cases narrow-gauge track is used for a temporary way because of the convenience in laying it and changing its location over unimproved ground.
In restricted spaces such as tunnels, the temporary way might be double track even though the tunnel will ultimately be single track. The Airport Rail Link in Sydney had construction trains of 900 mm (2 ft 11 7⁄16 in) gauge, which were replaced by permanent tracks of 1,435 mm (4 ft 8 1⁄2 in) gauge.
During World War I trench warfare led to a relatively static disposition of infantry, requiring considerable logistics to bring them support staff and supplies (food, ammunition, earthworks materials, etc.). Dense light railway networks using temporary narrow gauge track sections were established by both sides for this purpose.
In 1939 it was proposed to construct the western section of the Yunnan–Burma Railway using a gauge of 15 1⁄4 in (387 mm), since such tiny or "toy" gauge facilitates the tightest of curves in difficult terrain.
- 4 ft 8 1⁄2 in (1,435 mm) – 1825 – chosen by George Stephenson
- 5 ft (1,524 mm) – 1827 – chosen by Horatio Allen for the South Carolina Canal and Rail Road Company
- 1 ft 11 1⁄2 in (597 mm) – 1836 – chosen by Henry Archer for the Festiniog Railway to easily navigate mountainous terrain (started Britain's first narrow gauge passenger service in 1865) (originally horse-drawn)
- 7 ft 1⁄4 in (2,140 mm) – 1838 – chosen by I. K. Brunel
- 5 ft (1,524 mm) – 1842 – chosen by George Washington Whistler for the Moscow – Saint Petersburg Railway based on Southern US practice
- 5 ft 3 in (1,600 mm) – 1846 – chosen in Ireland as a compromise
- 5 ft 6 in (1,676 mm) – 1853 – chosen by Lord Dalhousie in India following Scottish practice
- 3 ft 6 in (1,067 mm) – 1862 – chosen by Carl Pihl for the Røros Line in Norway to reduce costs
- 3 ft 6 in (1,067 mm) – 1865 – chosen by Abraham Fitzgibbon for the Queensland Railways to reduce costs
- 3 ft (914 mm) – 1870 – chosen by William Jackson Palmer for the Denver & Rio Grande Railway to reduce costs (inspired by the Festiniog Railway)
- 2 ft (610 mm) – 1877 – chosen by George E. Mansfield for the Billerica and Bedford Railroad to reduce costs (inspired by the Festiniog Railway)
- 2 ft 6 in (762 mm) – 1887 – chosen by Everard Calthrop to reduce costs; had designs for a matching fleet of rolling stock
- The Act of Parliament did not prohibit expansion of the existing broad gauge system, but it had the indirect and delayed effect of forcing conformity with the "standard" gauge eventually
- "Track Safety Standards Compliance Manual Chapter 5 Track Safety Standards Classes 1 through 5" (PDF). Federal Railroad Administration. Retrieved 26 February 2010.
- M J T Lewis, Early Wooden Railways, Routledge Keegan Paul, London, 1970
- R Cragg, Civil Engineering Heritage—Wales and West Central, Thomas Telford Publishing, London, 2nd edition 1997, England, ISBN 0 7277 2576 9
- Andy Guy and Jim Rees, Early Railways 1569–1830, Shire Publications in association with the National Railway Museum, Oxford, 2011, ISBN 978 0 74780 811 4
- Don Martin, The Monkland and Kirkintilloch and Associated Railways, Strathkelvin Public Libraries, Kirkintilloch, 1995, ISBN 0 904966 41 0
- Dr N Ferguson, The Dundee and Newtyle Railway including the Alyth and Blairgowrie Branches, The Oakwood Press, 1995, ISBN 0-85361-476-8.
- D B Barton, The Redruth and Chasewater Railway, 1824–1915, D Bradford Barton Ltd, Truro, 2nd edition, 1966
- Francis Whishaw, The Railways of Great Britain and Ireland Practically Described and Illustrated, 1842, reprint 1969, David & Charles (Publishers) Limited, Newton Abbot, ISBN 0-7153-4786-1
- W W Tomlinson, The North Eastern Railway, its Rise and Development, Andrew Reid & Co, Newcastle upon Tyne, 1915
- Nicholas Wood, A Practical Treatise on Rail-Roads, Longman, Orme, Brown, Green and Longmans, London, Third edition, 1838
- "An Act for regulating the Gauge of Railways" (PDF). 18 October 1846. Retrieved 26 April 2010.
- The Russian Railways and Imperial Intersections in the Russian Empire, Karl E. M. Starns, Thesis, University of Washington 2012, p. 33
- "Linking a Nation: Australia's transport and communications 1788-1970 - Chapter 4: Building Australia's First Railways, 1848-1873".
- "Adoption of the 3ft. 6ins. gauge for queensland railways" (PDF). espace.library.uq.edu.au. 1983.
- "The beginning of the Great Southern and Western Railway".
- Proceedings of the standing committee on rail-roads and telegraph lines (1831) 
- "Planned development for transport sector".
- "A Trip to India (Page 2. Trucks and railways)".
- "[IRFCA] Indian Railways FAQ: Gauges in India".
- "Beyond Thunderdome: Iron Curtain 2k6". Retrieved 2007-10-10.
- Alberto García Álvarez, Automatic Gauge Changeover for Trains in Spain, Fundación de los Ferrocarrilos Españoles, 2010, online at 
- Experience and results of operation the SUW 2000 system in traffic corridors at 
- S C Jenkins and R C Langley, The West Cornwall Railway, The Oakwood Press, Usk, 2002, ISBN 0 85361 589 6, page 66
- E T MacDermot, History of the Great Western Railway, vol II: 1863–1921, published by the Great Western Railway, London, 1931, p316
- Karl Arne Richter (editor), Europäische Bahnen '11, Eurailpress, Hamburg, 2010, ISBN 978-3-7771-0413-3
- Sambu, Zeddy (29 April 2008). "East Africa: Countries Move to Upgrade Railway Network". Business Daily (South Africa). Retrieved 13 May 2014.
- Muramira, Gashegu (20 April 2009). "East Africa: EAC Railway Master Plan to Be Redesigned". New Times (Rwanda). Retrieved 13 May 2014.
- "Colombia and Venezuela to build railroad".
- "Venezuela, Argentina begin construction of railway linking their capitals". China Daily. Xinhua. 2008-08-21. Retrieved 2008-08-21.
- Christian Wolmar, Engines of War: How Wars Were Won & Lost on the Railways, Atlantic Books, London, 2010, ISBN 978 1 84887 172 4
- "TOY RAILWAY.". The Northern Standard. Darwin, NT: National Library of Australia. 8 December 1939. p. 15. Retrieved 5 December 2011.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Rail gauges.|
|Wikidata has the property: track gauge (P1064) (see uses)|
- A history of track gauge by George W. Hilton
- "Railroad Gauge Width". Archived from the original on 17 July 2012. — A list of railway gauges used or being used worldwide, including gauges that are obsolete.
- European Railway Agency: 1520 mm systems (issues with the participation of 1520/1524 mm gauge countries in the EU rail network)
- The Days they Changed the Gauge in the U.S. South
- Juan Manuel Grijalvo - The Myth of the "Standard" Gauge